Thanks for the reply. I've never hit with the Prestige Tour; how does it compare to the Classic?
Very similar. same mold, pt has a suspension grip made of plastic so the racket is very slightly heavier and a tad more flexible and a slightly lower HL balance due to the added handle weight.
Look in "classics" there are a number of threads on these rackets.
I love these old head rackets, never felt anything like them but the problem is being able to get hold of them.
TW sold the TGK pro sticks recently and a bloke in Belgium was selling on the bay some pro sticks straight from Austria. Other than that there are the volkls/pro kennex that have that flex feel.
Me, I play the kps 88 now cos its an old skool frame and is made now. I think its the nearest to those Head rackets I like (graphite pro/Comfort Edge), not in spec so much but all round playability and feel.
Ive gone thro a number of modern rackets and find them rather tinny and not as well made, didnt like modern yonex supposedly known for their workmanship, fischer/volkl/pk i really liked but a bit too flexy for that added boot when needed.
I found modern head mids less powered than their older name sakes.
I would try Wilson Pro Staff ROK imo its wilsons effort at a prestige, I love this racket and am still thinking it might be the one for me.
Dont get disheartened by the power level and dense stringbed pattern is has power to boot, great at the net, pro staff stability, flexy (60) but stiff at the same time (??) great serve and baseline too, not too much spin, similar to the prestige in tha way.
http://web.archive.org/web/20040804022434/www.tennis-warehouse.com/descpageRCWILSON-ROK92.html