PRIME Versions of WTA VS. Current Field

And later lost to Seles at the '92 French Open after winning Hamburg & Berlin.


Graf beat Seles in 3 of 4 matches in Seles's two best years ever (1991/92).

Graf won 7 sets: 6-4, 6-3, 7-5, 6-3, 6-3, 6-2, 6-1.
Seles won 3 sets: 7-6, 6-2, 10-8.


What would have happened to Seles if Graf had been in peak form in those years ... ? :)
 
At her 96 or even 88 peak, Seles would have been lucky to win a set off Graf.

Well, that's interesting because Seles won 3/5 sets against Graf in 1999.

As for 1988, well if 17 year-old Sabatini could beat Graf twice and Pam Shriver could beat her once and lose another match to her 7-6 in the 3rd, I think that Seles wouldn't have needed luck to take sets/matches off of Graf.
 
Good try, NadalAgassi. But, Graf was not in peak form in 93.

76-5 against players not named Seles. Finals at AO (losing to Seles), FO Champion, Wimbledon Champion, U.S. Open Champion, YEC Champion. You're right. I don't think that 1993 was Graf's "peak," but it was pretty close.
 
All your usernames starting to confuse you? I said 96, not 99.

My mistake. Let's look at Graf's 1996:

Losses to:

Date(#9)
15 year-old Hingis(#20)
Davenport(#10)
Novotna(#4)

Lost sets in matches against, in addition to the above:

Davenport(#12)
Habsudova(#54)
ASV(#3)
Date(#13)
Wiesner(#24)
Wiesner(#21)
Novtona(#4)
16 year-old Hingis(#7)

I'm pretty sure that peak Seles wouldn't have been sweating winning some sets off of '96 Graf.
 
Your idiocy speaks for itself.

Graf in 1993 (minus Seles loss):

76-5 (93.83%); AO finalist, FO Champ, Wimbledon Champ, U.S. Open Champ, YEC Champ

Graf in 1996:

54-4 (93.10%); AO DNP; FO Champ, Wimbledon Champ, U.S. Open Champ, YEC Champ

I don't see much difference between these 2 years.
 
My mistake. Let's look at Graf's 1996:

No, let's look at what Graf said herself.

Q. The last major you won was the French Open of 1999, and you said at the time that it was probably the most unexpected. You seem the most gratified by that win. Do you still feel that way now? And then the second part of the question would be, looking back on your career, do you feel like you may have peaked in that period of, say, '95, '96, rather than your Grand Slam season of '88?

STEFFI GRAF: Well, to answer your first question, I have to say there have been a few unexpected wins. I recall that I struggled a lot with my knee and with my back and I got to Wimbledon a day and a half before the tournament started and didn't even know if I should play or not and I ended up winning. But in terms of where I was in '99 and where I was coming back from with the knee surgeries, and just for many months, not playing as well as I could have for quite a period and didn't really believe in myself as much. To able to beat the players that I did at that time, yeah, I still think that that was -- that probably was the most unexpected. The second part, yeah, I believe that in '95 and '96, even though I was starting to struggle with my back and it has not been -- it wasn't so easy to work as hard as maybe I have done in my younger years, maybe not being physically in as great of shape as when I was younger. But I think as a player, I was much more complete, and I think that that's a big thanks to [Heinz] who elevated my game and statistics and strategies to another level, and to make me a smarter player on the court, for sure, I feel like that I was a better player then.
--- HOF Press Conference, April 28, 2004
http://www.asapsports.com/show_interview.php?id=19136
 
Graf won 1 Major in 1987.

Graf lost to a 17 year-old ASV at the French Open in 1989.


Graf didn't play AO in 1987.
And lost to 30-year-old Navi on fast courts in Wimbledon and at USO.
1991/92 Seles would not have had a shadow of a chance there against Navi.

Seles lost twice to 15-year-old Capriati in 1991/92. :):)
You know, this girl who won a staggering 14 tournaments in her long career ...
 
I think that we have a pretty good answer: What happened at the '93 Australian Open.


You think Seles would have been better than 1-3 H2H in 1991/92 against PEAK Graf ... ? :)

Hopefully you can earn some money for a living with manual labour ... :):):)
 
Well, that's interesting because Seles won 3/5 sets against Graf in 1999.

As for 1988, well if 17 year-old Sabatini could beat Graf twice and Pam Shriver could beat her once and lose another match to her 7-6 in the 3rd, I think that Seles wouldn't have needed luck to take sets/matches off of Graf.


Did I mention that peak prime Seles of 1991/92 lose twice against a 15-year-old (!) Capriati?
You know, this Jennifer girl? Who won tons of tournaments in the next 12 years?
About 14 .... ?
:):):)
 
76-5 against players not named Seles. Finals at AO (losing to Seles), FO Champion, Wimbledon Champion, U.S. Open Champion, YEC Champion. You're right. I don't think that 1993 was Graf's "peak," but it was pretty close.


Graf was not at her peak in the first months of 1993.
Lost 4 of her first 6 tournaments that year. Even lost to a 36-year-old Navi!!
(Remember, Graf won 4 of 4 matches against Navi in 1988/89!)

Graf was still improving after her slump.
She won 8 of her remaining 9 tournaments in 1993.

2-4 in first 4 months.
8-1 in last 7 months.
 
Graf in 1993 (minus Seles loss):

76-5 (93.83%); AO finalist, FO Champ, Wimbledon Champ, U.S. Open Champ, YEC Champ

Graf in 1996:

54-4 (93.10%); AO DNP; FO Champ, Wimbledon Champ, U.S. Open Champ, YEC Champ

I don't see much difference between these 2 years.



Graf won only 2 of 6 tournaments in January-April 1993.
But 8 of 9 in May-November 1993.

I do see a lot of difference between those parts of 1993.
 
If you folks genuinely believe that Navratilova could have played her effective serve/volley vs. today's power players or that Chrissie would have been remotely as unbeatable as she was in the 70's, well, you have not been watching all that closely or without prejudice.

There is a tendency to dismiss the current breed because of nostalgia and a dlsike of current parity. The Kvitova we just saw at Wimby would have blown Chrissie and Arantxa et. al. off the court. Women's tennis has improved greatly in applied skill, more so than the men. See Hingis in 2000 to 2002 (0 wins vs Capriati).
 
No, let's look at what Graf said herself.

Q. The last major you won was the French Open of 1999, and you said at the time that it was probably the most unexpected. You seem the most gratified by that win. Do you still feel that way now? And then the second part of the question would be, looking back on your career, do you feel like you may have peaked in that period of, say, '95, '96, rather than your Grand Slam season of '88?

STEFFI GRAF: Well, to answer your first question, I have to say there have been a few unexpected wins. I recall that I struggled a lot with my knee and with my back and I got to Wimbledon a day and a half before the tournament started and didn't even know if I should play or not and I ended up winning. But in terms of where I was in '99 and where I was coming back from with the knee surgeries, and just for many months, not playing as well as I could have for quite a period and didn't really believe in myself as much. To able to beat the players that I did at that time, yeah, I still think that that was -- that probably was the most unexpected. The second part, yeah, I believe that in '95 and '96, even though I was starting to struggle with my back and it has not been -- it wasn't so easy to work as hard as maybe I have done in my younger years, maybe not being physically in as great of shape as when I was younger. But I think as a player, I was much more complete, and I think that that's a big thanks to [Heinz] who elevated my game and statistics and strategies to another level, and to make me a smarter player on the court, for sure, I feel like that I was a better player then.
--- HOF Press Conference, April 28, 2004
http://www.asapsports.com/show_interview.php?id=19136

Look, I agree with you. I think that 1996 was Graf's peak. As I said before, Graf in 1993 was near-peak Graf, and I think the #s bear that out.
 
If you folks genuinely believe that Navratilova could have played her effective serve/volley vs. today's power players or that Chrissie would have been remotely as unbeatable as she was in the 70's, well, you have not been watching all that closely or without prejudice. ...

Against whom of today's players would Navratilova - with a modern racket! - struggle on grass?

Kvitova ... ?

Bwahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!
 
Graf didn't play AO in 1987.
And lost to 30-year-old Navi on fast courts in Wimbledon and at USO.
1991/92 Seles would not have had a shadow of a chance there against Navi.

Seles lost twice to 15-year-old Capriati in 1991/92. :):)
You know, this girl who won a staggering 14 tournaments in her long career ...

Navratilova was 56-8 in 1987.

She was 53-9 in 1991, 52-5 if you don't include 3 losses (and 1 win) against Seles, including losses at the U.S. Open and YEC.
 
... just saw at Wimby would have blown Chrissie and Arantxa et. al. off the court. Women's tennis has improved greatly in applied skill, more so than the men. ...


Yes, that's why 40-year-old Kimiko Date won 5 of her 10 matches against top-15 players last year - those "great improvements in applied skill" ....:):):)
 
Look, I agree with you. I think that 1996 was Graf's peak. As I said before, Graf in 1993 was near-peak Graf, and I think the #s bear that out.

"As a player more complete".
So?

Graf was not even near her physical peak anymore in 1996.
Everybody who says otherwise is nuts.
 
You think Seles would have been better than 1-3 H2H in 1991/92 against PEAK Graf ... ? :)

Hopefully you can earn some money for a living with manual labour ... :):):)

Seles wasn't at hear peak yet in 1991. Heck, she wasn't even at her peak until the '92 U.S. Open, when she started hitting bigger serves, bigger returns, and bigger angles. But she certainly wasn't at her peak until August 1991 when she took the #1 ranking away for good from Graf before she was stabbed. And from August 1991 or 1992-Hamburg '93, she was 2-1 against Graf.
 
Seles wasn't at hear peak yet in 1991. Heck, she wasn't even at her peak until the '92 U.S. Open, when she started hitting bigger serves, bigger returns, and bigger angles. ....


From January 1st until 27th April 1992 (week before Hamburg 1992) Monica Seles won 26 of 27 matches losing only 4 sets.
She lost 124 games in 58 sets (average 2.1 games)

From January 1st until April 26th 1993 (week before Hamburg 1993) Monica Seles won 15 of 16 matches losing 6 sets.
She lost 94 games in 39 sets (average 2.4 games)

And where is the improvement ... ?
 
... And from August 1991 or 1992-Hamburg '93, she was 2-1 against Graf.


4-4 in sets.
38-39 in games played.
Two matches on slow courts, one on a fast court.

But let's add the two 1991 matches, when Steffi had her worst year in the 1987-96 time frame.

2-3 in matches.
5-8 in sets.
60-70 in games played.
Seles's record as the #1 player against a slumping Graf.
 
Graf was not at her peak in the first months of 1993.
Lost 4 of her first 6 tournaments that year. Even lost to a 36-year-old Navi!!
(Remember, Graf won 4 of 4 matches against Navi in 1988/89!)

Graf was still improving after her slump.
She won 8 of her remaining 9 tournaments in 1993.

2-4 in first 4 months.
8-1 in last 7 months.

Still improving from a slump? From '92 Hamburg to the end of the year, Graf went 56-4 (55-3 against players not named Seles), winning 7 of the 10 tournaments she entered (she also swept Fed Cup and lost in the Olympic finals). Sure, a player is going to have ups-and-downs during a year, but there was nothing leading into the '93 AO, or in Graf's first 6 matches there, that would indicate that she was playing anything but great tennis.
 
From January 1st until 27th April 1992 (week before Hamburg 1992) Monica Seles won 26 of 27 matches losing only 4 sets.
She lost 124 games in 58 sets (average 2.1 games)

From January 1st until April 26th 1993 (week before Hamburg 1993) Monica Seles won 15 of 16 matches losing 6 sets.
She lost 94 games in 39 sets (average 2.4 games)

And where is the improvement ... ?

Better serve, better return of serve, better angles, better net play. The 1 match she lost in 1993 was 7-6 in the 3rd to Navratilova when she had the flu. And Martina was having a resurgence in late 1992-early 1993, going 28-4 on carpet, with her only losses coming to Graf and Seles.

Plus, the players Seles played in early 1993 >> the players Seles played in early 1992.
 
4-4 in sets.
38-39 in games played.
Two matches on slow courts, one on a fast court.

But let's add the two 1991 matches, when Steffi had her worst year in the 1987-96 time frame.

2-3 in matches.
5-8 in sets.
60-70 in games played.
Seles's record as the #1 player against a slumping Graf.

And Graf's record against a 16 year-old Seles was

0-2 in matches
0-4 in sets
17-25 in sets played

The bottom line is this: Seles didn't start to hit her peak until the '92 French Open, and she didn't really hit her peak until the '92 U.S. Open, which she won without dropping a set and with dropping only 27 games (much better statistically than Graf's best ever U.S. Open).
 
Still improving from a slump? From '92 Hamburg to the end of the year, Graf went 56-4 (55-3 against players not named Seles), winning 7 of the 10 tournaments she entered (she also swept Fed Cup and lost in the Olympic finals). Sure, a player is going to have ups-and-downs during a year, but there was nothing leading into the '93 AO, or in Graf's first 6 matches there, that would indicate that she was playing anything but great tennis.

Graf struggled against ASV in the AO semis and lost to Navi one week later in Tokyo.

In 1994 she beat ASV 60 62 in the AO final. And beat Navi 64 62 in Tokyo.
THAT is peak Graf, son ...
 
Look, I agree with you. I think that 1996 was Graf's peak. As I said before, Graf in 1993 was near-peak Graf, and I think the #s bear that out.

Her record in 93 is misleading.

But, then, who knows better? You? Or, Steffi herself?

Here is Steffi on her level of play in 92 and 93:

Q. If you say that you have grown as a player now compared to back to 1988, if you had to pinpoint one specific thing that has changed everything for you, what would you say that is? Would it be the new racket? Would it be the training? What?

STEFFI GRAF: I would say that it started with Heinz. That is what I really have to say. He had a lot of ideas which I wasn't just -- at that moment, I needed a change, I needed a push. For a couple of years I wasn't working as hard. I didn't do anything different. I just was playing tennis as a routine and he changed that. He made it more difficult, but he just -- he just showed me things that I wasn't shown at that stage. So I would think that he was the biggest change, the best change that I have had.

Q. More difficult, but would you also say he has made it more fun again?

STEFFI GRAF: Well, if I am playing like that all day, yeah, he has made it more fun. Maybe the training sometimes is not as much fun. If you are doing things that maybe you are not as good and you have to do them, it is difficult for me, but I know the result will show and I just need some time for it. I have a lot of trust in him. That is why I am just doing these things.

--- Presser, Miami (Lipton), March 15, 1994
http://www.asapsports.com/show_interview.php?id=19173
 
Graf struggled against ASV in the AO semis and lost to Navi one week later in Tokyo.

In 1994 she beat ASV 60 62 in the AO final. And beat Navi 64 62 in Tokyo.
THAT is peak Graf, son ...

As noted, Navratilova had a resurgence on carpet in late '92/early '93, only losing to Graf and Seles. In late '93/early '94, in addition to losing to Graf, she lost to Manuela Maleeva (in straight sets), Zvereva (in straight sets), Pierce, and Maggie Maleeva.

And her "struggle" against ASV in '93 was still a straight set win, which Graf followed up by beating her 6-4, 6-3 at Delray Beach. In '94, the AO win over ASV was easier, but the win at Delray Beach was tougher, 6-3, 7-5.

And for the record, I agree that Graf played better at the '94 AO than she played at the '93 AO. But she didn't play that much better.
 
Her record in 93 is misleading.

But, then, who knows better? You? Or, Steffi herself?

Here is Steffi on her level of play in 92 and 93:

Q. If you say that you have grown as a player now compared to back to 1988, if you had to pinpoint one specific thing that has changed everything for you, what would you say that is? Would it be the new racket? Would it be the training? What?

STEFFI GRAF: I would say that it started with Heinz. That is what I really have to say. He had a lot of ideas which I wasn't just -- at that moment, I needed a change, I needed a push. For a couple of years I wasn't working as hard. I didn't do anything different. I just was playing tennis as a routine and he changed that. He made it more difficult, but he just -- he just showed me things that I wasn't shown at that stage. So I would think that he was the biggest change, the best change that I have had.

Q. More difficult, but would you also say he has made it more fun again?

STEFFI GRAF: Well, if I am playing like that all day, yeah, he has made it more fun. Maybe the training sometimes is not as much fun. If you are doing things that maybe you are not as good and you have to do them, it is difficult for me, but I know the result will show and I just need some time for it. I have a lot of trust in him. That is why I am just doing these things.

--- Presser, Miami (Lipton), March 15, 1994
http://www.asapsports.com/show_interview.php?id=19173

I don't see how that makes her record in 1992 or 1993 misleading. It merely indicates that she thought that she wasn't playing at her absolute peak in those years. And I agree. I don't think that she was at her absolute peak. But I do think that she was pretty close to it.
 
Back
Top