ROCKinCourier
Rookie
Strung up/revived one of my old PSO85's with a full bed of gut @ 54lbs -- gonna be fun and silky smooth to hit with this weekend ....


Last edited:
Strung up/revived one of my old PSO85's with a full bed of gut @ 54lbs -- gonna be fun and silky smooth to hit with this weekend ....
![]()
![]()
I have the Prostaff 85 but I find it extremely hard to play with, it's fast but doesn't have the plowthrough of my BLX90. As a result I can't hit anything deep![]()
*whisper* lead tape…
Can't get the leaded Pro Staff 85 to work like my BLX90 leaded :evil: I must be doing something wrong, never liked the Pro Staff 85.
what do you want to achieve by customizing the PS 85? What kind of game do you want to play with it?
I wanted to get more stability off the PS85 as it is lighter than my BLX90 and I struggle to keep the shots deep with the 85, but leading the PS85 didn't work out so well cuz it became too hard to maneuver.
have you tried depolarized lead placement (some lead at 3/9 and on/around the top of the handle)? It will make the racquet much more solid and let it hit a penetrating shot quite easily, but without increasing the swing weight too much. Just add so much lead tape (in this fashion) so that you reach your ideal swing weight and the racquet should play fine (actually awesome really). Back in the days of the PS 85, almost all the players using it were using this customization (especially Sampras who probably had more lead than the actual racquet :lol.
Which version you got?I have the Prostaff 85 but I find it extremely hard to play with, it's fast but doesn't have the plowthrough of my BLX90. As a result I can't hit anything deep![]()
Which version you got?
I have one Taiwan version, and one TW re-issued version. They don't feel very different, and they weigh about the same on my scale.
I've always wondered how you can tell the difference. I've never known which ones I have.
A sizable portion of remaining new IG Prestiges just exited the market.
![]()
Have only bought 2 new racquets in the last 7yrs[long time Yonex 001 Mid abuser], here's hoping for another 7. Got a good deal too, less than $120 each.
![]()
Here they are with some old friends.
My Head Liquidmetal Instinct Tour XL frames and Head Tour Team Monstercombi bag. Racquets are strung with Tourna Big Hitter Silver Rough at 58 pounds, feature a TW 22mm x 1300mm x 1.3mm leather grip, Tournagrip, and SampDamp.
Original buttcaps were replaced with generic Head buttcaps. This is due to the fact that the original silver disk inlay on the original buttcaps tend to pop out during play.
![]()
![]()
![]()
A sizable portion of remaining new IG Prestiges just exited the market.
![]()
Have only bought 2 new racquets in the last 7yrs[long time Yonex 001 Mid abuser], here's hoping for another 7. Got a good deal too, less than $120 each.
![]()
Here they are with some old friends.
A sizable portion of remaining new IG Prestiges just exited the market.
![]()
Have only bought 2 new racquets in the last 7yrs[long time Yonex 001 Mid abuser], here's hoping for another 7. Got a good deal too, less than $120 each.
![]()
Here they are with some old friends.
The IG Prestige Mid is one sweet racquet! Closest to the Prestige Classic I have hit with.
Well the Taiwan version has "Taiwan" printed on the buttcap; and the TW re-issued version, I bought it from TW last year when the re-issued it, so yeah.....................As for St.Vincent version, never seen any.
Yes, they are mids. The Yonexes actually look in very good shape, I have taken care of all 6 extremely well, never whacked, dropped or tossed any of them but regular use has taken its cost and they've lost much of their rigidity, and so with it their stability, sweetspot and control.Mids I assume. Great reviews here. They look lovely. What has become of the yonexes??? What shape are they in?
I have never hit with one but I needed to replace the Classics so I spent much time reading what was best. In particular, your posts were the most helpful. Here's hoping it was the correct choiceThe IG Prestige Mid is one sweet racquet! Closest to the Prestige Classic I have hit with.
Yes, they are mids. The Yonexes actually look in very good shape, I have taken care of all 6 extremely well, never whacked, dropped or tossed any of them but regular use has taken its cost and they've lost much of their rigidity, and so with it their stability, sweetspot and control.
I have never hit with one but I needed to replace the Classics so I spent much time reading what was best. In particular, your posts were the most helpful. Here's hoping it was the correct choice
![]()
So what does this mean? All four of my PSO85's are like this (by the way, the hit this morning was awesome!!) ...
![]()
So Head spend 10 years developing new technology and tells the customers it's the best when every version comes out. Now they run out of stuffs to BS, so they tell the customers their 10 year old racquet is the best ? Another piece of evidence that proves all that "new technologies" are fake. Because Wilson claims their recent Tour 90 has "same graphite braiding as the original Pro Staff 90" for best feel.
Yes, they are mids. The Yonexes actually look in very good shape, I have taken care of all 6 extremely well, never whacked, dropped or tossed any of them but regular use has taken its cost and they've lost much of their rigidity, and so with it their stability, sweetspot and control.
I have never hit with one but I needed to replace the Classics so I spent much time reading what was best. In particular, your posts were the most helpful. Here's hoping it was the correct choice
![]()
As far as I know nobody spends 10 years developing any kind of technologies. Most technology is BS marketing. There has been no real advancement in racquet tech in over 25 years. They just make the racquets different every 2 years to try and get you to buy the new racquet.
As far as I know nobody spends 10 years developing any kind of technologies. Most technology is BS marketing. There has been no real advancement in racquet tech in over 25 years. They just make the racquets different every 2 years to try and get you to buy the new racquet.
What is the latest REAL Technology?
What is the latest REAL Technology?
I wonder if you have the vaunted unibody PS85 that seemed to be in production only briefly.I have the Prostaff 85 but I find it extremely hard to play with, it's fast but doesn't have the plowthrough of my BLX90. As a result I can't hit anything deep![]()
![]()
Here they are with some old friends.
I wonder if you have the vaunted unibody PS85 that seemed to be in production only briefly.
I have an early China Impact font PS85 and it is supremely rock solid, it's like playing with a piece of granite. I also have a BLX Tour 90 and it's not near as solid even with fairly long strips of lead tape at 3+9.
![]()
In terms of the patents, I would argue that its Prince's O3/Exo3 technology.
Just lovely, what are the specs on these GOAT xls?
Prince has HOLES in their technology.![]()
It's still the only original technology in the last 20 years.
It's still the only original technology in the last 20 years.
Ok there are the mines. 2x TGK238.4 personal from Marco Trungelliti (a young argentinian tennis player), 1 PT630, and 1 PT57a LM Radical PJ personal racquet of Fabrice Santoro, come from Gaston Gaudio.
imagen jpg
hosting imagenes
![]()
Just got my three V Core Tour G 310g in the mail today and a 9 pack pro bag.
i really like the new paint. hows the bag?
Finally got round to collecting all the sticks & shoes together. Some of these frames will be up for sale soon, UK only I'm afraid. Details to come soon.[/URL][/IMG]![]()