You should be in the recruiting process your Junior year. You only have 7 weeks until signing day.Can you guys give me a lot of reasons why it is best for juniors to move full-time to a tennis academy? Almost every professional did it when they reached a certain age, but why? The more reasons and feedback, the better
Thankks in advance!!!!
You should be in the recruiting process your Junior year. You only have 7 weeks until signing day.
My son went to an academy in the fall of his senior year. It was quite problematic and "late in the game" for some things, but good for other things. When you're in the juniors, it's difficult to see beyond juniors' competition. He got a lot out of the academy experience. It was good for him, in many ways and it equipped him better for college.
Going to an academy as a junior is possible, depending on your goals.
"If you are a Ryan Harrison caliber kid, go for it. If not, your parents will simply pay the bills for the few kids that are that good."
- How does the Ryan Harrison's of the world become the Ryan Harrison of the world as a junior?
a] talent?
b] support?
c] infrastructure?
d] etc., etc..
I reckoned that his parents were former collegiate tennis players, but most kids don't have that luxury.
Inquiring mind wants to know. Thank you.
"If you are a Ryan Harrison caliber kid, go for it. If not, your parents will simply pay the bills for the few kids that are that good."
- How does the Ryan Harrison's of the world become the Ryan Harrison of the world as a junior?
a] talent?
b] support?
c] infrastructure?
d] etc., etc..
I reckoned that his parents were former collegiate tennis players, but most kids don't have that luxury.
Inquiring mind wants to know. Thank you.
I assume by the original poster, that you want your son/daughter to be a pro and you want to know more about academies as a route to that goal?
IMOP, there are really only a few academies in the world. Everyone else that calls their after school program - some with a lot of success, are not really academies. I know for a fact, that there are a lot of kids that go to academies for a lot of different reasons:
1. To improve their english
2. To learn more about the different cultures
3. To assist with NCAA scholarship or college assistance
4. Their parents dont want them at home
5. the kids dont want to be with their parents
6. Belief of being a professional player
7. Parents believe their kids will be professional player
8. Coaches mis-lead parents and kids to believing un-realistic dreams
To answer the questions that was asked... Academies are great for a lot of reasons. Academies are bad for a lot of reasons. Mostly, the decision should be what the player/kid wants to do....afterall, it is merely a boarding school for sports. Not the "secret sauce" or the lottery...it is tennis training and school combined. Expect nothing else. But be surprised with something great at the end of the academy life. Awesome experience for most people.
You assumed wrong,I assume by the original poster, that you want your son/daughter to be a pro and you want to know more about academies as a route to that goal?
IMOP, there are really only a few academies in the world. Everyone else that calls their after school program - some with a lot of success, are not really academies.QUOTE]
That is a terrible statement to make considering you're in the tennis business.
Where do you think non full time academy kids go?
Reason I didn't send my kids to a full time academy are many, but the major reason is that they don't give the kids a good education.
IMOP, there are really only a few academies in the world. Everyone else that calls their after school program - some with a lot of success, are not really academies.QUOTE]
That is a terrible statement to make considering you're in the tennis business.
Where do you think non full time academy kids go?
Reason I didn't send my kids to a full time academy are many, but the major reason is that they don't give the kids a good education.
I am sorry you took that the wrong way. I am huge believer in "local" academies. They continue to produce great tennis players and great students. I was referring to full-time academies to the original post. I believe the local coach is the most important aspect of the development of a great tennis player and great person. I do not agree with Federations around the world, taking a player away from their local coach. But in most cases, money talks to un-educated parents. What parent would turn down, wildcards, training, and travel money from a federation to keep training with their local coach? I think the smart ones defer to the best development for their kids...they do not defer to the best offer from the federation or from the full-time academies.
My opinion says the best scenerio in order is:
1. the player to live with their parents while training
2. the player to live with a host family while training
and the least favorable is
3. the player to live at an academy without their parents
However, everyone is different and testing the waters is the best way to see how it goes. Sometimes the parents can't handle being away from their child or giving up control of the players tennis. And sometimes, the player can not handle being away from their parents...or not mature enough to be self disciplined.
I can tell you that a good academic student is always a good academic student...regardless of where they are going to school. An exceptional student requires exceptional education.... So it depends on what balance you want to achieve. Exceptional education and exceptional tennis training are hard to find in one location. It happens, but its difficult to find.
as predicted......and the only few academies in the world are
1.
2.
3.
![]()
I have to agree 100% on this one - there are only a few full time tennis academies with unparalleled records of producing champions year after year. I'll take a stab at it.
1) IMG Bollettieri
2) Saddlebrook Hopman
3) Sanchez Spain