Hi everyone, I know there are a few posts about tennis and golfers elbow, but mainly for men rather than women and I am struggling to find a racket I can play with for longer than an hour without pain - assuming it is possible..... I am 55 and started playing tennis regularly again after 35 years, with my old wilson graphite SL Plus as I was told it was fine to start with : ( 6 months in, I played 5 days in a row with it and given I now know it is a very stiff and relatively heavy racket, (albeit with new strings - a later change to multi and an overgrip wasn't enough) it's not surprising that tennis elbow kicked in. Partly poor technique, but overuse as well and my shoulder isn't 100% anyway, after op to tighten 15 years ago. That then progressed to tennis and golfers elbow and after resting for 6-8 weeks now been advised to play but half as much to start with, as exercises were making it worse and the muscles getting weaker, but need a racket and strings that doesn't aggravate the golfers elbow I still have further.
I liked playing with the Bab Pure Drive Lite but know it's very stiff and notorious - someone has suggested soft poly at 42lbs, but I am wary of this model as lots of comments about it casuing elbow issues
Also liked Yonex ezone 100L, but that also hurts after hour or so - RA of 67 so surprised this is seen as arm friendly.
And Prince 03 legacy 105 has a great sweet spot and really liked hitting with it (280g RA 67 and sww 321) and the 110, but couldn't play with it long enough to know if the heavy swing weight and slightly longer handle will be an issue. Suspect it will be as this isn't flexible either.
I hated the Gravity Lite which was tinny and felt awful (though the specs looked ok), Head rackets I have tried weren't good either
I hit the ball hard and flat and would say I am an advanced beginner / intermediate and play mostly doubles, with a bigger swing than most - but working on reducing it.
I am not sure if the rackets so far have been too heavy and / or too stiff. The Bab was lighter (270g) but very stiff at 72.
And is a high swingweight and longer than 27inch handle a bad idea too, if I want to be able to complete a 3 set match?
I know head heavy is too much for my wrist and elbow.
My research suggests RA of 63 or lower is best, and 100inch racket or more probably, but there's not much choice other than a Clash. Should I go for an UL and accept that I won't get as much zip from the ball, but will have the comfort, as 280/285g rackets I have tried (RA 67+ though), have so far resulted in pain after an hour, though the Clash 100L is RA 55 and the 100UL is 63, so will presumably feel very different?!
Someone also suggested pro kennex rackets, but they aren't available to demo (in the UK), but now very confused as to what to try, as I think I need a lighter racket, but they seem to be stiffer so would I be no better off? And I want to play at a decent level if I can as well.
I don't understand the difference between the Ki and the Ki Q+s, but would need a lighter one I think. KiQ+15 was mentioned, but it has a 27.5inch handle and I thought 27 was best? and a swingweight of 325 and RA of 72 which doesn't sound good for my arm?
Or is the stiffness spec meaningless in a pro kennex?
Sorry for the long post and I hope you can help me see the wood for the trees with this! I don't have the money to keep buying new rackets and demos if you can do them are very dependent on string type and tensions which are so variable
Many thanks
I liked playing with the Bab Pure Drive Lite but know it's very stiff and notorious - someone has suggested soft poly at 42lbs, but I am wary of this model as lots of comments about it casuing elbow issues
Also liked Yonex ezone 100L, but that also hurts after hour or so - RA of 67 so surprised this is seen as arm friendly.
And Prince 03 legacy 105 has a great sweet spot and really liked hitting with it (280g RA 67 and sww 321) and the 110, but couldn't play with it long enough to know if the heavy swing weight and slightly longer handle will be an issue. Suspect it will be as this isn't flexible either.
I hated the Gravity Lite which was tinny and felt awful (though the specs looked ok), Head rackets I have tried weren't good either
I hit the ball hard and flat and would say I am an advanced beginner / intermediate and play mostly doubles, with a bigger swing than most - but working on reducing it.
I am not sure if the rackets so far have been too heavy and / or too stiff. The Bab was lighter (270g) but very stiff at 72.
And is a high swingweight and longer than 27inch handle a bad idea too, if I want to be able to complete a 3 set match?
I know head heavy is too much for my wrist and elbow.
My research suggests RA of 63 or lower is best, and 100inch racket or more probably, but there's not much choice other than a Clash. Should I go for an UL and accept that I won't get as much zip from the ball, but will have the comfort, as 280/285g rackets I have tried (RA 67+ though), have so far resulted in pain after an hour, though the Clash 100L is RA 55 and the 100UL is 63, so will presumably feel very different?!
Someone also suggested pro kennex rackets, but they aren't available to demo (in the UK), but now very confused as to what to try, as I think I need a lighter racket, but they seem to be stiffer so would I be no better off? And I want to play at a decent level if I can as well.
I don't understand the difference between the Ki and the Ki Q+s, but would need a lighter one I think. KiQ+15 was mentioned, but it has a 27.5inch handle and I thought 27 was best? and a swingweight of 325 and RA of 72 which doesn't sound good for my arm?
Or is the stiffness spec meaningless in a pro kennex?
Sorry for the long post and I hope you can help me see the wood for the trees with this! I don't have the money to keep buying new rackets and demos if you can do them are very dependent on string type and tensions which are so variable
Many thanks