Pro Stock Wilson Racquets

Mdubb23

Hall of Fame
Recently, in the wake of all hype surrounding pro stock Wilson frames, I've decided to create this thread in an attempt to coherently organize all thoughts about Wilson pro stock frames into one thread. We, as a TT community, have over the past couple years unlocked many secrets pertaining to Head Pro Stock frames, and I feel we should have no problem doing the same for Wilson. That said, here are my thoughts so far:

Wilson Pros essentially fall into two different categories. The first category represents Wilson pros who enjoy and demand that classic, stiff Wilson feel on all of their shots. These pros tend to use Six.One or Pro.Tour/Pro.Open paintjobs on top of older Wilson frames, always with PWS, and often with the word "classic" in the throat. Examples of such players are the following: Roger Federer, Juan Martin del Potro, Jarkko Nieminen, Feliciano Lopez, and Mardy Fish. TT User Indiana Puffed, in particular, has a great collection of these "classic" racquets:
4325132420_ca7709091a_b.jpg

4325134656_97c2643323_b.jpg

On the contrary, the other category represents primarily former Head PT630 (PT57A/PT57E) users, who don't care for that stiff feel on their groundstrokes, but demand it on their serves and on their volleys, two areas where PT57's are noticeably lacking, according to pros. However, these pros demand the plush, soft PT57 feel on their groundstrokes. The answer? The Wilson H22, a prototype frame without PWS and seeming to duplicate the PT630/PT57 mold, but yet what former Head pros claim feeels much better on serves and volleys. These, as far as I know, are always found in Blade paintjobs, whether the Tour or the 98, and are incredibly hard to find--much more so than the "classic" paintjobs. I've seen arguments that the 22 stands for the beam width in millimeters, but I cannot confirm or deny that. There is much speculation as to whether or not Djokovic used the H22 under a KBT paintjob. I believe he did. VSBabolat believes he did not. Examples of pros undoubtedly using the H22 are as follows: Philipp Kohlschreiber, Paul-Henri Mathieu, Arnaud Clement, Dmitry Tursunov, Frank Dancevic, and Lester Cook. A TT member, Biciomac, posted a great picture of his H22:

So, to wrap it all up, it seems as though there are two categories of Wilson pros: those using older Wilson racquets with PWS under paintjobs and those transferring from Head to Wilson using the Wilson H22 with a KBlade paintjob. Again, this is only a crude conjecture (I'm hoping we can all work to refine it), and there are many exceptions to my observations. One, for example, is Taylor Dent. He used to use stiff-feeling Wilson racquets with PWS (I'm pretty sure the HPS Zone 7.1 with Prostaff ROK and n6.1 95 PJs) long before the concept of the H22 was even conceived. Now, however, he uses the H22 (or at least a KBlade 98 PJ without PWS, and that's good enough for me). That completely contradicts my theory. As a result of his back injuries, does he now demand a flexier feel on groundstrokes? Who knows. And also, to clear up any confusion, when I grouped Federer with those using "classic" Wilson frames, it's because he uses a stiff, custom Wilson frame with PWS, very similar to the Six.One Tour out today, therefore meeting the criteria of a Wilson pro who likes the stiffer, classic Wilson feel as opposed to one who likes a flexier feel on groundies.

All in all, I'm hoping we can get a ton of good information out of this thread. Tuners, stringers, please bless us mere mortals with your wealth of information.
 
here's my 2 cents.

i played with a wilson pj racquet once that a member of my team had in his possession. i'm 99% sure it once belonged to scott oudsema.

the racquet had the hyper prostaff 6.1 cosmetics. and an 85 square inch head. i don't remember exactly, but i'm pretty sure it said 6.0 on it just like it was supposed to be that way if it went to retail.

it wasn't the original prostaff 6.0 85, though, under the paint. i played with the two racquets back to back and the pj racquet was much whippier.
 
here's my 2 cents.

i played with a wilson pj racquet once that a member of my team had in his possession. i'm 99% sure it once belonged to scott oudsema.

the racquet had the hyper prostaff 6.1 cosmetics. and an 85 square inch head. i don't remember exactly, but i'm pretty sure it said 6.0 on it just like it was supposed to be that way if it went to retail.

it wasn't the original prostaff 6.0 85, though, under the paint. i played with the two racquets back to back and the pj racquet was much whippier.

Interesting. Could it just have been that the PJ was uncustomized?
 
There was a very limited edition racket with those specs on TW a long while back. Somebody can probably dig up those specs.
 
Very interesting thread. I'm not a Wilson user and thus have no knowledge of these frames but am always looking to learn. After reading this it makes me want to see about getting my hands on one of the H22 frames. My coach is a former tour player and was a Wilson sponsered player. I know he still has a lot of contacts so I'll see if he can get one through Wilson or the local rep. Certainly if I do I'll take pics, weight balance etc. and share.
 
I asked my coach about these H22 frames to see if I could get my hands on one. He is unsure about it, but will inquire. He should find out by today some basic info on the H22; more to follow!

Cheers,

Greek Goliath
 
Okay guys, here's an update for everything I've learned thus far.

The H22 is supposed to be the "hybrid" stick in the sense that it provides the soft flex of the PT57s on groundstrokes, making it extremely plush, but performing far better on serves and volleys. Most pros use a H22 and then transition into the H19, which is the regular KBlade mold. According to my coach, H22 does indeed stand for a 22mm beam width, and the (most common) headsize is a 98. I don't think there are any H22 93s, but have asked about that, and he will inquire. Weight and balance differ depending on who's stick it is. I hope I can get my hands on one of these; if so, it's straight to the RDC machine!

Cheers,

Greek Goliath
 
Okay guys, here's an update for everything I've learned thus far.

The H22 is supposed to be the "hybrid" stick in the sense that it provides the soft flex of the PT57s on groundstrokes, making it extremely plush, but performing far better on serves and volleys. Most pros use a H22 and then transition into the H19, which is the regular KBlade mold. According to my coach, H22 does indeed stand for a 22mm beam width, and the (most common) headsize is a 98. I don't think there are any H22 93s, but have asked about that, and he will inquire. Weight and balance differ depending on who's stick it is. I hope I can get my hands on one of these; if so, it's straight to the RDC machine!

Cheers,

Greek Goliath

very interesting my friend, thanks for the info.
 
Okay guys, here's an update for everything I've learned thus far.

The H22 is supposed to be the "hybrid" stick in the sense that it provides the soft flex of the PT57s on groundstrokes, making it extremely plush, but performing far better on serves and volleys. Most pros use a H22 and then transition into the H19, which is the regular KBlade mold. According to my coach, H22 does indeed stand for a 22mm beam width, and the (most common) headsize is a 98. I don't think there are any H22 93s, but have asked about that, and he will inquire. Weight and balance differ depending on who's stick it is. I hope I can get my hands on one of these; if so, it's straight to the RDC machine!

Cheers,

Greek Goliath

Great info, man! If you can get your hands on one, by all means please post!
 
Greek Goliath, does H19 stand for a 19mm beam width?


PS: Where is beam width measured btw?[/QUOTE]

on the beam:) LOL
those H models messures the same from top to bottom, same as 6.1´s and blades just to mention a few.. constant beam.
 
Hi guys,

No problem for the info; I know it's not that much, but hopefully I can get more. The H19 probably stands for a 19mm beam but I'm not 100% sure, so don't quote me on that :-P.

Vs.... the pro room....

I WANT TO GO THERE

Cheers,

Greek Goliath
 
Great, just when I get all the PT and TGK numbers memorized, I've got to start all over with Wilson ;)


Great thread and very interesting; I'm not much of a Wilson guy but the H22 does sound nice and rare.
 
The K Blade I got from my coach measures 20mm at the side of the neck and 19mm at the side of the head (where PWS would be on a 6.1) even though the internet says it's 20mm constant beam... I'm a bit confused here.
 
The K Blade I got from my coach measures 20mm at the side of the neck and 19mm at the side of the head (where PWS would be on a 6.1) even though the internet says it's 20mm constant beam... I'm a bit confused here.

Wilson quality control. Similar to Military Intelligence. (I a Veteran so I can pick on the military :-))
 
Bubba, I don't think it's QC. I mean QC is usually related to weight and balance, and the balance on this stick is exactly like the specs say - 31cm unstrung, 32 strung. My coach got it from a pro who received it for testing
 
Last edited:
Bubba, I don't think it's QC. I mean QC is usually related to weight and balance, and the balance on this stick is exactly like the specs say - 31cm unstrung, 32 strung. My coach got it from a pro who received it for testing

Actually, there have been several posts regarding beam width and QC and Wilson... also, what are you measuring it with - calipers???

... does it really matter? Does it hit like you need it?
 
^^Good call, my apologies. Can anyone shed some light on to what he is, in fact, using? (VSBabolat)
 
^^Good call, my apologies. Can anyone shed some light on to what he is, in fact, using? (VSBabolat)

Many say he uses the older Wilson Hyper Carbon Pro Staff 6.1 18x20 under paintjobs or it could be the nCode 6.1 95 from what I remember seeing at one point he said it was one of his favorite racquets and in other pro stringing sites they said it was a K95 18x20, what I do know is that it's a 4 3/8th grip size that he uses.
 
Last edited:
Anyone know if there is a pro-version of Fed's 6.1 90" frame in a 95?

Love the K 6.1 Tour with the box-style frame, but always wanted a 95 for just a bit more 'slack'.

As soon as the size jumps, they start making the oval/rounded frame, which completely changes the feel.
 
Today's the day I find out if I can get my hands on an H22...

Also the day I found out when my PT57Es get here!

Cheers,

Greek Goliath
 
Many say he uses the older Wilson Hyper Carbon Pro Staff 6.1 18x20 under paintjobs or it could be the nCode 6.1 95 from what I remember seeing at one point he said it was one of his favorite racquets and in other pro stringing sites they said it was a K95 18x20, what I do know is that it's a 4 3/8th grip size that he uses.

Great, thanks for the info. It seems like he's another exception to my theory; I would have guessed he would be using Six.One paint.
 
pros who use N95>

Many say he uses the older Wilson Hyper Carbon Pro Staff 6.1 18x20 under paintjobs or it could be the nCode 6.1 95 from what I remember seeing at one point he said it was one of his favorite racquets and in other pro stringing sites they said it was a K95 18x20, what I do know is that it's a 4 3/8th grip size that he uses.

I've asked this before but I never really got any examples back... are there ANY pros at all that ppl feel fairly sure use now or used previously the N95?

Thanks

R.
 
Actually, there have been several posts regarding beam width and QC and Wilson... also, what are you measuring it with - calipers???

... does it really matter? Does it hit like you need it?

Well if we take that H22 stands for 22mm beam then H19 stands for 19mm, like mine. Maybe someone who has a K blade tour can measure the beam and tell me if its 19 or 20mm?

Oh, btw Tsonga was using a KB98 with PWS before he switched to babolat, so maybe Wilson are painting some 6.1 like the KB98 like Head are painting some prestiges like the radical?
 
Well if we take that H22 stands for 22mm beam then H19 stands for 19mm, like mine. Maybe someone who has a K blade tour can measure the beam and tell me if its 19 or 20mm?

Oh, btw Tsonga was using a KB98 with PWS before he switched to babolat, so maybe Wilson are painting some 6.1 like the KB98 like Head are painting some prestiges like the radical?

According to Wilson, the KBT specs are a 20mm constant beam.

Tsonga was just using a Wilson PJ before switching - not the Blade. There are a ton of threads on this: most of them around January 2008 when he went to the AO finals :)
 
hmmm what about the h19, any info on it? If its the same mold as the KBT how come one has a 20mm beam and the other 19
PS: do the wilson pro stock racqs have a code inside or something
I
 
hmmm what about the h19, any info on it? If its the same mold as the KBT how come one has a 20mm beam and the other 19
PS: do the wilson pro stock racqs have a code inside or something
I

There's no visible code on the pro stock Wilson 95 sq. inch frame that I've got. There might be a code on the handle - I've not taken the base grip off yet. On the inside of the throat of the racket on one side, there is the word "Classic".

As for the 19/20mm beam width question, I've not got first hand experience of the H19 (or much first hand experience with the KBT) so I can't say for sure. Maybe the 20mm beam width just looks nicer on the specs sheets than 19 because it's a "rounder" number. Maybe, like the KPS88's head size, the H19's beam is ever so slightly larger than marketed.

It'd be great if Greek Goliath can get hold of an H22. Have you considered what to do with it after you've tested it, Greek Goliath? I'm sure that if you wanted to, you could sell it on these forums for a pretty penny. Of course, even if you don't want to use the H22 as one of your main rackets, I'm sure you'll want to keep it as a part of your collection - I know I would.
 
Last edited:
My guy says he can get his hands on the h22 (much harder to do than the head pro stocks) but it would cost me $450 to get it. Can't imagine the frame is THAT nice. But it would be fun to have and to hit with. If I only had more money...
 
My guy says he can get his hands on the h22 (much harder to do than the head pro stocks) but it would cost me $450 to get it. Can't imagine the frame is THAT nice. But it would be fun to have and to hit with. If I only had more money...

Blake, can you email this "guy" 's name and email address? (mweller23@comcast.net). Thanks a ton, bud.
 
^^ Well, if the racquet is really good, I will use it. It's like a car- IMO, what's the point of having a Ferrari if you don't drive it?

Otherwise, I will keep it in my collection.

$450? That's quite a lot! My coach hasn't given me a price tag on the H22, but has confirmed he can get one... but it will take anywhere from four-six weeks.

Cheers,

Greek Goliath
 
Oh man, only one? Can't he get another one for me? :p Anyways if he can have one for me I'll be more than happy to buy/trade it with you ;)
 
Hey Mike,

You are already friends with him on facebook. I actually played him at the Open Nationals in Vegas last year, really nice guy with tons of stuff. He texted me a few days back and told me he is getting a few h22's in next week, so keep an eye out on his facebook page for them. Just know they are expensive (like everything else he has).

Great, thanks Blake, I wasn't sure if it was him or not. :)
 
^^ Well, if the racquet is really good, I will use it. It's like a car- IMO, what's the point of having a Ferrari if you don't drive it?

Otherwise, I will keep it in my collection.

$450? That's quite a lot! My coach hasn't given me a price tag on the H22, but has confirmed he can get one... but it will take anywhere from four-six weeks.

Cheers,

Greek Goliath

Greek, H22s for everybody! How about it?
 
Also, here are some tips for match play: Thermotabs for cramps, quinine also(some are allergic), pickle juice, fluid recovery powder
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eql8Jnpa9Bs nate ferguson video
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=309803 lead tape/balance
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/LC/customize.html customizing racquets

http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cach...ize+a+tennis+racquet&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJfhKEt_4nQ pallet removal

http://www.stringforum.net/top5.php?cat=SS sppp
http://www.stringforum.net/stringsearch.php
http://www.weightloss-hq.biz/recovery-drinks-and-bars/fluid-recovery-drink-review.html
http://www.goldenpicklejuice.com/?pjsid=3
http://www.tennisplayer.net for improvement, high speed video, and lots of articles, on movement, tactics, etc.
I rec. the sampras serve videos.
See my thread on chi energy to heal injuries.
See my practice blog on time staggering, slowing down time. Also, to get the heavy ball on your serve, the stick accel. must be very loose and fast on take back, for it to have the accel forward on pronation, to create the heavy ball off leg drive up.

dude what are you talking about here?
 
OK it's confirmed now, my KBT is from the pro room. I'll demo the stock KBT sometime and let you know how they compare. It doesn't have any markings or codes like the pro room Heads
 
Back
Top