Racquet Factors That Contribute To More Power...

Hey Professor, please clarify if lowering tension can increase serve speed. There is a discussion about that in another thread.

A 10 lb decrease in tension might increase power potential by about 1% which in turn might increase a 100 mph serve to 101 mph. This might add 6 inches to a foot in distance. So is the combination of 1 mph and 1 foot significant? Perhaps.
 
A 10 lb decrease in tension might increase power potential by about 1% which in turn might increase a 100 mph serve to 101 mph. This might add 6 inches to a foot in distance. So is the combination of 1 mph and 1 foot significant? Perhaps.

Thanks. Fedace are you reading this?
 
I don't think your average healthy adult tennis player has a power problem. I really don't get the obsession with power. Yeah, I could get a 2lb. racquet and barely swing it and knock the ball into the fence, but what's the point. I've coached 8 yr. old kids that can hit the ball over the fence. They do this with 8oz. junior frames too.

I had one kid play with my frame. He did much better with it because he couldn't swing it nearly as fast. He was still hitting the ball too hard, but it got him close enough that he could see some progress and that helped more than the racquet.

The problem with a heavy frame IMO is spin generation. I say go as heavy as you can until it affects your spin generation. I like having a racquet where the spin goes to 11. :-)

I was working with a girl last summer - maybe 9 yrs. old - and let her borrow one of my NXG mp's (heavier frame for her). I got a big kick out of her because she really caught fire with it. I eventually got one to her to keep that had a better grip size and she kept on McLovin' it for the rest of the season. Interesting...

Spin has become a serious commodity for me, too. While I know that a lot of the ability to get the rpm's into the ball is about technique, I love a bat that fits my swing so that I have plenty of spin when I want it. For me, that's what allows me to play with more power because I can keep the ball down on the court.

The golf club thing... I think the changes in the gear for that sport have changed their power equation differently than with tennis. Golfers used to drive the ball with a solid club head and better players used a higher compression ball. Now they use lower compression balls and the faces of the drivers are virtually metal trampolines. The resilience of the club face powers the ball a lot now, but it used to be all about swinging a hefty club faster for more distance. Interesting...
 
This really isnt complex in a real world on court practical sort of way.


In a nutshell, batspeed is your friend..it is almost always better than choosing more mass...batspeed is your friend...know the swingweight which is best for you, and use something you can reliably flush hit

Nobad is correct in the sense that increasing racquet speed is always the easiest way to increase ball speed. Let's consider an example. Suppose you have a racquet with a power potential of 40% at the hitting location. The ball is coming at you at 30 mph. You swing your racquet such that the hitting location is traveling at 60 mph. The ball will leave at 96 mph.

Of that 96 mph, 37.5% of the final speed is due to the bounce from the racquet (power potential). The rest, 62.5% is due to the speed of the bounce pad (racquet) from which the ball bounced (from the formula that ball speed = bounce speed + bounce pad speed). For most groundstokes where the racquet is traveling faster than the ball, racquet speed is more important to ball speed than is power potential (which depends swingweight). If power potential is 40%, then every 1 mph you increase swing speed, you will increase ball speed by 1.4 mph.

But for a given swing speed, you want to maximize ball speed by having the highest swingweight you can comfortably swing. That's evident by considering what happens if you lower swingweight too much in an attempt to gain swing speed.

As swingweight gets lower you have to swing even faster to get the same speed. So, if instead of 40% we have a power potential of 20% (because we have lowered swingweight so much), then, for the same 30 mph incoming ball speed and 60 mph racquet speed, our outgoing ball speed is 78 mph. To make up the difference of 18 mph we have to swing about 10 mph faster. Perhaps the lower swingweight allows us to do that. But who wants to be swinging that fast for the same result? Accuracy and control go down and shock goes up.

Shock. That's a whole 'nuther' issue. Mass is always better at lowering shock. But even less shock can cause more strain on the arm if you are hitting late because of the extra mass. But on the other hand, swinging faster with less mass is going to blow your arm up too, even if your timing is correct. That's because the change in momentum due to the collision will have to occur by changing your racquet velocity much more for each gram of racquet weight than if the racquet had a greater mass (hittingweight) at the impact point. Momentum is mass x velocity. If you have many grams, each one has to change velocity less than if you only have a few in order to achieve the same change in momentum. Greater change in velocity of the racquet head compared to your hand means greater strain at the wrist.

So, as always, knowing these considerations helps you demo and experiment with racquets to choose the right combination of racquet speed and swingweight for you. If you know what the effects will be of changing variables, you will be able to analyze what is happening and why and then be able to change variables to meet your goals.
 
Nobad is correct in the sense that increasing racquet speed is always the easiest way to increase ball speed. .

Thanks..isnt it nice when on court experiences coincide w. what is tested in the lab??

There are useful on court cues to look for when trying to determine what swingweight a person needs based upon ones style/level of play and their level of competition. I've come to this based upon a lot of on court experimentation with vastly differing types of gear and observing <on court> how people learn and interract w. their racquets.
 
Thanks..isnt it nice when on court experiences coincide w. what is tested in the lab??

There are useful on court cues to look for when trying to determine what swingweight a person needs based upon ones style/level of play and their level of competition. I've come to this based upon a lot of on court experimentation with vastly differing types of gear and observing <on court> how people learn and interract w. their racquets.
NoBadMojo,

First of all I 'm like you having learned from practical tennis experiences. But since last year I went more into the racquet science theory by reading the book Technical Tennis (from USSRA). They also stated that arm speed is the most important factor in generating ball speed.

But besides proofs like this many misconceptions about racquets and strings are explained that are valuable for a tennis player.

I learned a lot from this book. So I really recommend you to read this book.
 
NoBadMojo,

First of all I 'm like you having learned from practical tennis experiences. But since last year I went more into the racquet science theory by reading the book Technical Tennis (from USSRA). They also stated that arm speed is the most important factor in generating ball speed.

But besides proofs like this many misconceptions about racquets and strings are explained that are valuable for a tennis player.

I learned a lot from this book. So I really recommend you to read this book.

hey thanks for the suggestion...i did pick up this book or one like it, and my eyes glazed over very quickly ;)
yes, i would think that arm speed would translate to ball speed....cant forget wrist action too, and this is also very much shot dependent...ie: a classic volley would have very little arm speed, as that shot is hit in larger part w. your legs
 
Back
Top