Sampras_Fan_71
New User
I purchased a Silent Partner Edge Lite-R ball machine recently, with the primary motivation to feed balls to my 11-old-year son. Some background on my son -- I would consider him a fairly advanced player, he hits the ball quite hard off both sides and very much hits thru the court with fairly low net clearance, and practices several days a week. He plays multifilament strings and generally breaks a string about once every 6 weeks. So he's not going to be bunting the ball around when he's hitting off the machine. He'll be putting the normal "tennis stresses" that good players put on their arm / shoulder.
My concerns as we begin incorporating the ball machine into his practice sessions are as follows:
Ideally, I'd like my 11-year-old to be able to use the machine as much as he likes at fairly high speed feeding -- say for 500-1000 groundstrokes in a practice session, a few times per week -- and not have to worry about arm and shoulder injuries due to pressureless balls. And from what I've read about pressureless balls, the cost over time appears to be so much cheaper as (people claim) they maintain their bounce for up to six months. So from a financial standpoint, that longevity is appealing -- but only if the pressureless ball reacts "fairly similarly" to a pressurized ball. It's not so important to me that the pressureless ball "feels" similar to a pressurized ball. What I care much more about is the flight of the ball when struck -- does it land on the court very close to where a pressurized ball would land? Does it arc similarly to a pressurized ball (similar amount of net clearance)?
I'd love to hear feedback from anyone who's had experience with the above.
Thanks much ahead of time!
My concerns as we begin incorporating the ball machine into his practice sessions are as follows:
- potential injury to his arm / shoulder if we use pressureless balls
- how close to the playability of a pressurized ball IS a pressureless ball, specifically for hitting groundstrokes from rally pace to winner pace?
- making sure we are using balls that play like a "fairly new" ball (I think it's a huge waste of time hit large numbers of groundstrokes using older, dead balls)
Ideally, I'd like my 11-year-old to be able to use the machine as much as he likes at fairly high speed feeding -- say for 500-1000 groundstrokes in a practice session, a few times per week -- and not have to worry about arm and shoulder injuries due to pressureless balls. And from what I've read about pressureless balls, the cost over time appears to be so much cheaper as (people claim) they maintain their bounce for up to six months. So from a financial standpoint, that longevity is appealing -- but only if the pressureless ball reacts "fairly similarly" to a pressurized ball. It's not so important to me that the pressureless ball "feels" similar to a pressurized ball. What I care much more about is the flight of the ball when struck -- does it land on the court very close to where a pressurized ball would land? Does it arc similarly to a pressurized ball (similar amount of net clearance)?
I'd love to hear feedback from anyone who's had experience with the above.
Thanks much ahead of time!
Last edited: