I think here in Southern California, you can play 3.5 USTA Tournaments and get a good challenge. keep up the good work.
Your forehands look good, but you have a lot of time to set up due to your opponent's high and slow balls. In 4.0, the games starts to go crazy with faster pace. You look like you work the ball well, hitting it side to side, corner to corner, working your opponent like a dog, but then again, he is not giving you much challeng with his high flying shots.
These threads are all the same!
And please if you're gonna post a video, do not preface it with "I'm not playing my best...not in top gear" stuff.
Just post it.
But I have to mention the fact ! I play according to the opposition I get, I have beaten this guy before and was hence relaxed and not so serious. About posting the video, this is first time I got a video of me playing, courtesy of my opponent, so I decided to post it ....
I cannot beleive the people who rate this guy as a 4.0 player. OP no disrespect but you are a 3.0 player. Period.
Here are some reasons why I think you are a 3.0 player.
1. In your entire video clip, forehand and backhand ground strokes are mostly (except one that I see) are landing way short, almost all close to serve line, and some shots inside the serve line. If you were playing with a 4.0 player all your balls landing that short will be punished.
2. I don't know if you purposefully making high bouncing shots with topspin to level your match with your friend, but your shots are way out of pace. Again, if you were playing with a 4.0 player, those slow paced balls will be good for your opponent to attack the net.
3. Your hitting partner's ball is seemingly not much of a challenge to you. If that was the case, and if you were to be a 4.0 player, the points should have been ended within 2-3 shots. A solid 4.0 player uses volleys and attacking the net, which I did not see in your clip. Even when you had a chance, you did not show any movement of coming into the net.
4. It is hard to tell just from this short clip with your serve. But I think there was one first serve in this clip, which is not a 4.0 player type serve.
Again OP, no disrespect to your game. In fact, I think you are a strong 3.0 player leading your way to 3.5 level. I just disagree with people who kind of over-rated. Good luck with your tennis!
I cannot beleive the people who rate this guy as a 4.0 player. OP no disrespect but you are a 3.0 player. Period.
Here are some reasons why I think you are a 3.0 player.
1. In your entire video clip, forehand and backhand ground strokes are mostly (except one that I see) are landing way short, almost all close to serve line, and some shots inside the serve line. If you were playing with a 4.0 player all your balls landing that short will be punished.
2. I don't know if you purposefully making high bouncing shots with topspin to level your match with your friend, but your shots are way out of pace. Again, if you were playing with a 4.0 player, those slow paced balls will be good for your opponent to attack the net.
3. Your hitting partner's ball is seemingly not much of a challenge to you. If that was the case, and if you were to be a 4.0 player, the points should have been ended within 2-3 shots. A solid 4.0 player uses volleys and attacking the net, which I did not see in your clip. Even when you had a chance, you did not show any movement of coming into the net.
4. It is hard to tell just from this short clip with your serve. But I think there was one first serve in this clip, which is not a 4.0 player type serve.
Again OP, no disrespect to your game. In fact, I think you are a strong 3.0 player leading your way to 3.5 level. I just disagree with people who kind of over-rated. Good luck with your tennis!
Thanks, we needed a random jerk to pop in and insult his tennis fashion. I feel complete now.
And yeah, the situation you were videotaping it under made it hard to judge that stuff, but I'd guess 3.5-4.0.
Work on that serve, though.
I cannot beleive the people who rate this guy as a 4.0 player. OP no disrespect but you are a 3.0 player. Period.
Here are some reasons why I think you are a 3.0 player.
1. In your entire video clip, forehand and backhand ground strokes are mostly (except one that I see) are landing way short, almost all close to serve line, and some shots inside the serve line. If you were playing with a 4.0 player all your balls landing that short will be punished.
2. I don't know if you purposefully making high bouncing shots with topspin to level your match with your friend, but your shots are way out of pace. Again, if you were playing with a 4.0 player, those slow paced balls will be good for your opponent to attack the net.
3. Your hitting partner's ball is seemingly not much of a challenge to you. If that was the case, and if you were to be a 4.0 player, the points should have been ended within 2-3 shots. A solid 4.0 player uses volleys and attacking the net, which I did not see in your clip. Even when you had a chance, you did not show any movement of coming into the net.
4. It is hard to tell just from this short clip with your serve. But I think there was one first serve in this clip, which is not a 4.0 player type serve.
Again OP, no disrespect to your game. In fact, I think you are a strong 3.0 player leading your way to 3.5 level. I just disagree with people who kind of over-rated. Good luck with your tennis!
No disrespect to you but you're out of your freaking mind. A 3.0 player can bearly keep the ball in play.
Do you people even play NTRP league tennis?
I cannot beleive the people who rate this guy as a 4.0 player. OP no disrespect but you are a 3.0 player. Period.
Here are some reasons why I think you are a 3.0 player.
1. In your entire video clip, forehand and backhand ground strokes are mostly (except one that I see) are landing way short, almost all close to serve line, and some shots inside the serve line. If you were playing with a 4.0 player all your balls landing that short will be punished.
2. I don't know if you purposefully making high bouncing shots with topspin to level your match with your friend, but your shots are way out of pace. Again, if you were playing with a 4.0 player, those slow paced balls will be good for your opponent to attack the net.
3. Your hitting partner's ball is seemingly not much of a challenge to you. If that was the case, and if you were to be a 4.0 player, the points should have been ended within 2-3 shots. A solid 4.0 player uses volleys and attacking the net, which I did not see in your clip. Even when you had a chance, you did not show any movement of coming into the net.
4. It is hard to tell just from this short clip with your serve. But I think there was one first serve in this clip, which is not a 4.0 player type serve.
Again OP, no disrespect to your game. In fact, I think you are a strong 3.0 player leading your way to 3.5 level. I just disagree with people who kind of over-rated. Good luck with your tennis!
I guess I brought some unhappy people here with my earlier post. Well, I do not have any intend to insult or disrespect OP's game. And, I am sorry if OP, you felt that way.
But, as I said, he, in my view, is a strong 3,0 player leading to 3.5 level, which I think, most of you called me "a random guy" agree with. Read my post again, if you missed. And I agree that OP has good strokes, both fore and back, control of the ball, etc.
I was just pointing out, to the people rated 4.0, that OP's play is not at 4.0 level. Cannot agree with that, because of the reasons I posted earlier.
And I think the reason for posting "rate my tennis" here in TW forum is to ask for tips for improvement, no? And I was giving tips for OP. Don't be so harsh on me, I'm actually a nice guy. Don't tell me that you guys cannot agree with my posting about 4.0 level player...
1. Some of his shots may be short, but they are often short ANGLED shots, stretching his opponent across the court, or are forced replies from extremely deep and high balls.
2. Federer practicing: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_yWePjInF8
Looks slow doesn't it, looks very different in real life even though he's just practicing. Now compare the speed in the OP's video to the video above, taking into consideration that the players in that vid are pros.
3. This I can't comment on, since his opponent is only visible for what, 5 seconds? So all I can tell is, his footwork is slightly hesitant, his serve needs some work, his groundstrokes are high and deep, and the OP got him running around a lot. Also, note from 1:45 -1:48 in the OP's vid how his opponent handled a relatively deep and decent-paced shot.
4. The serve technique needs some work, I agree. But the pace isn't too bad.
And similar to what you said, no disrespect to what you said, but I just disagree your assessment of the OP's game.
i have to admit that i do not know or care about rating, the way i see it thru this video, you can be 4.0 #1 single just to hit 6 feet over the net back and fourth? by the way, that's a hell of a series of nice lob.What is your opinion on the famous "4.0 #1 singles" video?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xB4RLZguN4
If you think anything less than 4.0, then you need to re-evaluate how you see tennis on video. I can point you to the record of this person (because it's me...) and prove that he is a lifetime 0.500+ 4.0 league player.
for the sake of learning, let's analyse OP forehand: OP basicly hit the ball with a body rotation and a large loop of his arm, a moderate whip forehand, arm and body move independently. hand have draw a C that the lower part of the C is a curve, that will result in a loopy from low to high forehand. his ball clear the net 2, 3 feet. For this kind of stroke, OP have an excellent talent to hit 4,5 shot in in a row. in order to hit penetrating shot, OP will have lot to do with his mechanic. in my humble opinion, a 4.0 and above should have a better forehand than this. Please visit hi-techtennis.com to see how a 5.0 excecute his forehand. it's a long way to learn, but a fun way. don't be discourage about i what said, after all, we are here for the learning.I. Read my post again, if you missed. And I agree that OP has good strokes, both fore and back, control of the ball, etc.
I cannot agree with your posting about 4.0. The game always looks slower on video than it is for real. The guy hits consistent topspin groundstrokes. That's definitely a 4.0 game, with the foundation to take it to 4.5. You're vastly underrating this video, presumably because you are vastly overrating what you think you look like on video and then comparing this video to that vision.
What is your opinion on the famous "4.0 #1 singles" video?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xB4RLZguN4
If you think anything less than 4.0, then you need to re-evaluate how you see tennis on video. I can point you to the record of this person (because it's me...) and prove that he is a lifetime 0.500+ 4.0 league player.
J.R.B., I think you are a .5 + 4.0 player. Much better than OP's game for sure. And, look I am aware of the video thing that you are keep talking about. I've been playing tennis for 13 years now, and beleive me I tapped my games a lot. With the video being slow, still what I see is that OP's and your game is different, your balls have much more depth (even considering that your opponent has a good depth too), your serve is much better than OP, much more pace on the balls. Your video tells me that my thinking of OP's game being at strong 3.0 (leading to 3.5) more sure. BTW, I always hear from people that I under-rate my game.
J.R.B., I think you are a .5 + 4.0 player. Much better than OP's game for sure. And, look I am aware of the video thing that you are keep talking about. I've been playing tennis for 13 years now, and beleive me I tapped my games a lot. With the video being slow, still what I see is that OP's and your game is different, your balls have much more depth (even considering that your opponent has a good depth too), your serve is much better than OP, much more pace on the balls. Your video tells me that my thinking of OP's game being at strong 3.0 (leading to 3.5) more sure. BTW, I always hear from people that I under-rate my game.
4.0 at least. 4.5 maybe. If you come to the US, sandbag at 3.5 for a year and go to nationals...
Dont mean to deflate egos or anything but no way youre 4.5. Im solid 4.5 and any of the points where you hit a slower short ball to me would be game over. Off the return of your serve you would be in trouble against alot of 4.0-4.5 level players I know. Your opponent wasnt skilled enough to make you pay, 4.0's and 4.5 will definitely make you pay. Possibly 4.0 but Im thinking that's a a bit of a stretch. Id say youre a solid 3.5. Keep working hard man!
Thanks RoddickAce![]()
You're welcome, but I was just calling it as I see it.
Like I said earlier, I believe you could be a 4.5 if you slightly refine your footwork and improve your serve technique.
Here are a few things I noticed that might help you refine your game. It seems like you have what it takes to go to the next level, but there are just some techical flaws.
Your footwork is pretty good right now, but it seems to lack explosiveness. One thing that I think will help refine your footwork is the split-step. Right before your opponent is about to hit the ball, do a slight hop. This will let you be more explosive with your footwork.
To be honest, if you watch your serve in slow motion, the form isn't too off. It's just that your swing isn't too explosive, and the timing of your weight transfer is a bit off. I think you just need to practice more and get more comfortable and natural with the service motion.
I like your forehand; very nice placement when attacking with angles.
On your backhand (I think I only saw one backhand aside from the return of serve), you might want to bring your racquet up before bringing it down to your hip on your takeback. Kind of like this: http://www.goroger.net/set/article/tennismag060808bh01.jpg
Good luck with your game!
He was referring to the OP... based on the video... not himself.
JRB's already stated he's USTA #1 4.0
And to avoid confusion, I don't mean the #1 4.0 in the USTA. LOL. Just the guy in that video.
As for the OP, I wouldn't put him at 4.5 because his opponent was not good enough to see how he handled shots under pressure that he would face in a 4.5 match here in the states, but his strokes have the potential to get there. Very nice consistent topspin groundies.
I think people need to stop being so fixated about this NTRP rating business. You win some, you lose some. End of story.
You play #1 spot on your league team, correct?
Mostly. I almost always play singles, although our captain sometimes mixes up who plays on which court (not that it really matters...). In the match on that video, I was playing the #1 singles court.
If you ever make it out west here, I'd love to play a match
I've been trying to find an opening on a 4.0 or 4.5 league for 3 weeks, now... I didn't realize it would be this difficult.
again, for the sake of learning, let analyse OP topspin: OP drawn a C with his large loop. the bottom of the C is a curve (supposed to be a straight line ) do to this mechanic, OP generate his topspin with a low to high racket path. ball clear the net high and land down with gravity: that's the old basic topspin, hitting hard this way, ball will find the fence. Ball should be hitted with a straight line (not a curve) to generated more impact and easier to aim. Topsin should be use with WW or a tilt racket face to conserve all energy. All 4.0 if do not know and execute this, then it is a disgrace to all of all 4.0 out there.Very nice consistent topspin groundies.
again, for the sake of learning, let analyse OP topspin: OP drawn a C with his large loop. the bottom of the C is a curve (supposed to be a straight line ) do to this mechanic, OP generate his topspin with a low to high racket path. ball clear the net high and land down with gravity: that's the old basic topspin, hitting hard this way, ball will find the fence. Ball should be hitted with a straight line (not a curve) to generated more impact and easier to aim. Topsin should be use with WW or a tilt racket face to conserve all energy. All 4.0 if do not know and execute this, then it is a disgrace to all of all 4.0 out there.
again, for the sake of learning, let analyse OP topspin: OP drawn a C with his large loop. the bottom of the C is a curve (supposed to be a straight line ) do to this mechanic, OP generate his topspin with a low to high racket path. ball clear the net high and land down with gravity: that's the old basic topspin, hitting hard this way, ball will find the fence. Ball should be hitted with a straight line (not a curve) to generated more impact and easier to aim. Topsin should be use with WW or a tilt racket face to conserve all energy. All 4.0 if do not know and execute this, then it is a disgrace to all of all 4.0 out there.
there is several ways to create topspin:You have no clue about what a topspin stroke is about.
the harder you hit, the more brush up the racket face (topspin) is needed. these are independent motion, not just hit hard and the topspin is built in. Low to high can help you get the ball in, but not with all your force, just go out and try will see. no need discusion. what i think is you brush the ball up unintentionally (talent) but you do not notice.That sounds strange, since its my forehand, I can tell you that the harder I hit more rpm I can put on the ball.
if thats 4.0 ide take 4.0s to pieces and im an avarage 14yo player
there is several ways to create topspin:
1- hit from low to high
2- Windshield Wiper
3-Tilt racket face
4- snap the wrist with a tilt racket face
5- combination of these
now, tell me what is your clue?
seem like you agree with me on brushing up the ball. there is no need to say no clue or have clue. Nadal hit with exagerated low to high, he fisnish his hand above his head, but if you notice clearly, he brush up the ball with a wrist snap forcefully.Next time you are watching somebody like Nadal, see how much clearance he gets over the net like your "old basic topspin".
By the way, the best way to communicate in public is politeness. nice message reach people ear better. IMHO