Yeah I am not naming or post past threads they are everywhere to see. I don’t want to call out posters and quite a few are still active. It’s not all posters many don’t but I am responding to a comment that mentioned it.Well you've already taken the shots, you just haven't named who you meant. Most of the time I think Fed's comp is put alongside Djokovic's weaker winning runs or losing efforts in finals etc...not his peak performances. A handful of posters or extremists shouldn't really concern you. There are 20 posters on here delusional enough to think Nadal is greater at the USO than Federer, I doubt you'll find 20 posters who think Roddick beats Djokovic peak for peak....and no threads about at Wimbledon pre-2015 hardly count.
I have no problem with somebody thinking Roddick could get some wins over Djokovic at Wim. He gets put aside better players too much though. I don’t agree pre 15 doesn’t count. Djokovic has been a ATG since after AO 2012 if not even after USO 11.
Nadal is not better at the USO and most posters rightly jumped on this thread that but even that is more reasonable still imo.