Women have better genetic , they can bring life and are aging slower than men .
For me 3 sets are half marathon , 5 sets are the full marathon of endurance .
The fact remains that ALL top women, world wide competed in All snactioned women's tournaments as well as the slams before 1968, until now. Again the Open Era ONLY applies to Men's tennis.Good point(s). Admittedly, this is a side point to the thread, but my command of women's tennis history may be a little off.
There was in (1970 or 1971) a Virginia Slims pro circuit which came before the WTA. And by '73, the US Open offered the same prize money to men and women. While professionals could play at the men's slams by the middle of 1968, when was that truly opened for women?...I know that there was no competing tour. I would guess that the larger prize money available to women in the early 70s did make the sport more open to players outside of (and even within) US, Australia and Great Britain.
RG>USO>W>AO>OGHere’s how I would order them if he can only win one more
WB>USO>RG>OG>AO
Why RG first? For the 4x CGS?RG>USO>W>AO>OG
yesWhy RG first? For the 4x CGS?
Why? On the contrary, he may lose motivation if he wins Olympics. And if he doesn’t win, he will be motivated to win in 2028 on HC.Olympics easily.
I feel if he doesn't win it this year he'll get very disappointed and experience massive loss of motivation, thus end his career maybe at the end of the year or during the next one.
Not many, since tennis was not an Olympic Sport for many years. Also, in some years not all top players competed, ss the year Agassi won. In the open era only: Agassi, Nadal, Murray- a near ATG- has won an OG, as far as I can recall. A tournament played only once every four years, should not be taken seriously.Djokovic is one of the all time great, but there are other ATG have a Gold Medal
Not many, since tennis was not an Olympic Sport for many years. Also, in some years not all top players competed, ss the year Agassi won. In the open era only: Agassi, Nadal, Murray- a near ATG- has won an OG, as far as I can recall. A tournament played only once every four years, should not be taken seriously.
Why? On the contrary, he may lose motivation if he wins Olympics. And if he doesn’t win, he will be motivated to win in 2028 on HC.
Don't you want to see the confrontations between Alcaraz, Sinner, Rune against the old wolf in the following seasons?I think he's achieved all he could. He should retire ASAP.
At the Latest.There's no way he'll play professional tennis in 2028. Best case scenario he ends his career in mid 2026, but I think it'll be during 2025.
I want one more USO, so he can be tied with Pete at 2 majors! I would love that, plus some what corrects his terrible USO finals record.One more Wimbledon title.
Become the greatest grand slam champion in singles of all time, mens or womens. Retire by setting the new gold standard.
I will take any slam over OG pleaseDepends what slam it is.
I’d prefer him to win an olympic gold over another Australia or French.
However, I’d prefer him tying the Wimbledon record or open era us open record over Olympic gold.
Overall it’s a tough choice. To be honest he has the most slams of any male player which most important so overall I might lean olympic gold to complete set.
He will never beat Sinner againDon't you want to see the confrontations between Alcaraz, Sinner, Rune against the old wolf in the following seasons?
![]()
He needs the Olympics as in 10 years time it will have superceded the slams importance wise. Alcaraz for instance has already said he would prioritise the OG over the FO this season.Depends what slam it is.
I’d prefer him to win an olympic gold over another Australia or French.
However, I’d prefer him tying the Wimbledon record or open era us open record over Olympic gold.
Overall it’s a tough choice. To be honest he has the most slams of any male player which most important so overall I might lean olympic gold to complete set.
Well, that is pretty much that thenI doubt Djokovic fans have any connection with Djokovic on this issue.
Djokovic cried on the court after losing the Olympics, twice.
Fans won't understand that pain, and are just obsessed with non-existent things like "goat".
![]()
Thats sort of the point. As time goes on the bigger the Olympics gets for the reasons you make. Its something for instance as time goes on will be a big advantage for Agassi over Sampras given he also won all the Majors which Pete didnt. Their h2h though the counter pointPeople who want an olympics gold over a slam just don't understand Tennis properly or maybe they are all post 2012 fans, for them olympics is important because all their lives they've known it to be one.
Thats sort of the point. As time goes on the bigger the Olympics gets for the reasons you make. Its something for instance as time goes on will be a big advantage for Agassi over Sampras given he also won all the Majors which Pete didnt. Their h2h though the counter point
No surprise the Capy crew contributed to the lolympics section in the poll.
Would be nice and all but the main thrill has always been at Slams.
Nadal also has a singles Olympic Gold Medal from 2008.A. Zverev has a gold medal and 0 slams.
A. Murray has a gold medal and 3 slams.
R. Nadal has a gold medal (doubles) and 22 slams.
Updated. ThanksNadal also has a singles Olympic Gold Medal from 2008.
Updated. Thanks
Of course. Whenever tennis Olympics are discussed, it's a moral obligation to mention Sir A. Murray.You also need to update "A. Murray has a gold medal and 3 slams". to "Murray has 2 gold medals (both singles) and 3 Slams".
I want one more USO, so he can be tied with Pete at 2 majors! I would love that, plus some what corrects his terrible USO finals record.
History gets re-written for many reasons. Court for instance is almost being airbrushed out of the sport!Yeah, Agassi's CGS became more important in 00s and 2010s after Big 3 won it in the homogenous era but in 90s this was not considered that big a deal because Agassi was much below Pete in 90s. History gets revisioned every era, it is inevitable as new immature fans join the fold and look at things from their own lens.
Now let's see if he wins gold.2024 Olympics gold. Defeating Nadal to win on his home court
Gold would be great, but any medal will do.Now let's see if he wins gold.
I believe it's gold or nothing.Gold would be great, but any medal will do.
I think he's achieved all he could. He should retire ASAP.
Yes, which is why I'd go 4th French Open title (win all 4 slams at least 4 times) > 8th Wimbledon title (tied for most Wimbledon titles ever) > 5th US Open title (tied for most USO titles ever) > Olympic Gold > 11th AO title (Djokovic already holds the record there)Another interesting Big3 stat
1) won all 4 slams atleast once - Fed
2) won all 4 slams atleast twice - Nadal
3) won all 4 slams atleast thrice - Djok