Perfection: Wilson H19 16X19 Pro Stock

[Dansan]

@asifallasleep, Did you try H22 and Blade Prostocks as well?
I have a pair of H22 16x19, 337g, 33cm (strung), 349 SW and one H19 338g, 32.3cm (strung), 315 SW (SW already strung!)

Next move is to try Blade Prostocks that are on their way, one @ 332SW and the other @ 340SW.

Trying to decide which of the three (H19, H22 and Blade Prostock) fits more into my liking.

Curious to see how you like the blade pro stocks, what paintjob are yours? I have 3 matched V7 PJ 16x19 blade pro stocks ....pretty hefty swingweights but static weight is below 340g. They hit an absolutely massive ball. Funny, because everyone I show them to keeps assuming they are the "blade pro".

 

[ppressure]

@asifallasleep, Did you try H22 and Blade Prostocks as well?
I have a pair of H22 16x19, 337g, 33cm (strung), 349 SW and one H19 338g, 32.3cm (strung), 315 SW (SW already strung!)

Next move is to try Blade Prostocks that are on their way, one @ 332SW and the other @ 340SW.

Trying to decide which of the three (H19, H22 and Blade Prostock) fits more into my liking.

Let me know what you settle on. I have a pair of H22s, 16x19, 330g, 32,2cm and 330SW (strung) to try alongside my H19s 16x19 at 343g, 31,5cm and 327SW (strung). I wonder which one I’ll prefer. SW is almost the same but big static weight difference between the two. I play a lefty topspin focused game but have mostly played above 340g rackets in the past. Don’t know if a lighter static weight would be better. So much in tennis is habit.

 

[JGads]

Let me know what you settle on. I have a pair of H22s, 16x19, 330g, 32,2cm and 330SW (strung) to try alongside my H19s 16x19 at 343g, 31,5cm and 327SW (strung). I wonder which one I’ll prefer. SW is almost the same but big static weight difference between the two. I play a lefty topspin focused game but have mostly played above 340g rackets in the past. Don’t know if a lighter static weight would be better. So much in tennis is habit.

Drooling.

 

[asifallasleep]

@asifallasleep, Did you try H22 and Blade Prostocks as well?
I have a pair of H22 16x19, 337g, 33cm (strung), 349 SW and one H19 338g, 32.3cm (strung), 315 SW (SW already strung!)

Next move is to try Blade Prostocks that are on their way, one @ 332SW and the other @ 340SW.

Trying to decide which of the three (H19, H22 and Blade Prostock) fits more into my liking.

I have a H22 and I also had the Blade Pro Stocks. I like my 16X19 H19's better than them both.

 

[asifallasleep]

It’s tragic but I haven’t been able to try them out yet because courts are shut here in Germany. I haven’t been able to hit since November .

Oh wow. I played with my H19's tonight and left my Pro Staff Rok 93's at home. I will take them both out on Thursday. I am completing my USPTA certification later this month. I am trying to see which ones I serve best with.

 

[dnlcarvalho]

I feel the H22's 16x19 are a bit slow on the air and "not natural", with sometimes the inertia acting against me. They have 349SW, but I guess I prefer them than my 315SW (strung) H19 16x19, which is also not so natural and feels more risky to play with (more unforced errors).
My expectation is that the Blade Prostocks ~340SW (although 18x20) will feel more natural than both of them and will be kind of a midterm between the power mass of the H22 and the naturality of a Donnay Pro One I feel very much "handy".

 

[PT280 Fan]

There's no question that all frames are not created equally! Congrats to you!

 

[AA7]

I feel the H22's 16x19 are a bit slow on the air and "not natural", with sometimes the inertia acting against me. They have 349SW, but I guess I prefer them than my 315SW (strung) H19 16x19, which is also not so natural and feels more risky to play with (more unforced errors).
My expectation is that the Blade Prostocks ~340SW (although 18x20) will feel more natural than both of them and will be kind of a midterm between the power mass of the H22 and the naturality of a Donnay Pro One I feel very much "handy".

I have BP 16m that are 330sw. They hit a mean ball.. ton of plow.. decent control. Lot of topspin and a beautiful feel.. a la butter...
I got them to 32.2cm balance and 335 static weight .

 

[asifallasleep]

I feel the H22's 16x19 are a bit slow on the air and "not natural", with sometimes the inertia acting against me. They have 349SW, but I guess I prefer them than my 315SW (strung) H19 16x19, which is also not so natural and feels more risky to play with (more unforced errors).
My expectation is that the Blade Prostocks ~340SW (although 18x20) will feel more natural than both of them and will be kind of a midterm between the power mass of the H22 and the naturality of a Donnay Pro One I feel very much "handy".

Wait, are your H19's 315SW or is it a typo and they are 351SW? Doesn't seem like a proper comparison between a 315 SW H19 and a 349 SW H22.

 

[ppressure]

Selling two Wilson H19 16x19 in as-new condition in the matte Blade 2015 paintjob with the following strung specs:

342g / 31.5 cm balance / 327 SW.

Drop me a line if you're interested!

 

[asifallasleep]

I feel the H22's 16x19 are a bit slow on the air and "not natural", with sometimes the inertia acting against me. They have 349SW, but I guess I prefer them than my 315SW (strung) H19 16x19, which is also not so natural and feels more risky to play with (more unforced errors).
My expectation is that the Blade Prostocks ~340SW (although 18x20) will feel more natural than both of them and will be kind of a midterm between the power mass of the H22 and the naturality of a Donnay Pro One I feel very much "handy".

Are you typically using heavier frames? My high swing weight, low static weight H22's feel so unnatural to me when I swing them because I am so used to high static high swing weight frames. My H22's take a lot of effort to get them moving even though they are super light. It's an odd combination. I've modded them a few times but my H19's not surprisingly are much faster as are my much heavier RF97's.