BorisBeckerFan
Professional
I watch tennis because I like the sport itself. I am a fan of the game.
I am a Federer fan because I like the style in wich he plays tennis.
It is entertaining for me. I do not like the style in wich Nadal plays.
I am not saying Nadal is not talented or doesn't hit amazing shots.
He is obviously talented and he is a hard worker. Since it is very unlikely
that I would have a meaningful friendship with either of them, I could careless if they are humble or if they are jerks. I am not watching tennis because of what they do off the court or how they handle themselves in
an interview. I am watching because I like tennis. If either one of them was
harming people or involved in criminal activity it would prevent me from
enjoying watching them play but otherwise it is how they play that makes
me watch.
It obvious to me (based on the public interviewsnot any personal knowledge
or relationship) that Federer is a Class A Jerk with little respect for his
counterparts and does not have his ego under control. Nadal seems to be
genuine, humble and respectful. A person of good character. Since they are
not my role models I could really careless about all the discussion over who is
classy and who is not. If you are watching tennis for the post match
interviews, have a personal or any connection to any player then character
and personality would be important. I however am watching because of the
beauty and game of tennis and I prefer Federer over Nadal. Where I picking
friends it would be Nadal over Federer. Federer despite being a jerk has been
a great ambassador for the sport and has helped it grow. Nadal is doing the
same. In that sense I like them both because I would like see tennis continue
to grow as a sport.
Being a new poster I don't want to offend any posters here but I believe
some people here have difficulty seperating objective and subjective
thoughts, my self included. I am trying to improve my critical thinking,
have clear thoughts and not simply defend something because I like it.
I use to think Federer was classy but I now realise that me liking the way he
plays made me excuse his childish behaviour. Being a father and raising
children I would prefer them to grow up and act more like Nadal. I have a
meaningful, loving relationship with my children hence I care about there
behaviour and character.
Some people seem to have a need to prove that what they like is also
what is best. Boris Becker is currently my all time favorite player and it
would take someone pretty special to change that but I'll never argue
that he was the best player or person ever.
So are you watching because of the tennis or because of the character
of the player? Maybe both? If both, are they equally important to you?
I am a Federer fan because I like the style in wich he plays tennis.
It is entertaining for me. I do not like the style in wich Nadal plays.
I am not saying Nadal is not talented or doesn't hit amazing shots.
He is obviously talented and he is a hard worker. Since it is very unlikely
that I would have a meaningful friendship with either of them, I could careless if they are humble or if they are jerks. I am not watching tennis because of what they do off the court or how they handle themselves in
an interview. I am watching because I like tennis. If either one of them was
harming people or involved in criminal activity it would prevent me from
enjoying watching them play but otherwise it is how they play that makes
me watch.
It obvious to me (based on the public interviewsnot any personal knowledge
or relationship) that Federer is a Class A Jerk with little respect for his
counterparts and does not have his ego under control. Nadal seems to be
genuine, humble and respectful. A person of good character. Since they are
not my role models I could really careless about all the discussion over who is
classy and who is not. If you are watching tennis for the post match
interviews, have a personal or any connection to any player then character
and personality would be important. I however am watching because of the
beauty and game of tennis and I prefer Federer over Nadal. Where I picking
friends it would be Nadal over Federer. Federer despite being a jerk has been
a great ambassador for the sport and has helped it grow. Nadal is doing the
same. In that sense I like them both because I would like see tennis continue
to grow as a sport.
Being a new poster I don't want to offend any posters here but I believe
some people here have difficulty seperating objective and subjective
thoughts, my self included. I am trying to improve my critical thinking,
have clear thoughts and not simply defend something because I like it.
I use to think Federer was classy but I now realise that me liking the way he
plays made me excuse his childish behaviour. Being a father and raising
children I would prefer them to grow up and act more like Nadal. I have a
meaningful, loving relationship with my children hence I care about there
behaviour and character.
Some people seem to have a need to prove that what they like is also
what is best. Boris Becker is currently my all time favorite player and it
would take someone pretty special to change that but I'll never argue
that he was the best player or person ever.
So are you watching because of the tennis or because of the character
of the player? Maybe both? If both, are they equally important to you?