Prince Racquet Questions/Discussions

Status
Not open for further replies.
SocalTennis said:
I love the way the EXO3 Rebel 95 plays and wondering if Prince will ever offers it in the 100 sq in. with 18x20 pattern and same weight (12oz).
Click to expand...

Hi Socal,

While we do not currently have plans for a Rebel with those exact specs, we are very curious to know what you’re looking for from future Rebels. In many cases, a larger head size is not the only solution. If you reply with your specific performance goals, perhaps we can work with you on a personalized customization strategy to get you where you need to be with the Prince weaponry available right now.

Thanks,
Prince Tennis - Who's Next.
 
Fed Kennedy said:
What will replace the ignite? Have you considered a rebel with 16x19?
Click to expand...

Hi Fed Kennedy,

Good question. As of right now we do not have an immediate replacement for the Ignite. However, we will have a brand new offering of Rebels coming out of the lab in 2012 with some models you may be interested in. Whether you’re looking for a more open string pattern or a little more “pop” out of your Rebel 95, we can confirm next season’s Rebel line will deliver on both of those requests. So stay tuned!

Thanks,
Prince Tennis - Who's Next.
 
vsbabolat said:
Would Prince consider a EXO3 Rebel 95 in a Limited Edition white or black cosmetic? Since the EXO3 Rebel 95 is yellow cosmetics. It might attract more players to switch to the EXO3 Rebel 95 to have a more conservative Limited Edition Cosmetic in white or even a stealth black cosmetic. Back in the mid 80's Prince had a Limited Edition Spectrum Comp that was Yellow where the Regular Spectrum Comp was White.
Click to expand...

Hi VsBabolat,

Why not?! We are always willing to consider new ideas. Better yet, let’s have some fun with this... Next week we’ll post a poll on our Facebook Page with some custom color options for “limited edition” racquets in the future. We can't promise anything, but maybe, just maybe, we’ll put something special together for this.

Thanks,
Prince Tennis - Who's Next.
 
TenFanLA said:
I've had my Ozone Pro Tours for 3 years now and they are beaten to death. I was waiting for the replacement and was excited when Prince finally introduced EXO Tour. But EXO hits nothing like OPT. At 52 stiffness the power and solid feel are missing esp. when you hit near the top of the racket. I was highly disappointed.

MY OPTs range from 343g to 355g so I'm just using the 2 lightest ones but they are torn up (I had to remove the headguard to reduce weight to 343g.) 12oz+ is getting heavy for me in a 3 set singles match. Will you be coming out with something closer to OPT with 100 sq in, ~65 flex, 11.5 oz? I LOVE OPT but EXO Tour definitely (for me) was not a suitable replacement due to its extreme flexibility 52, and lack of power and stability. The 11.5 oz, however, felt good.
Click to expand...

Hi TenFanLA,

To start, you are 100% correct that the specs of the EXO3 Tour 18x20 are completely different than the Ozone Pro Tour. This is in fact why we specifically chose to NOT call it the EXO3 Pro Tour. While the Ozone Pro Tour was a favorite among some players, while conducting extensive global testing, the majority of our test players greatly preferred the more flexible EXO3 design.

That said, it doesn’t mean that the stiffer option is a bad one. There were a number of players who, like you, preferred the stiffer model. We wish that we could design an individual racquet for every player – we love tinkering in the lab, designing and developing new racquets that take your game to new levels – but the preference in testing was too strong to launch both models.

Based on your personal racquet preferences, we would highly recommend a demo of the Rebel 95 since it is in the same weight target and has the same string pattern that you are used to. We would, however, recommend that you demo a Rebel 95 with larger PORT inserts to give you the more familiar string bed feel of a full EXO3 racquet, with edge-to-edge performance and response.

Thanks,
Prince Tennis - Who's Next.
 
Hey there TT members,

First off, thank you all for the great posts that have already been submitted. This is a new and exciting program, and we’re eager to engage with the TT community to help deliver products and information that truly help take your games to the next level.

Before we start answering questions, there are a few things to point out:

1. You are actually engaging directly with Prince product and player development managers . This is not a summer intern program. We are dedicated to taking our products and your game to the next level, and the best way to do that is to speak directly with you, the athletes.

2. While we’re always eager to make our products better, it's important that we hear not only what's NOT working for you, but also what IS working for you. We need both sides of the story in order to make your comments come to life.

3. Our ultimate goal here is to have an open and forward-thinking dialogue about the future direction of Prince products and all other areas of the game. Though some answers may not be to exactly what you hoped for, they will be detailed, sincere, and straight from the horse’s mouth.

4. We have extensive elite partnerships and the most knowledgeable staff in the sport, with expertise in nutrition, training, sponsorship, mental conditioning, etc. While we appreciate the product related questions, please don't hesitate to ask about these other important topics which can help take your game to the next level.

5. Please be aware that we will do our best to respond to every question asked, we must also conduct our daily responsibilities and continue to develop products and programs for athletes.

OK, with that out of the way... let's hear your questions!

Thanks,
Prince Tennis - Who's Next.
 
Prince Sports said:
Hey there TT members,

First off, thank you all for the great posts that have already been submitted. This is a new and exciting program, and we’re eager to engage with the TT community to help deliver products and information that truly help take your games to the next level.

Before we start answering questions, there are a few things to point out:

1. You are actually engaging directly with Prince product and player development managers . This is not a summer intern program. We are dedicated to taking our products and your game to the next level, and the best way to do that is to speak directly with you, the athletes.

2. While we’re always eager to make our products better, it's important that we hear not only what's NOT working for you, but also what IS working for you. We need both sides of the story in order to make your comments come to life.

3. Our ultimate goal here is to have an open and forward-thinking dialogue about the future direction of Prince products and all other areas of the game. Though some answers may not be to exactly what you hoped for, they will be detailed, sincere, and straight from the horse’s mouth.

4. We have extensive elite partnerships and the most knowledgeable staff in the sport, with expertise in nutrition, training, sponsorship, mental conditioning, etc. While we appreciate the product related questions, please don't hesitate to ask about these other important topics which can help take your game to the next level.

5. Please be aware that we will do our best to respond to every question asked, we must also conduct our daily responsibilities and continue to develop products and programs for athletes.

OK, with that out of the way... let's hear your questions!

Thanks,
Prince Tennis - Who's Next.
Click to expand...

Prince -

1. You are actually engaging directly with Prince product and player development managers . This is not a summer intern program. We are dedicated to taking our products and your game to the next level, and the best way to do that is to speak directly with you, the athletes.

I appreciate your very loose use of the word 'athletes'. :) I would first like to say that I have not used a Prince racquet for more than a week in over 20 years. Of late, the local tennis shop recommended the Prince EXO3 Tour Team. That frame is awesome and a real departure IMO from Prince's mainstream offerings. I love it and after about 6 months with it, have not be tempted to revert back to my old frame of 10+ years, the C10.

2. While we’re always eager to make our products better, it's important that we hear not only what's NOT working for you, but also what IS working for you. We need both sides of the story in order to make your comments come to life.

First, what is working. The Prince EXO 3 Tour Team is about the single best frame I've hit with in a very long time. The flex is fantastic and a welcome change in the Prince line, the string pattern is (16X18) is great and very feel/tension/control/spin/touch friendly. The lighter weight of the EXO3 Tour Team allows me to be more adaptive in my strokes which results in greater consistency. The frame itself is an ephiany for any and all who try it around here.

In short, GREAT frame.

Now....
The paint doesn't seem to want to stick to the frame or the inserts. Not a biggie, but it is kinda annoying. (On the upside, folks think I'm playing a lot more than I am :) )

And the boomerang for the EXO3 Tour Team, the red one. It just plain doesn't fit. Are there any plans to fix that?

3. Our ultimate goal here is to have an open and forward-thinking dialogue about the future direction of Prince products and all other areas of the game. Though some answers may not be to exactly what you hoped for, they will be detailed, sincere, and straight from the horse’s mouth.

Well, you certainly are a first on these boards in this regard and I for one, really appreciate the effort.

I certainly hope you continue to develop frames in the vein of the EXO3 Tour, Tour Team, and Tour Light which are all very easy to play with, very comfortable, and all around fine frames.


5. Please be aware that we will do our best to respond to every question asked, we must also conduct our daily responsibilities and continue to develop products and programs for athletes.

Again, Thanks so much for the effort. I also notice that Prince spends more time and donates more equipment and sponsorships to juniors which is a great thing.

OK, with that out of the way... let's hear your questions!

I have some questions above. I would also like to ask that you keep the basic green/black bags around as they are great.
 
Guys

I tried the EXO3 Tour recently. It is an exceptional racket but the headsize is too large for my game. Any chance of a 95" head 18x20 version.

cc
 
crosscourt said:
Guys

I tried the EXO3 Tour recently. It is an exceptional racket but the headsize is too large for my game. Any chance of a 95" head 18x20 version.

cc
Click to expand...

This is also my question!

I absolutely LOVED the EXO3 Tour, but 100 inches is just a bit too bulky for my game. I'd love a 95 inch, or even a 93-90 inch mid! That would be a phenomenal frame for people who love mids such as myself, and much prefer the flex and comfort that the EXO3 tour offers! :)

Thanks Prince!

-Fuji
 
Fuji said:
This is also my question!

I absolutely LOVED the EXO3 Tour, but 100 inches is just a bit too bulky for my game. I'd love a 95 inch, or even a 93-90 inch mid! That would be a phenomenal frame for people who love mids such as myself, and much prefer the flex and comfort that the EXO3 tour offers! :)

Thanks Prince!

-Fuji
Click to expand...


hahaha mid frames should not flex
 
rdis10093 said:
hahaha mid frames should not flex
Click to expand...

Really? What makes you say that?

The Redondo Mid is one of the flexiest frames available, and I really enjoyed it, but I could never get my groove with it.

Also the Dunlop Max 200G has a flex of something like 43-45 and it's arguably one of the greatest GMOAT! :)

-Fuji
 
Fuji said:
Really? What makes you say that?

The Redondo Mid is one of the flexiest frames available, and I really enjoyed it, but I could never get my groove with it.

Also the Dunlop Max 200G has a flex of something like 43-45 and it's arguably one of the greatest GMOAT! :)

-Fuji
Click to expand...



at the higher levels, you need a frame that is solid, and can just push back a hard hit ball. with a solid mid frame, you have to provide your own power, and when soeone hits something with pace, a flexable frame is not so great. lots of oversize frames are flexy, and thats why lower level players use them to help with power. can not think of alot of pros that use flexy mids

who is the avatar?
 
rdis10093 said:
at the higher levels, you need a frame that is solid, and can just push back a hard hit ball. with a solid mid frame, you have to provide your own power, and when soeone hits something with pace, a flexable frame is not so great. lots of oversize frames are flexy, and thats why lower level players use them to help with power. can not think of alot of pros that use flexy mids

who is the avatar?
Click to expand...

I guess so! I play 4.5 so I guess it's not that high of competition where flexy frames are a disadvantage.

I don't think many Pro's use mids at all really, next to Fed/Dimitriov.

Maria Sharapova is the Avatar! :)

-Fuji
 
Hello Prince! Back in the early 90's, almost everyone I knew had a Prince. The CTS line was great, I loved all those racquets. I'd like to see a revamped, back to basics Prince line with some "O Port-less frames" like the CTS line. Remember the Approach, the Lightning, the Precision, the Graduate, the Graphtech, the Response, the Synergies, etc.? Any plans on updating some old classics? I know the POG's have had this treatment. I'd buy a modern take on some classics.
 
Last edited:
Hello Prince,

I was playing a tournament in Raleigh and heard that you guys came to one of the local clubs there and somehow 'made' a racquet to suit there strengths, like personalization. I thought this was really cool, and some of them bought some. First off is this true, and how much are they? Will it be online where you can do that?

Thanks!
 
Hey prince, I have a question! Will you ever think of making a 90-93 square inch racket? I like the exo line, but the racket heads seem too big for me. Thanks very much!
 
Recently i was looking for a new racket. I wanted a smaller head size and prince being the brand that my first racket was from, I had sort of a soft spot for them. However when I browsed what prince had to offer, everything was basically 100sq" outside of the Rebel which isn't appealing to me, even though Monfils is my favorite player. Even as I tried to convince myself to buy one. I just couldn't because I didn't want to settle for anything, i really needed a racket to suit my needs and ended up with a dunlop 4d100.

So pretty much, my question is:

Will prince come out with a mid (90-93) frame that isn't called original graphite or a remake of said racket?​
I understand the legacy behind them but they simply don't appeal to me. Not when there is lighter, and more stable/solid materials available now-a-days. Plus, many pog owners/users give negative opinions of pog remakes simply because it's not the original. Which makes other consumers shy away from them.
 
Caesar said:
Why would you want a light racquet with a 90in head?

Midsize racquets need swingweight.
Click to expand...


The materials used make it so. Light(or maneuverable) but not sacrificing the stability of the racquet.

For instance, head's speed line. Everything was prefect until I served with it, felt like swinging a baseball bat. Wilson's Ktour team fx, 10.3oz right? I couldn't swing out on ground strokes with it for my life. Dunlop's 4d100 11.6oz right? 308 swingweight. Perfect when I use it, and it's very stable.

I'm by no means a small either, i'm built like Rafa. Muscled, explosive. I can easily generate my own power. I don't want to be reduced to blocking shots because the racket suddenly becomes lead mid swing. Or pushed back because the racket isn't stable. Ya know.

Sounds picky, i know but like I explained in the other post. I just couldn't settle, i needed something that fitted what I demanded out of a racket.
 
Are you male or female? You're talking about some very light racquets here. The KTour is not a very substantial racquet and the 4D100 is even worse. Neither is particularly stable against heavy hitters. If you're a strong player then I'm not really sure why you wouldn't opt for a heavier stick. 308 swingweight is pretty wimpy on a midsize, most good strong players would play better with something meatier. I would prefer a POG over either, tbh.

My understanding is that Prince hasn't produced a racquet like you're describing because they're more focused on producing proper players' sticks at the smaller headsize. The light hit-and-giggle racquets they give an oversize head, because that's what most low-level players want these days.

FWIW I use a Wilson K Factor Six.One Tour 90.
 
Last edited:
Dear Prince,

I have two constructive comments:

1) I find the way the product line is laid out to be somewhat confusing to the consumer. The whole Black, white, Blue, & Silver naming system does not really imply any identity of the racquet like more distinctive naming of the frames.

2) the graphics of the rebel, ignite, and EXO graphite were absolutely hideous and I think a big part of why they stiffed at the retail level. I would personally select a more conservative classic look with less BLING. In contrast to those models, your staff nailed the EXO3 tour which is absolutely beautiful.
 
I had played with the Graphite Comp 90 since I was very young and while the EXO3 Graphite 93 is a satisfactory replacement, it is slightly more head-heavy and the thick beam slows down my swing speed. Is there any chance that Prince will launch a racquet that utilizes new technology and matches the specifications (all graphite with/without fiberglass is fine) of the Graphite Comp 90 with a thinner beam, flex rating of 54, 8.5pts HL, and without a crossbar stabilizer? People had told me that it was a popular stick for college players back in the day and as a college Division 3 player, I would love to make use of one with new technology!
 
If not a Graphite, then...

@Prince,

By the sheer discounts alone, should we deduce that a next generation Graphite EXO or similar is in the works?

If I've loved various generations of the Graphite for oh so long, what racquet from your current offerings would you recommend I try?

Thanks in advance for your reply.
 
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Prince,
Are there any plans at all to bring back the Response line. I feel that you guys missed a trick with the Ignite. Great colours and supposed to hark back to the Response Ti (sort of) but absolutely nothing like it. As I understand it from most shop owners and racket dealers that I speak to, the Response Ti and the Warrior were 2 of the most popular frames made. I realise that having Rafter endorse the various paintjobs helped but there's no two ways about it...these were great frames!

very best regards

kissmyace
 
u guys are kings and princes for the forum here--elbow trouble so i really liked the rebel hoping u guys/gals come up with a 98 rebel with a 16/20 pattern with a flex at 60 and under s.weight of 325 .thank u
 
Prince Sports said:
there is no denying that the Original Graphite is one of the G.O.A.T racquets.

Bigger, faster, more athletic players are pushing each other out of position more often. Technology needs to adapt to the speed, power and quickness of tomorrow’s champions.
Click to expand...

By all means innovate and create new things, but keep perhaps the most cherished oldschool racquet around. Look at what happened when Wilson reintroduced the ps85, sold out in what a week?

As for saying only prince ports allow movement of the string, doesn't wilson have grooves for their grommets to allow them more movement? And Volkl probably has the most technological advancements of any company out there, catapult effect and big grommets just to name two that compare to the ports without being so obvious.

I know that video is mainly for marketing, but there are reasons that only "tomorrows" champions are using prince, todays champs are using Head which, shocker, are graphite.
Perhaps they should aim towards the diagonal stringing like powerangle, theres a racquet where you can hit anywhere (minus the frame) and have the exact response as the sweetspot.
 
Last edited:
Live Wire VS said:
I had played with the Graphite Comp 90 since I was very young and while the EXO3 Graphite 93 is a satisfactory replacement, it is slightly more head-heavy and the thick beam slows down my swing speed. Is there any chance that Prince will launch a racquet that utilizes new technology and matches the specifications (all graphite with/without fiberglass is fine) of the Graphite Comp 90 with a thinner beam, flex rating of 54, 8.5pts HL, and without a crossbar stabilizer? People had told me that it was a popular stick for college players back in the day and as a college Division 3 player, I would love to make use of one with new technology!
Click to expand...


I agree, the branding is trying a wee too hard. Prince is and has always been a true classic, and the aesthetic should reflect that. Go for something modern, but make it effortless and tasteful, and not so mid-90's Communications Arts.
 
Caesar said:
Are you male or female? You're talking about some very light racquets here. The KTour is not a very substantial racquet and the 4D100 is even worse. Neither is particularly stable against heavy hitters. If you're a strong player then I'm not really sure why you wouldn't opt for a heavier stick. 308 swingweight is pretty wimpy on a midsize, most good strong players would play better with something meatier. I would prefer a POG over either, tbh.

My understanding is that Prince hasn't produced a racquet like you're describing because they're more focused on producing proper players' sticks at the smaller headsize. The light hit-and-giggle racquets they give an oversize head, because that's what most low-level players want these days.

FWIW I use a Wilson K Factor Six.One Tour 90.
Click to expand...

Different materials act differently. I used the blx version of your racket before, and it suited my standards. Now the weight is up there but I could maneuver it easily and it was quite stable. However, for whatever reason, the ktour fx became lead when i swung it.

My question was really just a mid racket that isn't the POG or a remake of the POG. So, I don't see a problem with what I asked.
 
I don't like the BLX, it's not stiff enough. But, it's decent.

There's nothing wrong with what you're asking for, it just seems like a bit of an odd request. Light midsize racquets = no bueno, as far as most people are concerned. Not sure it would sell many units.
 
I should have used different verbiage then. I just want something maneuverable everywhere on the court. Not just at the net.

That isn't the POG or a remake of course. Just come out with a totally new mid. Because lets face it, to POG faithfuls, nothing is gonna match the original. lol
 
OK, you want to know exactly what I want? It can be an EXO racquet, as I am fine with my Tour 100 18x20's (see my signature). Here it is:

Headsize: 97 (yes, not 95,98,or 100)
String Pattern: 16x19
Weight: 12.1 oz
Swingweight: 320
Flex: 60
Beam: 19 at 2 o'clock thru 4 o'clock (doesn't matter everywhere else, 21 sounds good).

The name: Prince EXO3 Rapture (similar to Rafter :))
 
Prince Sports said:
Hi VsBabolat,

Why not?! We are always willing to consider new ideas. Better yet, let’s have some fun with this... Next week we’ll post a poll on our Facebook Page with some custom color options for “limited edition” racquets in the future. We can't promise anything, but maybe, just maybe, we’ll put something special together for this.

Thanks,
Prince Tennis - Who's Next.
Click to expand...

Hi Prince Tennis,

Thank you for answering my question. I look forward to seeing and participating in your poll on Facebook. I certainly would like to see a more subdued color way in the EXO3 Rebel 95.
 
edman9898 said:
OK, you want to know exactly what I want? It can be an EXO racquet, as I am fine with my Tour 100 18x20's (see my signature). Here it is:

Headsize: 97 (yes, not 95,98,or 100)
String Pattern: 16x19
Weight: 12.1 oz
Swingweight: 320
Flex: 60
Beam: 19 at 2 o'clock thru 4 o'clock (doesn't matter everywhere else, 21 sounds good).

The name: Prince EXO3 Rapture (similar to Rafter :))
Click to expand...

I'd happily use this...as long as it didn't have another paint job were it looked like the 80's threw up on it!
 
What Prince racket has a very similar specs with the Babolat Aero Pro Lite? Im currently looking for a Prince racket that has the following specs:

Weight: Not more than 11 oz strung
Stiffness: 70 RA - up
Balance: Head light to balance
Headsize: 95-100 sq inch
String pattern: 16x19

Thanks
 
Hello, I have great experience with Prince o3 Hybrid Tour racquet, but not only me, Ive lent it to guys playing czech league and the find it better than their Ignites... I wonder if you dont plan to put this racquet bact on maket (95 sq in, stiff, long oval head...)
 
Do you have a racquet that can rival the Babolat Aero Pro Drive? Higher power and spin level, but still fairly light?

Also what is your opinion on duration of use of full poly string jobs in your racquets before they should be removed?
 
Last edited:
Any chance of a thin beamed flexy player frame that is left unweighted to allow people to lead there rackets to whatever's specs they want?
 
To Prince Rep.

You wrote:

So although the Prince Original Graphite will forever hold a place in our hearts, a 30 year old racquet does not fit in with our philosophy as we continue to look to the future and deliver weapons for tomorrow's champions.

I understand the business aspect of a company like Prince. You want to sell more racquets not want to make best racquets. Companies think if there's no perfect racquet for a sponsored top players just give paintjob. IMHO, real players' racquets are different from the ones for mass market appeal. Is it surprising such phenomenal player as Federer still uses a racquet that's not too different in specs from one of the old classics from Wilson, and that POG's specs are almost the same as that? Development of new technologies are important for the company and the game as well but to be honest there haven't been almost any really significant improvement after graphite revolution. IMO Prince should focus more on the number of critical parameters such as weight, balance, stiffness, length, headsize, etc. instead of trying to focus on novel idea that sounds good for marketing. You need to get rid of MBA's who have no clue about tennis and have no passion for it and find people who really love the game.

borami
 
boramiNYC said:
You wrote:

So although the Prince Original Graphite will forever hold a place in our hearts, a 30 year old racquet does not fit in with our philosophy as we continue to look to the future and deliver weapons for tomorrow's champions.

I understand the business aspect of a company like Prince. You want to sell more racquets not want to make best racquets. Companies think if there's no perfect racquet for a sponsored top players just give paintjob. IMHO, real players' racquets are different from the ones for mass market appeal. Is it surprising such phenomenal player as Federer still uses a racquet that's not too different in specs from one of the old classics from Wilson, and that POG's specs are almost the same as that? Development of new technologies are important for the company and the game as well but to be honest there haven't been almost any really significant improvement after graphite revolution. IMO Prince should focus more on the number of critical parameters such as weight, balance, stiffness, length, headsize, etc. instead of trying to focus on novel idea that sounds good for marketing. You need to get rid of MBA's who have no clue about tennis and have no passion for it and find people who really love the game.

borami
Click to expand...

You probably don't want to admit this, but modern racquets make the game easier for younger players who are playing a different game then when Federer started and the POG/Pro Staff were being used.

Prince even explains their thinking in the link they provided in the response.
 
In the future, does Prince plan to make players frames - higher static weight & swingweight, in other words >12 oz and mid 300's+ sw? So many seem geared towards intermediate & recreational players.
 
Power Player said:
You probably don't want to admit this, but modern racquets make the game easier for younger players who are playing a different game then when Federer started and the POG/Pro Staff were being used.

Prince even explains their thinking in the link they provided in the response.
Click to expand...

I'm not an old guy playing old school tennis. I recently graduated college and played college tennis competitively and I'm currently heavily involved in teaching and coaching young players and still train and play more than almost anyone. Lots of young players in US don't play that much different game than say 10 years ago. 15 to 20 maybe a little. I think a lot of good young players use whatever tools and techniques that will give them winning results right away and don't think about developing more fuller and deeper game that can mature into greatness. I believe those classic spec'ed racquets are better for such purpose than any other fancy new technologies that adds power and spin and what not. I still stand by my preference for POG/prostaff racquets and wish next Prince racquets can improve the old school feel but not just cater to young players looking for immediate results.
 
boramiNYC said:
I'm not an old guy playing old school tennis. I recently graduated college and played college tennis competitively and I'm currently heavily involved in teaching and coaching young players and still train and play more than almost anyone. Lots of young players in US don't play that much different game than say 10 years ago. 15 to 20 maybe a little. I think a lot of good young players use whatever tools and techniques that will give them winning results right away and don't think about developing more fuller and deeper game that can mature into greatness. I believe those classic spec'ed racquets are better for such purpose than any other fancy new technologies that adds power and spin and what not. I still stand by my preference for POG/prostaff racquets and wish next Prince racquets can improve the old school feel but not just cater to young players looking for immediate results.
Click to expand...

I think Prince has done this with the 03 Tour/Ozone Tour/and the current EX03 Tour. These racquets are a great platform weight that can easily be altered to a higher swingweight/static weight if one desires. Most pros customize their racquets. It is interesting that Prince dropped the stiffness in the EX03 Tour down to 52 from the 60/61 of the 2 older models bacause the 2 older models played so soft to me, but the holes with the flexible thin beam make all 3 models stand alone type racquets.
 
Will the Prince Speedport Tour ever see a true successor?

It was radically different than the O3 tour, but I loved the power and control of the racquet on that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

TW Staff
  • Locked
Prince Miscellaneous Questions/Discussion
Replies
20
Views
4K
TW Staff
TW Staff
TW Staff
  • Locked
Prince String Questions/Discussion
Replies
43
Views
7K
ollinger
ollinger
TW Staff
  • Locked
Prince Footwear Questions/Discussion
Replies
49
Views
7K
Cindysphinx
Cindysphinx
TW Staff
  • Locked
Prince Bags/Accessories Questions/Discussion
Replies
21
Views
4K
parasailing
P
S
Dunlop 2012
Replies
1
Views
793
Automatix
Automatix
Back
Top