Rafa has won at least one slam every year since 2005. Anyone beaten that ?

Nadal has won consecutive . Has anyone have more consecutive slams?

2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013

9 consecutive years.
 
Last edited:
Impressive!

Batman, I think we need a thread for each of his slam victories. By my calculation, we need 13 threads.
 
Nadal has won

2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012

8 consecutive years.

Why didn't you include 2013. :shock: It is 9 consecutive years actually. I can't believe I am correcting TDK in Nadal's favor :shock:
This is definitely another failed thread by TDK.
 
Again, has TDK ever posted something without countless factual errors in it?

It is obvious he/she doesn't watch tennis (or he/she has severe memory problems).
 
Nope. Nadal is the first man in world history to accomplish this -- a true testament to his longevity. Previously Borg, Sampras and Federer tied the record at eight.
 
So you were trolling, as usual?

No. It's called a joke. That's why there's this thing called a smiley face.

I was reading from wiki and I just forgot about 2013.

Anyway has anyone beaten his consecutive record ?

What I find striking is that even though he missed a lot of slams he wins one every single year. The reason? Well he is that good but also because he takes time off and prepares .

A key to his success is taking time off.
 
I remember McEnroeisanartist (I think it was him) with countless bizarre statistics that in fact contained countless data errors, in all his threads I read.

But this guy, TDK, is clearly worse, is something else. It is impossible to make such an amount of data errors in all his threads by chance. It has to have a purpose, to look dumber, or to look clueless about tennis, or something else.

It is impossible to NOT KNOW so many things about tennis and still post countless threads about tennis everyday.

Something is seriously rotten here...maybe he/she wants to be acknowledged as the most clueless guy ever around here or the dumbest troll around here.

What do you think?
 
Yet he still has only won 13 slams, Rafa 'never had an era' Nadal.

RFederer took 6 years to accumulate 13 slams including an incredible 11 in a mind-blowing 4 year period. Amazing
 
I remember McEnroeisanartist (I think it was him) with countless bizarre statistics that in fact contained countless data errors, in all his threads I read.

But this guy, TDK, is clearly worse, is something else. It is impossible to make such an amount of data errors in all his threads by chance. It has to have a purpose, to look dumber, or to look clueless about tennis, or something else.

It is impossible to NOT KNOW so many things about tennis and still post countless threads about tennis everyday.

Something is seriously rotten here...maybe he/she wants to be acknowledged as the most clueless guy ever around here or the dumbest troll around here.

What do you think?

What data is wrong in this thread?
 
At first you wrote Nadal had 8 straight years and Federer 7.

Anybody who follow tennis knows Rafa this year set the record in 9 and that it was previoulsy in 8 along with Borg, Sampras and Federer.

You don't have to look at any wiki page to know it. Any person who seriously follow tennis knows it.
 
At first you wrote Nadal had 8 straight years and Federer 7.

Anybody who follow tennis knows Rafa this year set the record in 9 and that it was previoulsy in 8 along with Borg, Sampras and Federer.

You don't have to look at any wiki page to know it. Any person who seriously follow tennis knows it.

The OP doesn't know who Raonic is...

He also thought Nadal beat Federer at the Olympics, he knows nothing about tennis. He is just a troll.
 
And let's not talk about your other countless threads with countless factual errors in all of them. It is impossible to not know all those things and at the same time to pretend you follow tennis.

Listen, I am not complaining or something, I usually only post about tennis, not about other posters, but this thing with you is just too weird...
 
And let's not talk about your other countless threads with countless factual errors in all of them. It is impossible to not know all those things and at the same time to pretend you follow tennis.

Listen, I am not complaining or something, I usually only post about tennis, not about other posters, but this thing with you is just too weird...

the TDK is just a troll who knows nothing about tennis ...
 
Nope. Nadal is the first man in world history to accomplish this -- a true testament to his longevity. Previously Borg, Sampras and Federer tied the record at eight.

A concern troll is a false flag pseudonym created by a user whose actual point of view is opposed to the one that the user claims to hold.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A concern troll is a false flag pseudonym created by a user whose actual point of view is opposed to the one that the user claims to hold. The concern troll posts in Web forums devoted to its declared point of view and attempts to sway the group's actions or opinions while claiming to share their goals, but with professed "concerns". The goal is to sow fear, uncertainty and doubt within the group

Which never works and is an absolutely pointless activity. When it comes to fandom, no one is "convinced" by anyone else's opinion. Even if these opinions are put forth as "concerns".
 
Which never works and is an absolutely pointless activity. When it comes to fandom, no one is "convinced" by anyone else's opinion. Even if these opinions are put forth as "concerns".

It was more just the fake part I was highlighting, N-S-K is NOT a Nadal fan.
 
When you consider the string of injuries, how hard he plays, it makes it even more amazing

I guess you could say Sampras winning the USO 12 years apart is amazing as well. Winning it at 19 and winning it again at 31
 
When you consider the string of injuries, how hard he plays, it makes it even more amazing

I guess you could say Sampras winning the USO 12 years apart is amazing as well. Winning it at 19 and winning it again at 31

Depends how you look at it? I mean don't get me wrong ....it's amazing ....

But it's also smart.

Williams, Sampas and Nadal all had the same strategy......

They take time off .....they forget about the minor tournaments and let their meaningless rankings drop.....and gear up for the only thin that really matters:

The grand slams.
 
Federerwinswimbledon2014.....

Your wrong as usual....fed lost Wimbledon badly.

What are you talking about?

Your not happy with me as I have stood up to you and higlighted what a fraud you really are.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top