StrongRule
Talk Tennis Guru
Hitting 3 forehand winners is pathetic not just for Nadal in RG, but for any top-100 player. Today was clearly better level.Nah, Djokovic was just clinical that QF.
Hitting 3 forehand winners is pathetic not just for Nadal in RG, but for any top-100 player. Today was clearly better level.Nah, Djokovic was just clinical that QF.
I agree. That’s why I don’t buy injury excuses from anyone. If you show up to play, you better put up or gtfo.It counts. You step on court, it all counts.
Yes best version of Rafa would beat Zed at FO in straights, no doubt.It counts. You can say he didn't beat the best version of Nadal, but saying it doesn't count is very disrespectful to Zverev and Nadal.
Time Has Come TodayThe GOAT can lose any match now![]()
Is it just me, or is anyone else doubting Zverev’s mental strength here?
I have a feeling his resolve will fail him.
I guess we’ll know soon enough.
FH, FH and a FH for me. I'm not used to seeing Nadal's FH doesn't do damage. He even returned well(it looked while watching) moved fine. But couldn't hit through Z. Yeah Zverev defended well and played well and conditions made it even worse for his forehand but still it's not good since the comeback this year imo.Unless Nadal fixes his serving and returning issues, I'm afraid it's over. His groundstrokes are still there, but at 38 he can't rely on them anymore like he used to.
Zedbot played awesome tennis. We are used to seeing Zod go into his shell in big moments at majors but not today. His new commitment to the DTL forehand is a revelation.
Nadal looked SO good for a lot of this match. In some ways I can’t believe that he brought this level from nowhere after how bad he has looked this clay season but then again it’s Rafa on PC so I guess we should have expected this! I thought he was going to win the match when he swung that momentum in the second set with that break.
@Phenomenal - I hear you regarding the FH from Nadal. Hard to push through and develop the feelings and full power he needed on it in the tough and slow conditions. I think Rafa and Zverev were struggling a little with the visual of the new roof also. The power and level from Zverev and Nadal was pretty impressive given the pressures and conditions they were dealing with in a R1 match. Crazy to have to start in 5th gear in a round 1 match.
Thats pretty dumb commentI agree. That’s why I don’t buy injury excuses from anyone. If you show up to play, you better put up or gtfo.
Thank you for this very eloquent thought. 100 likes !Thats the thing, matches like this where we see legends possibly for the last time reminds us about our own lives and happy times and of those loved ones who passed during those years so the emotions i think for people are partly its a time to reflect on our own journeys as well.
But of course, every match takes a little more toll on his body. He may have made the quarters, but I’m afraid he would have had a humiliating exit. At least, yesterday he went out with a very respectable performance.Nadal looked okay. If he was seeded like normal, he would've probably made the quarters or something like that.
What a rotten attitudeFirst of hopefully many Zedrot double faults
Very respectful interview.
Even if he got a rookie, he wouldn't have lasted the full tournament, I feel. It is something he knew going in.As far as I’m concerned Rafa was shafted with that draw and yet it put in a very good performance considering the circumstances. Good for him. He was not blown off the court by the most in form top seed at this time and he should feel happy with the level he produced.
If I’m honest I’m hacked off that the draw didn’t give him the opportunity to play himself into the tournament but that’s how it goes.
The next 2 to 3 rounds are incredibly important for Zverev, if he suffers a huge let down of focus then he will lose easily. IF not then he can win the title here.Incredible job by Zverev to maintain focus and put it all out there. That had to be incredibly difficult. Zverev played incredibly well and everything was working for him. After Zverev's injury against Nadal... it is a fitting result. Zverev overcame a horrible injury, came through terrible confidence issues, and performed at an extremely high level. Nadal actually also played incredible given the circumstances. Kudos to both.
Boris Becker or Lendl said you can't win a slam in first week but you can lose it in first week.The next 2 to 3 rounds are incredibly important for Zverev, if he suffers a huge let down of focus then he will lose easily. IF not then he can win the title here.
What I meant was on the lines of players winning a title and then immediately failing in the next tournament in first round. There is a huge let down after playing Rafa in the FO especially for Zverev when he almost had a career ending injury the last time he faced Rafa in the same tournament.Boris Becker or Lendl said you can't win a slam in first week but you can lose it in first week.
What you said is very generic. And it is adding almost no value. Of course if Zverev played bad he can lose in week 1 just like sinner or Djokovic.
But there is NO and I will repeat NO guarantees that even if Zverev moves past week 1 he will win RG. He has 1 slam final in his whole life playing coric and pcb in QF and SF in the most asterisked conditions.
I got you now. Zverev has had most hopeless career losing matches he should win while winning matches we thought he wouldn't.What I meant was on the lines of players winning a title and then immediately failing in the next tournament in first round. There is a huge let down after playing Rafa in the FO especially for Zverev when he almost had a career ending injury the last time he faced Rafa in the same tournament.
Year | BH strokes/ total strokes % | BH winners % | BH Fcd Errors % | BH UE Errors % |
2009 | 41% | 3% | 2% | 6% |
2015 | 41% | 3% | 3% | 7% |
2021 | 52% | 1% | 3% | 10% |
2024 | 53% | 1% | 9% | 9% |
It counts. You step on court, it all counts.
I agree. That’s why I don’t buy injury excuses from anyone. If you show up to play, you better put up or gtfo.
No, it does not. "Defeating" an older, injured player long past any whiff of a strong form (and one step away from retirement) is not much more than an exhibition. If this match is some "credit" to Zverev, then it suggests his questionable supporters are desperately grasping at anything in order to make some claim about Zverev's abilities since he--up to this date and long into his career--has consistently failed to win a major.
Nonsense. In the case of Nadal, he was an older, injured player--two conditions that any rational person knows cannot be ignored or denied.
Yet it counts and gets added in Zverev column as a W. Doesn’t matter if you think it’s nonsense (which is also nonsense), ATP record books don’t go by your personal feelings fortunately for the rest of us. Arguing the quality of the win is fair, after all Zed wasn’t going to beat a peak version of Rafa at the FO.No, it does not. "Defeating" an older, injured player long past any whiff of a strong form (and one step away from retirement) is not much more than an exhibition. If this match is some "credit" to Zverev, then it suggests his questionable supporters are desperately grasping at anything in order to make some claim about Zverev's abilities since he--up to this date and long into his career--has consistently failed to win a major.
Nonsense. In the case of Nadal, he was an older, injured player--two conditions that any rational person knows cannot be ignored or denied.
@Hitman @pirhaksar @THUNDERVOLLEYYet it counts and gets added in Zverev column as a W. Doesn’t matter if you think it’s nonsense (which is also nonsense), ATP record books don’t go by your personal feelings fortunately for the rest of us. Arguing the quality of the win is fair, after all Zed wasn’t going to beat a peak version of Rafa at the FO.
What rubbish! What if Zverev had lost?No, it does not. "Defeating" an older, injured player long past any whiff of a strong form (and one step away from retirement) is not much more than an exhibition. If this match is some "credit" to Zverev, then it suggests his questionable supporters are desperately grasping at anything in order to make some claim about Zverev's abilities since he--up to this date and long into his career--has consistently failed to win a major.
Nonsense. In the case of Nadal, he was an older, injured player--two conditions that any rational person knows cannot be ignored or denied.
You step on the court, it all counts. This was not an exhibition match, it goes into the record books. You play to win.
What is agreeable is that Zverev beat an older diminished version of Nadal, but to say it doesn't count in just plain wrong. The history books will see it as a win.
@Hitman @pirhaksar @THUNDERVOLLEY
this is not a ground breaking discussion though. Does it matter or not. Nadal is shadow of himself and beating him was much easier in 2024.
What history will not gloss over: Zverev defeating a Nadal nowhere near the condition which made him a tennis legend. Details matter, and said details do not make Zverev a better player. He was simply fortunate not to face any version of Nadal other than an older, injured one.
Yes, and that's the point, so for the Zverev cheerleaders attempting to suggest he defeated Nadal at the French Open as implied code for "greatness" due to Nadal being the event's most successful player, its simply not going to happen. It the same as defeating Venus at the USO or Wimbledon in this era: a player earns no credit for Venus' history, but defeating an older player long past any hope of being her best.
Nadal, even in his defeats, is epic af.On an unrelated note, I wonder if there's ever been a first round match that garnered 34 pages? I sure can't think of any.
Nadal arrived tired from long matches against FAA and Djokovic and, like yesterday, it was played indoors that time, conditions that favor the game of the lanky German player.Even Nadal playing at a very strong level at RG 2022 was having enormous difficulty with Zverev.
It was a foregone conclusion that Nadal at his declined state wasn't going to have any chance if Zverev brought that same level today.
And that's exactly what happened.
It still counts.
No one is saying Zverev beat a peak Nadal here. Everyone knows Nadal is on the way out here. But the match was still legit.
It does not count as a credit to someone who only "defeated" an aging, injured player knocking on the door of retirement. When some claim that match was "legit", they're using it as a credit to Zverev on the shell of name player, which he has not earned. This was about as serious as an exhibition match, because it also lacks meaning / perspective about the winner's skills.
I think Zverev has a real good shot at winning this tournament.Calling it an exho is just as bad as saying as saying peak Nadal was defeated. The win counts all the same, it will be in the record books.
I think Zverev has a real good shot at winning this tournament.
Do you seriously think @THUNDERVOLLEY is disputing this? Good Lord. How many times are you going to make *this* point? Try arguing *his* point.it will be in the record books.
Indeed. Tennis players are not video game characters, but some "fans" are as removed from the real consequences in sports as said video game character.Thats pretty dumb comment
Do not expect that to happen when someone is Hell-bent on trying to shove Zverev into any sort of historical position.Do you seriously think @THUNDERVOLLEY is disputing this? Good Lord. How many times are you going to make *this* point? Try arguing *his* point.
To be sure, I agree with @Hitman, and disagree with you, that the match counts, but not for the asinine reason that it's in the record books.