Gazelle
G.O.A.T.
whose fluids are in whom
69
whose fluids are in whom
Probably in condoms cuz they don't wanna get their respective wives pregnent.whose fluids are in whom
It had always been 1 clay slam before Nadal came into existence. So its his fault that he decided to become clay specialist.If there were two clay slams instead of two hardcourt slams, Nadal might have 6.
The guy in your avi won't generate 0.1% of the interest even retired fedal can do.This is just well cringy. Not on Fedal's part but this unrelenting endless obsession of media about these two, they keep pestering both of them and trying new ways to make them look closer.
A slight difference is probably fair but doesn't push Nadal RG 08 offI wouldn't say it would be much but based on the way the tournaments played out, I would say 2019 AO Nadal was playing slightly better than 2008 RG Federer.
Go watch the match and see.![]()
Djokerer ao16Would you give it a 10 and if so any other Djokovic matches?
https://keepmeme.com/meme/20210730/cops-beat-chinese-man-after-asking-for-his-name-***-yu-name-meme.jpgA slight difference is probably fair but doesn't push Nadal RG 08 off
Seen the 2015 final more than one time. Maybe a weak 10/10 if RG 08 is a strong 10/10![]()
Didn't see what you sent to me
Any losing efforts 9/10 and over in general?Djokerer ao16
A slight difference is probably fair but doesn't push Nadal RG 08 off
Seen the 2015 final more than one time. Maybe a weak 10/10 if RG 08 is a strong 10/10![]()
Were would you put Djokovic in the AO 12 final and the AO 15 final?Fair enough.
Were would you put Djokovic in the AO 12 final and the AO 15 final?
I remembered the AO 15 final very good but I might be misremembering it . Obviously AO 2012 would be a common pick so not surprised you put it 9+.AO 15 final wasn't that great. Probably a 7.5 or 8 at best. AO 2012 was 9+.
9/10 effort and losing would be Blake vs agassi 2005 uso and Agassi vs fed 2004 uso, also 2003 tmc RRDidn't see what you sent to me.
Any losing efforts 9/10 and over in general?
I remembered the AO 15 final very good but I might be misremembering it . Obviously AO 2012 would be a common pick so not surprised you put it 9+.
I thought Djokovic was very good in both. I think in AO 2013 Djokovic struggled in the first on big points then kept getting better and better as the much went on but in AO 2015 Djokovic started fast then Murray equalled him then in the end Djokovic took control and ran away with it. Like I say I might be misremembering some of it though.I thought it was AO 2013 that was really good. I sometimes get those two matches confused.
I thought Djokovic was very good in both. I think in AO 2013 Djokovic struggled in the first on big points then kept getting better and better as the much went on but in AO 2015 Djokovic started fast then Murray equalled him then in the end Djokovic took control and ran away with it. Like I say I might be misremembering some of it though.
I think both matches were just very tight for a stretch and Murray was really threatening and forced the odd dip then Djokovic pulled away. 2013 Djokovic did hit the ball harder though by the eye.Well neither were bad performances but AO 2013 is the one I remember being the more high quality match. Of course, 2015 Djokovic coud turn up the heat and deliver bagels back then but it seemed like in the middle of the match, the level dropped a bit.
Ah yes, we all know how much Nadal can't stand DjokovicIt just means they don't hate each other like they do with Djokovic.
A example of a 8/10 losing effort?9/10 effort and losing would be Blake vs agassi 2005 uso and Agassi vs fed 2004 uso, also 2003 tmc RR
It's funny that does seem to be the consensus around here but I thought the first two sets in 15 were better. Murray did absolutely fall apart in the 4th set in 15 but he was also physically running low in 13 so not that different. I think people remember Djokovic playing a meh semi in 15 and assume that about the final but the final was very good from him.I thought it was AO 2013 that was really good. I sometimes get those two matches confused.
What you give Djokovic and Murray out of 10 in both?It's funny that does seem to be the consensus around here but I thought the first two sets in 15 were better. Murray did absolutely fall apart in the 4th set in 15 but he was also physically running low in 13 so not that different. I think people remember Djokovic playing a meh semi in 15 and assume that about the final but the final was very good from him.
It's funny that does seem to be the consensus around here but I thought the first two sets in 15 were better. Murray did absolutely fall apart in the 4th set in 15 but he was also physically running low in 13 so not that different. I think people remember Djokovic playing a meh semi in 15 and assume that about the final but the final was very good from him.
Fed 2008 WimbledonA example of a 8/10 losing effort?
That's fair. I think it's really hard to rank Novak's level in AO finals other than 2011 at the top and 2020 at the bottom though I still think he was good in 2020. I used to be lower on 2015 but now I think it's better than 2013 by a hair. Pretty much equal though. I actually think I'd put both over 2012 just because physically there was no let up in either especially 13 which was highly impressive given how brutal some of the rallies were whereas in 2012 he understandably tired. 2012 is the most impressive of his AO runs or any run for that matter but he didn't have as much to give physically as 2013/15 because of the absolute war of a semi he played that year compared to a steamrolling of Ferrer and a far less physical match with Wawrinka.Well I don't think Djokovic has ever played a bad AO final (so far) but I think most would say 2015 would be the one at the bottom of totem pole because it just felt like he was on autopilot at times. I definitely don't think it was a bad performance by any means but falls short of years like 2011, 2012 and 2019.
What an interesting group of runner ups to pick as equals.Fed 2008 Wimbledon
Fed 2009 Australia
Nadal 2006 Wimbledon
Djokovic 2010 uso
That's fair. I think it's really hard to rank Novak's level in AO finals other than 2011 at the top and 2020 at the bottom though I still think he was good in 2020. I used to be lower on 2015 but now I think it's better than 2013 by a hair. Pretty much equal though. I actually think I'd put both over 2012 just because physically there was no let up in either especially 13 which was highly impressive given how brutal some of the rallies were whereas in 2012 he understandably tired. 2012 is the most impressive of his AO runs or any run for that matter but he didn't have as much to give physically as 2013/15 because of the absolute war of a semi he played that year compared to a steamrolling of Ferrer and a far less physical match with Wawrinka.
Oh trust me I love the 2012 final. It's the best match I've ever watched. However, largely because of the draw Novak just had more legs in 13/15. I mean Novak won the 13 final off of superior physicality as they were dead even through 2 sets but Djokovic was able to keep it up and Murray slowly wilted physically. In 12 Djokovic had some bail out trigger pulls and moments of waning effort that weren't present in the other two matches. Yes 2012 went 5 but I don't think the Djokodal rallies are more physical than Murrovic ones often they are less physical. Also the courts in 13/15 up the general effectiveness of Djokovic's game the 12 court is too slow for him. I mean it's super close but my general feeling is that 12 Djok/13 Djok are on basically the same level except that 13 was fresher. 12 maybe had a little more sting on his groundies but not enough to make up for the difference in stamina. Then I think 15 was just a tiny bit better than both with the improved serve and that match is also one of his all time returning clinics. He absolutely pounded Murray's second serve in that match.I don't know about that. You may want to watch that 2012 final again. I did a year or so ago and it is still up there with the best. The level of that match is insane and he did that in back to back matches. I definitely put that performance above 2013 and 2015. Nadal went to super saiyan level that tournament and Djokovic went right with him and that made it one of their best matches if not the best. I agree with 2020 as very last but like you, I don't think it was a bad performance. I think he struggled physically for a set and a half but a lot of credit should be given to Thiem too who played a hell of a match and, in my opinion, his best run and level at any hardcourt Slam.
It just means they don't hate each other like they do with Djokovic.
A lot of examples:Fluid relationship... doesn't sound like the right adjective
SWhat an interesting group of runner ups to pick as equals.
Djokovic should have rightfully finished the 2012 final in 4 sets. He had no business losing 4th.I don't know about that. You may want to watch that 2012 final again. I did a year or so ago and it is still up there with the best. The level of that match is insane and he did that in back to back matches. I definitely put that performance above 2013 and 2015. Nadal went to super saiyan level that tournament and Djokovic went right with him and that made it one of their best matches if not the best. I agree with 2020 as very last but like you, I don't think it was a bad performance. I think he struggled physically for a set and a half but a lot of credit should be given to Thiem too who played a hell of a match and, in my opinion, his best run and level at any hardcourt Slam.
So, it's good when players are friends and it's good when they don't like each other? Can you make your mind?I am glad they are friends. I also like that they openly don’t like Novak. Rivalry is good. Feuds are good.
Honesty is good.
They have a fluid relationship meaning they will do PR together and say whatever in interviews to make the most money possible and increase their combined influence on the ATP so that they can keep lower level players down playing for crumbs and extend their own careers.
I speak fluent ‘Nadal’ (and ‘Fed’) and can interpret his semi-fluent English well because I meet many such self-serving knuckleheads in the corporate worldYes that is what he actually what he wanted to say.
Federer W 08/AO 09 the same as W 06 Nadal and USO 10 Djokovic? The former was a way way closer match unless you would think the later two winners were a lot better which you might do.Fed 2008 Wimbledon
Fed 2009 Australia
Nadal 2006 Wimbledon
Djokovic 2010 uso
What do you think of 8/10 levels?What an interesting group of runner ups to pick as equals.
Bound to happen, with that title.This thread is going sideways at a very rapid rate![]()
Awfully pronounced English is the universal language of these days.I speak fluent ‘Nadal’ (and ‘Fed’) and can interpret his semi-fluent English well because I meet many such self-serving knuckleheads in the corporate world![]()
Fluid relationship... doesn't sound like the right adjective
@Mainad might disagree with me but I rewatched the 2013 final earlier this year and thought Djokovic outplayed Murray in the first set apart from the tiebreak. Djokovic should've broken Murray in that first setWell neither were bad performances but AO 2013 is the one I remember being the more high quality match. Of course, 2015 Djokovic coud turn up the heat and deliver bagels back then but it seemed like in the middle of the match, the level dropped a bit.
Oh trust me I love the 2012 final. It's the best match I've ever watched. However, largely because of the draw Novak just had more legs in 13/15. I mean Novak won the 13 final off of superior physicality as they were dead even through 2 sets but Djokovic was able to keep it up and Murray slowly wilted physically. In 12 Djokovic had some bail out trigger pulls and moments of waning effort that weren't present in the other two matches. Yes 2012 went 5 but I don't think the Djokodal rallies are more physical than Murrovic ones often they are less physical. Also the courts in 13/15 up the general effectiveness of Djokovic's game the 12 court is too slow for him. I mean it's super close but my general feeling is that 12 Djok/13 Djok are on basically the same level except that 13 was fresher. 12 maybe had a little more sting on his groundies but not enough to make up for the difference in stamina. Then I think 15 was just a tiny bit better than both with the improved serve and that match is also one of his all time returning clinics. He absolutely pounded Murray's second serve in that match.
Djokovic should have rightfully finished the 2012 final in 4 sets. He had no business losing 4th.
But he turned into Djokob**ch and almost allowed nadal to win a match he had no business winning.
Wawrinka AUS 2013?Didn't see what you sent to me.
Any losing efforts 9/10 and over in general?