duaneeo
Legend
Roger: 20
Rafa: 17
Novak: 14
Zverev: 8
I would LOVE for this to happen!!
Roger: 20
Rafa: 17
Novak: 14
Zverev: 8
Some Fed fans think Roger has NO chance to win one more slam. This is recency bias at it’s worst.
We know hand injury issues have plagued him since Wimby18, which he admitted affected his forehand (despite which he had a increasingly better latter half of the season). This is good news because there is hope he can recover a better state of play than the last 6 months
Assuming he can keep scheduling his season well and stay fit, I don’t see why him winning another Wimbledon or a fast court AO is out if the question.
The age issue is overblown. Connors was in the semis at the USO in his 40s. Roger has an infinitely better suited game than Connors for playing at a later age.
I wouldn’t write him off just yet.
Excellent post!Some Fed fans think Roger has NO chance to win one more slam. This is recency bias at it’s worst.
We know hand injury issues have plagued him since Wimby18, which he admitted affected his forehand (despite which he had a increasingly better latter half of the season). This is good news because there is hope he can recover a better state of play than the last 6 months
Assuming he can keep scheduling his season well and stay fit, I don’t see why him winning another Wimbledon or a fast court AO is out if the question.
The age issue is overblown. Connors was in the semis at the USO in his 40s. Roger has an infinitely better suited game than Connors for playing at a later age.
I wouldn’t write him off just yet.
@NKDM Actually it’s the antithesis of regency bias. I base my belief that Fed won’t win any more slams on the entirety of tennis history. If he wins another slam, he will be the oldest champion to do so.Some Fed fans think Roger has NO chance to win one more slam. This is recency bias at it’s worst.
@NKDM Actually it’s the antithesis of regency bias. I base my belief that Fed won’t win any more slams on the entirety of tennis history. If he wins another slam, he will be the oldest champion to do so.
Well he caught 17 even faster than I predicted so anything else will be gravy at this point. Nadal is almost certain to hit 20 this year.I think Djokovic will now win at least 4 more before he retires. After that I have no idea. 4 more for me seems like a lock. The movement is still there, the serve, the return, the hunger. I think 4 more is a lock at this point.
Hahaha.Fed: 20
Nadal: 17-18
Djokovic: 15-16
Yeah, I think many people underestimated both Rafa and Novak. Those who don't make predictions are never wrong. There's no shame though - those champions are redefining the sport as it is now.Hahaha.
ImbaNovak: I can see Novak getting 3 or maybe 4 in the next 8 slams. The distribution is impossible to predict, but I think 1 or 2 AO, 1 WIM, and 1 US or maybe French, if Rafa falls off.
Rafa: Close to guaranteed for 1 of the next 2 RG. 95% of 1 RG, 70% at 2. I could also see a US or Wimby, but maybe ~40% chance of that over the next 2 years. Don't see an AO.
Fed: We have been writing him off for years, but one of these has to be his last... and given how he played at the end of last season, I think AO18 might have been it.
Novak: 17 probably.
Rafa: 19 or so.
Fed: Still the frontrunner at 20.
Nostradamus here is halfway home lol20, 20, 19, i.e., Nadal and Novak take 7 of the next 8.
This is aging like fine wineIt put into perspective how unlikely Nadal is to catch Federer the gap between them in regards to slams is the same as it was 13 years ago!
Nadal has zero chance of eclipsing Federer. Djokovic has zero chance of eclipsing Federer. The only race is between Nadal and Djokovic for who finishes second.
Yeah, I think many people underestimated both Rafa and Novak.
It really is only 8 tournaments. I have Novak pegged for the next 2 but it gets dicey after that as he might lose motivation again. Honestly if he got the Calendar Slam he might just call it a day given what happened in 2016. With guys like Anderson and Cilic sneaking in I think 2 of 8 Slams have to be won by wildcard guys so that leaves 6 for the Big 3. Federer's 2017 is a complete outlier for sure but you pencil him in for 1 Slam because he's the GOAT and deserves that BoD. So with 5 remaining and me already have said I think Novak gets 2 this year I'll finish it by saying 3-2-1 in Novak's favor. Nadal has won 1 Slam in 5 years outside of the French and as much of a safety net as it is, cannot be endless and I really don't see more than 2 Slams next 2 years.
Federer: 21
Nadal: 19
Djokovic: 17
AO 19: Djoker (Fed 20, Rafa 17, Djoker 15)
RG 19: Rafa (Fed 20, Rafa 18, Djoker 15)
WIM 19: Djoker (Fed 20, Rafa 18, Djoker 16)
USO 19: Djoker (Fed 20, Rafa 18, Djoker 17)
AO 20: Djoker (Fed 20, Rafa 18, Djoker 18)
RG 20: Rafa (Fed 20, Rafa 19, Djoker 18)
WIM: Djoker (Fed 20, Rafa 19, Djoker 19)
USO: None of the big 3 (Fed 20, Rafa 19, Djoker 19)
After this Rafa will be gunning for 20 at RG 2021 which, although he'll be an old man, will make him ultra-motivated. Snagging that elusive second AO in 2019 would greatly boost his chances of making 20 also.
Djoker is a year younger so he has time but is also behind the other two so anything less than a multi-slam year could be fatal to his chance of making 20.
Fed is still capable at slams but at 38 is more susceptible to the field. He would need the seas to part for him to get 21.
lolololololI'm loathe to make predictions, but I think this is reasonable.
However, I wonder if it's selling the rest of the field short -- only 2 out of 8?
Way to scoop up a reply from 15 months ago. Timely.lololololol
Don't worry, I don't hold it against you. I'm sure I could dig up some of my first posts from early 2019 that ended up incorrect. I thought it was funny that you said OP was underselling the next gen when he may in fact have been "overselling" the next gen.Way to scoop up a reply from 15 months ago. Timely.
All true, and in good fun. And yeah, though I'm an immense Big 3 fan, I did not envision 13 straight!Don't worry, I don't hold it against you. I'm sure I could dig up some of my first posts from early 2019 that ended up incorrect. I thought it was funny that you said OP was underselling the next gen when he may in fact have been "overselling" the next gen.
I think the likeliest way you get it right is if Thiem wins RG, Djokovic wins WIM/USO.If Djokovic wins RG my prediction is right on track. Also, if Djokovic wins RG and Wimbledon and Thiem or someone else other than Fedalovic wins the US Open I've picked it like a dirty nose.
I think the likeliest way you get it right is if Thiem wins RG, Djokovic wins WIM/USO.
Maybe it wasn't even overestimation but desperation to see a change finally take place on top...I think many people overestimated the NextGens.
Yeah, I think many people underestimated both Rafa and Novak. Those who don't make predictions are never wrong. There's no shame though - those champions are redefining the sport as it is now.
5 slams later... Rafole won all 5...This is as realistic a prediction as it comes. It factors in age and the inevitable rise of young power players who will blow the big 3 off the court. It’s coming.
I gave him like for laughing me...Hahaha.
AO 19: Djoker (Fed 20, Rafa 17, Djoker 15)
RG 19: Rafa (Fed 20, Rafa 18, Djoker 15)
WIM 19: Djoker (Fed 20, Rafa 18, Djoker 16)
USO 19: Djoker (Fed 20, Rafa 18, Djoker 17)
AO 20: Djoker (Fed 20, Rafa 18, Djoker 18)
RG 20: Rafa (Fed 20, Rafa 19, Djoker 18)
WIM: Djoker (Fed 20, Rafa 19, Djoker 19)
USO: None of the big 3 (Fed 20, Rafa 19, Djoker 19)
After this Rafa will be gunning for 20 at RG 2021 which, although he'll be an old man, will make him ultra-motivated. Snagging that elusive second AO in 2019 would greatly boost his chances of making 20 also.
Djoker is a year younger so he has time but is also behind the other two so anything less than a multi-slam year could be fatal to his chance of making 20.
Fed is still capable at slams but at 38 is more susceptible to the field. He would need the seas to part for him to get 21.
Tito does very well when it comes to predictions, I've noticed. Another reason why he's one of my favorite Rafans.This was EXTREMELY close to being DEAD ON accurate.
Literally only missed on USO 19 and WIM 20 being cancelled. 6/7 slams played, predicted accurately.
Very nice call!
Tito does very well when it comes to predictions, I've noticed. Another reason why he's one of my favorite Rafans.
It was a great call.. most likely would have been 100% true not for throat of that lineswoman.I just can't see Federer winning Slams. (Yes, we've said this numerous times only to be disproven). But he's 37 now. He's given everything he's got and more over the last 2 decades. We've been privileged to watch the legendary career unfold. But as much as we wished it, time never freezes.
Nadal: 3 more over the next 2 years (2 RG's, and one Wimbledon or possibly USO). Attackdal of 2018 who only lost 2 completed matches will be a scary opponent for the field
Djokovic: 4 more (3 AO, 1 more USO, or 2 and 2. As much as I would love to see him play into his 30's like Fed and Agassi and win 4 more AO, I can't pin my hopes on that because it's a setup for disappointment)
Nadal and Federer finish with 20, Djokovic with 18. Djokovic finishes as the undisputed AO GOAT and Nadal the undisputed RG GOAT, and Fed the Wimbledon GOAT.
I also did pretty well here. Rafa pulled off the USO I put him at 40% chance of getting (by the skin of his teeth), Novak pulled off an AO that was really close but lost out on a USO that was his for the taking.Novak: I can see Novak getting 3 or maybe 4 in the next 8 slams. The distribution is impossible to predict, but I think 1 or 2 AO, 1 WIM, and 1 US or maybe French, if Rafa falls off.
Rafa: Close to guaranteed for 1 of the next 2 RG. 95% of 1 RG, 70% at 2. I could also see a US or Wimby, but maybe ~40% chance of that over the next 2 years. Don't see an AO.
Fed: We have been writing him off for years, but one of these has to be his last... and given how he played at the end of last season, I think AO18 might have been it.
Novak: 17 probably.
Rafa: 19 or so.
Fed: Still the frontrunner at 20.
This aged wellIt put into perspective how unlikely Nadal is to catch Federer the gap between them in regards to slams is the same as it was 13 years ago!
Nadal has zero chance of eclipsing Federer. Djokovic has zero chance of eclipsing Federer. The only race is between Nadal and Djokovic for who finishes second.
Nadal hit 20 as most predicted.Some Fed fans think Roger has NO chance to win one more slam. This is recency bias at it’s worst.
We know hand injury issues have plagued him since Wimby18, which he admitted affected his forehand (despite which he had a increasingly better latter half of the season). This is good news because there is hope he can recover a better state of play than the last 6 months
Assuming he can keep scheduling his season well and stay fit, I don’t see why him winning another Wimbledon or a fast court AO is out if the question.
The age issue is overblown. Connors was in the semis at the USO in his 40s. Roger has an infinitely better suited game than Connors for playing at a later age.
I wouldn’t write him off just yet.
BamosIt put into perspective how unlikely Nadal is to catch Federer the gap between them in regards to slams is the same as it was 13 years ago!
Nadal has zero chance of eclipsing Federer. Djokovic has zero chance of eclipsing Federer. The only race is between Nadal and Djokovic for who finishes second.
It put into perspective how unlikely Nadal is to catch Federer the gap between them in regards to slams is the same as it was 13 years ago!
Nadal has zero chance of eclipsing Federer. Djokovic has zero chance of eclipsing Federer. The only race is between Nadal and Djokovic for who finishes second.
The 1st posts are hilarious
That’s why you should never say “they won’t do this” as if it’s a fact. Better to just be honest and say “I don’t think they’ll do this”.
Bump any prediction thread of today in 5 years and they will be hilarious as well.
Chum Jetze!It put into perspective how unlikely Nadal is to catch Federer the gap between them in regards to slams is the same as it was 13 years ago!
Nadal has zero chance of eclipsing Federer. Djokovic has zero chance of eclipsing Federer. The only race is between Nadal and Djokovic for who finishes second.
Pretty happy with this, C virus ended up taking the NextGen spot in my predictionFederer: I think he has no slams left in him, but we’ve saying that for ages, so I give him one last hurrah at the Australian Open.
Nadal: He’s definitely got the next two French Opens, I think he can win one or two more out of clay. Hopefully one Australian Open, maybe another Wimbledon. So 3-4
Djokovic: I say Novak takes the other three, I was originally thinking the NextGen take one, but they sure as hell ain’t taking one from Nole.
Overall, I say Djokovic takes 2019 AO, Nadal takes RG and Wimbledon, either Djokovic or a NextGen for USO (I know I said NextGen ain’t taking one from Djokovic, but keep reading). 2020 AO, either Djokovic takes it or Fedr has his last hurrah, RG for Rafa, Wimbledon goes to Djokodal or NextGen, the USO is between Djokodal. Tally then stands at
Fedr: 21
Nadl: 20-21
Djokr: 17-18