I would classify myself as a FedFan. State that upfront.
I don't know enough about the details to have a firm opinion, but I can't help but think Federer is perfectly ok with everything as is, because, well, the man is richer than some third world countries. And not appearing to cause trouble and rock the boat is likely a good business/political move. But there is something wrong when prize money skews so highly to the top end that only 100 players really make money, and when such a small percentage of tournament revenue is paid to players.
Unless someone does a study and can show that people buy tickets to see the executives or support the organization and don't care about the play, it's the players driving the revenue, and they should see that money. I know people like to rip on lower ranked players and call them journeymen who never win, etc., but if you want your Fed and Djokovic and Nadal title runs, they have to have people to beat. And you run out of those if there is no money. More players is always a good thing.
I don't know if Djokovic's plan is the answer, but agree with the other posts that if you base your opinion on this issue depending on which player supports what, you really are missing the forest for the trees.
I don't know enough about the details to have a firm opinion, but I can't help but think Federer is perfectly ok with everything as is, because, well, the man is richer than some third world countries. And not appearing to cause trouble and rock the boat is likely a good business/political move. But there is something wrong when prize money skews so highly to the top end that only 100 players really make money, and when such a small percentage of tournament revenue is paid to players.
Unless someone does a study and can show that people buy tickets to see the executives or support the organization and don't care about the play, it's the players driving the revenue, and they should see that money. I know people like to rip on lower ranked players and call them journeymen who never win, etc., but if you want your Fed and Djokovic and Nadal title runs, they have to have people to beat. And you run out of those if there is no money. More players is always a good thing.
I don't know if Djokovic's plan is the answer, but agree with the other posts that if you base your opinion on this issue depending on which player supports what, you really are missing the forest for the trees.