Rafa Nadal -the greatest outdoor tennis player in history?

mehdimike

Hall of Fame
I expect you to give the full information about the NA Hard Court season if you mention it in your post, and that includes the Cincinnati titles....you're selective presentation of results is just that, selective....so allow me to show you the full title haul for the NA season for all the big three.

USO
Federer 5
Nadal 4
Djokovic 3

Canada
Nadal 5
Djokovic 4
Federer 2

Cincinnati
Federer 7
Djokovic 2
Nadal 1
All in all, it's weird that Rafa had more success in NA season than Novak, though they have produced almost similar stats.
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
All in all, it's weird that Rafa had more success in NA season than Novak, though they have produced almost similar stats.
By the autumn, the clay season along with wear and tear on his body due to the effects of his congenital foot problem he is usually physically compromised that's why he hasn't done so well or played so much in the autumn. Winning 1x500, 2xM1000 & 1xGS in the space of 2 months is bound to take its toll.
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
I expect you to give the full information about the NA Hard Court season if you mention it in your post, and that includes the Cincinnati titles....you're selective presentation of results is just that, selective....so allow me to show you the full title haul for the NA season for all the big three.

USO
Federer 5
Nadal 4
Djokovic 3

Canada
Nadal 5
Djokovic 4
Federer 2

Cincinnati
Federer 7
Djokovic 2
Nadal 1
No one who is not good on hardcourt would win 5 Canadian titles, 4 USO titles and the American Hard Court Swing.
 
Last edited:

PilotPete

Hall of Fame
Sure, but is he even top 10 once clay is removed? Why remove clay you ask? To demonstrate skew? What's important about skew? To demonstrate that tennis encompasses all surfaces.
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
I expect you to give the full information about the NA Hard Court season if you mention it in your post, and that includes the Cincinnati titles....you're selective presentation of results is just that, selective....so allow me to show you the full title haul for the NA season for all the big three.

USO
Federer 5
Nadal 4
Djokovic 3

Canada
Nadal 5
Djokovic 4
Federer 2

Cincinnati
Federer 7
Djokovic 2
Nadal 1
Cincinnati
Federer - won 7 out of 17
Djokovic - won 2 out of 14
Nadal - won 1 out of 12

Nothing to see here.
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
Sure, but is he even top 10 once clay is removed? Why remove clay you ask? To demonstrate skew? What's important about skew? To demonstrate that tennis encompasses all surfaces.
No one is top 10, apart from Rafa, if you only use clay in their resumé.
 

skip1969

G.O.A.T.
Don't worry Nadal fanboys and girls . . . just one more week til we crown a new USO champion, and then you guys can take a much-needed break. It must be hard, hard work trying to keep your boy relevant when he ain't even playing.

After the USO, chill, get out a little, have some fun. We'll see you back at the YECs . . . when you can continue the spin campaign for your boy being GOAT.
 
Don't worry Nadal fanboys and girls . . . just one more week til we crown a new USO champion, and then you guys can take a much-needed break. It must be hard, hard work trying to keep your boy relevant when he ain't even playing.

After the USO, chill, get out a little, have some fun. We'll see you back at the YECs . . . when you can continue the spin campaign for your boy being GOAT.
Who is claiming he is goat? The claim here is he is the most successful outdoor tennis player in history.
 
61 of those 86 titles on clay :unsure:
Clay and grass were the two slam surfaces for the majority of the 20th century. Hard courts are a recent addition. If you have the outdoor record across all surfaces it really does mean you've mastered the game that the legends of the past mastered.

Indoor tennis is an inferior version of the sport. Still hugely enjoyable, but not quite the real thing.
 

Sunny014

Legend
Clay and grass were the two slam surfaces for the majority of the 20th century. Hard courts are a recent addition. If you have the outdoor record across all surfaces it really does mean you've mastered the game that the legends of the past mastered.

Indoor tennis is an inferior version of the sport. Still hugely enjoyable, but not quite the real thing.

Why isn't indoor the real thing?

Because Nadal is clueless on it?
 

Sunny014

Legend
He's definitely much weaker indoors. It's not quite the real thing for the same reason indoor golf wouldn't be. It was designed as an outdoor sport.

Traditionally you might be right.

However not in terms of ability, when other GOAT candidates like Fed, Sampras and Novak are excellent indoors in low bounce then Nadal being so weak is a question mark.

I guess that is a price to pay for being the GOAT on clay/super high bounce conditions, nature maybe doesn't allow someone to be so good at both the extreme ends of bounce....
 

brc444

Rookie
Wasn’t tennis designed to be played with wood racquets and what does that do to the pure tennis slam count?
 
ric-flair-wwe.gif


Nadal is epic AF :D

Who’s more epic—the Nature Boy or Rafa?
 

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
If we abolish or otherwise devalue tennis not played on grass, for which it was designed, where does that leave Nadal?
 

flanker2000fr

Hall of Fame
It is often forgotten or deliberately overlooked, but Nadal is the most successful tennis player in outdoor conditions in the history of the game. He has more outdoor Open Era titles than any other player and is the only player in the entire history of the sport to win his non-Covid slam titles in outdoor conditions (the others all won one or more non-Covid titles under closed roofs).

Given that the games was created to be an outdoor sport (in contrast to real tennis), there is a real argument for Nadal being the purest tennis champion in history.

There are two ways to answer to this:

- either that tennis was derived from the French Jeu de Paume, which was meant to be played indoor
- or that tennis was indeed created by the English, to be played outdoor on grass

On neither counts would he be anywhere close to be the purest / best player in tennis history.
 

flanker2000fr

Hall of Fame
Clay and grass were the two slam surfaces for the majority of the 20th century. Hard courts are a recent addition. If you have the outdoor record across all surfaces it really does mean you've mastered the game that the legends of the past mastered.

Indoor tennis is an inferior version of the sport.
Still hugely enjoyable, but not quite the real thing.

Says who?
 

tudwell

G.O.A.T.
He has more outdoor Open Era titles than any other player and is the only player in the entire history of the sport to win his non-Covid slam titles in outdoor conditions (the others all won one or more non-Covid titles under closed roofs).
That… sounds incorrect.
 
Top