30 and top 10 is same? What has she done in single at slams? Thank you.
What have you done other than post here? I think you are not even #1 million in whatever it is that you do.
30 and top 10 is same? What has she done in single at slams? Thank you.
You made an ignorant statement which i pointed out by making a similar generalization so you would hopefully recognize the simplistic fault in your approximation to a logical statement. Rather than admit your ignorance and learning from it, it appears you are digging in your heels to cloud the original statement. There, now you're corrected.You made a very ignorant assumption that I corrected.
In most countries, middle class has to struggle for tennis. And even with that, there is no guarantee.
You made an ignorant statement which i pointed out by making a similar generalization so you would hopefully recognize the simplistic fault in your approximation to a logical statement. Rather than admit your ignorance and learning from it, it appears you are digging in your heels to cloud the original statement. There, now your corrected.
I gave up if you think indian lower class and middle class = American lower and middle class. In India more than 80% people earn less than 800 use per month. Good luck with coaching their kids and sending outside India for tournaments with 800usd per month.
Yeah a ranking of #30 is not good for a singles player? Tell that to the thousands who can never make it there.
What she done in slam genius ? Lol whiteknighting for that overrated player? You're insulting Vijay by clubbing Sania Mirza with him. She was a journey woman in slams, perennial 1stbor second rounder.
Yeah but exchange rates? He will not even afford a week stay for kid abroad even with 2k USD salary while American middle lass with 7k-10k USD salary can . See the difference? Also, 80%of indian are below it. So realistically speaking in India only 5-%of population can afford to train their kids.But the expenses are also based on the same currency.
How many Slams did Vijay win LOL except the one in Octopussy? Sania has 3 doubles and 3 mixed doubles Slams and was #27 in singles.
I don't understand why private coaches charge $100 per hour for private coaching. It's ridiculous.
Lmao Vijay played singles semi if wimb, what Sania did? You whiteknighting hard for her won't change the fact. He was a top 10 and she was perennial 1st or second rounder at slams. Noone cares about doubles .
Yeah but exchange rates? He will not even afford a week stay for kid abroad even with 2k USD salary while American middle lass with 7k-10k USD salary can . See the difference? Also, 80%of indian are below it. So realistically speaking in India only 5-%of population can afford to train their kids.
I never made that claim, perhaps your confused with another poster. The only statement i made was, "your wrong in thinking westerners can't understand how hard it is to make it in anything when you come from nothing."You're the one who is stubborn and thinking all 3rd worlders think westerners are rich. Then I and to correct you by saying there is a difference in indian middle class , lower class and American middle class , I meant that.i didn't mean all yanks are rich smh.
Yeah but exchange rates? He will not even afford a week stay for kid abroad even with 2k USD salary while American middle lass with 7k-10k USD salary can . See the difference? Also, 80%of indian are below it. So realistically speaking in India only 5-%of population can afford to train their kids.
Alcohol may affect your performance. I smoke Cohibas.I drink Macallan 25 on changeovers. Gatorade is for troglodytes.
It has been a rich kids sport in India forever. Here 90% of population can't afford to train their kids as tennis player.
Let's be honest we already had a player Vijay Amritraj who was a top 10 player in singles and played wim semifinal. Thing is we don't have any infrastructure in any sports except cricket . We are a over a billion but we have just a single football academy.
But doesn't that mean that you still have 133+ million people (10 percent of the population) who CAN afford to raise tennis players? That's far more than the population of many highly successful tennis nations.
Yes, my impression as an outsider, looking at India's performance in the Olympics, in soccer and tennis, and some other international sports, is that Indians collectively seem not to care about any sport except cricket. Why is that? Culturally and linguistically, India is a very diverse country. Why so much emphasis on a single sport (and an imported sport at that, unlike with Canada and ice hockey)?
But doesn't that mean that you still have 133+ million people (10 percent of the population) who CAN afford to raise tennis players? That's far more than the population of many highly successful tennis nations.
Yes, my impression as an outsider, looking at India's performance in the Olympics, in soccer and tennis, and some other international sports, is that Indians collectively seem not to care about any sport except cricket. Why is that? Culturally and linguistically, India is a very diverse country. Why so much emphasis on a single sport (and an imported sport at that, unlike with Canada and ice hockey)?
The Williams Sisters may be the strongest rebuttal to this assumption. It's unquestionable that wealth has advantages but then again so do intelligence, athletic ability, good parenting, etc.
Thats not true some of the pockets of India(North east, Kerala, Goa ,Bengal ,Jharkhand) etc are crazy for football and in India Argentina has more fans than Argentina . Football is very popular here in many states but problem is we have only one true football academy in India(Jamshedpur). With out infrastructures not many can take on football as a profession at cost of studies. As far as tennis is concerned it's a rich man's sport and i live in a city with population of 2million and with good standard of living by Indian standard , yet we don't have a single court or any player who is playing tennis at national level. Here, cricket is the king and money flows like anything in cricket , it's the world's richest board. Even a semi decent player here can make a good earning by playing at state level . Cricket is something we are forced deep down our throat since childhood . Everyday we have a cricket match here on TV with news channels talking about it all the time. We qualified for Asia cup football and played really well in football but media gave no **** about it , no buzz nothing. Kids need national idols and inspiration to take up any sports and here no other exist in media. To get media coverage we will have to win world cup in football only then they will cover it. I'm sick of cricket now.
Noone cares about woman's tennis. If they played slams seperately then they would struggle to earn 1/10th of what they are earning now.The Williams Sisters may be the strongest rebuttal to this assumption. It's unquestionable that wealth has advantages but then again so do intelligence, athletic ability, good parenting, etc.
Yeah me too. Whenever I am in India, I start watching cricket on the popular channels but then switch over to Doordarshan Sports, which being a government channel is mandated to show all the other sports like table tennis, badminton, volleyball etc.
I threw my cable set top box when my cable guy came to ask for bills, I stopped watching TV long ago. It's cricket everywhere . I stream tennis and football on sonyliv and hotstar. Where do you live brah?
Btw your service motion is as smooth as your idol Federer's serveUS.
Streaming is the way to go. Cut the cord.
Btw your service motion is as smooth as your idol Federer's serve
I didn’t think Shapo, FAA, Hurkacz, Tsitsipas, etc. all had trust funds... maybe I got my info wrong.
And when I played Juniors, some of the top ranked kids in my section came from a pretty rough inner city area.
It has become even better of late. I have the best tennis technique among adults in my club, and across most clubs I think.
No, I don't. Someone making 7-10K in the US wouldn't be able to afford to spend a week abroad anywhere. You see, along with the increased income comparatively, you also pay increased expenses for everything. What is the average low income rent housing in India? What is the average low income rent housing in the US? According to Numbeo, avg. city rent is $1,261 per month. in the US. In India, it's $163 (in US dollars). Other expenses? Yup, they're exponentially higher also. Now, where I won't argue is that quality of life, what you get for said expenses, can be higher and in that way the poor of the US are "better off" often times.He will not even afford a week stay for kid abroad even with 2k USD salary while American middle lass with 7k-10k USD salary can . See the difference?
No, I don't. Someone making 7-10K in the US wouldn't be able to afford to spend a week abroad anywhere. You see, along with the increased income comparatively, you also pay increased expenses for everything. What is the average low income rent housing in India? What is the average low income rent housing in the US? According to Numbeo, avg. city rent is $1,261 per month. in the US. In India, it's $163 (in US dollars). Other expenses? Yup, they're exponentially higher also. Now, where I won't argue is that quality of life, what you get for said expenses, can be higher and in that way the poor of the US are "better off" often times.
Fair enough, although avg salary in the US is 50K.True, but his numbers were per month. 120K/year is pretty good in the US.
Tennis is for affluent and cultured people with sophisticated tastes. Let us not allow the hoi polloi to ruin that. Keep the riff raff out.
No, I don't. Someone making 7-10K in the US wouldn't be able to afford to spend a week abroad anywhere. You see, along with the increased income comparatively, you also pay increased expenses for everything. What is the average low income rent housing in India? What is the average low income rent housing in the US? According to Numbeo, avg. city rent is $1,261 per month. in the US. In India, it's $163 (in US dollars). Other expenses? Yup, they're exponentially higher also. Now, where I won't argue is that quality of life, what you get for said expenses, can be higher and in that way the poor of the US are "better off" often times.
Lets see those top ranked kids from your section try to play the tour though. Requires tons of money to go out there and get points.
It was a pizza 'restaurant'. They had to sell all gold from their own house to support a young Novak. They had to borrow the money at 20% per months. Huge debt. It paid off.I thought djokovic’s parents ran a restaurant. Restaurants make good money.
Very good point and it's true.They both played D1 at top ranked schools. That was as far as they got. One became a teaching pro at an academy.
I don’t think money was the reason why they didn’t go pro.
Money makes it easier. But becoming a pro tennis player is an incredibly risky endeavor. Actors/Actresses have a higher chance making it in Hollywood than players do making it on Tour.
I often wonder if the USTA is trying to discover the next US champion but seems like talented kids who could become really good players are often overlooked because they can't afford the training, travel and coaching needed to succeed. I think this is why the U.S doesn't dominate the world of tennis anymore because they cater to the wealthy and not looking for athletes who are talented and driven to succeed. I find the athletes who come from modest financial means have a better work ethic to succeed than a kid who comes from wealth IMO. A poor kid has something to achieve whereas a rich kid doesn't even know what hardship feels like.
Great post.
The USTA has no interest in middle class or poor kids, because they can't afford the travel expenses required to achieve and maintain a high national ranking.
Nearly every top kid in this nation comes from a wealthy family like a Doctor, Lawyer etc.
The only reason the Williams Sisters, Osaka, Tiafoe or Djocovik made it is because they had someone wealthy or influential take them under their wing to help fund their coaching and travel expenses.
Basically they got luck. Most Pro's that we are watching on the Pro tour came from rich families, which is much different from most other pro sports.
Can you tell us more about this story? I assumed he was a rich tennis brat. Like all pros.
There's always gonna be luck involved when it comes to being an "elite". There's no such thing as a 100% merit based game. Most of the people who are "talented", are only so because they spent most of their youth playing the game, and if not this game, other games. They developed the hand-eye coordination, movement, and experience early, and most of the time it was their parents who pushed them to do so, or at least gave in to every request and supported the direction the child wanted to go in. I don't wanna hear BS about how Djokovic is simply a talented guy who came from a humble background. Humble if you consider being the equivalent a Serbian noble to be "humble". Or the Serena sisters. Their parents PUSHED like crazy for this to happen for them. Then they got into the hands of the right talent scouts, and took off from there. Not everyone can do this. The game of LIFE takes more people than the game of Tennis. It is luck, and being in the right place at the right time. Good for them, but don't act like there aren't millions who never even had a chance to get a start in the game.
That's the problem. Millions can start the game, but only the rich or very, very lucky are allowed to keep progressing, because the coaching and travel are so expensive.
I see so many kids drop out because they can't afford the coaching or travel costs to keep pace with the elites.
Not because they weren't as talented as the billionaire's kid, but because their school teacher Mom and bus driver Dad couldn't afford to send them to travel to tourneys.
So next time you see that Pro playing please realize they aren't as great as you think. Their parents being well off had a lot to do with them getting to where they are today.
So next time you see that Pro playing please realize they aren't as great as you think. Their parents being well off had a lot to do with them getting to where they are today.
Is that really true? Most kids are not good enough or their family prioritizes education over sports.
Is this something personal for you?
Believe me it's true.
The flights and hotel cost to travel for these national tournaments is out of reach for most middle class Americans to do more than once a year at most.
It was a pizza 'restaurant'. They had to sell all gold from their own house to support a young Novak. They had to borrow the money at 20% per months. Huge debt. It paid off.
It is a valid question. Tennis is expensive. Why don't we have tennis players from Ghana, Morocco, Algeria?
I do sympathize with people in India too. Sania Mirza was accused of so many different things. A great lady. I loved watching her on the court.
I'm Caucasian btw but who cares? In a perfect world everyone should have the same opportunity. It looks like, it doesn't work that way. I wanted to play tennis as a young kid and my dad said 'It's too expensive'. Go play something else.
I can only hope that we'll see more tennis players all around the world. From what I can get 'the player council' is trying to fight for it ... Easier said than done.
Local UTR tournaments are the solution to this. The kids can find good opponents regardless of age or gender right where they are.