Roger Federer : "I’m playing in Basel, even without agreements”

There was an interview with Roger in Swiss media today and I thought to translate it:



„I’m playing in Basel, even without agreements”


Roger Federer ends the speculations and declares that he is going to play at the 2013 Swiss Indoors. Under new signs.



Roger Federer is in the middle of a 7 weeks tournamentfree building phase which he spends for most of the time in Switzerland at the Lake Zurich. Yesterday the 31year old #3 in the ranking and record Grand Slam winner made a standpoint and made clear that he is going to play the Swiss Indoors in Basel in autumn, which he has won 5 times already, despite his contract with the tournament has expired.



You are in the middle of a nearly 2 months rest of competition. What are you doing during this time?


First I recovered from the tournaments in Rotterdam, Dubai and Indian Wells. I had a short holiday but already after 9 days I started to work again. I didn’t want to do nothing for 3 weeks. I’m in Switzerland now for a while and do fitness training, I also started to play tennis again.


Despite the bad weather? Doesn’t this delay your build-up so short before the clay season?


As I mainly worked on my fitness the weather wasn’t a big problem for me. I played indoors on clay and 2 times on HC. I’m happy that the weather gets warmer at the weekend because then I can start to practice hard outside. Within the next weeks the practice is going to get more intense. It would be important that I get good practice conditions 2 weeks before the tournament in Madrid. It would be nice if the weather keeps up.


Do you stay in Switzerland until the start of the clay season and will let sparringspartners fly in just like in the last years?


Exactly. Severin (Lüthi) is in contact with several players who could come. I’m pleased that I can have this preparation in Switzerland. Later on Paul (Annacone) will be here as well, at the stage in which I’m going to play tennis for 4, 5 hours a day and don’t work on the fitness anymore.


You haven’t been in Switzerland for that many weeks for a very long time. Do you enjoy this?


Absolutely. I missed Switzerland in the last years. It is great to play in the nature with the little ones and to be here with friends and family and to work on things. I could come down a bit from the stressful daily routine on the tour and to find back to normality. 2012 was extremely stressful due to the Olympic Games. I really enjoyed the last weeks even though the weather was bad.




Another open question is if you are going to play in Basel in autumn after your contract has run out.


For me it was always sure: I’m also going to play the Swiss Indoors in 2013. I haven’t commentated on it yet but now the moment has arrived. I have always played in Basel during all those years when I wasn’t injured. Everyone knows how much the tournament means to me and that is still the case. I was a ballboy there, played once in the qualification and got to play as a junior against Andre Agassi. I experienced many unforgettable moments in this unique atmosphere with the great fans and I’m extremely happy that I can experience it again this year.




So there has been made an agreement in the meantime between the Swiss Indoors and you?


No, but it wasn’t necessary. I can play in Basel without any contracts or agreements when I want to and that’s want I want. It is always very special to play in front of a home crowd when you are on the tour the whole year. I don’t want to miss this chance.




There were many discussions about the negotiations between you and tournament director Roger Brennwald. Rumours and speculations and there was the talk of many money. And now you just play?



I don’t really want to say anything more to it because it could be mistaken again. I have never said that I won’t play in Basel. Now I just try to simplifiy this complicated issue.



Does it mean that you are going to skip Paris-Bercy again then?

I have often missed tournaments due to the Swiss Indoors, so it’s nothing new. I love to to to Asia or Paris but you have to set priorities and Basel has always been one of my priorities.



.
 
So there has been made an agreement in the meantime between the Swiss Indoors and you?


No, but it wasn’t necessary. I can play in Basel without any contracts or agreements when I want to and that’s want I want. It is always very special to play in front of a home crowd when you are on the tour the whole year. I don’t want to miss this chance.


There were many discussions about the negotiations between you and tournament director Roger Brennwald. Rumours and speculations and there was the talk of many money. And now you just play?


I don’t really want to say anything more to it because it could be mistaken again. I have never said that I won’t play in Basel. Now I just try to simplifiy this complicated issue.


Does it mean that you are going to skip Paris-Bercy again then?

I have often missed tournaments due to the Swiss Indoors, so it’s nothing new. I love to to to Asia or Paris but you have to set priorities and Basel has always been one of my priorities.




ttp://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/sport/tennis/Ich-spiele-in-Basel-auch-ohne-Abmachung/story/17293661
 
He says its a complicated issue. It becomes a lot less complicated when he gets his 2 million for playing. :)
 
This is an old interview from a few weeks ago.

After this came out Basel was added to his schedule on his website.

There's been no new news I know of since the TD shot his mouth off the other day.
 
I like them both I get annoyed when people say one or the other is way better than the other because that's ridiculous. I'm really surprised Fed is this greedy. I had absolutely no idea he was motivated by money at this point in his career.


But Federer is better than Sampras. He's not "way" better, but he is better. We've been through this remember.

The point is money is money. You have to look at it from Federer's perspective. Not a SINGLE professional athlete (not just Federer) thinks when doing business "Oh I've got enough money so I'll be nice because I don't need to get paid what I'm worth." The truth is he's worth more than 2 million dollars (or probably whatever figure he's going to get, to Basel). Have you seen that stadium when he doesn't play? Sorry to say, but Nadal won't be saving that place if Federer doesn't play. I think he will anyway, but back to the point. And believe it or not (not saying it'll happen to Federer) a sizable chunk of pro athletes can be in debt very quickly or even become bankrupt after they retire. Of course, some of this is due to bad decisions, but the point stands.

It really astounds me that very few people understand the concepts of business and how a pro athlete thinks. That's where all the crazy contracts come from these days. Especially when somebody sets an overblown market (e.g Joe Flacco.) Of course the consequence of this was the Aaron Rodgers deal because Rodgers > Flacco everyday of the week and twice on Sunday, but I digress.

It's like the "real world" only on a larger pay scale. You would be angry I'm sure if you weren't getting paid what you thought you were worth. The truth is these days that no "normal" person accepts the fact that pro athletes get paid more than they do. They can't fathom having that kind of money so when a pro athlete asks for what they are worth (for the purposes of this discussion lets agree that they are worth that much) we just call them greedy. But in the end you want to get paid what you deserve whether you're joe blow or Roger Federer.
 
Last edited:
He still shouldn't have asked for 2 million. That's disgraceful. The man has to be worth nearly 500 million between prize money, appearance fees and endorsements.

Shouldnt? And why is that? What would they do with the 2 million if they didnt give it to him? built tennis courts in Africa?



Should Nadal ask for less tax at Wimbledon?
 
Shouldnt? And why is that? What would they do with the 2 million if they didnt give it to him? built tennis courts in Africa?



Should Nadal ask for less tax at Wimbledon?

Given higher prize money to mediocre journeymen, which is an isssue Federer professed to care about.
 
That was classy not to trash the tournament director. If I was Roger I would have scheduled a week long EXO during the tourney and then purchased it when the value dropped. That tournament dir is also the owner and has been trying to use the home town thing against Roger to make some extra cash.
 
Back
Top