Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by aphex, Jan 18, 2011.
71 wins-10 losses
That's probably not even top 5 in the open era...
And yet, he won three slams in a row. Absolutely top 5 in the open era.
Who cares when the guy is in top-1 of the most humble players of all time.
I'm talking W/L...
Probably barely top 10. Winning slams surely is most important but maintaing a good WL is what differentiates the truly special player
It is very similar to Federer's 2007 record. 68-9 W-L, 3 grand slams, and 8 titles. Nadal just had 1 less title.
I lol at these statements. Have you ever heard of Arthur Ashe?
Have you ever heard of sarcasm?
And 2007 was not even Feds best !!
More like 3rd or 4th best...
Worst player in the world yet he shows up in many TW discussions.
Stop hating on Ralph!
Lot of them started by Fediots... Like this one.
...and followed religiously by terminally unfunny tools...like you.
Holmes: Hmmm, not sure if it was or wasn't. Either way, seeing Ralph in a thread title makes me smile, still.
Nadal sweeps the entire clay season, wins three grandslams on three different surfaces (consecutively) and his year wasn't good?
Tell me more, *******!
It was good. Just not as good as Federer's 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, when you also factor in the all important W-L.
All those years Federer could barely get a win on clay. He didn't even win one French open in all those years and they were better than Nada's 2010? Yeah okay...
I believe in those years Federer really only lost to Nadal on clay. Check 2006. Nadal ONLY won FO's in all those years. The only reason he had such great 2008 and 2010 was due to Fed injuries.
Oh, please enlighten us on what injuries allowed Nadal to sweep three grandslams in a row?
Fed had a lung infection at the beginning of the year and leg injury during W10. Rafa won USO10 legitimately however, with a cakewalk draw. We'll see what happens when the law of averages takes over.
I believe the right expression is BOO HOO.
Yeah kinda like in 2009 when Rafa skipped out due to "injuries"?
Yes, kinda like
Just because you have a head it doesn't mean you have to stick it up Ralph's arse, as your reply clearly shows.
What do you wanna know Ralphette?
How many players have had years with fewer than 10 losses and a better W/L ratio?
my friend got mono recently,I'm hoping it's the Roger Federer type where you can play top level tennis and get cured when you win a slam title
You mean 9 months later? Yeah, me too.
you're also hoping that my friend only got "lame mono", you're a really caring person
I'm not saying that Rafa's year wasn't good when I say what I am saying, but bear with me:
Fed's 3 slams and a slam final is better than 3 slams and a non-slam final, especially when Fed could make the finals of RG consecutively for years...
ROFL X 2500, V!
See, Roger Federer is a truly unique player ... he can play high level tennis with mono yet when the light diminishes ever so slightly, as it did in the Wimbledon final 2008 against Rafa, he can't play good enough, losing in 5 sets! ROFL!
Certainly, but the real miracles is having tendonitis that allows you to destroy Hewitt in a Major and then at the same time allows you to use it as an excuse for skipping Wimbledon. Now that's magic!
Won 2, cheated to win at Wimbledon.
IMHO they shouldn't have let Rafa wear those night vision goggles, that was just unfair
fixed it for you.
I wasn't talking about magic,I was talking about mononucleosis type RF,if you don't believe me read this:
Well, Nadal's own "injury" at Wimbledon's 3rd round allowed him to win that match. In fact, Nadal should thank the "injuries", or "injury timeouts" I should say. Nadal won many titles BECAUSE he was "injured". The most fake champion of all time.
that's called being smart
Smart? Maybe. But with that he is also fake and a cheater. If you are willing to respect a person like that then have fun. I know I can't.
yeah,everyone knows that,really
you can shut up for a while with that and post something else for a change
Where did Fed come in?
Nadal had a great year. He came back from a lot of injury and a really BAD 11 months. To come back in style like that, beats any other numbers. What a true champion.
Twas a terrible 11 months. The turnaround was fantastic for sure.
1) Get over it.
2) LOL at the idea that Nadal would have lost that match. Sorry but Petz's streak was about over when Rafa took his MTO. Result would have been no different.
Nadal cheated to win Wimbledon, when the umpire turned round he hit Petz with a steal chair.
Or better, YOU can shut up and just ignore my posts if you don't like them. How about that?
You remind me of the babe
I love it how all the Nards reply with the likes of "shut up" or "get over it" because obviously they don't have any valid points to add. Anyway, let's focus at the AO, if Nadal wins that he would have completed the "Cheater Slam".
How you refer to your boyfriend is none of my buisness.
Separate names with a comma.