Pure Strike 2024

Well if the launch angle is still the same between the 98s then the fsi control is a hoax. Damn
Well, it’s been a year since I played with gen 3 and it was just one hit. Now I wish I hadn’t sold them and I could then do a true comparison. This new 98 does feel like it’s a better racquet, for sure on the feel and comfort side
 
It’s tough to say after just one outing with the 98. I think I get a little more on the serve with the 98, but the 100 16x20 is more forgiving and love the flex and feel of it.
16x20 feels slightly more controlled than 98 for me. 98 has more power, balls are heavier and yes I agree on the serve, 98 is better.
I will play for another week to see which one I will go for. My takes so far are 16x20 is for more all-court players, 98 is more for aggressive baseliners.
Speaking of looking for the PA98 alternative (my main purpose to demo the strikes), I feel like Strike 98 is more close to PA98.
 
16x20 feels slightly more controlled than 98 for me. 98 has more power, balls are heavier and yes I agree on the serve, 98 is better.
I will play for another week to see which one I will go for. My takes so far are 16x20 is for more all-court players, 98 is more for aggressive baseliners.
Speaking of looking for the PA98 alternative (my main purpose to demo the strikes), I feel like Strike 98 is more close to PA98.
Interesting - yeah I feel like there's definitely more control, touch, normal launch angle in the 100 16x20 vs. the PA98. Why would you say the 16x20 is more for all courters vs. the 98? Better feel and what not?
 
16x20 feels slightly more controlled than 98 for me. 98 has more power, balls are heavier and yes I agree on the serve, 98 is better.
I will play for another week to see which one I will go for. My takes so far are 16x20 is for more all-court players, 98 is more for aggressive baseliners.
Speaking of looking for the PA98 alternative (my main purpose to demo the strikes), I feel like Strike 98 is more close to PA98.
Thats what I really want to know! Can you please compare them with PA98????
 
Thats what I really want to know! Can you please compare them with PA98????
PA98 will give you a higher launch angle, a little more power, for sure more spin. The Strikes are still very spin friendly and have more pop than a typical "control" frame, and I feel more confident on my second serves and hitting driving balls through the court with the strikes vs. the PA98. I also haven't been a huge fan of the PA98 at the net for some reason, whereas the strikes are somewhat better for an all court game vs. the PA98 being more of a baseline topspin stick.
 
Interesting - yeah I feel like there's definitely more control, touch, normal launch angle in the 100 16x20 vs. the PA98. Why would you say the 16x20 is more for all courters vs. the 98? Better feel and what not?
I find the 100 16x20 is better at the net, maybe because of the 100-inch head, and I slice better with it than 98 as well. So when I play with it, I approach the net more often.
With 98, I tend to stay at the baseline more, cause the power produces heavier and deeper balls, I can usually keep my opponent at the baseline, and easier to hit winners from the baseline.
 
Thats what I really want to know! Can you please compare them with PA98????
So far I'm actually liking Strikes more, could be the honeymoon period, the biggest reason is they are def more comfortable than PA98.
And I find I hit more consistently with PS as well. PS98 has more pop than 100 16x20. Maybe because I came from PA98, I'm still craving a little stiffness, 100 16x20 feels a little 'soft' from time to time, PS98 just has the right amount of stiff to it but is still comfortable. Also PS98 kinda helps me to 'slow down' my swing to watch the ball more carefully. With PA98, sometimes I feel it's too fast through the air, resulting in mishit sometimes. Of course, I believe higher-level players won't have this problem lol.
 
So far I'm actually liking Strikes more, could be the honeymoon period, the biggest reason is they are def more comfortable than PA98.
And I find I hit more consistently with PS as well. PS98 has more pop than 100 16x20. Maybe because I came from PA98, I'm still craving a little stiffness, 100 16x20 feels a little 'soft' from time to time, PS98 just has the right amount of stiff to it but is still comfortable. Also PS98 kinda helps me to 'slow down' my swing to watch the ball more carefully. With PA98, sometimes I feel it's too fast through the air, resulting in mishit sometimes. Of course, I believe higher-level players won't have this problem lol.
Does ps98 has more pop than pa98? Also how about launch angle between the two? Thanks
 
Does ps98 has more pop than pa98? Also how about launch angle between the two? Thanks
PA98 still has more pop and a higher launch angle, PS98 hits the ball go through the court more, and it has higher SW, so more plow through. PA98 feels 'hollow' compared to the PS98, but you get more feedback. PS98 feels more muted and 'solid'.
 
Just hit with the 98 16x19 today - very familiar to the Gen2/3 I used to use, but definitely more comfortable with better feel.
That’s great news. The P17 was one of the most fun racquets I ever used, but it was rather harsh. A comfier version has my interest piqued!
 
Could either of you discuss how the PS100 16x20 compares to the Head Speed MP 2002?
The Speed MP 2022 is probably easier to play with, slightly higher launch angle, more easier topspin. The Strike feels firmer, more solid of a stick, I think it serves slightly better, drives the ball through the court better, better feel and control.
 
Following up on my thoughts on the PS100 16x20 where I predicted I'd like the PS100 16x19 better... I was very, very wrong. I strung the 16x19 in exactly the same way as the 16x20 and it plays dramatically stiffer and less comfortable. It also feels significantly less stable from a twistweight perspective, and the higher launch angle makes it less predictable. Obviously QC could play a role (I didn't have a chance to weigh the 16x19) but both frames felt within the ballpark of a similar spec. While the 16x19 is definitely crisper and more powerful, I didn't feel that the increases in power or spin were significant enough to beat out the 16x20 in any way.
 
I'm considering to buy 2023 vcore 100 or 2024 pure strike 100 16x20. Which one would play better in stock form(no customization)?
I imagine they would play similar. I tried the 2021 vcore 100 and it has a solid feeling, a little whippy but solid and from what I’ve read the pure strike 100 would be similar. I can’t speak for the 2023 however.
 
I imagine they would play similar. I tried the 2021 vcore 100 and it has a solid feeling, a little whippy but solid and from what I’ve read the pure strike 100 would be similar. I can’t speak for the 2023 however.
I would think both would play pretty well in stock form, assuming QC isn't crazy off. I played with both recently, and they're pretty different racquets imo - Vcore 100 is great, but definitely a higher launch angle than the PS, less control but more power. The Vcore 100 is also noticeably more muted than the Pure Strike.
 
I would think both would play pretty well in stock form, assuming QC isn't crazy off. I played with both recently, and they're pretty different racquets imo - Vcore 100 is great, but definitely a higher launch angle than the PS, less control but more power. The Vcore 100 is also noticeably more muted than the Pure Strike.
I have a good amount of experience with Vcore 100s, 2021 and 2023. 2023 is much more muted, with a dramatically higher launch angle than 2021 (or than most other rackets I've ever played with). Control is also not great. But if you want something relatively comfortable and just want to rip the cover off the ball, go for it. In my 6-8 hours with the PS 100 16x20 I'd say it is indeed an extremely different racket than a VCore 100. Slower through the air, much softer, and with a much lower launch angle. It also feels more solid and stable, but a little on the clunkier side. I'd demo both and see what fits your game better.
 
I have a good amount of experience with Vcore 100s, 2021 and 2023. 2023 is much more muted, with a dramatically higher launch angle than 2021 (or than most other rackets I've ever played with). Control is also not great. But if you want something relatively comfortable and just want to rip the cover off the ball, go for it. In my 6-8 hours with the PS 100 16x20 I'd say it is indeed an extremely different racket than a VCore 100. Slower through the air, much softer, and with a much lower launch angle. It also feels more solid and stable, but a little on the clunkier side. I'd demo both and see what fits your game better.

Thanks! How did volley, maneuverity, and stability compare between vcore100 and pure strike 100 16x20?
 
I'm considering to buy 2023 vcore 100 or 2024 pure strike 100 16x20. Which one would play better in stock form(no customization)?
I am considering the same two racquets. I am really hoping to trade in my Clash 100 v2 for something better. Prior to having a major bout with tennis elbow back in 2018-2019 my two favorite racquets were the Pure Aero 100 and the Pure Strike Project One 7. I am a lefty so I loved getting more "lefty spin" with the PA, but I am also a consistent grinder so I loved the control of the PS. My elbow made we go to the Clash. My elbow feels much better and I was able to play the Speed MP the past 2-3 months without any elbow concerns. So, now I am considering the VCore 100 as a way to return my game to my Pure Aero days, or the PS 100 16x20 to return to my Pure Strike days.
 
I wonder if the new Pure Strike 98 16x19 can hit as heavy a ball as the Pro Staff 97 V14 can? :unsure: I'm sure it can produce the same if not more spin. But plow and stability seem very doubtful to me as I've demoed the last two generations and decided that they just didn't have that "drive" and "pop" that the Pro Staff delivers. Could this be the version that finally catches up to the Pro Staff? :unsure:
 
I wonder if the new Pure Strike 98 16x19 can hit as heavy a ball as the Pro Staff 97 V14 can? :unsure: I'm sure it can produce the same if not more spin. But plow and stability seem very doubtful to me as I've demoed the last two generations and decided that they just didn't have that "drive" and "pop" that the Pro Staff delivers. Could this be the version that finally catches up to the Pro Staff? :unsure:
I actually am the opposite, I felt the pro staff was more of a headlight racquet that got power from its weight and not swingweight. The pure strike to me could flatten and plow the ball better than the pro staff v13, don’t know about the v14 however.
 
OK WTF, no grip size 1 for PS100. I kind of expected that. No grip size 1 for PS98 either??? Even Yonex has grip size 1 on most models.
 
I actually am the opposite, I felt the pro staff was more of a headlight racquet that got power from its weight and not swingweight. The pure strike to me could flatten and plow the ball better than the pro staff v13, don’t know about the v14 however.
The V14 is a lot different than the V13.
 
@topspn - It's a very encouraging frame -- good power, good consistency out of the string bed (more so than any Aero or Drive). Just pray you get one that's on-spec -- so, ~31cm unstrung balance and <= upper 290's swing weight -- because over-spec (mine playtest sample is 31.7 and 304sw...) it's a bit of slug. On-spec, however, I can see tons of promise.
 
@topspn - It's a very encouraging frame -- good power, good consistency out of the string bed (more so than any Aero or Drive). Just pray you get one that's on-spec -- so, ~31cm unstrung balance and <= upper 290's swing weight -- because over-spec (mine playtest sample is 31.7 and 304sw...) it's a bit of slug. On-spec, however, I can see tons of promise.
I currently play the PA98 at 331-332SW. I made an MRT order for the strike targeting 297-298SW and other specs inline. That would put me at around 331SW with full poly which adds 33pts.
 
@topspn - It's a very encouraging frame -- good power, good consistency out of the string bed (more so than any Aero or Drive). Just pray you get one that's on-spec -- so, ~31cm unstrung balance and <= upper 290's swing weight -- because over-spec (mine playtest sample is 31.7 and 304sw...) it's a bit of slug. On-spec, however, I can see tons of promise.
I ordered 4 frames and plan to keep the 2 that are the closest in spec to what TW says are specs. I am not a master technician so the only thing I can do is use my scale to weight the frame, and then do the poor man’s balance by seeing where they fall off my kitchen counter. I figure if they weigh the same, and have the same balance point they should have the same swing weight.

My question is. If I want a swing weight at 320 what should I hope they weigh in at? Considering I am not going to remove the plastic around the grip or the promotional card that is typically fastened into the frame?
 
Like Yonex... does Babolat grip sizes still run large compared to brands like Wilson, Head, Dunlop ect.?

No. The Strike VS I just got actually feels a touch smaller in my hand than my Wilson Blades. Could be the leather grip, could be the grip shape. But I measured around the center of the handle with a string and they’re identical circumference. Whatever size you are in Wilson, get the same in Babolat.
 
Back
Top