"Pusher" ... Playing This (Dreaded) Opponent

Wait. How is that a strategy difference?
counter puncher would construct the point. He would move the ball around and look for an opening to win the point.

pusher does not construct the point. He would just push the ball back and wait for his opponent to make an error.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PDJ
counter puncher would construct the point. He would move the ball around and look for an opening to win the point.

No. That is what a baseliner does - serve and then try to construct a point. A counter puncher just keeps hitting it back until the other player messes up, whether that means getting out of position and leaving the court open or making an error.
 
No. That is what a baseliner does - serve and then try to construct a point. A counter puncher just keeps hitting it back until the other player messes up, whether that means getting out of position and leaving the court open or making an error.

From "The Six Playing Styles Described" by Kaptain Karl

http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=58284

3 - Counter Punching players are always looking for the opportunity to *instantly* switch from safe defensive tennis ... to ripping winners. They can “change gears” with a single shot. Their passing shots are “thread the needle” accurate against those playing Attack the Net. Their drop-shots and lobs are deadly. Counter Punchers can detect and exploit the baseliners’ inadvertent openings ... and end the point with one “high risk” down-the-line winner ... or fool you with a short-angle inside-out forehand winner.

Opponents playing both Attack the Net and Baseline tennis are fooled into thinking “He can’t keep that up the whole match.” When do these opponents realize their error? Unfortunately, when -- befuddled -- they are shaking hands at the net and congratulating the Counter Puncher on a 6-3, 6-3 victory.
 
From "The Six Playing Styles Described" by Kaptain Karl

http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=58284

3 - Counter Punching players are always looking for the opportunity to *instantly* switch from safe defensive tennis ... to ripping winners. They can “change gears” with a single shot. Their passing shots are “thread the needle” accurate against those playing Attack the Net. Their drop-shots and lobs are deadly. Counter Punchers can detect and exploit the baseliners’ inadvertent openings ... and end the point with one “high risk” down-the-line winner ... or fool you with a short-angle inside-out forehand winner.

Opponents playing both Attack the Net and Baseline tennis are fooled into thinking “He can’t keep that up the whole match.” When do these opponents realize their error? Unfortunately, when -- befuddled -- they are shaking hands at the net and congratulating the Counter Puncher on a 6-3, 6-3 victory.

Ok, so a "semi-pusher" then.
 
I played and beat a pusher on Monday night. I'd struggled against this guy before but mainly focused on three things.

Deep low returns which had little or no top spin forcing him to have to chip high short returns
Target his backhand. Even when I had a lot of open court I went hard into that corner. Harder to lob it back with that stroke.
Improve first serve percentage. I took a bit off my serves and served more body serve making him have to avoid being hit or just leave a short ball for me.
 
I admit it, I admire pushers, however anoying I find them. A good pusher somehow manages to shrink the court the other side of the net to size of a postage stamp.

Constantly digging dying balls from the centre of the court, knowing a rubbish shot will lead to lob over your head. Too difficult for me, give me a ball basher any day. Much less work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PDJ
i admit it, i admire pushers, however anoying i find them. A good pusher somehow manages to shrink the court the other side of the net to size of a postage stamp.

Constantly digging dying balls from the centre of the court, knowing a rubbish shot will lead to lob over your head. Too difficult for me, give me a ball basher any day. Much less work.

+1

...............
 
I was watching two juniors play (open junior tournament at my club) - both around 15. The one was already 6ft, hit the ball beautifully with elegant strokes. The other barely 5ft and running and scrambling for everything. No pace but consistently digging the ball back. The taller boy won the first easily 6-1. The second much closer with the naturally talented boy beginning to get frustrated by the ball always coming back and then started to misfire and unbelievable temper tantrums. The smaller boy took the second set 7-5.
The third went quickly 4-1 to the taller boy but the smaller boy kept on plugging away and the taller boy again unravelled. Soon 4-4, 5-5, 6--6. All during this the smaller boy was calm, no histrionics of any description and I was internally rooting for him (didn't know either of them). The taller boy was now putting McEnroe or Serena Williams to shame such were his outbursts. The smaller boy won 7-6 final set on successive double faults from his far more talented opponent.
If that smaller boy is a "pusher", so be it BUT he deserved his victory.
I'd far rather see a player win by utilising what ever strengths they have than a supremely talented basket case who just assumes they are better because they have better shots. Wrong. It takes a brain to.
 
Regarding pushers, they just face the player with his own consistency problems. So, if you're more talented and a better player than the pusher, how come he can be more consistent than you?

The way I see it it's just a different quality.

However, the way I see it, player must know how to use court depth as well against pushers. So some shorter balls (I don't mean dropshots by that) makes the pusher need to cover much longer distance than just a width (left to right). One short to one side, than a deep attack to the other side can do the job. But you need to know how to hit a good short consistent cross for that, right?
 
Last edited:
Hmm... looks like everybody has their own definisions...

Counter Punchers do construct points, as good as any other style of play. I believe the key difference is in the shot combo/recovery positions used to switch from rally mode to offense mode.

A counter puncher just keeps hitting it back until the other player messes up
 
If that smaller boy is a "pusher", so be it BUT he deserved his victory.

People often use the term "pusher" as an insult, as if there was some form of disgrace in the act of avoiding to give into a power struggle from the backcourt. Players seldom identify as pushers themselves, just like masons never called their masterpiece a gothic monument or someone living under Charles Magnus would not consider their era peculiarly dark. The names come from other people, usually people who have no clue what they're talking about and, hence, can't appreciate what lies before their eyes.

I'd far rather see a player win by utilising what ever strengths they have than a supremely talented basket case who just assumes they are better because they have better shots. Wrong. It takes a brain to.

The truth is that a tennis ball can outrun you several times. You don't have to play huge shots to gain an edge, you have to play the right shots.
 
This topic is funny because just today on the court next to us was a PUSHER playing a pretty good player but every time the better player got him in trouble up went the lob and I mean deep and high. He completely frustrated what appeared to be a much better player. I feel it takes a lot of patience, concentration and speed to be a good pusher. They make the game more interesting.
 
This topic is funny because just today on the court next to us was a PUSHER playing a pretty good player but every time the better player got him in trouble up went the lob and I mean deep and high. He completely frustrated what appeared to be a much better player. I feel it takes a lot of patience, concentration and speed to be a good pusher. They make the game more interesting.
The defensive lob is grossly underused at every level of tennis.
 
I hate playing against pushers, and I bet a lot of people do.. I was wondering whats one way to beat a pusher. So I realized, get the pusher mad, he'll start hitting shots out. I dont know if that happens all the time but in tournaments i've played in I would beat my pushers 6-1 6-1. Is their anything easier to getting a pusher mad? Should you start pushing it back? Should you go with the serve and volley technique or should you just have one helluva serve?


HELP!!!!

tots

I like practicing with pushers - you can get some really long rallies going. I don't mind playing them either.

Some people call me a pusher too.

> I am on JV high school tennis team. I play 3rd singles so I have to play agianst these people who tap the ball back.
> My problem is I load up and then just blast it, I get way too anxious. What is a good strategy to beat LOLLIPOPPERS
> and how can a get a more consisting stroke.

Spend a lot of time practicing your shots with really good footwork and early preparation. Be prepared to hit short balls that don't bounce the way you to expect them to (watch Andy Murray's forehand and his setup on balls that might land short or not bounce forward as much - he's off his back foot ready to transfer or hop forward if the ball is short or lacks pace).
 
Interesting thread. I think definition most use of a pusher is wrong. Generally, a pusher is someone who is consistent and doesn't play the style of tennis you find fun. Period. You get frustrated because they pull you away from the tennis you love to play.

There are two solutions imo. If you just want to play "what you deem as fun" tennis. Don't play them or don't worry about winning or losing to "pushers".

Or learn to adjust your style and play to win, not necessarily for fun.

I used to hate pushers. And they still beat me. But maybe not for long. I have lost weight, improved endurance and am now working on patience and tennis intelligence. I want to play "pushers". Because the sooner I learn to play and enjoy playing them the sooner I can move up and start winning more. A 4.0 pusher is probably a very solid 3.0 or 3.5. Pushers are players who outsmart the rest of us and get the most out of their game and bring out the worst of ours.

We don't like losing to them because we don't get joy of playing our game. Who doesn't want to bang 3-4 heavy shots before a "forced error". But our heavy shots would be pushers to the pros - assuming we could get any, much less most of their shots back. Point being that everything is relative. A 3-0 pusher is crushing balls compared 10yo.

And I have seen too many pushers who when you figure it out, start to play other styles. Or who pull you away from your strengths.
 
Last edited:
People often use the term "pusher" as an insult, as if there was some form of disgrace in the act of avoiding to give into a power struggle from the backcourt. Players seldom identify as pushers themselves, just like masons never called their masterpiece a gothic monument or someone living under Charles Magnus would not consider their era peculiarly dark. The names come from other people, usually people who have no clue what they're talking about and, hence, can't appreciate what lies before their eyes.



The truth is that a tennis ball can outrun you several times. You don't have to play huge shots to gain an edge, you have to play the right shots.
What a great post.
Thoroughly enjoyed reading it.
Thank you.
 
The greatest achievement of my tennis life, I got a pusher to stop pushing. The guy hit these dink slice balls into the middle of the court, with appalling technique. I just forgot about the score and treated it as an exercise in putting short balls away. Just get as many on the forehand as possible and aim for the corner.

I held serve, broke him and the scoreboard pressure reversed. He actually stopped dinking and started hitting proper ground strokes. This also demonstrated why he is a pusher, he missed most of them. Still it did cheer me up.

Not that I can consistantly beat pushers, they still torment me. One never missed, was fast as the flash and hit the ball at random lengths. I was compenhensively stuffed.

A few things I have picked up. You must go for your shots, your advantage over a pusher is spin and pace. If you choke on the shots, reduce the power too much, you may as well push and will lose. You also need to hit with purpose, move the pusher about.

Oh and learn the more diffucult shot. Whst I mean by this is pushers are not as superhuman fast as they seem, they learn patterns of play. If you're not comfortable with short balls, for example, you will go to the easiest shot, so you will make it. On the forehand this will normally br cross court, so the pusher cheats that way. If you can hit the inside out you make the pushers life much harder. Same if you can hit a backhand down the line, the pusher doesn't know which way you will go.

I need a better backhand and serve to beat them, so happy pusher hunting.
 
I still don't understand few things here. Can you share your experience and practice against pushers?

1. Do you use depth of the court (one short to one corner, then the other deep to the other)?
2. If they just dink balls but not especially high (not lobs), can you put pressure on them by playing strong attacks?
3. Are you prepared to go to the net after a good attack (preferably not too close to the net to deal with their lobs)?
4. If they play lobs against you, can you shoot overheads from the baseline?

This describes pretty much how I play against a pusher - one of my best friends often plays this way since it's the most effective tactics for him, however he didn't beat me once playing this way (tie sets was the best he could manage).
 
I still don't understand few things here. Can you share your experience and practice against pushers?

1. Do you use depth of the court (one short to one corner, then the other deep to the other)?
2. If they just dink balls but not especially high (not lobs), can you put pressure on them by playing strong attacks?
3. Are you prepared to go to the net after a good attack (preferably not too close to the net to deal with their lobs)?
4. If they play lobs against you, can you shoot overheads from the baseline?

This describes pretty much how I play against a pusher - one of my best friends often plays this way since it's the most effective tactics for him, however he didn't beat me once playing this way (tie sets was the best he could manage).

I use the standard approaches on moving the other player around and confuse, deep and short, side to side, high and low, straight and angles, hard and soft. But I don't mind sitting there all day hitting groundstrokes either.

If I get a short sitter, I look to move in and put it away. Sometimes it takes more than one shot and sometimes I move in in more than one shot.

On lobs, I just hit heavy topspin back deep. This is pretty easy to do with high-swingweight racquets.
 
There are two players/pushers that I really hated playing against. One was a dinker/moon baller whose sole strategy was just to keep the ball in play. The other guy was a slice and dice spin guy who hit junk balls all day. One thing common was that they were both super athletic and nimble on their feet.

Most guys (me included) would overhit and lose points, or slow down our swings so much (after missing a few shots) that we played tentative tennis.

One thing that worked for me was that I hit as hard as I could right at them taking away their angle shots and also stopping their movements. It was also a safe, high percentage shot hitting hard straight down the middle. By doing so, I was able to dictate the point and got lots of short balls to put away.
 
Against lobs this is simply not a perfect material for FH/BH, we're talking about balls that bounce above your head, sometimes much more. I find such to be a better material for overheads. Worthwhile practicing them. You don't need to put away, you just need some placement and to put pressure on the opponent. Even a consistent pusher can miss against flat overhead balls with decent power, or miss desired depth. Anyway, I tend to approach the net to make the point shorter, but usually step forward to half a court, just barely in front of the service line. Now, if I faced a skillful opponent who can take advantage of it by playing strong and precise passing shots I'll be in trouble when standing at half court, but then he's probably a better player than me with more than one strategy in his bag, I don't mind losing to such.

What's best: I practice overheads, volleys, approaching to the net, dealing with highish balls, practice my hitting consistency...what's wrong with that? I must thank my 'pushing buddy' (lol), he's helping me become more complete a player :)
 
I don't mind high-bouncing balls - I can half-volley them or just hit a groundstroke. There were a number in the practice session which he couldn't reach as I hit them with a lot of topspin and they bounce high into the fence. The other option is the loose-wrist backhand half-volley. You don't actually have to do much with it. Just brush the ball and get it into NML with or without pace. If it's a real pusher, they won't do much with it, even if it's short.
 
just want to note, that every 5.0+ that I play knows how to play like a "pusher"... backed into a corner they throw up a high defensive lob, hoping to reset the point. so it's a good thing to practice playing like a "pusher" (except they try to "reset" the point on every shot :p)
 
Interesting thread. I think definition most use of a pusher is wrong. Generally, a pusher is someone who is consistent and doesn't play the style of tennis you find fun. Period. You get frustrated because they pull you away from the tennis you love to play.

There are two solutions imo. If you just want to play "what you deem as fun" tennis. Don't play them or don't worry about winning or losing to "pushers".

Or learn to adjust your style and play to win, not necessarily for fun.

I used to hate pushers. And they still beat me. But maybe not for long. I have lost weight, improved endurance and am now working on patience and tennis intelligence. I want to play "pushers". Because the sooner I learn to play and enjoy playing them the sooner I can move up and start winning more. A 4.0 pusher is probably a very solid 3.0 or 3.5. Pushers are players who outsmart the rest of us and get the most out of their game and bring out the worst of ours.

We don't like losing to them because we don't get joy of playing our game. Who doesn't want to bang 3-4 heavy shots before a "forced error". But our heavy shots would be pushers to the pros - assuming we could get any, much less most of their shots back. Point being that everything is relative. A 3-0 pusher is crushing balls compared 10yo.

And I have seen too many pushers who when you figure it out, start to play other styles. Or who pull you away from your strengths.
No, a 4.0 pusher is a 4.0, not a 3.0 or 3.5.
 
I think a lot of the problems with playing pushers is mental. I have started beating these guys consistently and it isn't any great change to my game which has made the difference. It has been accepting the fact that I am not good enough to win every point or game against pushers. Go in with the attitude that you will blow them off the court, unless you are really good, you will lose.

I can only consistently beat pushers by being more aggressive than them and playing on the front foot. I have to take risks and win points with winners, they aren't giving me unforced errors. That means I am going to make mistakes and sometimes those mistakes will be in a bunch and cost me games.

In the past when that happened, I panicked and let the score board get to me. With the attitude of I am the better player, how can I be loosing to this guy? My response was to play safe and basically try to push back. At which point I collapsed. Whereas the best strategy is to just carry on playing sensible aggressive tennis and play the odds. That eventually things will right themselves and if they don't, accept the other guy is better.

Basically I am saying the hardest things about playing a pusher, is ignoring the score and playing your own game.
 
Okay! Now we know who you're up against. A Soft-Baller Baseliner is essentially a really advanced Pusher. (Usually a guy who thinks of himself as an EX-Pusher.) His game has adapted to the point that he has some ability to place the ball and he's learned to keep you pinned deep in your own back court. (Which is something the classic Pusher cannot do.)

[From the Sticky....] Soft-Baller Baseliners are tireless players with excellent footwork and anticipation. They always seem to be where they need to be to cut down your angles of attack. You cannot get them to engage you in a power exchange. They seem to absorb all the power of your shots and redirect it with good deep placement, but they won’t give you any pace to work with. You must always supply your own power. This player exhausts you ... physically and mentally.

_____________


1 - Be mentally, emotionally and physically prepared for a long match. It takes patience and devotion to your plan to beat a Soft-baller.

2 - Most players try to “blow Pusher and Soft-ballers off the court.” They LOVE this. You are suplying all the power; they just have to re-direct YOUR power. (Don’t try to blast them off the court.)

Most of us like it when our opponent is supplying *some* of the power in the exchanges. Soft-ballers don’t “help” the exchanges this way and this is what
frustrates a lot of players. (Deal with it...)

3 - Keep alert; keep your feet “dancing” (Stay on your toes.) Lazy footwork will hurt you against any opponent. Against a Soft-baller ... it will speed your demise.

4 - It might help to write your two or three Strategic Plans on a page to consult during change overs. It may help you avoid slipping into “automatic pilot” and reverting to your natural style (which must be causing you concern, or you wouldn't have asked for help). Here we go with a few ideas ... from Easiest to More Difficult.
_____________

a) BIDE YOUR TIME - On every single point ... determine to hit five balls in the opponent’s court before trying for a winner. (If they are not as consistent as they (or you) think, they may miss before you have to do much of anything else.) This would be the easiest plan.

b) SMART ATTACK - (Notice “smart” is first.) Keep your shots deeper in their court ... until you find yourself positioned closer to your own Service Line than your Baseline for a shot. Hit that ball firmly and deeply into their court, and approach the Net, but hesitate at a little deeper volleying position than you normally would (in case they lob you). Volley the very next ball away for a winner. (But be prepared. These opponents tend to be *fast*. They may just get that ball back, too. If so, volley the next one for a winner to the other corner.)

c) PIN ‘EM DOWN - Soft-ballers actually enjoy running ... and tend to be more effective when on the move. (They also tend to “protect” one side by “cheating” toward it to tempt you to hit to the other -- more open -- side.) Say this Soft-baller is protecting his BH by leaving more room on the FH side.... The natural tendency is to figure, “Ah-ha! His BH is weaker, so I’ll hit there. Don’t....

Instead, at about 80% of your normal power, hit several balls deep into his FH corner. After five or six of these, he’ll start “camping” over in that corner. He’ll probably not hit the ball back as deeply as when on the run. When you get a ball which brings you into the area of your own Service Line, go firmly for the other corner. (Don’t “kill” it; just strike it at about 85% of power and place it deep in that BH corner.) Against guys who can run like Soft-ballers can, placement is more important than power.

d) DROP-SHOT / LOB - Give him some of his own medicine, by forcing him to come to net with a short ball. Then lob to the opposite corner of wherever he hits to you. (Most guys who run -- like this opponent tends to -- cannot run nearly as well Up and Back as they can Side-to-Side. And frequently they really don’t like the net.) ... IF ... he's the kind of Baseliner who tries to immediately "retreat" to the back court after every short ball ... bring him right back to the net *again*. Bringing them IN takes them out of their comfort zone.

e) MIX IT UP - Most Soft-ballers like to be “in a groove.” They like to get used to the way you hit the ball ... and play off your pace. Mix it up, by never hitting the same shot twice in a row.
#1 - A soft slice deep in their court
#2 - An 80% firm topspin deep in their court
#3 - A looping topspin shot deep in their court
#4 - A mostly flat shot hit firmly and deeply
#5 - An 80% firm topspin deep in their court
#6 - A soft slice deep in their court
#7 - A mostly flat shot hit firmly and deeply
#8 - A soft slice deep in their court
#9 - (Please tell me you're getting the idea...!)

He won’t be able to get “grooved” and will make more errors ... sooner. (Just be sure and not slip into a predictable pattern with each shot choice....)

f) “DIAGONAL” HIM - Hit a short, sharply-angled slice to (say) his FH side ... followed by a shot deep into his BH corner. Repeat as often as needed. (Baseliners try to avoid the net ... AND ... they don’t run as well this way as they do Side-to-Side.) They’ll get a lot more tired more quickly if you “diagonal” them to pieces.

Okay. That’s six strategic approaches. Pick two or three you know YOU can do and try them out...! Let us know how it goes....

- KK
 
In tennis discussions, the word “pusher” is usually meant as an insult. It describes a player who doesn’t hit hard winners but just keeps putting the ball back in play again and again. So here’s my confession: I am a proud pusher. And I’ve learned that this style can actually win a lot of matches.

I didn’t become a pusher by accident. My background is in badminton. That sport taught me to move constantly, read the game, and survive long rallies. In badminton you have to go for every shuttle at full effort, and rallies can be extremely intense. When I later focused more on tennis, I realized that many of the same skills transferred surprisingly well.

My strengths were never big power shots. Instead, I relied on footwork, endurance, and patience. Long rallies don’t bother me at all. If a rally lasts 20 or 200 shots, that’s perfectly fine. In fact, the longer the rally goes, the more comfortable I usually feel.

One thing is absolutely crucial if you want to play this way: physical conditioning. Being a pusher only works if you truly have the fitness to chase every ball for the entire match. When you trust your conditioning, you can stay calm in every point. You don’t have to fear long rallies or three-set matches. In many cases, the longer the match goes, the more it starts to favor you.

Many players want to finish points quickly. But when the ball keeps coming back for the sixth or seventh time, frustration often begins to appear. Players start taking bigger risks, and that’s when the errors start coming.

When I'm in a good form, I enjoy playing against other pushers because then I can attack from side to side with my heavy topspin shots. Key point in my attacking game is that I never try to hit a direct winner from back of the court but I try to keep advantage in rally. I never think like I.m in a hurry to end the point. If you go for straight winner you get surprised and start to panic when shot comes back so I allways expect my shot to come back.

If I'm not in a good form to consistently hit attacking shots with good precision. Then I play safe game and always ready to play hundreds of shots in each rally. I don't get bored in rallies and I never think that I.m in a hurry to end the point. I'm allways ready for a six hour match so I can stay calm in each situations.

But pushing is not just about hitting the ball back. I constantly try to break my opponent’s rhythm. Sometimes I hit a high defensive ball, sometimes a low slice, sometimes a drop shot followed by a lob. When an opponent can’t find a comfortable rhythm, attacking becomes much harder.

There is also a strong mental side to this style. If you actually enjoy long rallies and are willing to chase down ball after ball, it can slowly get inside your opponent’s head. Eventually many players start forcing things, and the mistakes come from their side.

Some people say pushing isn’t “real tennis.” Maybe. But one thing is certain: a point counts exactly the same whether it ends with a huge winner or after a 30-shot rally.

And if someone gets frustrated because the ball keeps coming back… well, that’s part of the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PDJ
In tennis discussions, the word “pusher” is usually meant as an insult. It describes a player who doesn’t hit hard winners but just keeps putting the ball back in play again and again. So here’s my confession: I am a proud pusher. And I’ve learned that this style can actually win a lot of matches.

I didn’t become a pusher by accident. My background is in badminton. That sport taught me to move constantly, read the game, and survive long rallies. In badminton you have to go for every shuttle at full effort, and rallies can be extremely intense. When I later focused more on tennis, I realized that many of the same skills transferred surprisingly well.

My strengths were never big power shots. Instead, I relied on footwork, endurance, and patience. Long rallies don’t bother me at all. If a rally lasts 20 or 200 shots, that’s perfectly fine. In fact, the longer the rally goes, the more comfortable I usually feel.

One thing is absolutely crucial if you want to play this way: physical conditioning. Being a pusher only works if you truly have the fitness to chase every ball for the entire match. When you trust your conditioning, you can stay calm in every point. You don’t have to fear long rallies or three-set matches. In many cases, the longer the match goes, the more it starts to favor you.

Many players want to finish points quickly. But when the ball keeps coming back for the sixth or seventh time, frustration often begins to appear. Players start taking bigger risks, and that’s when the errors start coming.

When I'm in a good form, I enjoy playing against other pushers because then I can attack from side to side with my heavy topspin shots. Key point in my attacking game is that I never try to hit a direct winner from back of the court but I try to keep advantage in rally. I never think like I.m in a hurry to end the point. If you go for straight winner you get surprised and start to panic when shot comes back so I allways expect my shot to come back.

If I'm not in a good form to consistently hit attacking shots with good precision. Then I play safe game and always ready to play hundreds of shots in each rally. I don't get bored in rallies and I never think that I.m in a hurry to end the point. I'm allways ready for a six hour match so I can stay calm in each situations.

But pushing is not just about hitting the ball back. I constantly try to break my opponent’s rhythm. Sometimes I hit a high defensive ball, sometimes a low slice, sometimes a drop shot followed by a lob. When an opponent can’t find a comfortable rhythm, attacking becomes much harder.

There is also a strong mental side to this style. If you actually enjoy long rallies and are willing to chase down ball after ball, it can slowly get inside your opponent’s head. Eventually many players start forcing things, and the mistakes come from their side.

Some people say pushing isn’t “real tennis.” Maybe. But one thing is certain: a point counts exactly the same whether it ends with a huge winner or after a 30-shot rally.

And if someone gets frustrated because the ball keeps coming back… well, that’s part of the game.

dude - instead of poasting in a few dozen threads, why dont you show us how you play.
 
On this board, the definition of pusher changed over time. Originally it was a description of a a swing style normally associated with a consistent player who bunted the ball. Under this original definition, the problem that many people had was not just that the pusher was consistent, but also that the ball lacked pace and the opponent had to be able to generate his own power if he wanted to hit a winner.

Over time, the meaning has shifted to someone who is consistent. People here were calling Nadal, a player who hit one of the heaviest topspin forehands in the history of professional tennis, a pusher. I've watched Nadal practice at court level and he was consistently swinging harder than any other professional player I've watched practice. I've since lost all interest in the topic.
 
On this board, the definition of pusher changed over time. Originally it was a description of a a swing style normally associated with a consistent player who bunted the ball. Under this original definition, the problem that many people had was not just that the pusher was consistent, but also that the ball lacked pace and the opponent had to be able to generate his own power if he wanted to hit a winner.

Over time, the meaning has shifted to someone who is consistent. People here were calling Nadal, a player who hit one of the heaviest topspin forehands in the history of professional tennis, a pusher. I've watched Nadal practice at court level and he was consistently swinging harder than any other professional player I've watched practice. I've since lost all interest in the topic.

Just a matter of time for the term "pusher" to come into existence. It's like a must.

Sore losers need a term to excuse for their loss and at the same time bash their victors.

How else would you call this? There's terms for everything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PDJ
Just a matter of time for the term "pusher" to come into existence. It's like a must.

Sore losers need a term to excuse for their loss and at the same time bash their victors.

How else would you call this? There's terms for everything.
"Pusher" means, "guy I thought I could beat easily, who I lost to".
 
  • Like
Reactions: PDJ
The truth is that most amateurs have weak shots, would Sampras, Del Potro, Perricard or Gonzalez struggle against typical amateur pushers...?!?!?!;)
 
Some people say pushing isn’t “real tennis.”

And those people are usually the same people that get beaten by pushers by playing 40+ unforced errors trying to force the point and smashing their rackets out of frustration.

Last year our last man of the interclub team lost 6-1 6-1. He was mad as hell afterwards, complaining about his opponent's "not real tennis" and how that guy should just stay home instead of being on court. I smirked and said "... And yet, he beats you with 1 and 1..."


Maybe. But one thing is certain: a point counts exactly the same whether it ends with a huge winner or after a 30-shot rally.

And if someone gets frustrated because the ball keeps coming back… well, that’s part of the game.
Exactly. Instead of complaining, find solutions and stop doing stupid things and just missing.
 
I have no problem with pushers in singles as I control the strategy and can move them around the court. But in doubles they are a nuisance, unless you and your partner are telepathic.
 
this mindmaster guy maybe won a match over the weekend with pushing and now he can't contain himself to the point of creating dupe accounts to congrat himself.
 
Back
Top