Roddick v Cash - who is/was better?

who was the better player?

  • cash

    Votes: 7 28.0%
  • roddick

    Votes: 15 60.0%
  • i am 12 n wat is this?

    Votes: 3 12.0%

  • Total voters
    25

TeflonTom

Banned
One slam each. who is better?

a-rod: much more impressive cv. more slam finals than cash (5 v 3), tons more titles. fed roadblock stopped him winning more

cash: arguably much stronger era (lendl, mcenroe, connors, edberg, becker, wilander). slam arguably better quality (beat wilander, connors, lendl). career ruined at peak by injuries.

imo cash was better player than roddick at his peak. demolished lendl in that wimby final, n got good wins over lotsa legends. but i be biased - love the s&v.

what say u?
 
Last edited:

tennis_pro

Bionic Poster
Roddick would serve Cash's a** off.

But then again I'm biased as I utterly despise Cash and like Roddick.
 

TigerTim

Rookie
Roddick vs. Muster would be interesting. I would still go with Roddick tbh, the Duck as some quack.

Plus, did cash have to play the GOAT? No. Then again neither did Duck, both too old to play Laver ;)
 

Cormorant

Professional
Cash's body barely let him be more than a glorified part timer, unfortunately. But he could've won one of those AO finals if his muscle tears didn't have tears on them, if you take his word for it.
 
Top