110 is marked zero in the sheet109. [6] Alexander Zverev (GER) vs. [Q] Marco Cecchinato (ITA) - (3-29) 25th Cecchinato
110. Federico Coria (ARG) vs. Jannik Sinner (ITA) - (11-9) 26th Sinner
My mistake, lots of people picked Coria, must have accidentally typed it in wrong for you. Fixed.110 is marked zero in the sheet
Something I just learned when scanning odds on this match:122. [13] Andrey Rublev (RUS) vs. [5] Stefanos Tsitsipas (GRE) - (15-7) 31st
Not so sure that's right.Something I just learned when scanning odds on this match:
Stefanos Tsitsipas (GRC) is the proper 3-letter abbreviation for Greece.
NATO/EU code is GRC; FIFA/IOC is GRE. Maybe we split the difference and make it GRD.
NATO/EU code is GRC; FIFA/IOC is GRE. Maybe we split the difference and make it GRD.
NATO/EU code is GRC; FIFA/IOC is GRE. Maybe we split the difference and make it GRD.
Go to HELlas. Hope that’s Greek to you.GRK maybe?![]()
Cancel Sinner.123. [12] Diego Schwartzman (ARG) vs. [3] Dominic Thiem (AUT) - (19-5)
124. Jannik Sinner (ITA) vs. [2] Rafael Nadal (ESP) - (35-3)
Cancel Sinner.123. [12] Diego Schwartzman (ARG) vs. [3] Dominic Thiem (AUT) - (19-5)
124. Jannik Sinner (ITA) vs. [2] Rafael Nadal (ESP) - (35-3)
Gracias Schwartzman vamos
This makes no sense.Timestamp RG match began at 1:37:10. My post: 1:37:08. PDJ's post: 1:37:28. My second post: 1:38:09.
PDJ's cancellation was late, my re-pick for Sinner was late, but my cancellation was buzzer-beater, as per the PDL's ruling that RG timeclock is the more accurate time measurement.
It takes time for databases to update. I did the exact same thing with my re-pick, and it took 40 seconds for your update to reach my computer and my post to go through. Yours took 20 seconds. You can check the timestamps by looking in the Inspect Element.This makes no sense.
@Big_Dangerous please check the times.
I literally posted seconds after Triple as I was waiting on his predictable change and had my post ready just to press send.
Except the length of the match is shorter than my post.It takes time for databases to update. I did the exact same thing with my re-pick, and it took 40 seconds for your update to reach my computer and my post to go through. Yours took 20 seconds. You can check the timestamps by looking in the Inspect Element.
Go ahead, I'm only changing picks because you're tactically picking based on my picks. You can check the timestamps. The match timer started at 1:37:10. Your post has a timestamp of 1:37:28. You're definitely late. Don't know what to tell you.Except the length of the match is shorter than my post.
I wouldn't even have to think about it, or pay attention if you were not changing picks.
I'm just used to it and therefore ready to counter in this instance.
I had good faith in Diego and even had some money on him! Glad he pulled it out in 5Gracias Schwartzman vamos
@Big_DangerousGo ahead, I'm only changing picks because you're tactically picking based on my picks. You can check the timestamps. The match timer started at 1:37:10. Your post has a timestamp of 1:37:28. You're definitely late. Don't know what to tell you.
I agree.My thought would be that you both made posts cancelling your pick at 15:37 (my time in the central time zone) or 22:37 RG time. I would say that either the cancellation should count for both of you or neither of you. I don't think it's worth qubbling over 20 seconds because it's hard to know exactly and precisely what the time stamp that first ball went into play.
@gn your thoughts?
I'm content with either both being counted or not counted.I agree.
I made a ruling in PDL game where PDJ picks were in by 26 seconds based on RG website.But that one doesn't have timestamp and if admins are not around, it would be difficult to know the exact start time. I think in the future, we should just stick with flashscore,xscores even though they round off the timestamp. If a match start at 10:02, you pick at 10:01 but flashscore says 10:00 then your pick is invalid. What do you think?
My thought would be that you both made posts cancelling your pick at 15:37 (my time in the central time zone) or 22:37 RG time. I would say that either the cancellation should count for both of you or neither of you. I don't think it's worth qubbling over 20 seconds because it's hard to know exactly and precisely what the time stamp that first ball went into play.
@gn your thoughts?
I'm not good with this ruling. 20 seconds might not be worth quibbling about to you, but it is to me. The same sort of shenanigans happened in PDL where I made my final change several minutes in advance, well ahead of any questioning. @PDJ on the other hand made a change 26 seconds before the first ball was hit.I agree.
I made a ruling in PDL game where PDJ picks were in by 26 seconds based on RG website.But that one doesn't have timestamp and if admins are not around, it would be difficult to know the exact start time. I think in the future, we should just stick with flashscore,xscores even though they round off the timestamp. If a match start at 10:02, you pick at 10:01 but flashscore says 10:00 then your pick is invalid. What do you think?