Relax everyone , this just got started

[aman92]

Sinner is a better HC player than Carlos by miles so yeah comparing him to Carlos is an insult to Sinner.

Alcaraz 1 HC Slam at age 21
Sinner 1 HC Slam at Age 23..


Lol yeah miles better

 

[NeutralFan]

Alcaraz 1 HC Slam at age 21
Sinner 1 HC Slam at Age 23..


Lol yeah miles better

Sinner has two HC slams in a year meanwhile Carlos is busy losing to journeymen on HC. He's a worse player on Hc than he was at 19

 

[NeutralFan]

Where are the haters? Bumping this @theSlicer you okay?son!!

 

[Djokovic_is_the_best#1]

Are the haters repenting for their sins?

 

[NeutralFan]

You're talking about CYGS for Sinner in your OP. Lol. Get real.

I am still sticking to CYGS. Sinner can do it next year.

 

[NeutralFan]

Keep going on about hypotheticals when in reality Carlos is 2-0 against Sinner this year and has won 2 slams to Sinner’s 1, equal on masters1000 wins. I really don’t know why is Sinner v Alcaraz even a debate currently when Alcaraz has beaten Sinner to win 2 of his 4 GS and beaten Djokovic in the final in his other 2 slams. At this point Sinner is the Hewitt to Carlos’s Federer. Not that Sinner is at Hewitt’s level or Carlos on Fed’s level in an absolute sense but the relative levels are equal.

You're right there's no debate, Sinner is clearly a better HC player than Carlos and has been the best player since last one year .your Carlos is busy losing on HC o journeymen in straights in slams

 

[Djokovic_is_the_best#1]

Keep going on about hypotheticals when in reality Carlos is 2-0 against Sinner this year and has won 2 slams to Sinner’s 1, equal on masters1000 wins. I really don’t know why is Sinner v Alcaraz even a debate currently when Alcaraz has beaten Sinner to win 2 of his 4 GS and beaten Djokovic in the final in his other 2 slams. At this point Sinner is the Hewitt to Carlos’s Federer. Not that Sinner is at Hewitt’s level or Carlos on Fed’s level in an absolute sense but the relative levels are equal.

 

[NeutralFan]

I wonder with what slam difference the trolling act of putting sinner in the same level as Alcaraz Will start to feel awkward

Oh really??

 

[TheSlicer]

Oh really??

Its the second time you bring that coment Up, if i did that twice with every coment you made about Alcaraz that didnt go well, we would never be finish, let me tell you; Long way to go mate, long way to go, enjoy now that 21 year old Alcaraz is finding his Game, the difference is that when sinner was learning and warming Up into the tour he didnt win crap, while Alcaraz, being patchy and having a lot to learn has acumulated a good amount of big titles, you underestimate him, bad mistake, the slam difference is the same than at the begining of the season, in Alcaraz worst season by far, injuries, very few matches played, etc, if you expect Next season to be this poor for him, you are being optimistic for yourself, he won Channel slam with his c game

 

[NoleFam]

I am still sticking to CYGS. Sinner can do it next year.

A little redemption for you being that they split the Slams this year but CYGS is still a pipe dream. Let's see Sinner win more than one title on clay and a Masters 1st.

 

[Djokovic_is_the_best#1]

A little redemption for you being that they split the Slams this year but CYGS is still a pipe dream. Let's see Sinner win more than one title on clay and a Masters 1st.

To be fair he was 1 set away from probably winning RG. I think he’d have beat Zverev in the final. He won Halle and just lost a closely fought match with Meddy at Wimbledon. He isn’t far from putting it all together in my view.

 

[NoleFam]

To be fair he was 1 set away from probably winning RG. I think he’d have beat Zverev in the final. He won Halle and just lost a closely fought match with Meddy at Wimbledon. He isn’t far from putting it all together in my view.

Many players have won 2 Slams in a year and did well in the other 2, but I would say most were far away from a CYGS. Sinner fell at the 2nd hurdle so imo he was far away from it. Have to disagree here.