wings56
Hall of Fame
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=501806
link to my post about the match i played with a radar setup
link to my post about the match i played with a radar setup
Not to go thru all this again but the line has to be drawn somewhere.... I've previously stated that 4 years of D1 tennis is beyond my definition of "rec tennis."http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=501806
link to my post about the match i played with a radar setup
I'm not going back over 20 pages but despite all the talk and boasting the most humorous thing I recall is that NO ttw poster has presented a vid of any ttw poster hitting 100 serves. Much less 120.
Rec guys do hit 100; just 1/10th of the ones who think they do - the top tier of true rec tennis. And ttw rec guys aren't hitting 120. No way; no how.
I've never seen a tall, lively armed *rec* guy with 120 technique. almost by definition such a guy isn't "rec."Tall lively armed rec guys with decent form can get above 120mph if they catch it right.
I've never seen a tall, lively armed *rec* guy with 120 technique. almost by definition such a guy isn't "rec."
it's quite funny that the thread was resurrected to see if Ballinbob actually did manage to ever play a match with 100mph+ serves with 40-50% of them being in - and he himself never responded. Yet all the other folks that have always claimed it 'can be done' did, but of course with any actual match-play proof.
Again, the fact that someone, at one point in life, happened to close his eyes, and the wind just made his toss perfect, and he blindly swung and hit 100mph serve doesn't prove anything. Just like hitting half-court basketball shoot does not mean anything about your basketball shooting skills.
We are talking match play tennis serve. Not tricks. A repeatable, reliable, under stress serve.
I was playing today and I hit about 15 double faults in a 3 set match. Power means nothing if you can't get it in haha.
Years ago, I once served four double faults in a row in a single game. It was a perfect game, unfortunately for the opponent.
I saw Gulbis serve four double faults (though not in a row - he got the fourth point serve in) in a game against Raonic in Canada last year. Does that mean he shouldn't hit those 130mph serves?
I'm not going back over 20 pages but despite all the talk and boasting the most humorous thing I recall is that NO ttw poster has presented a vid of any ttw poster hitting 100 serves. Much less 120.
Rec guys do hit 100; just 1/10th of the ones who think they do - the top tier of true rec tennis. And ttw rec guys aren't hitting 120. No way; no how.
If you could the serve speed app as an accurate method of measurement, I have a handful of videos popping out low 100's after my matches. I even have one during a match. It's not that big of a deal. That being said I have a live arm and half way decent technique. If you count the app as accurate, I also have my doubles partner hitting 120MPH on the nose. :razz:
-Fuji
He doesn't consider the app accurate. If you have radar confirmed video that would good evidence.
I've measured a bunch of rec-players hitting right around and above 100mph with a radar gun. Some of them were pretty terrible players but they were aggressive. I even had a high school player hit 115mph on radar when he was going all out for speed. He was a strong guy but sort of a wild man and really not that consistent of a player. I would guess that most 4.0s would have beaten him.
Hmm. Well that's interesting haha. I've hit similar numbers on a gun, (105 average on a couple of flat ones without warmup.) It's not that big a deal to hit over 100 haha.
Oh for sure! I wouldn't doubt it. I've seen kids (teens) in my clubs national program that have hit 115 easy on the radar.
-Fuji
ocd thinks it is a big deal.
My point about the high school player I was coaching (the guy who hit 115mph) was that he really wasn't a good player and I think he was muscling the serve a bit and would sometimes tweak his shoulder. I encouraged him to back off and protect his shoulder. It does take a certain amount of physical talent and form to hit a 115mph serve, but it definitely doesn't make you a great player. The best player on my team never hit a serve over 90mph in a match and he could work the guy who hit hard. ocd seems to confuse hitting hard with being a very good player.
I don't doubt that you can hit over 100mph, but don't expect to convince ocd.![]()
I guess so! Hahaha! It amazes me what people constitute as a good player. (That being said, my doubles partner has a career high 11 in Canada for Men's doubles, behind Nestor and the like :razz![]()
Yeah! I was coaching a guy that is 6 foot 9ish? Anywho, he played volleyball and can absolutely BOMB his serve. It's bigger than mine for sure. His results? He's a decent 4.0 player because of his serve. Take that away and he can't rally more than 6-7 balls.
-Fuji
Your doubles partner sounds like he's more than just a rec player. In this thread we were just just talking about video from guys who are rec players, not ex-college players or teaching pros or ex-touring pros. However, if he's not part of that category he'd qualify.
Tall guys definitely have an advantage with the serve, as do those who are from throwing sports. Biggest rec serve I've seen was from a guy who was about 6'4" tall.
He does not play tennis though ! Like at all. He is a rec player in tennis, what else would you call him? A professional? I'll see him this summer when he's back from Virginia and I'll film his serve. It's sick
Suresh and tennis_OCD are just sore losers. Like I said most any athlete with legit experience in a throwing sport - like baseball can hit 100mph.
Most any D1 pitcher can hit 120 with a LITTLE training.. These guys are RECREATIONAL players like it or not.
Being athletic doesn't disqualify you from being a recreational player.. These guys can sign up and join USTA leagues if they want too.
Tough if you guys don't like it..
Now if you want to claim that an unathletic inflexible 5'5" 40 something fat *** can't hit 120 mph on a serve - yeah we buy that.
How about rec guys claiming 145? Is that possible?
My guess is that someone only needs to be able to throw a baseball 70 MPH to be able to serve over 100 or so. The racquet provides a pretty big increase in leverage..and the ball is lighter.
It's likely never happened. However its possible.. If we count actual MLB players as recreational tennis players pitchers are going to have a superior throwing motion to most pro tennis players.
They get paid directly for arm speed and they work almost exclusively on it. They are also bigger and stronger then pro tennis players (but of course slower and less agile)..
So in theory they could serve bigger then most people on the tour. It's said that Andy Roddick could have pitched in the MLB. He has the kind of live arm that could have made the bigs..
But lots of the guys in the bigs are bigger and stronger then Roddick and thus they would server harder.
The problem is I'd wager that most MLB players have clauses in their contracts that exclude serving - for fear of shoulder injuries etc etc.
My guess is that someone only needs to be able to throw a baseball 70 MPH to be able to serve over 100 or so. The racquet provides a pretty big increase in leverage..and the ball is lighter.
So ex MLB players with a decent motion can likely throw in the 80 MPH and thus hit 120 and so on and so forth. Take an MLB player who can hit a 100 train him up and you would have new world record in serve speeds...
Isner is another guy who might have been able to pitch in the bigs...
I'd wager then Tom Brady has a pretty big serve too if he goes to the Hamptons and hits around..So its not just baseball...either.
Our resident leeD used to serve 148. Or 142. One of these. that's an elite level serve requiring superior technique and arm speed.
Actually, in post #335 LeeD claims his fastest measured serve was 129.5 mph at the 1979 TransAmerica Pro fast serve contest.
I realize you enjoy fighting with LeeD but at least get your facts straight.:twisted:
So leeD can serve 129. Do we believe it?
90 mph forehands is where it is at broskies
If you can hit 90 mph drop feed forehands with pinpoint accuracy anywhere
into the service box, perhaps you should consider using a low-toss forehand
serve.
Based on the Dystra vid, you seem well capable of hitting over 107mph when you decide to, when you hit center. Both of which is not too often.
ALL our second serves poke in around 65-80 mph.
By the rationale in this thread he could've also been a Cy Young award winner.So leeD can serve 129. Do we believe it?
Still, with all the ongoing endless blather, no ttw rec poster has yet to show his 120 big gun. All talk.
I glanced back and stopped after going thru just half the pages. The thread is chalk full of beauties;I don't think I've seen anyone in the thread claim that they can currently hit 120.
It's a long thread though so I probably overlooked something. Can you point me to that claim?
I glanced back and stopped after going thru just half the pages. The thread is chalk full of beauties;
easily hit over 100mph
Faced guys with 130
easily clear 110mph
I counted your second one at 121 mph
I have your second serve at 116 mph
117 mph
118 mph
hit around 120... sick..
my friend is hitting 120mph
servers here can hit in the 120s
there are many that can hit over 100 and a few that can hit over 120.
If I try I can crack 115
Rec players CAN hit 130 mph serves
hit close enough to 120-125mph
But my fav it the one who states he hits "119 mph absolute minimum."
Still no vid. Funny stuff.
I've never played around with gunning some of the bigger rec forehands... might be fun. I'm sure rec players have a realistic grasp of this shot.... Picture a mix of Fed's speed but with Rafa's spin.I can't hit a serve over 107 mph (fastest I've recorded), but I think I can clock over 90 mph on the forehand.
I glanced back and stopped after going thru just half the pages. The thread is chalk full of beauties;
easily hit over 100mph
Faced guys with 130
easily clear 110mph
I counted your second one at 121 mph
I have your second serve at 116 mph
117 mph
118 mph
hit around 120... sick..
my friend is hitting 120mph
servers here can hit in the 120s
there are many that can hit over 100 and a few that can hit over 120.
If I try I can crack 115
Rec players CAN hit 130 mph serves
hit close enough to 120-125mph
But my fav it the one who states he hits "119 mph absolute minimum."
Still no vid. Funny stuff.
I glanced back and stopped after going thru just half the pages. The thread is chalk full of beauties;
I glanced back and stopped after going thru just half the pages. The thread is chalk full of beauties;
easily hit over 100mph
Faced guys with 130
easily clear 110mph
I counted your second one at 121 mph
I have your second serve at 116 mph
117 mph
118 mph
hit around 120... sick..
my friend is hitting 120mph
servers here can hit in the 120s
there are many that can hit over 100 and a few that can hit over 120.
If I try I can crack 115
Rec players CAN hit 130 mph serves
hit close enough to 120-125mph
But my fav it the one who states he hits "119 mph absolute minimum."
Still no vid. Funny stuff.
Some? ya really think?? lol.Some of those were clearly estimations... .
You changed that into a false assertion that I had claimed that I averaged higher than Isner "on a regular basis."
I long ago classed you with trolls like Sureshs
So, I'll ask again! Who in this thread has actually said that they can currently serve at 120 mph, and where did they say it? If you could actually provide the post number or a quote instead of a fragmentary paraphrase that would be great.
Some? ya really think?? lol.
???
You're confusing "trolls" with the likes of those who once stated that world wasn't flat.
So if you were regularly hitting Isner like 120/125 back in the glory days it was a compliment.Convenient of you to forget your own trolling. To quote you:
"Also kinda amusing that in 2011 Isner led all with an *average* first served of 124.5 mph. Something WV regularly exceeded on a regular basis five years ago. rotfl. You guys crack me up."
So if you were regularly hitting Isner like 120/125 back in the glory days it was a compliment.
On my first click of pages #141 and #180 clearly state current 120s.
But to play your game I'll ask: Is there any rec player here who still believes they hit 120? No affirmations would tend to prove my point as effectively as no video....