One slam each. who is better?
a-rod: much more impressive cv. more slam finals than cash (5 v 3), tons more titles. fed roadblock stopped him winning more
cash: arguably much stronger era (lendl, mcenroe, connors, edberg, becker, wilander). slam arguably better quality (beat wilander, connors, lendl). career ruined at peak by injuries.
imo cash was better player than roddick at his peak. demolished lendl in that wimby final, n got good wins over lotsa legends. but i be biased - love the s&v.
what say u?
a-rod: much more impressive cv. more slam finals than cash (5 v 3), tons more titles. fed roadblock stopped him winning more
cash: arguably much stronger era (lendl, mcenroe, connors, edberg, becker, wilander). slam arguably better quality (beat wilander, connors, lendl). career ruined at peak by injuries.
imo cash was better player than roddick at his peak. demolished lendl in that wimby final, n got good wins over lotsa legends. but i be biased - love the s&v.
what say u?
Last edited: