D
Noleberic123
G.O.A.T.
But if pre-prime djokovic would do it sometimes. then I don't see why prime djokovic couldn't do it more often. If not give trouble to Federer all the time besides Wimbledon. Considering how consistent prime novak is.
D
Deleted member 688153
Guest
Eh, I'll give that to you.
Prime Djokovic can trouble anyone, but there is nobody better equipped to deal with him match-up wise than Federer, and it shows.
Federer would own anybody at Wimbledon, that's not an insult to Djokovic.
Fed's too good to lose on fast HC too I'd wager, but Novak would make several matches close (Canada, USO specifically).
RF-18
Talk Tennis Guru
Gary Duane
Talk Tennis Guru
Fixed it for you.
Djokovic2011
Bionic Poster
I remember this gif so fondly from the 2013 Monte Carlo final match thread after Novak won. How I wish F1Bob was still here.
D
Deleted member 688153
Guest
I remember this gif so fondly from the 2013 Monte Carlo final match thread after Novak won. How I wish F1Bob was still here.
That was a good match.
Rafa got the big one though! :twisted:
Noleberic123
G.O.A.T.
I remember this gif so fondly from the 2013 Monte Carlo final match thread after Novak won. How I wish F1Bob was still here.
You weren't even on this board back then! :-?
Djokovic2011
Bionic Poster
You know something we don't mate? :wink:
Djokovic2011
Bionic Poster
Noleberic123
G.O.A.T.
I was lurking for almost a year before I joined TTW.
Lol! Cant say I didn't do the same
Another boring thread...Why Federer fans try to fool anybody with this statistical trash that supposes to make him look like goat? The guy was lucky to be in the position when Sampras era was over and other greats like Nadal and Djokovic were too young. It's no coincidence that he won like 3 Slams since 2007 when Nadal hit his prime and none of these Slams were vs Nadal. Same story with Djokovic, when Nole took his game to another level Federer has been in his shadow since US Open-2010.
Roger can't dominate real rivals, but you gotta give him credit for being the greatest at using any possible free-load, although that doesn't help him much in any reasonably goat conversation.
Roger can't dominate real rivals, but you gotta give him credit for being the greatest at using any possible free-load, although that doesn't help him much in any reasonably goat conversation.
90's Clay
Banned
2006 was a mug year for the men's game and 2007 wasn't much better really.
What Roger did those two years was impressive numbers wise but then you factor in the strength of the men's game those 2 years, its nothing to write how about.
Now if he had done in that 2005 when it was a bit stronger? That would have been pretty dang impressive. That a good year for the men's game
What Roger did those two years was impressive numbers wise but then you factor in the strength of the men's game those 2 years, its nothing to write how about.
Now if he had done in that 2005 when it was a bit stronger? That would have been pretty dang impressive. That a good year for the men's game
Candide
Hall of Fame
GOAT POAST from new member who's not afraid to take centre stage after a mere 13 poasts. The lad's a veritable prodigy, he could be a 90s Clay of the future. Or even a 90s Clay of the present...
Noleberic123
G.O.A.T.
He has obviously been here before.....
D
Deleted member 688153
Guest
Well he had >95% win percentage in 2005, higher even than 2006!
He was also one point away from a 3-slam year too.
