Tour_G
Semi-Pro
Why?yonex 95D.
Why?yonex 95D.
Got to personally put the Biomimetic 300 Tour here, lovely paintjob but felt far too underpowered, in a way that disabled my ability to hit winners into a fairly open space. The Bio 100 and 200 Tour despite having smaller head sizes crush the ball better and have more user-friendly sweet spots. I'm not one to play about with lead, so no doubt some of these things could be improved.
Yeah it is the 18*20 frame. It is the same frame as the M Fil 200 plus, but that is a 16*19 and despite having a higher stiffness rating plays softer to me and has more power, significantly, as well as a bigger sweet spot.300 tour is 18x20 right?
I played with the biomimetic 300 for several years. Also very underpowered but the lead at 12, 3 and 9 really helped. It's a very light racquet so it was easy to customise. The bio300 gets a mention here too because I loved everything about it besides the very small sweet spot.
I wanted to love tennis with my woody, whatever the brand was, when I was kid... Instead, it damaged my wrist and put me out of the game for 25 years...
Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
Ahahaha, to much playing with woody leads to wrist damage! Makes sense.Damn man, that is really open to interpretation.
300 tour is 18x20 right?
I played with the biomimetic 300 for several years. Also very underpowered but the lead at 12, 3 and 9 really helped. It's a very light racquet so it was easy to customise. The bio300 gets a mention here too because I loved everything about it besides the very small sweet spot.
Ahahaha, to much playing with woody leads to wrist damage! Makes sense.