Prince Synergy 98

What type of tension are people going with in this frame. Usually in 18x20 control frames i go lower tension like 44-46, i see this whilst pretty soft has the bigger swingweight and 320 balance so would about 50lbs be about there as a start point. Probably going to be stringing hybrid with a poly mains gut cross.
 
Poly would be signum pro hyperion 1.24 and gut Wilson sensation plus 1.27. I also have thinner poly (1.20, but was thinking 1.24 be fine on this).
 
Wilson Sensation Plus is not natural gut. It’s a multifilament string with a coating. And your poly mains will shred the coating.
 
For a better visual perspective of the string pattern

IMG-20240909-175315.jpg
IMG-20240909-175332.jpg
 
whats your assessment and what it being compared with ?
On paper and specs wise it's comparable to the ISO305 but i'd expect different sensation and to the Prestige MP 18*19 2021-2023. These two feel stiffer overall, the Synergy feels flexy in the throat. To my surprise, the Yonex DR98 had a similar flex in the same throat area.

An even balanced, flat hitter's frame who is capable of a very early preparation a la Medvedev (I've only seen a former tennis player here having such a stroke, very rare style) with big takeback, who hits through the ball and provides his own power into the shot. Just think Medvedev style.

Defending felt much easier on the backhand side, because I could just chop the ball and because of the high swingweight I didn't have to impart much of a forwrds bodyweight transfer.
It felt harder to defend on the forehand side because it felt slow to maneuver on the back foot.

Rock solid at the net, on returns, on the 2-handed backhand, faster than the swingweight suggests from the mid-court when I had to come in and lift a low ball I could do it easier than wirh the Prestige MP.

It's a demanding frame for a 3.5-4.0 player or the median recreational player of my level.

Again, at the very least, it plays way different than anything else I've tried. You're gonna love it or hate it, it's not a safe bet.
A very good friend of mine than has given to me 3 rackets for free, didn't like the stringbed sensation. He's hit with almost every racket ever released.

Personally, I enjoyed it more on groundstroke practicing than actual match-play. I prefer lower swingweight and a 5-6 points hl balance strung.
 
If you look on twu the iso and synergy have canny near identical specs . They do feel differnt on impact though and play slightly differnt
 
I pick my Synergy up from time to time and it feels like an absolute Bommy knocker/ mace/ or flail.

I’m I’m so used to using sub 22mm box beams that cut & glide through the air.

Synergy is a chunky boii, but it packs a mighty punch! One of the best volleying frames on the market tbh. The over exaggerated round frying pan head shape is amazing for 2HBHs.

It’s a great frame, but I think I prefer a weighted up phantom-X 18x20. It’s just more manoeuvrable, and I can hit harder without fear of my balls sailing.

If my play style was to hit hard, aim big and to either hit through you, or power ball you off the court...then this would be my stick of choice.

I know this is the synergy thread but if your looking for more spin the Diablo weighted up plays great too (but it needs a heap of lead to make it comfortable)

I added a leather base grip, 2 overgrips on my G#2 to bulk it up, make it a tad more HL & for some unknown reason added 2g @ 3 & 9 to make it that little bit extra plush on contact.

Think mine comes in at 342g with a fat shock-absorber, strung with PTP 1.25 @ 50lbs
 
I pick my Synergy up from time to time and it feels like an absolute Bommy knocker/ mace/ or flail.

I’m I’m so used to using sub 22mm box beams that cut & glide through the air.

Synergy is a chunky boii, but it packs a mighty punch! One of the best volleying frames on the market tbh. The over exaggerated round frying pan head shape is amazing for 2HBHs.

It’s a great frame, but I think I prefer a weighted up phantom-X 18x20. It’s just more manoeuvrable, and I can hit harder without fear of my balls sailing.

If my play style was to hit hard, aim big and to either hit through you, or power ball you off the court...then this would be my stick of choice.

I know this is the synergy thread but if your looking for more spin the Diablo weighted up plays great too (but it needs a heap of lead to make it comfortable)

I added a leather base grip, 2 overgrips on my G#2 to bulk it up, make it a tad more HL & for some unknown reason added 2g @ 3 & 9 to make it that little bit extra plush on contact.

Think mine comes in at 342g with a fat shock-absorber, strung with PTP 1.25 @ 50lbs
Are you saying that is how you modded the Synergy, or the Diablo?
 
On paper and specs wise it's comparable to the ISO305 but i'd expect different sensation and to the Prestige MP 18*19 2021-2023. These two feel stiffer overall, the Synergy feels flexy in the throat. To my surprise, the Yonex DR98 had a similar flex in the same throat area.

An even balanced, flat hitter's frame who is capable of a very early preparation a la Medvedev (I've only seen a former tennis player here having such a stroke, very rare style) with big takeback, who hits through the ball and provides his own power into the shot. Just think Medvedev style.

Defending felt much easier on the backhand side, because I could just chop the ball and because of the high swingweight I didn't have to impart much of a forwrds bodyweight transfer.
It felt harder to defend on the forehand side because it felt slow to maneuver on the back foot.

Rock solid at the net, on returns, on the 2-handed backhand, faster than the swingweight suggests from the mid-court when I had to come in and lift a low ball I could do it easier than wirh the Prestige MP.

It's a demanding frame for a 3.5-4.0 player or the median recreational player of my level.

Again, at the very least, it plays way different than anything else I've tried. You're gonna love it or hate it, it's not a safe bet.
A very good friend of mine than has given to me 3 rackets for free, didn't like the stringbed sensation. He's hit with almost every racket ever released.

Personally, I enjoyed it more on groundstroke practicing than actual match-play. I prefer lower swingweight and a 5-6 points hl balance strung.
I always thought the prestige mp 2021 was an outlier in the prestige series with the swingweight and string pattern. This is is where the power chart only tells one aspect of the story, they used to have the L5 for instance where it was more about swing length which i think made more sense. But even that was only a guide. With high swingweight comes timing and technique. I have seen many people compare the synergy to the Blade pro as it has a lower 305 static weight but an inflated swingweight no doubt due to the balance load in the racket also. The speed pro from Head had nice stability and decent defensive abilities but just didn't feel great for the touch and control side of things. Head actually has a big gap in my opinion currently for a nice all round frame to be used by higher level players. The nee Boom seems to be the closest thing which seems to tick a lot of boxes but i haven't tested it enough to be sure. It certainly felt the best to me of all the Head range when i tested most of them a couple of months ago. The problem with frames when theses frames come in with higher (330+) swingweights there isn't much headroom to work with, it pretty much has to work out the box but great if it does fit. The prestige MP-L was popular with many as it allowed various levels of adjustment and even played fine as a lighter swinging stick. For me it felt a bit hollow and I didn't like the weight distribution in the frame and felt it needed too much work to get it to a place where i would be happy with it. I felt the racket felt cheaper than the pro and didn't feel as nice. I still have to test the synergy but was looking at string set ups as it does seem to be a string sensitive frame i hear.
 
With high swingweight comes timing and technique.
That's the most accurate way to put it with the Synergy 98.

Α very good friend of mine has been maining the Prestige MP-L 2021 and also has the MP 18x19 2021. He has put a good amount of lead to the MP-L.
Personally, I would have to be blown away with the ATS 100 290 grams to pick it over the MP-L with the constant 21.5mm beam.
Nothing beats a not too thin-not too thick constant beam of 21.5 or 22mm.

With the Synergy, the 18x18 pattern will for sure prolong the lifespan of any string setup, whether it's 1.20 or 1.25 for sure.
For me, there are 3 major polyester families of strings: the stiff ones, the lively ones and the plasticky/mute/dead ones.
I used to dislike some plasticky feeling strings on rackets like the Elevate V2, but they play great on powerful frames like the Nova or the Blade V5 16x19.
 
Just hit with this for the first time.

For the first 1 1/2 hours, man this was a BEAST. I think it’s a perfect spec for anyone who plays all court tennis, and needs a bit more stability on a One hander. Two hand backhand is super forgiving, but my one hander was rock solid with the synergy.

18x18. Didn’t know what to think about it, but I’m sold. Grigor might be on some all time genius for anyone with a flatter one-y.

Around the 2 hour mark was when the swingweight caught up to me, and I realized how much I use my arm to flatten out balls, instead of my legs.

Overall I’ve never felt more inspired from a 305 98” and Prince deserves some long overdue flowers for this one.

The paint job is the cherry on top, the slight pearl in the white, and the powder coat are top notch.

Underrated, the bridge to playerbithia is what I’m thinking.
 
Just hit with this for the first time.

For the first 1 1/2 hours, man this was a BEAST. I think it’s a perfect spec for anyone who plays all court tennis, and needs a bit more stability on a One hander. Two hand backhand is super forgiving, but my one hander was rock solid with the synergy.

18x18. Didn’t know what to think about it, but I’m sold. Grigor might be on some all time genius for anyone with a flatter one-y.

Around the 2 hour mark was when the swingweight caught up to me, and I realized how much I use my arm to flatten out balls, instead of my legs.

Overall I’ve never felt more inspired from a 305 98” and Prince deserves some long overdue flowers for this one.

The paint job is the cherry on top, the slight pearl in the white, and the powder coat are top notch.

Underrated, the bridge to playerbithia is what I’m thinking.
Indeed what did you string it with

Not sure Grigor can take all credit it’s not too disimilar to an 18*19 Novak uses .

However beast frame one of the best I have ever used
 
Iv hit with it now with several string set ups , suits you bite soft well as string has some power and not too low powered also

Hit with 4g bronze and a few others and it’s low powered . A medium power string is ideal and a bit stiffer
 
I really like my Synergy. But the weak point for me is the serve. The higher swing weight is great for rallying, but it totally throws off my timing and ability to snap through the serve. So when playing points, I'm at a disadvantage when I'm serving. However, it it a pretty solid returning racquet, so there's that too....
 
Indeed what did you string it with

Not sure Grigor can take all credit it’s not too disimilar to an 18*19 Novak uses .

However beast frame one of the best I have ever used
It came in from the bay with solinco revolution, not a bad hitting experience but definitely going to cut it out
 
Wow, this racket has certainly got my attention. I hit outdoors last night and felt pretty at ease right away with it, i was thinking a lot about the swingweight before trying but i have to say once out on the court it helped me actually in a positive way. It seems like i cannot miss with this racket. The depth on shots is improved but still nice amd controlled and from my flat shots it seems to produce a pretty heavy ball. Tonight i played indoors and could get some real heavy hitting from it. Its a serious racket. To think back to a racket this serious and heavy hitting on my flat hits i have to say it is similar to the Head Liquid metal radical tour which was an absolute beast, I'm guessing very similar swingweight and RA tho the static weight for that i think was more like about 325g but I seem to remember it feeling similar in stability and the shots it produces. I strung with a Hybrid at 52lbs with prince tour xp mains and Wilson Sensation plus crosses. It looks nice too when set up. Big thumbs up to Prince for this one. Maybe i should have tried a Blade pro too a while ago if that plays similarly. I had been trying some 100p frames but was producing a bit too much racket head speed on some shots and making some bad errors. With this i haven't been able to produce so much and it has refined the strokes. Serving felt ok too. I am tempted in future maybe to string a touch lower but this is getting good results as is for the moment. I may have to find the Japanese F1 version now haha.
 
What are your synergy 98s weighing in at. Mine feels pretty heavy? Similar to my prestige (320g) to pick up static weight wise? It weighs 330g strung but that's still with the plastic film. Still on the handle (does that add much on prince, on head it was only 2g or so)
I have bought 3 and unstrung with the plastic wrapper still on they weigh in as follows.
308g, 312g, 316g,
I am most disappointed with the 316g one as that is a long way out on what is a heavy swinging frame as it is?
 
Wow I someone who sees it like me it’s a mini Novak frame

It is very similar to that head liquidmetal tour . The throat too it seems

It’s ridiculously good

I’m not sure why anyone hasn’t seen it before ..

Iv had some which came lighter too . I’ll have to sw them all
 
Last edited:
When you lighter, these weights are just for the frame before stringing so depending on the plastic wrapper weight, these are over weight wise. One by maybe 8-9 grams which is considerable i think? No wonder it felt like prestige when i held it as it isn't far off 320g.
 
What are your synergy 98s weighing in at. Mine feels pretty heavy? Similar to my prestige (320g) to pick up static weight wise? It weighs 330g strung but that's still with the plastic film. Still on the handle (does that add much on prince, on head it was only 2g or so)
I have bought 3 and unstrung with the plastic wrapper still on they weigh in as follows.
308g, 312g, 316g,
I am most disappointed with the 316g one as that is a long way out on what is a heavy swinging frame as it is?
I currently have four of these with one more on the way later this week (trying vortex 17g in this one). The one that is strung comes in at 323 with diablo 16g full bed. Two unstrung with plastic wrapped grip come in at 306 and 309. My phantom F1 unstrung with plastic wrapped grip comes in at 304.
 
Having hit with it 4 times now, I see that the tip of the racket wants to take over, so whoever uses the Synergy has to hit the ball flat and early or like a whip. It's very stable, I've noticed it on slight misshits.

To put it into visual percpective, what I think is the Synergy 98 requires a Stan/Medvedev take-back and swing. The problem is that this takes more time (better footwork, early preparation etc), something I'm not able to be doing for 1 hour straight with it. If I hit late, the ball will find the net.

To stick with the Synergy would require big adjustments to my style and I believe a racket should complement my strengths first. Now, I'm trying to improve on my top-spin, cross-court forehands and my 5-month-old 2-handed backhands, with medium-to-high net clearence and depth. I can do that much easier with the Elevate. The Synergy has a much lower launch angle.

If I was to stick to one racket, that would probably be my current V2 Elevate that I've been using for the last 2 years and would get a second one, but that's not what I want to do. I just want to have fun with exciting rackets I can get my hands on.

I'll keep hitting with the Synergy 98 along with 2 more Princes I'm expecting delivery from 2 friends, a Tour 95 2015 and an O3 Tour (Ferrer, I think).
Its your level and training that makes the Synergy/Prestige MP and alike rackets not a good match. There are different rackets for different levels. I wonder a little why you go after and use rackets that is a somewhat away from your level of play and experience. You like to use 5.0 rackets, yet you are 3.5. Its clear that your form and technique and preparation is better suited with rackets that are lighter and with bigger hoops and multifilament strings that can help you. 5.0 rackets are for people that needs to have help to control and maybe even dial down the power that they wield themselves. Seing you play with Prestige/Synergy is like seeing a 10 year old using his fathers bike. You need more strength, atlethcism and timing for those big boy rackets.
As a racket technician, customizer and coach and string/product nerd, I would advice you to use the light versions of the flagships. So not the Speed MP but the Speed MP L as an example.
 
Last edited:
Not having any Pros on Tour using Prince is CRIMINAL!
So many great under appreciated frames that Rec players won’t even consider...real shame.

The Gunmetal grey, golf ball slinger is a beauty with a responsive (yet plush) rock solid string bed.
It feels like like you’re swinging a pillow around that firms up at contact.

The throat feels really nice in the off hand but I feel that a box beam throat would have given it even more consistency and me confidence when aiming for small/fine margins...extremely good clay court racquet too (suits my game better than any Aero would)
Did you try the Prince RipStick 300 ?
 
By my experience, it felt like a head-heavy frame, faster through the air than the similarly balanced Prestige MP 18x19 2021, VERY flexible in the throat, leading to a feel that there was serious lag upon ball contact. Not exactly serious ball pocketing, but lack of easy launch out of the stringbed. Like I said before, one has to take flat swings a la Madvedev to play trully good with this one. What stood out for my game, was the easiness of the 2-handed backhand and the ease to slice with minimal bodyweight transfer (high swingweight).
At the very least, it is another of those Prince interesting molds who deserve a try.
The "serious Lag upon contact" you experince with the Prince Synergy is bc you dont take full swings... and thus you lack the synergy between the technique and the racket. There is a reason why Prince calls this racket Synergy. The 60 RA needs full swings and better preperation and greater athleticism. all flagship models are dialing down the RA to the request of the lvl 5's and above.
Heavy hitters with full swing and good preperation needs a softer racket, than intermidaites or the ball would hit the back fence and not the court.
Shopping tennis rackets are not like shopping mobile phones. getting the flagship model do not benefit all.
Also you might use too stiff strings also. I think your level is more towards soft co-polyester or multifilaments or hybrids that gives you more help.
 
Last edited:
I really like my Synergy. But the weak point for me is the serve. The higher swing weight is great for rallying, but it totally throws off my timing and ability to snap through the serve. So when playing points, I'm at a disadvantage when I'm serving. However, it it a pretty solid returning racquet, so there's that too....
Alter the timing and program your mind to hit the ball earlier than with other rackets..... and get the racket as much as possible down the back and get the elbow to point stright up to the sky this before releasing the energy upwards and try hit the ball a bit more upwards and let the gravity do its thing.
 
I've had a Synergy 98 since April. Didn't much care for it at first. Sweet spot seemed small. The standard weight, but with higher end swing weight felt a bit off, especially on serves....However, about midsummer I pulled it out again and began to realize its charms. If you allow your strokes to flow, the swing weight just comes along for the ride and adds some nice umph to your shots. Trying to "arm" your shots the racquet will just work against you. Same with the serves; I couldn't muscle through the motion, but allowing the added swing weight to ensure a good pro drop on my arm action, and then that weight coming through the ball gave me some very nice serves with rather good spin as well. On ground strokes, the perceived small sweet spot made me KEEP MY EYE ON THE BALL all the way through contact, and now the racquet feels quite forgiving and the sweet spot feels rather large actually.
It certainly is a unique racquet in string pattern, swing weight and flex. What I have found is that the more I play with this racquet alone, not switching around to others in my bag, the better it plays for me. That's likely true for most racquets, but I feel that this stick doesn't get the recognition it deserves because perhaps many don't bother to give it a long enough tryout.

At one point I tried to even out the swing weight by adding weight to the handle. Racquet just ended up feeling sluggish. I removed the handle weight, played it stock, and that's when I began to get a groove on with the stick. The design concept of a 305 racquet, so it is physically light in your hand, but with enhanced swing weight for good plow through really caught on with me. I'm not a heavy topspin player, and tend to hit through the ball. But the shots with the racquet aren't what I would deem "flat shots". The 18x18 strikes a nice balance between control and spin. The 18x18 may be a gimmick of sorts, as it looks as if they could easily have put in another couple of crosses. But perhaps leaving the borders vacant of strings is what helps give this racquet such a nice pocketing feel. Nobody is hitting useful shots off of the crosses at the very tip or throat anyhow, so just leave them out I guess. Oh, and stabilty- yes this racquet feels very stable. Comes right through the ball smooth as can be. Sure, any racquet returning a blistering serve will get blown off axis from time to time, but it is a rare event with this racquet in my experience.

Last time they had a sale on it I grabbed a second one, and am now using them to test strings and tensions to level up even more. So far, for me, the Volkl Cyclone 17g at 50lbs is the winner. Tried RPM Blast 17g , V-Square 18g , and Black Widow 18g.

Other racquets I've had over the past year or so: Textreme Tour 100P (2019), Phantom 100P, Clash 100, Aero 100 (2016), Head Gravity S, RipStick, Dunlop SX 300 tour.

I love that Prince has been bold in their design concepts. I hope they continue in that direction.
How was the Ripstick ?
 
Its your level and training that makes the Synergy/Prestige MP and alike rackets not a good match. There are different rackets for different levels. I wonder a little why you go after and use rackets that is a somewhat away from your level of play and experience.
I have some very nice friends who send me some of their rackets to hit with for some weeks and return them. I was the first to state that the Prestige MP and the Synergy are too demanding for me, mostly because of the balance point and the high swingweight.
During August, last month I played tennis, I was using the Diadem Nova V2 FS100 exclusively and in general went lighter, to be able to swing the racket faster.
I'm not playing for competition or anything, just for fun and that's it.
 
I have some very nice friends who send me some of their rackets to hit with for some weeks and return them. I was the first to state that the Prestige MP and the Synergy are too demanding for me, mostly because of the balance point and the high swingweight.
During August, last month I played tennis, I was using the Diadem Nova V2 FS100 exclusively and in general went lighter, to be able to swing the racket faster.
I'm not playing for competition or anything, just for fun and that's it.
Its all fine and good. Nice to have good friends.
But the reason I wrote what I wrote/commented is simply this:
As you dont quite have the lvl to play with those two rackets, and struggle with the choice of string and tension, then I find it a bit odd that you use a lot of time to write a review of + 5.0 rackets which are not in your wheel-house. And that makes your review also not something a person that has the lvl and skill that matches those rackets, able to use you review for much.
So when you say the racket is too something. then it really is not... bc your review would is off, bc your skill and that racket dont match.
Us who can use those rackets, we are searching for reviews and experience for those rackets... and its not good if we base our considerations on a review from people who cant use them. So the problem, as I see it, is that you might throw someone off buying a racket based on your skills/performance and not the actual racket.
 
So the problem, as I see it, is that you might throw someone off buying a racket based on your skills/performance and not the actual racket.
That's why I (used to) post hitting clips of me hitting with the thing I'm talking about, so whoever is interested, can compare his/her level to mine and take my feedback into consideration or not.
Higher level players than me could look somewhere else.
Interestingly, I don't see you saying anything about players (tennis enthusiasts to be exact) that play at a lower level than mine...
I will never get into any arguement about one's feedback about anything. If not interested, look away.
Everyone can judge for themselves while seeing actual footage.
At the end of the day, this is just a forum.
 
That's why I (used to) post hitting clips of me hitting with the thing I'm talking about, so whoever is interested, can compare his/her level to mine and take my feedback into consideration or not.
Higher level players than me could look somewhere else.
Interestingly, I don't see you saying anything about players (tennis enthusiasts to be exact) that play at a lower level than mine...
I will never get into any arguement about one's feedback about anything. If not interested, look away.
Everyone can judge for themselves while seeing actual footage.
At the end of the day, this is just a forum.
Well I dont have the problem to be scared to interact if something is off or can mislead people. Its a forum correct. So expect some feedback and opinions. also when its not necesarely positive. I still think its odd and a waste of time that you review rackets you cant wield and then give opinions about what is good and not good about the racket....this when the racket is not at fault.
Cheers.
 
How was the Ripstick ?
Love the Ripstick (300g). Easy swinging, good power, but also with lots of spin to bring the ball down too. That works pretty well for my serves too. Just feels "right". Volkl Cyclone @53 lbs.

I haven't played with it in a while because I am using a Twistpower X100 Tour and ProKennex Black Ace 105 mostly these days just for fun.
 
The guy how actually designed and developed this racket is not a high level pro player, his inspiration was taken from the older series Prince frames from the 90s which also led him with the team to reissue the classic Synergy DB26. Whilst some rackets are harder to use than others the synergy is not difficult to handle. I found it rock solid but i hit pretty hard and flat. Many frames are designed with a similar aim in mind to give a lot of topspin and have a lighter frame to generate racket head speed. I have tried virtually every frame in Heads line up in recent months and find they all blur into one. With the prestige pro they still have a players stick, with wilson the Blade Pro is pro labs only. Many have compared the synergy in some ways to the head speed pro and the Wilson blade pro. I haven't hit with a blade pro but was Hitting with 360+ speed pro i have again last night, its a very easy racket to get pace with, swingweight is up at around 330ish too but feels very one dimensional in touch and feedback. The synergy is a strange one to get the string set up right for. The frame is pretty unusual in its beam width too. Prince have made some really good frames and have been slept on by the mainstream to some degree no doubt due to having no presence in the pro game with main tour players now to my knowledge. There was pouille but not many others. I think with the synergy it is just so different and such an acquired taste. Its a great frame though and looking at the prince range with the tour range this sits on a cloud of its own.
 
Love the Ripstick (300g). Easy swinging, good power, but also with lots of spin to bring the ball down too. That works pretty well for my serves too. Just feels "right". Volkl Cyclone @53 lbs.

I haven't played with it in a while because I am using a Twistpower X100 Tour and ProKennex Black Ace 105 mostly these days just for fun.
Volk Cyclone gauge?
16G/1.30 ?
 
I really like my Synergy. But the weak point for me is the serve. The higher swing weight is great for rallying, but it totally throws off my timing and ability to snap through the serve. So when playing points, I'm at a disadvantage when I'm serving. However, it it a pretty solid returning racquet, so there's that too....
Maybe have one racket for returning and a different for serving?
 
Maybe you would get suprised positively? Many seems to like hitting with it. Many good reviews from buyers. Many prefer it over the known power spinsters.

I’m sure it’s a nice playing frame but I don’t like open patterns. The string tension maintenance is crap and the “slap-ability” drops off a cliff.

I’ve already got a 310 tour & Japan 2020 ATS (in 100 & 95) that don’t see enough court time lol...I’m also kinda over buying new frames tbh. I still haven’t even strung up my Diablo a second time yet...
 
That's one of the things I discovered earlier this summer--I was hitting too high in the hoop on the Synergy during serves. Felt bad, served bad. I had to re-train myself to allow the ball to enter a slightly lower zone before striking it. It seemed too low, but the results said that is where it needed to be. As I said previously, my best results have been when I practice & play exclusively with the Synergy to acclimatize to certain quirks of this racquet. The hoop does seem rounder, less oblong than many others, and thus less accommodating of vertical error on the serve in my experience. But when well struck, it can produce some very nice pace and spin with minimal effort.
Interesting.
They (Prince) implemented technologies (CTS and ATS and double holes) https://princetennis.jp/product-category/tennis/tennis-racket/tennis-racket-phantom-f1 to actually make the upper hoop having an expanded sweetspot and more repulsion power. So it should be better than other rackets when you hit ball in the upper hoop, not worse. What string do/did you use and at what tension?
 
I’m sure it’s a nice playing frame but I don’t like open patterns. The string tension maintenance is crap and the “slap-ability” drops off a cliff.

I’ve already got a 310 tour & Japan 2020 ATS (in 100 & 95) that don’t see enough court time lol...I’m also kinda over buying new frames tbh. I still haven’t even strung up my Diablo a second time yet...
Too many rackets and too little time. :)
 
Interesting.
They (Prince) implemented technologies (CTS and ATS and double holes) https://princetennis.jp/product-category/tennis/tennis-racket/tennis-racket-phantom-f1 to actually make the upper hoop having an expanded sweetspot and more repulsion power. So it should be better than other rackets when you hit ball in the upper hoop, not worse. What string do/did you use and at what tension?
Yeah, but my problem was hitting at the extreme top of the hoop. No tech is going to help way up there..... As I said before, my main problem when using the Synergy on serves is timing. The racquet has a high swing weight, so it feels a bit sluggish on serves for me. I then tend to overcompensate by swinging too early, and trying for too fast, resulting in hitting the ball too high up in the hoop. When I relax and let it flow, the racquet does a nice job plowing through on its own, but its a different sort of serve timing than the other racquets that I use, and so I never end up giving it the proper amount of playing time to acclimate. I use Volkl Cyclone 17g @50-52lbs usually
 
Yeah, but my problem was hitting at the extreme top of the hoop. No tech is going to help way up there..... As I said before, my main problem when using the Synergy on serves is timing. The racquet has a high swing weight, so it feels a bit sluggish on serves for me. I then tend to overcompensate by swinging too early, and trying for too fast, resulting in hitting the ball too high up in the hoop. When I relax and let it flow, the racquet does a nice job plowing through on its own, but its a different sort of serve timing than the other racquets that I use, and so I never end up giving it the proper amount of playing time to acclimate. I use Volkl Cyclone 17g @50-52lbs usually
I had that problem with the Babolat Pure Strike VS.... and the solution was to string it with a bit lower tension.... and also to not string the top/1. cross.
 
Previous owner here. Probably played with it a total of 40 hours and 5 string jobs' worth of varying material, gauge and tension. I found it to pretty much behave like what is says on the tin: an arm-friendly baseliner's counterpunching stick with a decent balance of power, control and spin. That said, I have more of an all-court game and with flatter striking off both wings, including an Eastern OHBH, all of which I found a bit harder to execute, with a head-heavier balance, more of a frying-pan shape to the head and more pocketing and dwell than I ultimately prefer.

If I had to visualize a perfect player for the Synergy 98, it would be a counterpuncher with long, swipey strokes who's perhaps been using more stiff and/or lower-powered frames than he/she wants to handle, and is looking for a softer and/or slightly higher-powered option, while retaining control.

Certainly a good stick for the right player, but to me the use-case is a fairly narrow one, which is why, if I had to guess, they haven't sold well, and consequently has been marked down to ridiculously low pricing at times (as low as $69 in the recent past).
whats the best stringjob you tried on it? Stringing for a friend
 
Back
Top