Rank YE#2 seasons from most to least successful (since 2010)

Best YE#2 Season

  • Nadal 2011

    Votes: 4 10.5%
  • Federer 2012

    Votes: 1 2.6%
  • Djokovic 2013

    Votes: 2 5.3%
  • Federer 2014

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Murray 2015

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Djokovic 2016

    Votes: 18 47.4%
  • Federer 2017

    Votes: 11 28.9%
  • Nadal 2018

    Votes: 1 2.6%
  • Djokovic 2019

    Votes: 1 2.6%
  • Nadal 2020 OR Fed 2010 (Comment which one)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    38
Rank the best to worst YE#2 finishers of the past decade, and vote on who had the best year in the poll!
I'll start:

1. Djokovic 2016
2. Djokovic 2013
3. Federer 2017
4. Djokovic 2019
5. Nadal 2018
6. Federer 2012
7. Nadal 2011
8. Nadal 2020
9. Federer 2014
10. Murray 2015
11. Federer 2010

Discuss
I don't have much to disagree with here. 2018 Nadal is the only one that sticks out to me as a little high. I'd bump him down a spot or two.

Edit: And bump 2010 Fed up a spot or two.
 
In the early Srichapan era, 2015erer would have probably had a Calendar slam under his belt
yes 2014erer-2019erer would steamroll Srichiphan era, with all the knowledge, training and experience he attained in order to go toe to toe with djokodal...but pity for him he didn't have those rivals back then that made him better. At least he got a few freebie slams on his resume
 
I would bump up 2011 Nadal into the top 5. I mean, if not for Djokovic having one of the all-time great seasons, Nadal likely has an all-time great season himself. He likely wins 3 slams and 5 masters
 
1. Federer 2017
2. Djokovic 2016
3. Djokovic 2019
4. Federer 2012
5. Djokovic 2013
6. Nadal 2011
7. Nadal 2018
8. Federer 2010
9. Federer 2014
10. Murray 2015
11. Nadal 2020 (shouldn't even count this season really)

I think Federer's conversion rate in 17 was just insane to be honest. And he really should have done a bit more to secure the YE #1 but I guess that's owing to the back injury in Canada. He had absolutely planned to play Cincy after and maybe goes a step further at the USO. All of that would have given him #1. All that said, got the 2 Slams including no sets dropped at Wimbledon first in over 40 years. Djokovic 2016 & 2019 is the only other 2 Slam guy to consider. From a Slam perspective, obviously Fed 14 & Murray 15 without Slams should be at the bottom but Covid season just has to be the worst in my opinion so by default I put it there. The margins between 4-8 is pretty small. I ultimately go with 2012 Fed because it was the most evenly split year for the Big 4 and Fed did do quite well taking the #1 rank for several weeks. After that Novak in 13 was damn strong but never rivaling Nadal really. Nadal in 2011 is in the same group but more bad losses and becoming Novak's pigeon, at least Novak in 13 came agonizingly close to beating Rafa on clay. Nadal 2018 over Fed 2010 because Rafa was out last part of the year and so his percentages are quite a bit better and that epic Wimbledon SF loss which we all know if he wins that's a 2nd Slam.
 
I would bump up 2011 Nadal into the top 5. I mean, if not for Djokovic having one of the all-time great seasons, Nadal likely has an all-time great season himself. He likely wins 3 slams and 5 masters
Federer was quiet good at USO 2011, he could have taken Nadal out...we know how indoor season went for Fed
 
Federer was quiet good at USO 2011, he could have taken Nadal out...we know how indoor season went for Fed

Yeah, that's the one final I'm not certain Nadal wins, but I think I would've favored him against Fed that year. It's a shame they never met at the USO
 
yes 2014erer-2019erer would steamroll Srichiphan era, with all the knowledge, training and experience he attained in order to go toe to toe with djokodal...but pity for him he didn't have those rivals back then that made him better. At least he got a few freebie slams on his resume
Sir, he got Roy Emerson's career worth of freebie slams in the Srichapan era! Only toughie from 03-07 was W07. Everything else was a Skittle slam
 
Yeah, that's the one final I'm not certain Nadal wins, but I think I would've favored him against Fed that year. It's a shame they never met at the USO

If Federer beats Novak in straights I think he would have been favoured. Remember now Fed lost up 2-0 to Tsonga at Wimbledon and upset Novak at the French. I don't think Nadal even as defending champ would be the favourite under the circumstances Roger again upsets Novak let alone in straights. And speaking of Tsonga, he played Novak tougher than Nadal on grass despite coming back against Roger down 0-2. I could definitely see Nadal losing both finals to Tsonga & Fed. Have to look at his draws, he beat Fish/Murray & Roddick(seeded 21)/Murray. Not exactly prime form.
 
And he really should have done a bit more to secure the YE #1 but I guess that's owing to the back injury in Canada.

I remember an argument over him playing Basel instead of Paris. Some (me among them) thought it was nuts to skip a 1000 event rather than the 500 with the YE#1 within grasp, but others thought he should rest to prepare for another WTF.
 
I remember an argument over him playing Basel instead of Paris. Some (me among them) thought it was nuts to skip a 1000 event rather than the 500 with the YE#1 within grasp, but others thought he should rest to prepare for another WTF.

Nah, race was over after USO. Basel was a much easier give at 500 and playing both it and Paris potentially losing WTF wasn't worth it. I mean, ultimately it didn't help with WTF but to get that #1 he needed to win Canada, obviously play Cincinnati and then who knows. I believe in a scenario where he wins both Canada & Cincinnati (Dimitrov lol) he's with the #1 ranking before Shanghai. He consolidates if he wins it as he did and then Basel puts him in cruise control if Nadal still finishes Paris in QF. He doesn't need to improve on WTF to finish YE.
 
Nah, race was over after USO. Basel was a much easier give at 500 and playing both it and Paris potentially losing WTF wasn't worth it.

Nah, the race wasn't over after USO, which is why Rafa played so much afterwards. Like Nadal, Federer should've actively pursued it.
 
Djokovic 2016, cant believe person finished second after winning two slam, 4 masters, one slam final, yec final(went undefeated) and one master final
 
Djokovic 16
Fed 2017
Djokovic 19
Djokovic 13
Rafa 2011
Fed 2012
Fed 2010
Rafa 2018
Rafa 2020
Fed 2014
Murray 2015
 
Djokovic 2016
Nadal 2011
Federer 2017
Djokovic 2019
Djokovic 2013
Federer 2012
Nadal 2018
Federer 2010
Murray 2015
Federer 2014
 
Rank the best to worst YE#2 finishers of the past decade, and vote on who had the best year in the poll!
I'll start:

1. Djokovic 2016
2. Djokovic 2013
3. Federer 2017
4. Djokovic 2019
5. Nadal 2018
6. Federer 2012
7. Nadal 2011
8. Nadal 2020
9. Federer 2014
10. Murray 2015
11. Federer 2010

Discuss
Federer 2010 should probably be higher and Murray 2015 maybe bottom.
 
Rank the best to worst YE#2 finishers of the past decade, and vote on who had the best year in the poll!
I'll start:

1. Djokovic 2016
2. Djokovic 2013
3. Federer 2017
4. Djokovic 2019
5. Nadal 2018
6. Federer 2012
7. Nadal 2011
8. Nadal 2020
9. Federer 2014
10. Murray 2015
11. Federer 2010

Discuss
I would put Federer 2010 ahead of Murray 2015 and Federer 2014
 
1. Djokovic 2016
2. Nadal 2011
3. Federer 2017
4. Djokovic 2013
5. Djokovic 2019
6. Federer 2012
7. Nadal 2018
8.Federer 2010
9. Nadal 2020
10. Murray 2015
11. Federer 2014
 
Back
Top