ChrisJR3264
Hall of Fame
Carlos hits with heavy spin and uses a L4 plus OG. He also doesn’t look to have massive hands either haha
Carlos hits with heavy spin and uses a L4 plus OG. He also doesn’t look to have massive hands either haha
Carlos hits with heavy spin and uses a L4 plus OG. He also doesn’t look to have massive hands either haha
Yeah. I also don’t think folks realize grip shape can impact spin potential either. I tend to not hit enough spin with that TF rectangular shape but can shape thd ball better with the prestige MPSpin is my entire game and I use a 1/2, and I’m about alcaraz size as well, probably smaller hands even
Spin is my entire game and I use a 1/2, and I’m about alcaraz size as well, probably smaller hands even
Ah so you use a 1/2 and that means that the rest of the tour (which uses predominately smaller grips now) is wrong.
![]()
Can you stay on track with your argument? You said small grip is more spin, which is not true
Wrong. Smaller grips are better for spin which is why most of the tour has trended toward smaller ones over the years.
I have larger hands and technically could be using much larger than 5/8 but I use a 1/4 with one overgrip. Smaller grips allow more range of motion and wrist snap which is essential for spin.
What was wrong about my comment about you getting distracted? Can you please stay on track?
Going back to original point, no. Can you please think? Think about why they think that and how that works and whether that makes any sense? Just like the bro science in the bodybuilding community, what is the evidence to back up their claims that you take for absolute fact? Can you think?
You should be the one thinking.
I’ve provided good reasons why the pros are using smaller grips.
You on the other hand think that because YOU, a random rec player, use a 1/2 and “spin is your game” (lol)that the tour is somehow wrong.
Look at the list I provided, hardly any grip size 5s and these are grown men. Lots of 3s and even 2s. A lot of companies don’t even make size 5s anymore.
But yeah don’t let the facts get in the way of your silly opinion.
Scientifically proven where? Do you even know how that works?Smaller grips are definitely better for generating spin. Scientifically proven without a doubt. Those who say otherwise are just being defiant for some strange reason. Maybe they're unhappy people who like to argue. Who knows
No you haven’t. You just said pros use small grip so spin….tell me how biomechanically a smaller grip, by 1/8 of an inch, helps the mechanics that produce top spin? Explain the mechanism. Let’s see you think.
Scientifically proven where? Do you even know how that works?
I already said that smaller grips make is easier to create wrist snap, essential for pronating and supinating etc. More range of motion. You can hold a smaller grip looser.
You in the other hand provide nothing. Like I said you think because you use a 1/2 that it means the rest of the tour is wrong. You’re an arrogant and delusional person.
Here is an article for you since you don’t seem to understand modern tennis.
![]()
The Incredible Shrinking Grip | Tennis.com
www.tennis.com
Here is an article for you since you don’t seem to understand modern tennis.
![]()
The Incredible Shrinking Grip | Tennis.com
www.tennis.com
Do you have data to substantiate this? I tried it once, didn't see any material difference either than it was harder to get the right feel of the grip when transitioning from 2 hander to western FH.
The fact that I asked “where’s the science” and you provided a link to a tennis article is hysterical XD
This isn’t science. This is equivalent to referencing Fox News or CNN
“Players like the thin grips because they can come over the ball much more and whip it,” says Roman Prokes, owner of **** Tennis in New York City and stringer to many pro players."
Direct quote from a guy who has forgotten more about tennis than you will ever know to begin with.
Critical thinking please…
Here is a website that a lot of sports medicine docs use as a reference for treating patients. Navigate down to treatment and you see we recommend increasing grip size, this is due to helping patients loosen up the grip….
Lateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow) - Shoulder & Elbow - Orthobullets
image at end of sentencewww.orthobullets.com
The fact that you essentially referenced CNN thinking it’s science is absolutely hilarious OMG
Your random doctors option does not supersede the opinion of hundreds of professionals that actually play tennis on tour.
Again, please stay on track. When did I ever say a doctor’s opinion supersedes a coach or pro? Sometimes it does, particularly when it comes to injuries, but most of the time it doesn’t. I believe this area is prime for new scientific research, which I am actively involved in as I’m leading 3 studies at the moment. That being said, all I said since the beginning was critically think and ask ‘why’ rather than taking a persons word for absolute truth. What is the evidence? Is there evidence? You come here with anecdotal evidence and using it as absolute truth backed scientific evidence and then provide a joke article. That’s lack of critical thinking.
You saying it’s a “joke article” and being ignorant of what is going on in modern tennis doesn’t make it such.
Try out critical thinking for yourself someday.
@AAATSportingGoods “Mr. Spin is my game” I’d love to see your Playsight RPM stats.
@AAATSportingGoods “Mr. Spin is my game” I’d love to see your Playsight RPM stats.
I asked where’s the science and you link tennis.com….that’s a joke
What’s a joke is that you ignore real experts like Roman Prokes who actually customize racquets for professionals and are providing insight.
Yeah, about what I expected.
![]()
Sounds like something a 3.5 would use
Lol you truly are clueless. Take care, dude.
As a 3.5, you shouldn’t care about your rpms anyways. It’s just about getting your feet in the water at that point
You don’t know me or my level. Happy to show you in person on court though. Hit me up.
As a 3.5, you shouldn’t care about your rpms anyways. It’s just about getting your feet in the water at that point
You use olaysight and reference tennis.com….that’s all I need to know
lol ok
3.5 =/= beginner
![]()
Wow.
Did I say beginner somewhere? Man people on here with staying on track
You said "it's just about getting feet in the water" which unless you have a totally different definition of the phrase, means a beginner
Yea that doesn’t mean beginner
To most ppl it does--it's a swimming analogy so someone "just getting their feet wet" is a beginner.
I think we can both agree that a 3.5 can be someone who played for decades. I've been called a 3.5 on here plenty of times and who am I to say they're wrong?
Nah 3.5 for decades means something is wrong tbh
I know you're 6.0+ but getting to 4.0 isn't "easy" for a lot of people. Plus physical decline is a thing. I get that being a D1 men's coach is awesome but you're not on a D1 forum, there are lots of trash players here (4.5 and below). Actually most of us are trash compared to you
Are you taking lessons at all? Or doing clinics? You’re right, physical decline is definitely a thing. Im definitely not that level anymore due to physical decline. But that’s what I mean, if you’re a 3.5 after decades of playing and no health issues or decline, something is definitely wrong. I’m pretty sure I’ve seen YouTuber series of completely inexperienced people become 4.0s or something in a year
Don't worry about me bud, I'm trash and will always be
Just saying 3.5s aren't always getting their feet wet. Sometimes they've been in the game a long time.
Yea if you’re still a 3.5, you’re not playing enough and still getting your feet well and getting used to competing, which is how NTRP/UTR ratings are based off of.