dozu
Banned
dozu thanks for hijacking my thread
sorry, all I can say is...
'He started it'... whoever 'he' is. lolol.
dozu thanks for hijacking my thread
there are many many nuances on case to case basis on different opponents.... but usually boil down to the stuff I have been posting..
does he swing the human racket? if not, then he will have consistency issues, e.g. high FH, and timing issues, e.g. against skidding slices
does he have good tempo? if not, then he will have movement issues - will be tough for him to stay in balance while moving around
and then extend these 2 questions to his fh, bh, volleys, returns... so at the recreational level, it's quite easy to find a bunch for those weekend hackers... but the better guys I play against, like star recruits or former college guys, usually have only 1 or 2 that are 'screaming flaws' to my eyes...
The psychological aspect is even more case to case... base on the players age, his demeaner etc, if you practice, you can 'read' what he is thinking.... so if the guy is hot on something, like certain strokes or hitting patterns, you do the best you can to avoid or break that pattern.... if you sense the guy is cold on something, you press harder on the gas pedal to put more pressure on that pain point...
then you gotta see the conditions, where the wind is blowing, if he is bothered by the sun etc.... some common sense stuff that many don't pay attention to.
there are many many nuances on case to case basis on different opponents.... but usually boil down to the stuff I have been posting..
does he swing the human racket? if not, then he will have consistency issues, e.g. high FH, and timing issues, e.g. against skidding slices
does he have good tempo? if not, then he will have movement issues - will be tough for him to stay in balance while moving around
and then extend these 2 questions to his fh, bh, volleys, returns... so at the recreational level, it's quite easy to find a bunch for those weekend hackers... but the better guys I play against, like star recruits or former college guys, usually have only 1 or 2 that are 'screaming flaws' to my eyes...
The psychological aspect is even more case to case... base on the players age, his demeaner etc, if you practice, you can 'read' what he is thinking.... so if the guy is hot on something, like certain strokes or hitting patterns, you do the best you can to avoid or break that pattern.... if you sense the guy is cold on something, you press harder on the gas pedal to put more pressure on that pain point...
then you gotta see the conditions, where the wind is blowing, if he is bothered by the sun etc.... some common sense stuff that many don't pay attention to.
I tried swinging my human racket but the club kicked me out...then the police came.
Are you a teaching pro?
I coached junior golfers for a couple of years... but I don't teach tennis for a fee.... I do help some partners out a little, apparently they see enough benefits to continue seeking opinions from me.
my profession is all about analyzing problems, finding solutions and communicating them to my clients.
and since I love tennis so much, a lot of my job habits have gone into it.
dozu, speaking of psycological skills u indeed have the ablity to see the glass as half full if not completely full.....funny stuff....i liked the one with ur body type permitting hitting in front of the body.....and how that is not an issues at all as long a u rotate 180 degrees lol how does hitting to the side leave u in the weight transfer dpt? Oh i forgot u dont need weight transfer or knee bend because of ur classical fh Do u need a racket at all, cant u just outsmart ur opponents jedi style using the stuff u learned on the job?
Keep going dozu, ur cool in ur own way!
Just from watching that video there is nothing that would say you were anything less than 3.5. There is also nothing in there that would scare any 4.0 to thinking they would have no trouble winning a match against you. Granted it is just warmups so its hard to see how that relates to match play.So around here you be a really good 3.5 or a little below average 4.0.
Thanks for the comments. There is one service game at 5:50 mark...
I can hit 'standard' WW fh just fine, but my own body type doesnt quite like it,
I have a deeper shoulder turn than 'standard' during the backswing, and less core rotation than 'standard' during the forward swing.... but if you count from the end of my backturn to the end of my follow thru, it's still close to 180 degrees, which is what the 'standard' should be, and that rotation is indeed around my spine, not the shoulder.
since the contact is more to my side, the swing do feel with a lot of classical linear fh type of action in it... so there is less loading/unloading from the leg....
u have improved- I am impressed where u play has the single sticks up
Groundstokes look pretty good. I think your serve is at a little lower level than the groundies. Your serve has a hitch where you're almost completely static. You should strive for constant motion in the serve.
I couldn't play in courts like those - like racquet ball/squash courts with the sound/echo. It would drive me crazy so you should get "extra credit" right from the start.
The thing every player cannot eliminate on the way to success is the hitting. The more balls you hit the better your going to get, so just stay with it.
You are right, I think my ground strokes a bit better than my serve. I am good at returning serves... About the hitch in the serve: I started doing this in recent months, before that I used to rush into my serves and my toss was all over the place. The small stop inbetween the action looks bad, but it helps me keep my toss where I want it to be. I am striving for a more fluid motion, where I am more relaxed and I can bring the edge of the racquet to the ball and open the face ("high 5") at the last time.
Thanks for the comments
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jym76LGEX3Q good drill for fluency.
Also, the high five you're describing is pronation. In my opinion, if you have a loose grip and a proper serve grip, then you shouldn't think about pronation. It will just kind of happen.
What is it specifically about your body type that doesn't like the WW motion?
Perhaps the most efficient type of swing would be a more old school,
on-the-rise-hitting, linear, flatter swing. You wouldn't need a lot of
shoulder rotation and the racquet would do most of the work as long as
you are really relaxed. Should get plenty of power.
It seems like a motion without wiping that cuts up w/o a front contact
point is going to rob you of some power and give you a small contact
zone b/c you are swinging up a bit more.
goodness, I just can't get out of this... I don't want to hijack either.... there is a ho ho ho thread I had some time ago regarding my own hitting, feel free to comment there....
I know my swing... in the ho ho ho thread there are some suggestions I took as a small tweak, some I dismissed as not applicable.
I have some knee issue and don't want to over load it, I am 40+ and am just not athletic enough to jump around with the standard WW, I am not flexible enough to follow thru like the standard WW.
The swing is good enough to produce enough kick to bother good amateurs.
but with all these limitations how are u able to give decent opposition to "star recruits" and ex-college guys? Unless ofcourse u mean star recruits for other professions than tennis and ex-college guys who didnt play tennis in college.
Some guys got ugly strokes that looks like below average club players, but still they are very good players. Same way as some guys can look like semi pros when hitting but stink in a match.
Bet most guys here faced an opponent who they thought they would blow away judged by how he looked during warmup, but a few games later they thought diffently and knew they were in for a tough match!
A good coach is not allways a good player with flawless technique.
I know some great coaches that can analyse strokes as good as anyone but stink when it comes to playing.. On the other hand I know some great players who stinks when it comes to coaching. Its 2 different skills, but the ppl that got both skills can become worldclass coaches.
but with all these limitations how are u able to give decent opposition to "star recruits" and ex-college guys? Unless ofcourse u mean star recruits for other professions than tennis and ex-college guys who didnt play tennis in college.
This has been true in my short career. I once played a guy who had appeared to have 4.5 strokes, but unfortunately for him, he was not consistent. Got his massive 1st serve in ~20% of the time. I won in a close one.
I'd say you're a 3.5.
@Shindemac, who's Na Li? Do you mean Li Na?
Li is her last name or family name. Western countries like to put their family name last. Eastern countries like to put it first. It's like saying Federer Roger. Got it?
I've always heard that what you wrote here is correct, but apparently Li Na said that even her mother calls her Li Na.
I've always heard that what you wrote here is correct, but apparently Li Na said that even her mother calls her Li Na.
She call her Li Na because that is correct, but the correct way to spell it is Na Li, pretty simple!I've always heard that what you wrote here is correct, but apparently Li Na said that even her mother calls her Li Na.
1.5-2.0.....
I've always heard that what you wrote here is correct, but apparently Li Na said that even her mother calls her Li Na.
People seriously thought you were a 3.0 from the first video?
Well some said a low 3.0 :/
3.0 is a ridiculous rating, you're easily better than that. I like your strokes, backhand moreso than forehand. Only thing is I've seen people with great strokes who struggle to win at 3.5, so I can't give you a rating above 3.5 just from a video. I'd guess you're better than 3.5 but I have no way to know. Just depends on what level you compete and win at.