zill
Legend
Nah, Agassi
Ok but in terms of modern strokes and a semi western forehand grip though. Agassi’s strokes look a bit old school. It’s like in between old school and modern school.
Nah, Agassi
All in all, it's weird that Rafa had more success in NA season than Novak, though they have produced almost similar stats.I expect you to give the full information about the NA Hard Court season if you mention it in your post, and that includes the Cincinnati titles....you're selective presentation of results is just that, selective....so allow me to show you the full title haul for the NA season for all the big three.
USO
Federer 5
Nadal 4
Djokovic 3
Canada
Nadal 5
Djokovic 4
Federer 2
Cincinnati
Federer 7
Djokovic 2
Nadal 1
By the autumn, the clay season along with wear and tear on his body due to the effects of his congenital foot problem he is usually physically compromised that's why he hasn't done so well or played so much in the autumn. Winning 1x500, 2xM1000 & 1xGS in the space of 2 months is bound to take its toll.All in all, it's weird that Rafa had more success in NA season than Novak, though they have produced almost similar stats.
No one who is not good on hardcourt would win 5 Canadian titles, 4 USO titles and the American Hard Court Swing.I expect you to give the full information about the NA Hard Court season if you mention it in your post, and that includes the Cincinnati titles....you're selective presentation of results is just that, selective....so allow me to show you the full title haul for the NA season for all the big three.
USO
Federer 5
Nadal 4
Djokovic 3
Canada
Nadal 5
Djokovic 4
Federer 2
Cincinnati
Federer 7
Djokovic 2
Nadal 1
CincinnatiI expect you to give the full information about the NA Hard Court season if you mention it in your post, and that includes the Cincinnati titles....you're selective presentation of results is just that, selective....so allow me to show you the full title haul for the NA season for all the big three.
USO
Federer 5
Nadal 4
Djokovic 3
Canada
Nadal 5
Djokovic 4
Federer 2
Cincinnati
Federer 7
Djokovic 2
Nadal 1
No one is top 10, apart from Rafa, if you only use clay in their resumé.Sure, but is he even top 10 once clay is removed? Why remove clay you ask? To demonstrate skew? What's important about skew? To demonstrate that tennis encompasses all surfaces.
No one is top 10, apart from Rafa, if you only use clay in their resumé.
Rank | Country | Name | Outdoor Titles |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ESP | Rafael Nadal | 86 |
2 | SUI | Roger Federer | 77 |
3 | SRB | Novak Djokovic | 72 |
4 | ARG | Guillermo Vilas | 55 |
5 | USA | Jimmy Connors | 53 |
6 | USA | Ivan Lendl | 52 |
7 | USA | Andre Agassi | 48 |
8 | AUT | Thomas Muster | 43 |
9 | AUS | Rod Laver | 42 |
9 | ROU | Ilie Nastase | 42 |
9 | SWE | Bjorn Borg | 42 |
12 | USA | Pete Sampras | 41 |
Who is claiming he is goat? The claim here is he is the most successful outdoor tennis player in history.Don't worry Nadal fanboys and girls . . . just one more week til we crown a new USO champion, and then you guys can take a much-needed break. It must be hard, hard work trying to keep your boy relevant when he ain't even playing.
After the USO, chill, get out a little, have some fun. We'll see you back at the YECs . . . when you can continue the spin campaign for your boy being GOAT.
Are these figures correct?
Most Outdoor Titles
Active players
- Records
- Most Titles
- Most Outdoor Titles
20
Rank Country Name Outdoor Titles 1 ESP Rafael Nadal 86 2 SUI Roger Federer 77 3 SRB Novak Djokovic 72 4 ARG Guillermo Vilas 55 5 USA Jimmy Connors 53 6 USA Ivan Lendl 52 7 USA Andre Agassi 48 8 AUT Thomas Muster 43 9 AUS Rod Laver 42 9 ROU Ilie Nastase 42 9 SWE Bjorn Borg 42 12 USA Pete Sampras 41
Clay and grass were the two slam surfaces for the majority of the 20th century. Hard courts are a recent addition. If you have the outdoor record across all surfaces it really does mean you've mastered the game that the legends of the past mastered.61 of those 86 titles on clay![]()
Clay and grass were the two slam surfaces for the majority of the 20th century. Hard courts are a recent addition. If you have the outdoor record across all surfaces it really does mean you've mastered the game that the legends of the past mastered.
Indoor tennis is an inferior version of the sport. Still hugely enjoyable, but not quite the real thing.
He's definitely much weaker indoors. It's not quite the real thing for the same reason indoor golf wouldn't be. It was designed as an outdoor sport.Why isn't indoor the real thing?
Because Nadal is clueless on it?
He's definitely much weaker indoors. It's not quite the real thing for the same reason indoor golf wouldn't be. It was designed as an outdoor sport.
It was. And they should never have allowed it to change.Wasn’t tennis designed to be played with wood racquets and what does that do to the pure tennis slam count?
What 'vote'? I don't care. Your argument from popularity does little to sway my interpretation of his antics.But the majority will still carry the vote and they don't agree with you.
It was. And they should never have allowed it to change.
Wasn’t tennis designed to be played with wood racquets and what does that do to the pure tennis slam count?
![]()
Nadal is epic AF![]()
Who’s more epic—the Nature Boy or Rafa?
It is often forgotten or deliberately overlooked, but Nadal is the most successful tennis player in outdoor conditions in the history of the game. He has more outdoor Open Era titles than any other player and is the only player in the entire history of the sport to win his non-Covid slam titles in outdoor conditions (the others all won one or more non-Covid titles under closed roofs).
Given that the games was created to be an outdoor sport (in contrast to real tennis), there is a real argument for Nadal being the purest tennis champion in history.
Clay and grass were the two slam surfaces for the majority of the 20th century. Hard courts are a recent addition. If you have the outdoor record across all surfaces it really does mean you've mastered the game that the legends of the past mastered.
Indoor tennis is an inferior version of the sport. Still hugely enjoyable, but not quite the real thing.
If we abolish or otherwise devalue tennis not played on grass, for which it was designed, where does that leave Nadal?
That… sounds incorrect.He has more outdoor Open Era titles than any other player and is the only player in the entire history of the sport to win his non-Covid slam titles in outdoor conditions (the others all won one or more non-Covid titles under closed roofs).