**Radical Limited Edition OS Review**

jdeloach

Hall of Fame
I would like to thank Doc Hollidae for submitting this review.

**Remember, this review is strictly based on Doc Hollidae's experience. If you disagree....write your own!**


Radical Limited Edition OS

String – Topspin CyberFlash 17g @ 64 lbs
Weight - 12.2oz with Gamma Hi Tech Gel grip, Blue Tournagrip, and #64 Rubber Band​



Design & Comfort 10/10
The paintjob is obviously a classic. The racket’s cosmetics are a replica of the Trisys 260. My usual racket is a Liquidmetal (LM) Radical OS and the first noticeable thing about the Limited Edition (LE) is the weight. The LE unstrung weighs just as much as the LM strung. For me it was perfect in weight, as I found the LM too light. The weight of the racket took a little adjusting to, Hitting with the LE can be described in one work: solid. Even off center shots gave no vibration. Changing the direction on hard struck balls was stable and controlled. Hitting with the LE is similar to hitting with a Pure Drive, but with more flex and feel. They both have that solid “thud” feeling upon contact. The stability of this racket really stands out. There was a consistent response and every hit is solid and crisp.

Overall – This is probably the most stable and solid racket I’ve ever hit with. Whether on time, late, or off centered each shot gave the same solid and consistent response. For those with arm problems and can handle the weight, this racket is definitely easy on the arm, as it is 100% graphite and with little to no vibration, The paintjob is a classic. It is a collector’s item so it has all of Agassi’s slams printed on the throat, except for Wimbledon ’92 when he was with Donnay.

Groundstrokes 10/10
The LE was made for the baseline. The racket is moderately powered. The weight of the racket definitely translated to more pace of my strokes. I found the sweet spot very large. If counting the crosses starting with the bottom, Crosses #6-15 are the sweetspot. This racket is excellent for short backswings and blocking back balls with lots of pace. With the LM Radical many of my blocked shots would land short and stability was poor, the LE hit with more depth and pace when blocking and shorting backswings. Many balls I would usually hit in the middle of “No Man’s Land” were landing about 6 inches inside the baseline to the baseline consistently. Topspin was easy and many of my shots look like they were going to go long, but would suddenly drop and kick out. Slice was solid and smooth. I didn’t have a slice float long on me once. When flattening out my groundies pace was easy to come by. The weight of the racket definitely helps here and the dense string pattern (18x19) allows you to keep the ball in play. Control was superb with this racket. I was able to change direction of the ball easily and even when I hit long, I didn’t feel like balls were flying. Everything was solid and consistent. The string bed played softer at high tensions than other rackets. The LM Radical at 64lbs with CyberFlash is very boardy and stiff. 64 lbs of the LE had much more feel and felt closer to 61-62 lbs.

Overall – This is a racket is great for baseliners and counterpunchers. Groundstrokes are very effortless as long as the weight doesn’t bother you. Aggressive baseliners will enjoy the control, while counterpunchers will enjoy the depth and effortlessness when blocking back the ball and shortening backswings. The racket is very stable and comfortable. Not many OS’s play with this balance of power and control.

Volleys 8/10
Like groundstrokes, volleys were very solid and stable. However being an OS, off centered volleys hit near the frame at 3 and 9 o’clock were a weak spot, as expected with an OS and volleying. On a positive note, off centered volleys produced little to no vibration with little racket twist. Pace was easy to handle and the LE definitely excels with punch volleys. Putting away volleys was very easy and controlled. Touch shots and sharp angled volleys were average. Aggressive punch volleys are definitely the best category though. The weight of the racket makes it a little slow to maneuver with shots hit into the body. The weight is most notable in longer volley exchanges, but provides for good pop and stability. I was able to keep volleys and half volleys deep and low to the ground.

Overall – The LE Radical is by no means a serve and volleyer’s racket, but it is more than adequate in the volley department. Like mentioned above, the racket really excels with punch volleys. Punch volleys are easily controlled and directed. Poly isn’t the have the greatest playability, so touch and finesse are a little skewed. Touch was average at best. Volleyer’s with longer backswings and more finesse oriented net play will not find this their ideal racket. It isn’t the most maneuverable racket. The weight is noticeable, but an average weight for player’s racket. That’s the one aspect the LM beats out the LE. Like I said, it’s not the ideal volleying racket, but it is more than adequate.

Serves 9/10
I’m not a big server, but my serves were much harder compared to serving with the LM. The weight of the racket definitely helps add pace. Kick serves had good depth and height. The spin was very heavy and had a steep drop. I was able to go for on my second serve than I would with my LM due to the heavy topspin created and control. I played 2 full sets with a guy about 6’ – 6’1” and kick serves were consistently elbow to shoulder height on him. Flat serves had lots of pop. Slice serves had good spin and stayed low, but flat and kick serves were definitely better. I was able to place serves well and with control was good. Kick serves were best, followed by flats then slices.

Overall – Excellent racket to serve with. The stiffness and weight both provide additional pace. The stability and minimal vibration gives a great feeling on serves. Flat serves are complimented by that sweet “thud” sound. Slice serves had good spin, but were nothing special. Kicks really shined and were definitely the strongest point. The OS gives a nice large stringbed for the ball to brush against.

Final Thoughts
Although this is not an exact replica of the Radical Tour Trisys 260, it is still an excellent player’s racket. Aggressive baseliners with two handed backhands will love the balance in control and power. The spin, power, and control of groundstrokes were excellent. The stability of the racket give a very solid feeling and allows you to remain aggressive when facing pace or changing the direction of the ball. There is very little racket twist or vibration even on hard struck off centered shots. This racket would be idea for counterpunchers, aggressive baseliners, and all-courters who favor the baseline. Control and topspin are definitely two selling points for this racket. I’ve hit with every Radical except for the Original Trisys 260 and this is hands down the best Radical to date. I played with the Radical Tour Twintube for a long time and loved that racket, but this rackets offers so much more versatility as the Twintube wasn’t nearly as good at the net. Although it is suppose to be a collector’s item, this is still a serious player’s racket. It plays very similar to a Pure Drive, so people that find the Pure Drive too stiff or powerful might find this a satisfying option. Head should definitely release this racket permanently.

Total Score 9.25/10
 

poncho

Rookie
DOC, what did you think about the power level of the racquet? Did you feel it had enough power when you needed it? Could you drive the ball when hitting a down the line shot or a sharp cross court knowing you had enough speed on the ball and force?

Did you buy your racquet unstrung? If so would you recommend a poly string?
How do you think a gut string 16 guage would feel and play in that racquet?

When returning a hard forehand return, did you feel the racquet had enough behind it to make an even harder return shot?

Good review!!!
 

Doc Hollidae

Hall of Fame
Poncho, the power level of the racket was low-moderate I would say. I never felt like I was overhitting, unlike hitting with the LM. Whether I was swinging out or blocking the ball, I was able to keep the ball deep and with a good amount of pace. There was more than enough power in the racket when I needed.

I bought the racket stock, so it came pre-strung with some sort of Head string. I cut it out immediately and strung it up with my usual string, Cyberflash. I figured I'd be able to give a more accurate review with the same setup as my normal racket. I can't really comment on which string to use. My personal preference is a "dead" string bed with a real muted feel. So I'm not the best person to give opinions about strings with more playability. Like I said the string bed plays soft. This may be attributed to the Graphite construction, but compared to the LM Radical, the LE was much softer. I'd suggest using poly, but that's just my biased opinion.

Returns were definitely a strength with this racket. This racket really excells with short backswings and blocking. Due to the stability and stiffness of the racket, pace was easily handled and provided for solid returns. I was able to consistently keep the ball deep and with good pace. The racket definitely allows for aggressive returning.
 

poncho

Rookie
Doc, how was the racquet on touch shots like the drop shot or the angled cross court short angled slice?
 

Doc Hollidae

Hall of Fame
There was good control, but slice with this racket wasn't anything special. I hit a few drop shots, but they weren't anything out of the norm. The graphite frame allows for added feel, but you're defintely better off playing an aggressive baseline game than a finesse oriented play style. Like I mentioned with volleys, the racket performed much better with punch volleys than angled volleys.
 

StunLock

Semi-Pro
How does the racket feel with a one handed backhand ?

It plays very stable and comfort. Although not as solid as ps 6.0 85, which in my opinion is the most solid 1hbh racquet by far, the Agassi LE is much, much more forgiving.
 

StunLock

Semi-Pro
I agree with the OP that this racquet, together with the pure drive, are the best baseline racquets I've ever hit with, while the Agassi LE is just so much more comfortable.
 

Doc Hollidae

Hall of Fame
@ spadesss
The racket is not an exact replica. The original had 5% of another material, other than graphite. The mold is apparently that of the Ti.Radical as well. However spec wise the racket is very similar to the original.

@ Slaz
I have a 2 handed backhand so my experience with one handed backhands is limited to slice and messing around. The head size would be my biggest concern. As a personal preference I tend to favor smaller head sizes for one handed backhands, however the stability and solid hitting would make me think this racket would do well with one handed backhands with topspin and pace. Like I said though, my experience with one handers is very limited, but two handers were a thing of beauty.
 

Slaz

Rookie
@ Slaz
I have a 2 handed backhand so my experience with one handed backhands is limited to slice and messing around. The head size would be my biggest concern. As a personal preference I tend to favor smaller head sizes for one handed backhands, however the stability and solid hitting would make me think this racket would do well with one handed backhands with topspin and pace. Like I said though, my experience with one handers is very limited, but two handers were a thing of beauty.


Thanks for your quick answer ;)
 

jace112

Semi-Pro
owned & played for about one month

Design 7/10

Comfort 10/10


Very stable and forgiving indeed. One of the most confortable racquet ever (along with some Yonex)

Groundstrokes 9/10

Huge sweetspot for sure. A bit of lack of spin compared to the true spin machines (rdx500, aeropro...). Very good power / control ratio.

Volleys 7/10

OS frames are forgiving at the net, but slow down a bit your volleys. Good feeling anyway.

Serves 8/10

High SW and flexible frame. Not bad at all finaly. Not tons of spin, but overall good pace and placement.

Final Thoughts

I recently owned the LM Rad OS that didn't really suit me. This Agassi Edition is a GREAT stick. My only concern would be about my 1HBH, which is harder to play than with MP frames.

Good power, good control, old-school feel.

It looks like Andre is still on court ;)
 

poncho

Rookie
What about one handed backhand slice? Were you able to drive it low and deep with the racquet? What about touch shots, like the drop shot..were they effective?
 

jace112

Semi-Pro
The original string is still alive ([FONT=verdana,arial,helvetica]HEAD Ultra Tour 16L[/FONT])
Don't know the tension exactly.
 

Doc Hollidae

Hall of Fame
I played with it for about 8-9 hours. I hit with it over the course of 3 days. My hitting partner was also a 4.5 with big groundies. I also played a league match, so I was able to test it in a comptetitve situation.
 

jace112

Semi-Pro
I played with it for about 8-9 hours. I hit with it over the course of 3 days. My hitting partner was also a 4.5 with big groundies. I also played a league match, so I was able to test it in a comptetitve situation.
you've already changed the Ultra Tour for the CBF? :confused:
 

Doc Hollidae

Hall of Fame
you've already changed the Ultra Tour for the CBF? :confused:

I didn't even attempt to hit with it. I want to compare it to my LM Radicals so I wanted to have the same setups. That's why I also replaced the original grip with the Gamma Hi Tech Gel replacement grip.
 

spadesss

Semi-Pro
i had the orginal OS one.
used in in high school and play around in college.
i gave up that racket as it was getting too heavy for me after my non playing days.

at my playing days, i gave this racket a 9/10 on all aspects except 'volley'
i sux at volley so i am not the person to judge.

the 2hbh was by best shot.
can deflect, guide, short and full swing with this racket.
slice was crazy on both FH and BH (1 handed).
can absorb power shots as wll as dishing them out.

if the new racket is anything like the old, i might give it a shot again in a few years.
 

jdeloach

Hall of Fame
My problem is....if I got a Radical LE, I would want it hanging on my wall and would miss out on the greatness of the racquet. :-(
 

Doc Hollidae

Hall of Fame
I had this problem too, but then after I heard the racket wasn't so Limited (More than 9,000 were produced). However, this stick simply has too much game in it to just be eye candy.
 

Val

New User
How would you compare this to the iRadical, which is my current racquet? I'm happy with my iRadical MP, but was wondering where I should go in terms of my next.
 

Doc Hollidae

Hall of Fame
Val,
The Radical LE will be a lot heavier than your i.Radical. The added heft might be an issue if you play with the i.Radical stock. The added weight gives a more stable feel than the i.Rad with definitely more control. The stiffness and balance are pretty close. The Radical LE also played softer and with more feel, probably due to the graphite.
 

Gundam

Semi-Pro
POG OS vs. AA radical?

I agree with the OP that this racquet, together with the pure drive, are the best baseline racquets I've ever hit with, while the Agassi LE is just so much more comfortable.

How does the AA radical compare with POG oversize? Thnx!
 

StunLock

Semi-Pro
How does the AA radical compare with POG oversize? Thnx!

I've never played with the POG OS, but I recall in TW's review one of the reviewers mentioned the Agassi LE outperforms the POG OS. But I think later they removed those lines from the review.
 

keithchircop

Professional
I've never played with the POG OS, but I recall in TW's review one of the reviewers mentioned the Agassi LE outperforms the POG OS. But I think later they removed those lines from the review.

I don't know about that, but they say in the review that the Agassi LE is better than the Fischer M Speed 105. In the M Speed review they say it's better than the POG OS. Draw your own conclusions :)
 

cukoo

Semi-Pro
I put 6 grams of lead tape in the butt and but on a babolat leather as a replacement grip but it still feels kind of head heavy...
 
Top