FudgeControl
Banned
@TheMaestro1990 posted two threads about Novak and Rafa's top 10 losses. I would like to know what Fed fans think is his most heartbreaking loss? And why?
Wimbledon 2008 and AO 2009. The combination of the 2 broke Federer for a while.
After Wimbledon 2008 he immediately won Us Open 2008 and after AO 2009 he immediately won the RG/Wimbledon double.
That is a myth.
![]()
Look at his play in early 2009, the infamous racquet break in Miami for instance. He was struggling mentally big time.
So, real results do not count as an evidence?
![]()
What are you talking about?Aussie 2009 because most of us thought that Federer could never win a GS again after that. Unbelievable that he won 5 more.
I said it was a combination of the 2. He wasn't broken after Wimbledon alone but after the AO there was a clear change in his demeanour up until the clay season. I think losing both affected him for a few months.
Had he won Wimbledon I doubt there would have been tears at the AO irrespective of whether he won the USO.
"Up untill the clay court season" that makes factually and logically little sense.
Clay is where he was most likely to lose to his biggest rival, so if the story about him getting all heart-broken after the AO loss has affected him in the way you describe, he should have grown more concerned and badly playing.
Also, in the two biggest tournaments before the clay season he posted two SF results, losing respectively to Djokovic and Murray as opposed to his lesser results on clay up untill Madrid.
Federer gets all emotional when he plays for the biggest trophies, no matter win or lose.
That is another myth (that he got especially emotional at AO 2009).
![]()
The bolded used to bother me. But at the end of the day it was a win-win situation in hindsight:AO 2009 for me, and it isn't even close. Don't have to further elaborate on the reasons, I hope...
No "problems" with Wimbledon 2008 - I thought it to be a clear case of 'sweet justice' for Rafa after him so painfully losing Wimbledon 2007.
USO 2009 was pretty bad, too, but I can't help but feel that was quite a bit Fed's own fault, clearly underestimating his opponent, which I fortunately happen to like as well.![]()
USO 2015 wasn't good either....from memory he squandered 2015 break points.
Wimbledon a far more signifciant tournament than australian open. Most players best memories and most painful are from wimbledon.Wimbledon 2008.. will be a frustration in my system forever..
Australian Open 2009 a close second.. will also be a frustration forever..
Those actually still hurt thinking of them.
Top 12 (can't narrow it down to 10) most heartbreaking losses in chronological order
2000 Basel final lost in 5 to Enqvist (had the momentum after winning the 4th)
2003 Davis Cup sf lost in 5 to Hewitt (2 sets to 0 up and served for the match)
2005 AO sf lost in 5 to Safin (had match point)
2005 Masters Cup final lost in 5 to Nalbandian (2 sets to 0 up and served for the match)
2006 Rome final lost in 5 to Nadal (had 2 match points)
2008 Wimbledon final lost in 5 to Nadal (had the momentum after winning the 4th)
2009 AO final lost in 5 to Nadal (had the momentum after winning the 4th)
2009 USO final lost in 5 to DelPotro (was 2 points from winning the match)
2011 USO final lost in 5 to Djokovic (2 sets to 0 up and served for the match and held 2 match points on serve)
2013 AO sf lost in 5 to Murray (had the momentum after winning the 4th)
2014 Wimbledon final lost in 5 to Djokovic (had the momentum after winning the 4th)
2016 Wimbledon sf lost in 5 to Raonic (Capitulated in the 4th for no apparent reason)
Of course i could just as easily had included these "gems"
2002 AO r4 lost in 5 to Haas (had 2 match points)
2003 AO r4 lost in 5 to Nalbandian (had the momentum after winning the 4th)
2003 Gstaad final lost in 5 to Novak (had the momentum after winning the 4th)
2010 USO sf lost in 5 to Djokovic (had 2 match points)
2011 Wimbledon qf lost in 5 to Tsonga (led 2 sets to 0 up)
2014 FO r4 lost in 5 to Gulbis (Capitulated in the 2nd but had the momentum after winning the 4th)
Once Rome came around Federer was looking more positive IMO, he was happy to reach the SF (that's what he said was his goal before the event).
Again you can look at the results on wikipedia all you want, my perceptions of how I feel Federer looked in himself won't change. His results were still decent but he wasn't playing great and he looked frustrated case in point the racquet break. If you didn't see the body language etc...I saw that's fine but you won't change my opinion on this. TBH not sure why you have a hard on for this.
You should find a more fitting emoticon for yourself...I recommend this one;
He was very emotional when he won his first Wimbledon and the AO in 2006, but I still think 2009 was the most emotional I've ever seen Federer - especially after a loss. If you want to play it down be by guest.
I will pass on your inadequate effort for a joke and comment the other stuff.
Besides the insulting remark (I saw many of his matches in that period either live or on the TV) nothing of what you say confirms your comments apart from your "gut feeling".
I already lowered the bar quite a bit for your remarks to stand when I even discussed tournament below the highest level, but even there there is not much beyond what I already said your main source of opinion is.
I also explained my logic and unsurprisingly you didn't address any of it.
The truth is that Federer was disappointed from some of the losses in question, but none of them got to him in a particularly bad way, which would be the definition of "heart-breaking".
You are wrong.
Here is cold-as-stone Federer after beating Sampras (and long before "winning his first Wimbledon"):
![]()
I can give many, many more examples, but I think that I will pass on the obvious as I am not in a mood to search just to prove you wrong (again).
Oh, and, by the way, I couldn't care less if you want to remain ignorant.
![]()
I honestly don't know what your problem is. Funny that it offends you so much me saying that I believe the combination of losing Wimbledon and the AO had a greater impact on Federer.
I believe I did address your points, but regardless I will pass on your posts from now.
if the story about him getting all heart-broken after the AO loss has affected him in the way you describe, he should have grown more concerned and badly playing.
Also, in the two biggest tournaments before the clay season he posted two SF results, losing respectively to Djokovic and Murray as opposed to his lesser results on clay up untill Madrid.
![]()
The truth is that Federer was disappointed from some of the losses in question, but none of them got to him in a particularly bad way, which would be the definition of "heart-breaking".
This actually doesn't make sense. We know that Federer is such a good player than, as long as he is physically healthy (not the case in 2008, hence early losses here and there), even in a mentally burdened state he is still going to beat lesser players by skill, which is exactly what happened in the early part of 2009. But once he came up against top adversaries, what happened? Breadsticked by Murray; lost to Djokovic from a set up; lost to Djokovic from a set and a break up. Not good. Madrid was where he managed to put it behind him and beat Nadal again, even if he was helped by Nadal's long semi (his fault).
Losing from a set and a break up to anyone, even Novack, and getting 1-6'd by Mugray is bad for Federer standards, no?
But why? I thought you had to be close for a loss to be heartbreaking? Fed was closer to losing in 4 in both of those matches than to actually winning them. Why aren't they more heartbreaking than the losses to Djokovic where he actually held MPs?2009 AO without a doubt. Only 2008 Wimbledon comes close.
Henman in the quarters at Big W in 2001. Had a chance to be one of only two players since the wood era to win both a fast court slam and a slow court one. Rafter matchup in the final would have been epic, but he'd have throttled Goran with the way he returns.
Instead, that honor still belongs solely to Agassi.
Federer was 1 point from serving for the match in 2008. In 2009 I feel if he broke and served out the 3rd set he had the match in his bag.But why? I thought you had to be close for a loss to be heartbreaking? Fed was closer to losing in 4 in both of those matches than to actually winning them. Why aren't they more heartbreaking than the losses to Djokovic where he actually held MPs?
Or are you going to acknowledge that closeness is only one factor in the heartbreak meter?![]()
I hate when people put down opponents just to make their point.
Murray was in a very good form at the time (didn't he win also the very next HC tournament as well?) and it was a 3 setter match.
Also, Djokovic is not a problem for Roger, so Roger is not "allowed" to lose from a set and a break up?
In the AO final one of the players lost a set 6-1.
Is finnish, no?
![]()
I'll definitively put 2002 WTF vs Hewitt in top 10.That match was pure depression. Fed had 7-8 set points in first set. Also, Wimbledon 2001 vs Henman. At least he deserves fifth set. He was better player. Monte Carlo and Rome 2014&2003. No Nadal,two golden chances.