There's no doubt that Roger probably had the most pressure on him at Roland Garros this after once Rafa was out of the tournament.
Wimbledon probably wasn't anywhere near as much but there was still a good bit due to going for 15 and no Rafa again.
He said after he won RG that he could play freely and without pressure and that is likely true - until/unless he can pull out another title at the U.S. Open.
If (emphasis on IF) he can win at Flushing Meadows, he will again have an enormous amount of pressure on him in Australia in 2010 to complete a Grand Slam (Roger Slam I guess).
Knowing that IF he can get this far, and knowing this will likely be the last chance in his career to attempt this (similar to RG), do you guys think the pressure will be more or less than he had this year at the French?
Wimbledon probably wasn't anywhere near as much but there was still a good bit due to going for 15 and no Rafa again.
He said after he won RG that he could play freely and without pressure and that is likely true - until/unless he can pull out another title at the U.S. Open.
If (emphasis on IF) he can win at Flushing Meadows, he will again have an enormous amount of pressure on him in Australia in 2010 to complete a Grand Slam (Roger Slam I guess).
Knowing that IF he can get this far, and knowing this will likely be the last chance in his career to attempt this (similar to RG), do you guys think the pressure will be more or less than he had this year at the French?