Pete Sampras

I doubt it. 1991 would be his best shot. Players like Lendl, Becker, Edberg and Courier would have been big challenges for Agassi around that time.

For the record, Agassi did intend to play the 1994 Australian Open, but his December 1993 wrist surgery prevented that.
Agassi was No 3 in 1988, he matured as a player once he started pairing up with Brad Gilbert. Losing to Gomzez at French was considered a choke. He just matured as a balanced player very late in his career. If not for ups and downs in his career, taking crystal meth, failed relationship with brooke shields and just focused on slam count he could have won 12-14 slams.
 
Agassi was No 3 in 1988
True, but Agassi had a notably poor record against top players in 1988, apart from beating Connors at the US Open. Agassi was higher ranked than Connors at the time of the 1988 US Open, though.

he matured as a player once he started pairing up with Brad Gilbert. Losing to Gomzez at French was considered a choke.
I personally don't understand why Agassi was favoured over Gomez in the 1990 French Open final. Gomez was a battle hardened veteran in very good form, and didn't have his nemesis Lendl in the way this time.

He just matured as a balanced player very late in his career. If not for ups and downs in his career, taking crystal meth, failed relationship with brooke shields and just focused on slam count he could have won 12-14 slams.
Agassi didn't like the constant pressure of expectation, and expressed to often hating tennis. And when he did seriously dedicate, think 1994-1995, he got seriously burned in the 1995 US Open final.
 
True, but Agassi had a notably poor record against top players in 1988, apart from beating Connors at the US Open. Agassi was higher ranked than Connors at the time of the 1988 US Open, though.


I personally don't understand why Agassi was favoured over Gomez in the 1990 French Open final. Gomez was a battle hardened veteran in very good form, and didn't have his nemesis Lendl in the way this time.


Agassi didn't like the constant pressure of expectation, and expressed to often hating tennis. And when he did seriously dedicate, think 1994-1995, he got seriously burned in the 1995 US Open final.
Good points , but I felt at the least he could have won 11-12 majors if he didn’t skip Australian open 10 times and a couple of French more.
 
True, but Agassi had a notably poor record against top players in 1988, apart from beating Connors at the US Open. Agassi was higher ranked than Connors at the time of the 1988 US Open, though.
OTOH, the two finalists at the 1988 Australian Open were Wilander and Cash.

Agassi extended Wilander to a fifth set on his home turf at the French Open in the 1988 semifinals and surely would have preferred the matchup on Rebound Ace.

And, with Agassi only at #90 in the world back in the summer of 1987, he took down world #7 Cash right after the Aussie had won Wimbledon.

I don't know whether Agassi was ready to win a Major back in 1988, but I like both of those matchups for him on Rebound Ace. And, if Agassi goes down under and is able to do some damage in 1988, that could have given him a leg up on the Beckers and Courier of the world who took the next few titles.

All complete speculation of course.
 
OTOH, the two finalists at the 1988 Australian Open were Wilander and Cash.

Agassi extended Wilander to a fifth set on his home turf at the French Open in the 1988 semifinals and surely would have preferred the matchup on Rebound Ace.
A 17-year-old Agassi favoured over 1988 Wilander? I doubt it.

Cash had previously beaten Wilander 3 times at Wimbledon in 1984, 1986 and 1987, and at the 1984 US Open, and Wilander won their 1988 Australian Open final.
 
A 17-year-old Agassi favoured over 1988 Wilander? I doubt it.

Cash had previously beaten Wilander 3 times at Wimbledon in 1984, 1986 and 1987, and at the 1984 US Open, and Wilander won their 1988 Australian Open final.
Oh, definitely not saying Andre would be the favorite, just that he played Mats pretty tough on the terre battue that year, giving him a solid shot on Rebound Ace.
 
Oh, definitely not saying Andre would be the favorite, just that he played Mats pretty tough on the terre battue that year, giving him a solid shot on Rebound Ace.
Agassi took him to 5 sets at French open that year. He never played at Australian Open for first 8 years
 
Agassi took him to 5 sets at French open that year. He never played at Australian Open for first 8 years
Yeah, that's what I'm saying. The fact that Agassi took Wilander to five sets in 1988 at the French Open -- a surface that favors Wilander's game -- makes me think Agassi would have had a solid shot against Wilander had Agassi played the Australian Open in 1988 on Rebound Ace -- a surface that favors Agassi's game.
 
Back
Top