HetTheGreaterer
Banned
You mean robotovic?Sure, but a lot of times he will win matches he should have lost (based on how poorly he is playing), simply by holding his serve and rolling the dice on the tiebreaker
You mean robotovic?Sure, but a lot of times he will win matches he should have lost (based on how poorly he is playing), simply by holding his serve and rolling the dice on the tiebreaker
![]()
10/10 meme. I rate 40 stars out of 15
I'll take a guess, Djokovic?Anyone can guess who I enjoy getting destroyed?![]()
Fedr had his moment at AO17, only fair to let Nole have his, right?Even Fed's most ardent critics like us have to hand it to him: he sure knows to keep entertaining in these later stages of his career.
Someone's choke is not treatFedr had his moment at AO17, only fair to let Nole have his, right?
Nole could've easily missed that passing shot at 40-30. Or any of the returns that he made in play. The fact is he had his back against the wall and refused to yield.Someone's choke is not treat
I enjoy watching Federer lose
The sad part is because of his serve he rarely ever gets "destroyed"
I thoroughly enjoyed Novak getting destroyed by the ENTIRE SPORTING INDUSTRY for the Adria Tour...Nole could've easily missed that passing shot at 40-30. Or any of the returns that he made in play. The fact is he had his back against the wall and refused to yield.
Poor Fedr....DESTROYED once more, LOLI enjoy watching Federer lose
The sad part is because of his serve he rarely ever gets "destroyed"
That was stupid. My only hope is that such a tournament with fans and full-capacity will ever be possible in the future.I loved it when Djokovic got destroyed by the ENTIRE SPORTING INDUSTRY for the Adria Tour...
Djokovic's version of this is when he plays the ugliest, pushiest tennis imaginable but his opponent somehow doesn't punish him for it. Then I'm forced to watch a really boring and ugly match for way longer than it should lastYou mean robotovic?
Unfortunately that is nowhere sight... the Citi Open cancelled yesterday and my inkling is that NY is soon to follow... What's the status with the Madrid Open? Will it be spectator-less??That was stupid. My only hope is that such a tournament with fans and full-capacity will ever be possible in the future.
FedrI'll take a guess, Djokovic?
Someone's choke is not treat
I don't know, but 2020 is out of the question for sure.Unfortunately that is nowhere sight... the Citi Open cancelled yesterday and my inkling is that NY is soon to follow... What's the status with the Madrid Open? Will it be spectator-less??
A part of me hates myself for it, but I genuinely do root against Nadal and Djokovic every single time I watch them play.
AO 19 was weird. In a way I enjoyed it because I was definitely rooting for Novak in that one. But Nadal was just playing so poorly that it wasn't fun to watch. Novak played pretty flawlessly, but I also think his level in that match is extremely overrated because he wasn't pushed at all. Nadal was spraying balls all day, right from the warm-up through to match point.Well put. Even when they deserve to win and clearly the better and more attacking player, I just can’t do it. Then I end up bearing a little grudge against the muppet who just couldn’t keep up their level and close it out.
That’s a big reason why I love guys like the Fog, Nick, Simon etc who just wont take Nadalovic s**t and can (too infrequently) finish the job.
AO19 Nadalovic was just so strange because I felt nothing. It was a fantastic denadalization but it was nullified because it was Novak playing clean aggressive tennis. Some denadalizations I can watch dozens of times, including by Novak (especially BO3 clay), but I have never returned to that one.
If you want some true Djokovic AO masterclass, I recommend the 2013 SF vs Ferrer. Now that's a match I will never get tired of rewatching!AO 19 was weird. In a way I enjoyed it because I was definitely rooting for Novak in that one. But Nadal was just playing so poorly that it wasn't fun to watch. Novak played pretty flawlessly, but I also think his level in that match is extremely overrated because he wasn't pushed at all. Nadal was spraying balls all day, right from the warm-up through to match point.
It's not a match with a lot of awesome Djokovic highlights that make Nadal look silly. It was just classic Novak placing the ball deep and his opponent not being able to handle it. Pretty boring match.
I've gone back and re-watched 2011 & 2016 to a masochistic level. Trust me, I know what a Djoker masterclass looks like down under.If you want some true Djokovic AO masterclass, I recommend the 2013 SF vs Ferrer. Now that's a match I will never get tired of rewatching!
update: the match was removed from YouTube on copyright claims. So much for that
If you want some true Djokovic AO masterclass, I recommend the 2013 SF vs Ferrer. Now that's a match I will never get tired of rewatching!
update: the match was removed from YouTube on copyright claims. So much for that
I haven't rewatched the full 2016 match since it happened. Was it really anything special from Novak? I remembered it as being a pretty routine, unremarkable match, at least compared to the epic performance against Federer in the semi.I've gone back and re-watched 2011 & 2016 to a masochistic level. Trust me, I know what a Djoker masterclass looks like down under.
Not a very amor v paz thread, I know, but there are certain players whom I enjoy most when they get destroyed. Like, absolutely get hit off the court.
When Zverev hype was at its peak, I enjoyed watching him lose. Especially when he would melt down and smash the hell out of his racquet(s).
Lately, my favourite walking wicket has been Aryna Sabalenka. It was particularly enjoyable to watch Anisimova and Yastremska destroy her with effortless, non grunt hitting while she screamed and huffed and puffed but found herself way out of court to get within a mile of the ball.
So who are the ones you enjoy watching lose? Especially those like Sabalenka who sulk massively when they lose, as if her losing to Anisimova is the upset of the millennium.
For 2016 I'm referring to the semi specifically. The early part of that match is still the highest level I can remember seeing from him.I haven't rewatched the full 2016 match since it happened. Was it really anything special from Novak? I remembered it as being a pretty routine, unremarkable match, at least compared to the epic performance against Federer in the semi.
2011 final is always a joy to watch though (unless you're a Murray fan). Djokovic was on fire that day.
It's one of my top 5, for sure. Fedr just had to ruin the moment by winning a set, smh...For 2016 I'm referring to the semi specifically. The early part of that match is still the highest level I can remember seeing from him.
I love it whenever Novak beats Federer, especially at Wimbledon, sorry.
Those losses have only added to his Wimby GOAT status.LOL, make that two! And with every loss to Djokovic, Federer's Wimbledon GOAT claim becomes more LOL worthy![]()
Those losses have only added to his Wimby GOAT status.
Still making finals in his mid 30s where only the #1 player in the world, another ATG and potential GOAT can stop him?Machan ... it adds to his accomplishments, no argument there. But losing to the same player repeatedly, a fellow GOAT candidate, how does that add to his Wimbledon GOAT status?
No, making a final only adds to his resume. Sampras was 7-0, Federer is 8-4. Federer isn't as invulnerable against his rivals as Sampras was, but he's still been there 5 more times than Pete. And 3 of those 4 losses came when Fed was past Sampras's retirement age.LOL, make that two! And with every loss to Djokovic, Federer's Wimbledon GOAT claim becomes more LOL worthy![]()
That's just being realistic, isn't it? As a Djokovic fan, let's say he's waiting in the final of RG and Nadal-Isner play the second semi. You're seriously telling me you're not rooting like hell for Isner to beat Rafa?
Still making finals in his mid 30s where only the #1 player in the world, another ATG and potential GOAT can stop him?
Hard to see how that makes him look worse unless you completely ignore his and Novak's ages in 2014-19.
His Wimbledon GOAT status is still completely unchallenged, so idk how these losses make it laughable.
No, making a final only adds to his resume. Sampras was 7-0, Federer is 8-4. Federer isn't as invulnerable against his rivals as Sampras was, but he's still been there 5 more times than Pete. And 3 of those 4 losses came when Fed was past Sampras's retirement age.
If I'm not mistaken it means something like "bro"I don't know what a Machan or Machi is and I'm a little afraid to find out.
I don't know what a Machan or Machi is and I'm a little afraid to find out.
If I'm not mistaken it means something like "bro"
meilleur amiMachi, you're fast![]()
No it does not.A good denadalization never gets old
She could have the elegance of Edberg or Fed, when she screams on every shot, her game is ugly.I don't think her game is ugly.
No, making a final only adds to his resume. Sampras was 7-0, Federer is 8-4. Federer isn't as invulnerable against his rivals as Sampras was, but he's still been there 5 more times than Pete. And 3 of those 4 losses came when Fed was past Sampras's retirement age.
Well Djokovic is head and shoulders above Sampras in the overall GOAT race, that's for sure.... and several of Djokovic's grand slam titles have come after Sampras's retirement age! GOAT!
no hay de que, amigoBest friend? That's what google saysThanks Machi
![]()
Well Djokovic is head and shoulders above Sampras in the overall GOAT race, that's for sure.