Players that would have won slams without the BIG-3

The_Mental_Giant

The_Mental_Giant

Hall of Fame
I think Tsonga would have won WImbledon and AO (obviously)
Ferrer would have won RG (2 or maybe even 3) and maybe 1 AO.
Berdych would have won Wimbledon.
Wawrinka would have Won USO and maybe more than 1 AO...
Delpotro would have won WImbledon.
Soderling would have several RG
Roddick would have won several USO,Wimbledon maybe 1 AO
Davydenko and Nalbandian would have been slam champions
Agassi would have double digit slams
 
True, but a bit funny. Of course that without big 3 someone else has to win those slams.

Most likely is that a guy who was consistenly nr.4 wins most of them, then a guy who was nr.5 and so on.
 
Hewitt probably would have got another couple.

Stat: in 2004-2005 Hewitt went down to eventual champion in 7 straight slams he played in.

I second calling Roddick
 
Murray would have won at least 4-5 more Majors (he's lost five Major finals to BIG-3).
 
Hewitt would have probably added 2 more majors: W 2005 and either USO 2004 or USO 2005.

Roddick would have added 3 W titles (2003,2004,2009), 1 more USO (2006) and 1 AO (2007). So 4 or 5 majors.

Murray would have added 3 AO titles (2010,2011,2013), 1 more W title (2012) or even 2 more W titles(2010-judging by how mentally weak Berdych is, I fancy Murray's chances in 2010 without Nadal). So right now he would probably have 6-7 majors.

Davydenko maybe would have grabbed AO 2006 without Fed. He would have had to beat only Kiefer and Baghdatis in the next 2 rounds. Both beatable opponents for Nikolay.

And Nalbandian would maybe have AO 2004? That title would be disputed between Hewitt and Nalbandian.

I think that's it.
 
mike danny said:
Hewitt would have probably added 2 more majors: W 2005 and either USO 2004 or USO 2005.

Roddick would have added 3 W titles (2003,2004,2009), 1 more USO (2006) and 1 AO (2007). So 4 or 5 majors.

Murray would have added 3 AO titles (2010,2011,2013), 1 more W title (2012) or even 2 more W titles(2010-judging by how mentally weak Berdych is, I fancy Murray's chances in 2010 without Nadal). So right now he would probably have 6-7 majors.

Davydenko maybe would have grabbed AO 2006 without Fed. He would have had to beat only Kiefer and Baghdatis in the next 2 rounds. Both beatable opponents for Nikolay.

And Nalbandian would maybe have AO 2004? That title would be disputed between Hewitt and Nalbandian.

I think that's it.
Click to expand...

Agassi would of won either USO 2004 or USO 2005 as well.

Roddick would of won the USO 2007 and possibly 2008 without the big 3. I think he could outplay Murray in a slam final at that point in 08.

Soderling grabs 2 FO, and Ferrer might sneak a couple too. Nalbandian probably becomes the favorite for FO 2006 if he avoids injury.
 
OP says "big 3" but neglects to mention all the slams Murray would of won. So much butthurt bias amuses me.

On topic:
The most relevant one would be Murray as he has lost 5 slam finals to a fellow Big 4 member, so thats 5 right there. How many times has he lost in the SF to a Big 4 member with another Big 4 member waiting in the final? Thats probably another 4-5. Basically, Murray would be the GOAT.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
If the Big 4 didn't exist
2
Replies
51
Views
3K
Deleted member 307496
D
onehandbh
How many slams would Wawrinka have won against big 3?
Replies
40
Views
2K
duaneeo
duaneeo
mike danny
  • Poll Poll
How would the tour have looked like in the last 2 years if the Big 3 resurgence had not happened?
Replies
30
Views
1K
tennis_pro
tennis_pro
Megafanoftennis100
  • Poll Poll
How many Slams would the 2025 version of Jannik Sinner have taken from Djokodal during 2019-2023?
Replies
6
Views
372
DSH
DSH
BGod
  • Poll Poll
Berdych without Big 3?
Replies
40
Views
2K
abmk
abmk
Back
Top