beltsman
G.O.A.T.
Now that Zverev has burst onto the scene, how does everyone compare him as a prospect to Roddick at a similar age and game/talent-wise? Roddick was 21 in 2003. Zverev is 21 in 2018.
Serve: Roddick was certainly the better server, despite being far shorter.
ROS: Zverev.
FH: 2003-04 Roddick had a much better FH, I'm not sure about 2005 and later "puffball" Roddick.
BH: Zverev, no question.
Slice: Roddick, I guess. Neither are great. Roddick developed a good slice in his later years.
Touch: Probably Zverev?
Net play: Roddick. He was a decent volleyer. (Note: I'm not including approach here).
Court sense: Zverev, I think. Roddick gets a big minus here for poor net approaches. Zverev seems to be intelligent with his positioning, except for playing too far back.
Movement: Roddick
Mentality: 2003 Roddick was a mental monster, but as the Fed losses piled up, he lost his swagger. Zverev has the swagger.
Overall, I would say 2003 Roddick (21 y/o) was a better prospect than 2018 Zverev (21 y/o). It will be interesting to see how Zverev develops. The big diference is Roddick had to deal with peak Federer and Nadal.
Results-wise, Roddick reached No. 1, won a slam, defeated early-peak Federer, and won back-to-back Masters. Zverev has a WTF and a few Masters, but poor slam results.
Thoughts?
Serve: Roddick was certainly the better server, despite being far shorter.
ROS: Zverev.
FH: 2003-04 Roddick had a much better FH, I'm not sure about 2005 and later "puffball" Roddick.
BH: Zverev, no question.
Slice: Roddick, I guess. Neither are great. Roddick developed a good slice in his later years.
Touch: Probably Zverev?
Net play: Roddick. He was a decent volleyer. (Note: I'm not including approach here).
Court sense: Zverev, I think. Roddick gets a big minus here for poor net approaches. Zverev seems to be intelligent with his positioning, except for playing too far back.
Movement: Roddick
Mentality: 2003 Roddick was a mental monster, but as the Fed losses piled up, he lost his swagger. Zverev has the swagger.
Overall, I would say 2003 Roddick (21 y/o) was a better prospect than 2018 Zverev (21 y/o). It will be interesting to see how Zverev develops. The big diference is Roddick had to deal with peak Federer and Nadal.
Results-wise, Roddick reached No. 1, won a slam, defeated early-peak Federer, and won back-to-back Masters. Zverev has a WTF and a few Masters, but poor slam results.
Thoughts?