Post retirement vlogging career securedHe is such a bad actor lol. Still the best actor of top tennis players.
I'm interested to see how this thread turns into a GOAT debate too xD
I'm interested to see how this thread turns into a GOAT debate too xD
No. My favorite millionaire is better than those two.>>>>
Let the fireworks begin
No. My favorite millionaire is better than those two.
Clip REALLY reminded me of Mister Rogers’ Neighborhood episode.
Looks great but too bad we won't get to see it too much in the slam finals
He is looking genuinely happy, like a 8 year old kid. Wish you all the best roger!
RF...More news to come !
-ouch,, that would have hurt a little!!Looks great but too bad we won't get to see it too much in the slam finals
>>>>
Let the fireworks begin
I really don't like unimaginative initials logos like this.
i have to admit, this is pretty ugly
huh?Most iconic logo of an athlete!!
Or CanasOn that 'peRFect' shirt they should put in tiny letters underneath
'except when facing Djokovic or Nadal'
Really Fossilized.RF...
Does that stand for "Regrow Follicles"?
Indeed; it's definitely worth elucidating that when the greatest warrior the sport has ever seen succumbed to the insurmountable task of defeating a matchup-disadvantaged dinosaur with back problems at tennis in 6 out of the last 7 attempts, it was against one that didn't play as well as he could have.On that 'peRFect' shirt they should put in tiny letters underneath
'except when facing Djokovic or Nadal'
From a marketing and sales point of view i'd love to know how much him and his team paid to get the logo.
From a marketing and sales point of view i'd love to know how much him and his team paid to get the logo.
To ask such a question you should be privy with who owned the logo and what were the contractual arrangements around it, and you are not.
It wasn't a question. It was a wish in the form of a question. The explanation is therefore redundant.
Aussie Darcy also works in this field so he has a professional curiosity, and knows all about commercial confidentiality.
Most iconic logo of an athlete!!
Your remark was unneeded and rude when I just wanted to ask a simple question about the sale. It was uncalled for. I just wanted to post from a marketing perspective and make a comment but then you decided to be unnecessarily rude and point out that I’m not privy to that information. Like, I know I’m not I was just making a simple post that it would be cool to know and you chose to be rude.You have no idea what you are talking about. AD's "wish" is based on the presumption that the transfer of the logo happened as a result of a sale i.e. that Nike owned the logo and sold it to Federer. My remark was about that, so your N-th attempt to intervene just so that I notice you makes the situation even more hilarious.
Your remark was unneeded and rude when I just wanted to ask a simple question about the sale. It was uncalled for. I just wanted to post from a marketing perspective and make a comment but then you decided to be unnecessarily rude and point out that I’m not privy to that information. Like, I know I’m not I was just making a simple post that it would be cool to know and you chose to be rude.
Unneeded.
more like a 55 year old kidHe is looking genuinely happy, like a 8 year old kid. Wish you all the best roger!
I just said that you are not privy with the information to make such a comment.
You have no idea what you are talking about. AD's "wish" is based on the presumption that the transfer of the logo happened as a result of a sale i.e. that Nike owned the logo and sold it to Federer. My remark was about that, so your N-th attempt to intervene just so that I notice you makes the situation even more hilarious.
To ask such a question you should be privy with who owned the logo and what were the contractual arrangements around it, and you are not.
To ask a question is to seek information, or in this case more probably to express a desire that one could get an answer.
Questions of the precise nature of this issue are interesting but unknown, and no one ever suggested otherwise.
From a marketing and sales point of view i'd love to know how much him and his team paid to get the logo.
No question has been asked about the truthfulness of the claim that there was a sale of the logo to Federer, so you fail.
On the contrary. AD suggested that Federer bought the rights for the logo.
So, you are wrong about that too.