Players Who Have Won a Grand Slam - Then Never Reached Another Grand Slam semifinal - Nadal?

McEnroeisanartist

Hall of Fame
Wondering what players have won a Grand Slam and then never reached another Grand Slam semifinal?

In the last 30 years:

Gomez - 90 French Open - played 5 more Grand Slams, one Grand Slam 2nd Round
Becker - 96 Australian Open - played 4 more Grand Slams, one Grand Slam quarterfinal
Korda - 98 Australian Open - played 6 more Grand Slams, one Grand Slam quarterfinal
Kuerten - 01 French Open - played 13 more Grand Slams, two Grand Slam quarterfinals
Ivanisevic - 01 Wimbledon - played 4 more Grand Slams, two Grand Slam 3rd Rounds
Sampras - 02 US Open - never played another Grand Slam
Gaudio - 04 French Open - played 11 more Grand Slams, two Grand Slam 4th Rounds
 
Last edited:
Sorry McEnroeisanartist, but Nadal's career is FAR from over, and since he's just withdrawn from Wimbledon, he'll have much more time than anybody else to prepare for Rio 2016 by hitting the hard-courts nice and early, ready to wipe out another wave of opposition- and then he'll be the first man in world history to win the men's singles gold twice. And with that level of confidence, he'll almost SURELY reach at least the US Open SF.

So no, Nadal isn't joining your list.
 
Del Potro

(Sorry misread OP thought you meant GS final, not semi, clearly I stand corrected with his Wimby semi in 2013.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just realized Nadal hasn't made it to a second week in a slam since the AO last year....wow. Hope he can change that at the USO.
 
Just realized Nadal hasn't made it to a second week in a slam since the AO last year....wow. Hope he can change that at the USO.

The only thing that was between Nadal and the second week of Roland Garros 2016 (and in fact the title) was a wrist. As far as I'm concerned, no such "poor performance at slams" streak exists- Nadal was playing as well as I've ever seen at Roland Garros, and we all know what happens when he carries that form through to the US Open...

No slams for Dj, that's what.
 
The only thing that was between Nadal and the second week of Roland Garros 2016 (and in fact the title) was a wrist. As far as I'm concerned, no such "poor performance at slams" streak exists- Nadal was playing as well as I've ever seen at Roland Garros, and we all know what happens when he carries that form through to the US Open...

No slams for Dj, that's what.

Well you probably won't last more than a week but hey at least you're kind of funnier than your previous accounts like Bullzilla and 6-1 6-3 6-0
 
Welcome back NSK. you presence is needed in fending off some of the Cvac trolls that have come along to pollute this forum like mattosgrant, Djokodalfan and Noelan.
 
Pete, the only guy who retired after winning a slam. Man I wish he played another 2-3 seasons at least. HE would have had a shot at some more USO's at least

I mean Roddick won the USO the next year For god sakes. Then you got Agassi taking Fed 5 sets and reaching slam finals in 2005. Pete would have still of been there where anything can happen
 
When Pete retired, he had won 14 Grand Slams, two more than the record and more than his main rival, Agassi. I don't think he could have predicted that in less than 7 years, a guy from Switzerland would win 15 Grand Slams.
 
When Pete retired, he had won 14 Grand Slams, two more than the record and more than his main rival, Agassi. I don't think he could have predicted that in less than 7 years, a guy from Switzerland would win 15 Grand Slams.

Very nearly happened to Federer too- if it wasn't for Nadal's injuries, Nadal would be well beyond 17 grand slams by the end of Roland Garros 2016.
 
Pete, the only guy who retired after winning a slam. Man I wish he played another 2-3 seasons at least. HE would have had a shot at some more USO's at least

I mean Roddick won the USO the next year For god sakes. Then you got Agassi taking Fed 5 sets and reaching slam finals in 2005. Pete would have still of been there where anything can happen

Let's be clear here. Pete won the US Open and then decided to not play until Wimbledon. He did not announce his retirement immediately after the US Open 2002, he was still an active player, just choosing not to play any event other than the following year's Wimbledon. He was on the practice courts getting ready for Wimbledon 2003 and while he was practicing he realized that he just didn't want to play anymore. The desire was gone. He announced his retirement straight after that, he said if he doesn't have the passion to play at SW19, then it is time to hang it up.
 
When Pete retired, he had won 14 Grand Slams, two more than the record and more than his main rival, Agassi. I don't think he could have predicted that in less than 7 years, a guy from Switzerland would win 15 Grand Slams.
And now,7 years after Federer won his 17th,Djokovic will win his 18th ! :)
 
And now,7 years after Federer won his 17th,Djokovic will win his 18th ! :)

No matter how many slams Fed/Dj "win", Nadal will end up with more in the end (he'll always be the man to beat at Roland Garros from 2016 onwards if he stays uninjured, and Francisco Roig said Nadal plans to compete for the biggest titles (e.g. Roland Garros) at the age of 33, which gives Nadal a minimum of 3 more slams, plus any extras along the way).
 
Let's be clear here. Pete won the US Open and then decided to not play until Wimbledon. He did not announce his retirement immediately after the US Open 2002, he was still an active player, just choosing not to play any event other than the following year's Wimbledon. He was on the practice courts getting ready for Wimbledon 2003 and while he was practicing he realized that he just didn't want to play anymore. The desire was gone. He announced his retirement straight after that, he said if he doesn't have the passion to play at SW19, then it is time to hang it up.

Well his results at Wimbleon the previous 2 years weren't great and his level in both 2001-2002 was questionable at best those years but the Flushing Meadows crowd got him motivated and amped up and his level went sky high during that time. He reached the last 3 finals of the USO. He had PLENTY of game left still there. I would have at least gone for more USO titles if I was Pete (maybe even if the desire wasn't there at some other slams). He was certainly capable of winning more USO titles after 2002

Looking back, Im sure Pete does regret retiring when he did considering he wasn't even that old and still have plenty of game left as the USO showed.


Physically he could have played until his late 30s and still had a shot at more slams. His game was just that overwhelming an easier on the body.

I don't like seeing guys retire when they could still EASILY win some slams. From what I saw from Pete at the USO from 2000-2002 he still had more USO titles in him. 2003 and 2004-2006 the shot was still there. If Agassi with a bad back can reach USO finals. SO can Pete
 
The only thing that was between Nadal and the second week of Roland Garros 2016 (and in fact the title) was a wrist. As far as I'm concerned, no such "poor performance at slams" streak exists- Nadal was playing as well as I've ever seen at Roland Garros, and we all know what happens when he carries that form through to the US Open...

No slams for Dj, that's what.

As a first step Nadal has to start winning a set against Novak. I'm still waiting for that to happen for last 1 year or so.
 
Well his results at Wimbleon the previous 2 years weren't great and his level in both 2001-2002 was questionable at best those years but the Flushing Meadows crowd got him motivated and amped up and his level went sky high during that time. He reached the last 3 finals of the USO. He had PLENTY of game left still there. I would have at least gone for more USO titles if I was Pete (maybe even if the desire wasn't there at some other slams). He was certainly capable of winning more USO titles after 2002

Looking back, Im sure Pete does regret retiring when he did considering he wasn't even that old and still have plenty of game left as the USO showed.


Physically he could have played until his late 30s and still had a shot at more slams. His game was just that overwhelming an easier on the body

Maybe Pete does regret trying, but he did say if he didn't have the passion to step onto Centre Court, then he did not want to play tennis again, regardless of the late surge he had at the US Open. And that was why he called it quits. He lived to be the Wimbledon champion. That was his kingdom, not flushing meadows.
 
Welcome back NSK. you presence is needed in fending off some of the Cvac trolls that have come along to pollute this forum like mattosgrant, Djokodalfan and Noelan.

A troll asking another troll like NSK, happy for that , bull zilla, tennis commentator for help is LOL worthy.
 
As a first step Nadal has to start winning a set against Novak. I'm still waiting for that to happen for last 1 year or so.

Nadal had set points in their last two encounters, one of which was on hard-court (Dj's best surface). That's virtually as good as taking a set- and if it weren't for Nadal's wrist, Dj would have been dumped out of the tournament before he even reached the "final" of Roland Garros 2016. And as you saw in 2013, Dj beating Nadal in masters tournaments on clay-courts means nothing compared to the real deal at Roland Garros.
 
Nadal had set points in their last two encounters, one of which was on hard-court (Dj's best surface). That's virtually as good as taking a set- and if it weren't for Nadal's wrist, Dj would have been dumped out of the tournament before he even reached the "final" of Roland Garros 2016. And as you saw in 2013, Dj beating Nadal in masters tournaments on clay-courts means nothing compared to the real deal at Roland Garros.

SO having set point is actually winning a set is it? How long have you been watching tennis? The last time I checked Djokovic won every single set against Nadal dating right back to RG2015.
 
SO having set point is actually winning a set is it? How long have you been watching tennis? The last time I checked Djokovic won every single set against Nadal dating right back to RG2015.

And the last time I checked, Dj beating up on Nadal in clay-court masters before Roland Garros has no impact on Roland Garros, apart from 2015, when Nadal simply displayed terrible form all year.

Dj beats Nadal in back-to-back clay-court Masters in 2011. Who wins Roland Garros? Not Dj. NADAL.
Dj beats Nadal in Monte Carlo 2013 in straight sets (and it was an easier victory for Dj than Indian Wells 2016). Who wins Roland Garros? Not Dj. NADAL.
Dj beats Nadal in Rome 2014. Who wins Roland Garros? Not Dj. NADAL.
Dj beats Nadal in Rome 2016. Who wins Roland Garros? Dj, because a wrist injury prevented Nadal from competing.

How long have you been watching tennis?
 
And the last time I checked, Dj beating up on Nadal in clay-court masters before Roland Garros has no impact on Roland Garros, apart from 2015, when Nadal simply displayed terrible form all year.

Dj beats Nadal in back-to-back clay-court Masters in 2011. Who wins Roland Garros? Not Dj. NADAL.
Dj beats Nadal in Monte Carlo 2013 in straight sets (and it was an easier victory for Dj than Indian Wells 2016). Who wins Roland Garros? Not Dj. NADAL.
Dj beats Nadal in Rome 2014. Who wins Roland Garros? Not Dj. NADAL.
Dj beats Nadal in Rome 2016. Who wins Roland Garros? Dj, because a wrist injury prevented Nadal from competing.

How long have you been watching tennis?
Nadal's last 4 Slams: 2R, 3R, 1R, 3R

He hasn't been good enough to even reach Novak, let alone beat him
 
Last edited:
And the last time I checked, Dj beating up on Nadal in clay-court masters before Roland Garros has no impact on Roland Garros, apart from 2015, when Nadal simply displayed terrible form all year.

Dj beats Nadal in back-to-back clay-court Masters in 2011. Who wins Roland Garros? Not Dj. NADAL.
Dj beats Nadal in Monte Carlo 2013 in straight sets (and it was an easier victory for Dj than Indian Wells 2016). Who wins Roland Garros? Not Dj. NADAL.
Dj beats Nadal in Rome 2014. Who wins Roland Garros? Not Dj. NADAL.
Dj beats Nadal in Rome 2016. Who wins Roland Garros? Dj, because a wrist injury prevented Nadal from competing.

How long have you been watching tennis?

What has previous RG wins of Nadal has anything to do with just winning a set off Djokovic by Nadal? Nadal didn't even win a set let alone a match. Let Nadal win a set and we can speak when he actually wins a match. Having a set point in tennis not enough as far as results are concerned.

Been watching Tennis for a while. Do you want me to share the results of what Nadal had for the past 4 grandslams vs Djokovic? Don't embarrass yourself with tall claims. Nadal hasn't even reached semis for last 2 years.
 
Nadal has definitely been the least consistent of the big 3 in slams (due to a slew of injuries):

How many slams total?
Djokovic has played 46 slams (his first one was AO 2005) and amazingly, # he's skipped = a big fat 0.
Federer has played 67 (first was RG 1999) and has skipped only 2: USO 99 and RG 2016
Nadal has played 45 (first = W 2003) and has skipped a staggering 8 (RG 04, W 04, AO 06, W 09, USO 12, AO 13, USO 14, W 16). Most skipped: W. Least skipped: RG. Situation has worsened in the last 5 years: he has skipped a slam every year bar 2015 since 2012.
Player hit hardest by wear and tear is also player with fewest slams played!
Fun fact: all 3 played their first slam at 17 years old.

How long did it take them to reach their first good result in a slam (QF or better)?
Nadal and Djokovic: 5 participations (before RG 2005 title for Nadal and RG 2006 quarter for Djoko).
It took Fed a bit longer: 7 participations (before RG 2001 quarter)
Fun facts: they all reached their first QF+ result at a slam at RG and all at 19 years old. (Do you copy that Sasha? Not that much time left ;))

# of losses in 1st round (R128):
Federer: 6 (all in early career. Last time was at RG 2003, 13 years ago!)
Djokovic: 2 (also early on: AO 2005 and AO 2006)
Nadal: 2 (both recent: W 2013 and AO 2016)
Slow start vs early decline pattern
Fun fact: Djoko's worst losses happened at his best slam!

# of losses before QF:
Federer: 20 (6 RG, 5 AO, 5 USO, 4 W = clay worst, grass best- surprise,surprise...)
Nadal: 16 (6 W, 5 USO, 3 AO, 2 RG = the slower, the better...)
Djokovic: 10 (3 AO, 3 W, 2 RG, 2 USO = no loss before quarter since RG 2009, ie for the last 7 years!)

Worst streaks:
Nadal: last 9 consecutive slams without reaching semi or not playing at all: from W 2014 to W 2016 (yep, decline sucks)
Djoko: first 9 consecutive slams of doing worse than semi : from AO 2005 to AO 2007 (first semi reached was RG 2007)
Fed: it took Fed 16 attempts (from RG 99 to RG 03, 4 full years!!) to reach his 1st semi but when he did (W 2003), he won the whole thing and never looked back. Morality: better be a tortoise than a hare ;)

Best streaks:
Federer: a record breaking 10 straight finals (between W 2005 and USO 2007, winning 80%, the 2 losses were to Nadal at RG, who else/where else?. And who stopped the streak, hum? Well, of course, no other than Djoko in his pet slam 2008). Not to be fazed , Fed proceeded to embark on a 2nd streak of 8 consecutive finals :eek: (RG 08 to AO 10), winning and losing 50% of those (4/4)
Djokovic is on an ongoing streak of 6 consecutive finals (AO 15 to RG 16), losing only 1 of them (and scoring a historical 4 in a row "Nole slam" in the process)
Nadal did 5 finals in a row from RG 2011 to RG 2012 (but won only 2 of them, no need to tell you which ones :D)

Quarter or better streak:
Federer had a mindboggling 36 QF+ streak from W 2004 to RG 2013 (9 years!). The streak got broken by Stakho at W 2013 (in the midst of multiple early upsets that year)
Djoko has an ongoing streak of 28 QF+. Last time he lost before QF was at RG 2009 (R32) 7 years ago
By comparison, Nadal's 11 (from USO 2009 to RG 2012) seems a bit shabby. Once again, consistency not his strong point.

SF or better streak:
Djokovic had 14 consecutive semi or better from W 2010 to USO 2013 (Wawa snapped that one at AO 2014 and boy did that match go to the wire!)
But there again, Fed rules with a remarkable 23 between W 2004 and AO 2010. It seemed like Fed's would go on forever until Soderling decided that enough was enough at RG 2010.
There again, Nadal trains lamely with no better that 5 in a row ever.

Slam success in %:
Slams skipped (since 1st played): Nadal 15% :oops: (8 out of 53)- Fed 2.8% (2 out of 69)- Djoko 0% (played them all! 46)
1st round losses: Federer 8.6% (6) - Djoko 4.3% (2) - Nadal 3.7% (2)
2nd round : Nadal 9.4% (5) - Djokovic 4.3% (2) - Fed 1.4% (1)
3rd round: Nadal 9.4 (5) - Djoko 8.6 (4) - Fed 7.2 (5)
R16: Fed 11.5 (8) - Nadal 7.5 (4) - Djoko 4.3 (2)
QF: Djoko 13.0 (6) - Fed 11.5 (8) - Nadal 11.3 (6)
SF: Djoko 21.7 (10) - Fed 17.3 (12) - Nadal 5.6 (3)
F: Djoko 17.3 (8) - Fed 14.4 (10) - Nadal 11.3 (6)
W: Nadal - 26.4 (14) - Djoko 26.0 (12) - Fed 24.6 (17)
Worse than quarter: Nadal 45.2 (24) - Fed 31.8 (22) - Djoko 21.7 (10)
Quarter or better: Djoko 78.2 (36) - Fed 68.1 (47) - Nadal 54.7 (29)

Consistency may not be his forte but Nadal made the most of the opportunities he got with highest % of titles won.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top