Players to be automatically removed from tournament if they 'leave bubble' - US Open protocols revealed

Margaret Court gets blasted about her easy wins in a national championship every time her record is mentioned.

Tell that to the nearly 40 y.o. slow overweight Serena, who might otherwise be retired by now, but has been killing herself for years desperately trying to catch our favorite GOAT Margaret Court's precious respected record.

r0_0_4928_3280_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg
 
Last edited:
The tournament will probably be shut down mid-way through.

So we might not have to worry about a devalued champion.
 
The tournament will probably be shut down mid-way through.

So we might not have to worry about a devalued champion.

We have full faith in the efficacy of the carefully constructed biosecure NYC bubble.
Bubble is safer than the outside world.
Tell us your shut-down scenario.
:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
in June the USTA laid off 110 people(20% of their staff), so obviously they aren’t in a great state. I’m not sure they will be making money off holding this years USO. there are articles that show the most $ they make yearly is from ticket sales and there are none this year. The tv deals are from existing contacts. It’s impressive that they are even able to equal prize money from last year(and some players like Cilic complained there was no increase In money this year)

I’m a little uneasy that this event is going on, but I think many of you are being a bit harsh. There are many threads here year after talking about how hard it is to make a living as a pro player. I’m sure players ranked 75-200(some even went on unemployment benefits when the tour shut down) are pretty thrilled they have a chance to make some money this year. Many coaches basically only get paid when their player gets paid. I’m sure they are struggling right now, so many of them are also thrilled to have a chance to make money. Wangs coach was recently fired, there are probably a lot more that have been fired over the last few months we haven’t heard about. He mentioned before he was fired that he tried to get a reduced salary from her when the tour shut down, but she refused. I doubt most players are paying their teams anything right now(and lower ranked players probably can’t afford to).

the pandemic has obviously changed the world, but I fear tennis(more so than team sports which have billion dollar stadiums that are named after huge companies supporting them and built in fan bases going back decades) will never recover unless some of the majors at least try. Sadly, most on here only care about the big 3 and the slam race, not the bigger picture of what the USO can give to the sport, especially right now.

the trickle down effect will soon be seen in 2021. Small tourneys have mentioned how much of a struggle it is to even break even, do you think they will all survive? why would a sponsor for a 250 or 500 event sign on for another year of the event if it gets cancelled In ‘20 or ‘21? A lot of these companies that are sponsors have been hit hard by the pandemic. You think if Auckland, Rotterdam, etc lose their sponsor it will be easy to get another one? I don’t think many of you realize how bad it’s gonna get. So many people have lost their jobs, and you think tennis can just cancel every event indefinitely and the structure of the calendar and draw sizes, prize money will remain the same? All I can say is enjoy pro tennis while you can, there’s probably gonna be a lot less of it in the years to come.

No tournament will be giving away millions of dollars of prize money, if it was on the brink of collapse, so I don't buy the idea that they are struggling for money and that is why they are laying off staff. They are run like a business, and the USTA bosses thought that those people are unnecessary expense in times when their profits suffer. I am sure that they had a choice to keep them, but decided to increase the profits with the saved money. Cutting off of the check of the winner would have kept those people employed for a long period of time, and no one in his right mind would have objected against that, as everyone sees how difficult the situation is.

I get that everything running as before would have been ideal for those 70-200 players, but that is not the case and the solution is not to just crash ourselves into even more precarious situations. At my local tennis club there are no courts available, and tennis lessons are happening all over the place. If these coaches and tennis players want to earn a modest living I am sure that they will find a way and one related to tennis at that (I don't know Wang's coach's circumstances, but he can probably make better money by giving such lessons, instead of delivering pizza as was her expectation. I would expect a high profile player to be able to cover the expenses of his/her entourage for at least an year, no problem, otherwise that would be an indication of bad management of one's finances. If the players themselves simply refuse to pay to their teams that speaks also volumes about their attitude.

I am not that pessimistic about the future of tennis (or at least not for that: there is enough money in the sport if they are redistributed fairly and wisely. Most small tournaments are tightly connected with the local authorities , so they will not be ruined. USO refuses (just like the other Majors) to distribute the money in a more fair manner since forever, so they will need to do it now, in more complicated circumstances. Most sponsors of small events won't be withdrawing for 2021. I don't see a reason for that. They are also with contracts for far longer than the pandemic will supposedly rage. I don't anticipate tennis to be "as before", so I don't know why tournaments won't be able to cut respectively prize money or re-negotiate the contracts of everyone. I don't know whether everything will be exactly the same: prize money will clearly go down, and for once the Majors will have to share a bit more than the peanuts they give to the tennis world. Anyway the talk here is about USO, and they don't have such problems. That is like talking about Wang's coach as being influenced by the situation and then transferring the same thinking over Federer's coach.

8-)
 
The tournament will probably be shut down mid-way through.

So we might not have to worry about a devalued champion.
Florida is rife with infections. Second wave in Europe. This is just never going to work unfortunately. Had cases kept dropping i would be excited. Your prediction is probably spot on
 
The tournament will probably be shut down mid-way through.

So we might not have to worry about a devalued champion.
Would you be willing to bet money on this prediction?


Florida is rife with infections. Second wave in Europe. This is just never going to work unfortunately. Had cases kept dropping i would be excited. Your prediction is probably spot on
Florida is rife with infections, and even they are able to have successful sporting events like the MLS Is Back Cup and NBA Bubble staged there with 0 infections. New York has much, much less infections than Florida. If the USTA's protocols are good, and the players don't go partying in night clubs like at the Adria Tour, then the event will be a success and all the hand-wringing will look a bit daft.
 
in June the USTA laid off 110 people(20% of their staff), so obviously they aren’t in a great state. ..

You don't have to guess what state the USTA is in from a financial perspective. You can pull up their audited financial statements. ;)

The USTA is doing OK from a financial perspective, with or without a 2020 USO. As far as the layoffs, by its own admission the USTA has been planning since 2018 a "transformational plan" involving large layoffs which was accelerated the USTA said due to Covid.

"The restructuring had been in the works since 2018, but was rapidly moved up due to the COVID-19 pandemic."



Your fears concerning tennis (tournaments) in general recovering is another topic but at least insofar as the USO is concerned the fear is not shared by Fitch Ratings in its most recent assessment of the USTA debt, which accounted for Covid including the possibility of no USO in 2020.

Whether the event will fully recover by 2021 or later I don't know. However, I suspect sooner rather than later and that many 2020 subscription and suite tickets have already been rolled over to 2021 instead of refunded and the TV contracts, I believe, are longer term and locked in for a while.

I agree a pay day for the lower ranked players is an important reason for holding the event. There are other good reasons to hold the event as well. However, all things considered I would scrap the 2020 no fans USO and look past it toward 2021, cross fingers.
 
Last edited:
It was Stacey Allaster, who said that if there is a problem at the US Open the tournament will be stopped, and she was asked by a journalist what happens if someone tests positive. That was early days, before USO came up with their "plan".

Then there is that: "
U.S. Open facilities will be equipped to rapidly screen and test players to ensure the major tournament runs with minimal interruptions this summer, U.S. Tennis Association Chief Revenue Officer Lew Sherr said Thursday.
Tennis officials are enacting strict safety standards, including temperature checks and coronavirus testing, to maintain a safe playing environment at the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center in New York. While a positive test for COVID-19 would result in a player’s withdrawal from the tournament, Sherr said any other medical screen results that raised alarms would be evaluated on a case-by-case basis."

So, ever since they announced reluctantly that they intend to hold it, they started off with what I said, to appease the public that if the worst happens there will be no need for the people to be worried, if it will continue, and then gradually backed off, little by little, first by announcing that any medical situation will be evaluated separately, and then getting even more limited in their "plan" by removing only the player that eventually tested positive.

All that while we were promised "the plan" of which no one has seen anything regarding different medical scenarios.

All in all USTA has directly announced that financial concerns take precedence over anything else and their "plan" is effectively an instrument to do the necessary PR, so that the tournament wouldn't be cancelled.

:cool:
So, in short, no one said what you claimed they said...

And, even if they stated anything, are you aware it's good/acceptable to make/change decisions on the run, because we are not sure about anything considering this virus...

Even the rules they gave now should be changed (more restrictions or less restrictions) if situation changes...
 
When USO officially said what you claim they said?
"if there is a positive case we will stop the tournament immediately"
Quote please...

Has there been any citation from the :cool: Troll that the tournament will be stopped immediately after a single positive case?

Let us know and we will investigate further.
Otherwise we shall continue to have the Troll on ignore.

Any player testing positive will be tossed out of the tournament. But that certainly does not automatically end the tournament. Especially if that player has kept his distance from other players on the court.

Play will go on!

So, in short, no one said what you claimed they said...

:(
 
Last edited:
Has there been any citation from the :cool: Troll that the tournament will be stopped immediately after a single positive case?

Let us know and we will investigate further.
Otherwise we will continue to have the Troll on ignore.



:(
Off course no one said that... He is doing that kind of scam all the time... Then he wrotes a novel to explain what someone said instead of just giving the quote he was asked for... :rolleyes:
 
If a player tests positive and is out the opponent gets a walkover into the next round ? What if it’s a finalist that tests positive ? (Yeh, like that result will be allowed to make it over from the lab before the match starts.:rolleyes:)

Should they (mandatory or perhaps optionally and with some compensation) have the losers stick around for another round to potentially Lucky Loser back in to the tournament if there is a positive test/default ?
 
If a player tests positive and is out the opponent gets a walkover into the next round ? What if it’s a finalist that tests positive ? (Yeh, like that result will be allowed to make it over from the lab before the match starts.:rolleyes:)

Should they (mandatory or perhaps optionally and with some compensation) have the losers stick around for another round to potentially Lucky Loser back in to the tournament if there is a positive test/default ?
Those are all good questions.

Much like the current NHL tournament, NBA bubble tournament, and whatever this baseball season is - 2020 USO will be a bit of an anomaly as a slam. How history views it? Guess we'll find out.
 




Massive rave party held in New York in middle of coronavirus pandemic

Pip Christmass



Published: Tuesday, 4 August 2020 3:32 pm

The United States is in a new phase of the novel coronavirus outbreak with infections "extraordinarily widespread" in rural areas as well as cities, a White House coronavirus expert said on Sunday. Lisa Bernhard produced this report. Credit: Instagram

The organiser of a massive “secret” rave party in the middle of the COVID pandemic has defended the decision to hold the event, saying “people need a release.”

Hundreds of people attended the rave at Kosciuszko Bridge in Brooklyn, New York, on Saturday, with pictures and video showing people crowded close together and very few wearing masks.

The rave was broken up by police at 4am - several hours after the rave got underway.

The event was organised by a group called Renegade, which has thrown a series of parties in New York in recent months, Gothamist reports.
Speaking anonymously to the New York-based publication, one of the organisers said it was foolish to think people weren’t going to gather at parties.

a5d34cb5e32b5d03781b3445e980e6bdd2ebd92d.jpg

A scene from the rave in Brooklyn, New York. Credit: Instagram/KristinaforMayor
“The event got out of control because people wanted to come, people wanted to be out,” the organiser said.
“The pressure is building, and people need a release.
“It’s already happening.”




The organiser said hand sanitiser was handed out and masks were available for people to wear.
But an attendee said as the party progressed, those who were wearing masks gradually discarded them and any attempt at social distancing was abandoned.





“My friends and I stayed on the outskirts of the party, I definitely didn’t feel safe going into the pit,” he said.
“I would not do that again.
“All the friends I went with said we’re going to self-quarantine for a week or two, it was too soon for way too many people in one spot.”

‘It was too soon for way too many people in one spot.’

On Monday, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo called the illegal rave “disrespectful” and a violation of common decency.
“Look at all the people you endangered,” he said.
“What if one of the people gets sick and dies? We need better enforcement all across the state.”

DJ turns down gig

One DJ who had been asked to play at the rave, Mike Simonetti, said he refused outright.
“Ok, so I was asked to play that party under the bridge last night, and I turned it down,” he tweeted.
“My father died alone because of COVID.
“My mother was not allowed to see him until hours before he could die in hospice.”





NYC party boat owners arrested after their cruise was busted with more than 170 guests on board
By Harmeet Kaur and Evan Simko-Bednarski, CNN
Updated 10:51 PM EDT, Tue August 04, 2020


200804093706-nyc-party-boat-coronavirus-large-169.jpg

New York authorities intercepted the Liberty Belle on Saturday for a party that officials said was in violation of state and local emergency orders.


(CNN)A riverboat party attended by more than 170 people in New York over the weekend violated state and city emergency orders, according to the New York City Sheriff's Office.
Sheriff's deputies on Saturday intercepted the Liberty Belle at Manhattan's Pier 36 on the East River and arrested the owners for an illegal party, the sheriff's office said on Twitter. Authorities also accused the boat operators of serving alcohol without a liquor license.
Boat operators Ronny Vargas and Alex Sauzo were issued appearance tickets for warehousing without a permit, operating an unlicensed bottle club and bar and for prohibited acts during a local state of emergency, according to a report from the sheriff's office.

Sheriff Joseph Fucito told CNN that in addition to serving alcohol without a license, the boat owners also violated New York City's emergency order, which prohibits establishments from serving alcohol indoors.
Vargas and Sauzo could not be immediately reached for comment.


The boat captain, who was unnamed in the report, was issued a summons for not properly displaying the vessel identification number, according to the sheriff's office.

The Liberty Belle, with its four decks, four bars and multi-level speaker system, often plays host to promotional events, concerts, corporate outings, church parties and other events, according to Empire Cruises, the company that operates the boat.
The boat seats 200 passengers and has a maximum capacity of 600, according to Empire Cruises.
Photos of the boat appear to show a large group of people gathered on one of the outdoor decks. It is unclear from the picture if they are wearing masks.


Empire Cruises says in a statement on its website that it ceased operations as of March 16 until further notice because of the Covid-19 pandemic.
CNN has reached out to Empire Cruises for comment.
On Monday, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo called the boat party "just really reckless, rude, irresponsible and illegal," adding that it "violates public decency."
"What if one of those people on that cruise gets sick and dies?" he asked.
The governor also referenced another reported party near a New York City bridge and called for better enforcement across the state.

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio didn't comment about specific gatherings over the weekend when asked about it on Monday, but commended the sheriff's deputies for their actions. He also said that New Yorkers were overwhelmingly complying with social distancing guidelines.

"... Overwhelmingly we've been blessed here in New York City that we have not seen a lot of clusters and people have handled things right," de Blasio said.
The city's greatest concerns remain with indoor activities, the mayor added.
CNN's Lauren del Valle and Melanie Schuman contributed to this report.
 
Last edited:
The U$TA is not engaged in altruistic endeavours....

I think you mean the USO is not an altruistic endeavor ?

The USTA is a not-for-profit entity — it exists for the benefit of the general public and without a profit motive. “Altruistic” if you will.

The reason the USTA can legally conduct the very profit making USO is to further it’s not-for-profit mission which is to “promote and develop the growth of tennis.”
 
Last edited:
The USTA‘s entire purpose like every other not-for-profit entity is essentially “altruistic“ — as in it exists for the benefit of the general public and without a profit motive.

The general public wants to see pro tennis.

So if the US Open had had pandemic insurance, it would forego the profitable pandemic payout and host the far less lucrative Tournament.
:unsure:
 
The general public wants to see pro tennis.

So if the US Open had had pandemic insurance, it would forego the profitable pandemic payout and host the far less lucrative Tournament.
:unsure:

No, I don’t think that follows.
 
Last edited:
No, I don’t think that follows.

Their mission is to promote tennis amongst the general public.

Surely we all agree that the tournament would NOT be being held if they had pandemic insurance,
despite the fact that the general public desperately wants to see pro tennis.

Therefore, it is clearly obvious that it is being held purely for profit motives.
 
Last edited:
Their mission is to promote tennis amongst the general public.

Surely we all agree that the tournament would NOT be being held if they had pandemic insurance,
despite the fact that the general public desperately wants to see pro tennis.

Therefore, it is clearly obvious that it is being held purely for profit motives.

I really don’t know what they would have done if they had insurance. I suspect Cuomo would have pushed for it for reasons I already mentioned in a thread likely long ago deleted. :cry:

Re your point that the decision from the USTA POV is primarily (or solely) motivated by $$$. Yeh, probably true. But I like to think part of it is for the players, the fans and the city/state.
 
Last edited:
I really don’t know what they would have done if they had insurance.

We will tell you exactly what they would have done.

They would have collected the insurance payout just as Wimbledon did. Even though the public wants to see the tournament played. So they are clearly not behaving like a non-profit that is following its mission statement of serving the public and promoting tennis.

If ESPN was not interested in paying anything, a non profit would still hold the tournament for the public interest; that is their non profit mission statement.

This tournament is being held purely for profit motives.
 
So, I was right, and if there is a positive nothing will happen other than the player/person in question being removed. What happened with "if there is a positive case we will stop the tournament immediately" which was the original pledge? Where is the cutoff for when the tournament could be halted?

USO organisers will remove Djokovic, if he "leaves the bubble" and it is not done openly and as a demonstration.

Does anyone believe that?

:cool:
Not me.
 




Massive rave party held in New York in middle of coronavirus pandemic

Pip Christmass



Published: Tuesday, 4 August 2020 3:32 pm

The United States is in a new phase of the novel coronavirus outbreak with infections "extraordinarily widespread" in rural areas as well as cities, a White House coronavirus expert said on Sunday. Lisa Bernhard produced this report. Credit: Instagram

The organiser of a massive “secret” rave party in the middle of the COVID pandemic has defended the decision to hold the event, saying “people need a release.”

Hundreds of people attended the rave at Kosciuszko Bridge in Brooklyn, New York, on Saturday, with pictures and video showing people crowded close together and very few wearing masks.

The rave was broken up by police at 4am - several hours after the rave got underway.

The event was organised by a group called Renegade, which has thrown a series of parties in New York in recent months, Gothamist reports.
Speaking anonymously to the New York-based publication, one of the organisers said it was foolish to think people weren’t going to gather at parties.

a5d34cb5e32b5d03781b3445e980e6bdd2ebd92d.jpg

A scene from the rave in Brooklyn, New York. Credit: Instagram/KristinaforMayor
“The event got out of control because people wanted to come, people wanted to be out,” the organiser said.
“The pressure is building, and people need a release.
“It’s already happening.”




The organiser said hand sanitiser was handed out and masks were available for people to wear.
But an attendee said as the party progressed, those who were wearing masks gradually discarded them and any attempt at social distancing was abandoned.





“My friends and I stayed on the outskirts of the party, I definitely didn’t feel safe going into the pit,” he said.
“I would not do that again.
“All the friends I went with said we’re going to self-quarantine for a week or two, it was too soon for way too many people in one spot.”

‘It was too soon for way too many people in one spot.’

On Monday, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo called the illegal rave “disrespectful” and a violation of common decency.
“Look at all the people you endangered,” he said.
“What if one of the people gets sick and dies? We need better enforcement all across the state.”

DJ turns down gig

One DJ who had been asked to play at the rave, Mike Simonetti, said he refused outright.
“Ok, so I was asked to play that party under the bridge last night, and I turned it down,” he tweeted.
“My father died alone because of COVID.
“My mother was not allowed to see him until hours before he could die in hospice.”

This is why Zverev, Thiem and Dmitrov will need a chaperone in NYC.
 
We will tell you exactly what they would have done.

They would have collected the insurance payout just as Wimbledon did. Even though the public wants to see the tournament played. So they are clearly not behaving like a non-profit that is following its mission statement of serving the public and promoting tennis.

If ESPN was not interested in paying anything, a non profit would still hold the tournament for the public interest; that is their non profit mission statement.

This tournament is being held purely for profit motives.

Probably on the insurance though don’t you think it would depend on the insurance payout amount verse revenue from holding the tournament ?

However, no on what you think constitutes fulfilling the “mission statement.“ You could argue the tail (USO) has been wagging the dog (“grow and promote tennis”) for a long time. But it doesn’t change that the USO is how they fund their mission but, as much as we may enjoy the USO, it isn’t the mission.
 
Last edited:
lol, this thread is a goldmine of hubris. :giggle:

Suspect that certain agitators will be learning some very valuable lessons shortly. :giggle:
 
So... who is more likely to inadvertently F this up? Djokovic or Dimitrov? Normally I’d bet on Kyrgios to fumble this but he’s out...
 
So... who is more likely to inadvertently F this up? Djokovic or Dimitrov? Normally I’d bet on Kyrgios to fumble this but he’s out...

Dunderhead Dummitrov was in bed for a month after running around the Belgrade nightclubs.

Nobody is that stupid to do it again...
:unsure:

 
Last edited:
We will tell you exactly what they would have done.

They would have collected the insurance payout just as Wimbledon did. Even though the public wants to see the tournament played. So they are clearly not behaving like a non-profit that is following its mission statement of serving the public and promoting tennis.

If ESPN was not interested in paying anything, a non profit would still hold the tournament for the public interest; that is their non profit mission statement.

This tournament is being held purely for profit motives.




Massive rave party held in New York in middle of coronavirus pandemic

Pip Christmass



Published: Tuesday, 4 August 2020 3:32 pm

The United States is in a new phase of the novel coronavirus outbreak with infections "extraordinarily widespread" in rural areas as well as cities, a White House coronavirus expert said on Sunday. Lisa Bernhard produced this report. Credit: Instagram

The organiser of a massive “secret” rave party in the middle of the COVID pandemic has defended the decision to hold the event, saying “people need a release.”

Hundreds of people attended the rave at Kosciuszko Bridge in Brooklyn, New York, on Saturday, with pictures and video showing people crowded close together and very few wearing masks.

The rave was broken up by police at 4am - several hours after the rave got underway.

The event was organised by a group called Renegade, which has thrown a series of parties in New York in recent months, Gothamist reports.
Speaking anonymously to the New York-based publication, one of the organisers said it was foolish to think people weren’t going to gather at parties.

a5d34cb5e32b5d03781b3445e980e6bdd2ebd92d.jpg

A scene from the rave in Brooklyn, New York. Credit: Instagram/KristinaforMayor
“The event got out of control because people wanted to come, people wanted to be out,” the organiser said.
“The pressure is building, and people need a release.
“It’s already happening.”




The organiser said hand sanitiser was handed out and masks were available for people to wear.
But an attendee said as the party progressed, those who were wearing masks gradually discarded them and any attempt at social distancing was abandoned.





“My friends and I stayed on the outskirts of the party, I definitely didn’t feel safe going into the pit,” he said.
“I would not do that again.
“All the friends I went with said we’re going to self-quarantine for a week or two, it was too soon for way too many people in one spot.”

‘It was too soon for way too many people in one spot.’

On Monday, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo called the illegal rave “disrespectful” and a violation of common decency.
“Look at all the people you endangered,” he said.
“What if one of the people gets sick and dies? We need better enforcement all across the state.”

DJ turns down gig

One DJ who had been asked to play at the rave, Mike Simonetti, said he refused outright.
“Ok, so I was asked to play that party under the bridge last night, and I turned it down,” he tweeted.
“My father died alone because of COVID.
“My mother was not allowed to see him until hours before he could die in hospice.”





NYC party boat owners arrested after their cruise was busted with more than 170 guests on board
By Harmeet Kaur and Evan Simko-Bednarski, CNN
Updated 10:51 PM EDT, Tue August 04, 2020


200804093706-nyc-party-boat-coronavirus-large-169.jpg

New York authorities intercepted the Liberty Belle on Saturday for a party that officials said was in violation of state and local emergency orders.


(CNN)A riverboat party attended by more than 170 people in New York over the weekend violated state and city emergency orders, according to the New York City Sheriff's Office.
Sheriff's deputies on Saturday intercepted the Liberty Belle at Manhattan's Pier 36 on the East River and arrested the owners for an illegal party, the sheriff's office said on Twitter. Authorities also accused the boat operators of serving alcohol without a liquor license.
Boat operators Ronny Vargas and Alex Sauzo were issued appearance tickets for warehousing without a permit, operating an unlicensed bottle club and bar and for prohibited acts during a local state of emergency, according to a report from the sheriff's office.

Sheriff Joseph Fucito told CNN that in addition to serving alcohol without a license, the boat owners also violated New York City's emergency order, which prohibits establishments from serving alcohol indoors.
Vargas and Sauzo could not be immediately reached for comment.


The boat captain, who was unnamed in the report, was issued a summons for not properly displaying the vessel identification number, according to the sheriff's office.

The Liberty Belle, with its four decks, four bars and multi-level speaker system, often plays host to promotional events, concerts, corporate outings, church parties and other events, according to Empire Cruises, the company that operates the boat.
The boat seats 200 passengers and has a maximum capacity of 600, according to Empire Cruises.
Photos of the boat appear to show a large group of people gathered on one of the outdoor decks. It is unclear from the picture if they are wearing masks.


Empire Cruises says in a statement on its website that it ceased operations as of March 16 until further notice because of the Covid-19 pandemic.
CNN has reached out to Empire Cruises for comment.
On Monday, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo called the boat party "just really reckless, rude, irresponsible and illegal," adding that it "violates public decency."
"What if one of those people on that cruise gets sick and dies?" he asked.
The governor also referenced another reported party near a New York City bridge and called for better enforcement across the state.

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio didn't comment about specific gatherings over the weekend when asked about it on Monday, but commended the sheriff's deputies for their actions. He also said that New Yorkers were overwhelmingly complying with social distancing guidelines.

"... Overwhelmingly we've been blessed here in New York City that we have not seen a lot of clusters and people have handled things right," de Blasio said.
The city's greatest concerns remain with indoor activities, the mayor added.
CNN's Lauren del Valle and Melanie Schuman contributed to this report.
The general public wants to see pro tennis.

So if the US Open had had pandemic insurance, it would forego the profitable pandemic payout and host the far less lucrative Tournament.
:unsure:
Pop off Raul! Go off!
 
Dunderhead Dummitrov was in bed for a month after running around the Belgrade nightclubs.

Nobody is that stupid to do it again...
:unsure:

Novacxxs was the one leading the topless party in Belgrade nightclub.

 
Good. Players who don't follow the rules should be disqualified. We have all had to make massive adjustments in our daily lives since this started, some much worse than no sightseeing or no going out to eat. It stinks, but it is what it is right now. Hopefully the Open actually follows through on the policy and doesn't back down if certain people choose to violate it. Players have not only their health, but the health of their teams and loved ones to think about, so I don't see players being purposefully reckless en mass. I do hope the players take adequate time to review everything, but they should since doing so is in their best interests.
 
So is everyone to be policed at the USO? Executives as well as officials, or just players? People never ask that question. They never even see its obviousness.
 
So is everyone to be policed at the USO? Executives as well as officials, or just players? People never ask that question. They never even see its obviousness.

You have no credibility on this matter as you have foolishly suggested that USO players be allowed to stay in disparate hotel locations.

We have recommended that players stay at a designated hotel dedicated to a providing a secure sanitized environment.

This is exactly what the tournament organizers at Prague and Palermo did.

The second European tournament in the WTA's restart amid the pandemic is following the same rules as the Palermo Open last week: No fans and media, players have to handle their own towels and are not allowed to shake hands. The players are isolated on one floor of a Prague hotel that was completely booked by tournament organizers.
 
I always like reading you for the complete fiction you write about me without the slightest twinge from your conscience.

You truly are a reprobate like your mentor.

You have no credibility on this matter as you have foolishly suggested that USO players be allowed to stay in disparate hotel locations.

We have recommended that players stay at a designated hotel dedicated to a providing a secure sanitized environment.

This is exactly what the tournament organizers at Prague and Palermo did.

The second European tournament in the WTA's restart amid the pandemic is following the same rules as the Palermo Open last week: No fans and media, players have to handle their own towels and are not allowed to shake hands. The players are isolated on one floor of a Prague hotel that was completely booked by tournament organizers.
 
Back
Top