falstaff78
Hall of Fame
i still firmly stand by this statement.......djokovic and company have zero chance at roland garros......zero......

i still firmly stand by this statement.......djokovic and company have zero chance at roland garros......zero......
we will talk again in two months......
lul, wut ? rafa is still the favourite at RG ... doesn't mean he can't lose there this year...get the difference ?
i still firmly stand by this statement.......djokovic and company have zero chance at roland garros......zero......
yeah big difference between 90% and 100%.......thanks for letting me know that.......NOT......
and if by "injured" you mean you don't think he was injured in '11 AO quarters, you fall under casual followers of the sport.......everyone who watched that match knows that he pulled a muscle in his right thigh in the fourth game(2-2 in the first set) and did not retire just because he thought ferrer deserved to WIN......
Ark, don't you listen to them.
lul, wut ? rafa is still the favourite at RG ... doesn't mean he can't lose there this year...get the difference ?
excepting 2009, he has not lost a best of 5 sets tennis match on clay in his career.......until i see someone beating him there, there is no reason to believe that he can lose.......andreev, gaudio, federer, ferrero and in the recent years djokovic, they all scored wins over rafa before roland garros, but it accounted for nothing as far as roland garros is concerned.......
if nadal vs djokovic happens at RG, expect a thrashing of massive proportions.......something like 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 to rafa.......nadal will make a joke of djokovic's clay movement and game......
Actually there is a sizable (in fact 10%) difference between 90% and 100% Socrates.
You need to relax mate. Although I can just imagine the conniptions you're having today.
RG is certainly not out of reach for Djokovic, and even if Nadal does win RG your thread title is an epic fail since it never was "beyond reach" even if Nadal had won MC today. Your choice of title is impeccable as usual.
so roland garros is "within reach" for djokovic(and others) according to you.......delusions are certainly within your reach it seems.......
come back and speak to me when someone else wins roland garros......until then it's beyond reach.......i know it pains for fediva enthusiasts because they could never assert their authority even during their player's so called peak.......
hey, federer won RG in 2009 ........now go cry about it ..... :twisted:
your posts are full of butthurt. Good to know nole's 3rd straight set win over rafa on clay has had some impact . :lol:
so roland garros is "within reach" for djokovic(and others) according to you.......delusions are certainly within your reach it seems.......
come back and speak to me when someone else wins roland garros......until then it's beyond reach.......i know it pains for fediva enthusiasts because they could never assert their authority even during their player's so called peak.......
Sure it's within reach. Djokovic just won MC which would lead to any normal person making the conclusion that Djokovic could potentially win RG so therefore it is "within reach." It's simple logic. What is wrong with you?
i don't cry, bro......i take losses equally like my favourite does.......from your suggestion i can only think that you cried and ended up with a running nose watching your favourite cry on tv after receiving runner up plate from laver......
if nadal vs djokovic happens at RG, expect a thrashing of massive proportions.......something like 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 to rafa.......nadal will make a joke of djokovic's clay movement and game......
do not expect another career slam this year.......roland garros is out of reach.......novak fans better be prepared for it......
once again nole fans, no need to get too greedy.......just be content with what you have, your australian opens and small clay titles here and there.......forget roland garros and forget career grandslam.......
Sure it's within reach. Djokovic just won MC which would lead to any normal person making the conclusion that Djokovic could potentially win RG so therefore it is "within reach." It's simple logic. What is wrong with you?
Now that they are enforcing the time delay rule, that won't happen. And because they are enforcing the time delay rule, which won't allow Nadal to cheat by recovering after each point, he will be dead tired by the 5th set. Thus, he will be vulnerable. Heck, he even completely ran out of gas in the 5th set on hardcourt against Federer (who plays fast and keeps points short) in Miami in 2005.it will take 7 hours just to drag nadal deep into the fifth set of a best of 5 sets tennis match on clay.......with sun beating down, that is the task awaiting novak and all that just to get a sniff.......and then there is also this job of finishing from there......just forget it already.......
it will take 7 hours just to drag nadal deep into the fifth set of a best of 5 sets tennis match on clay.......with sun beating down, that is the task awaiting novak and all that just to get a sniff.......and then there is also this job of finishing from there......just forget it already.......
it will still take 6 hours, every single hour under the sun.......you just can't beat him with the 1-2 combos like on slow hardcourts or on the wet mud we had at montecarlo last sunday.......there is a high probablity that djokovic will lose the final in 4 sets and there is also a little probability that he will lose it in straight sets......the task is just too daunting baby.......Now that they are enforcing the time delay rule, that won't happen. And because they are enforcing the time delay rule, which won't allow Nadal to cheat by recovering after each point, he will be dead tired by the 5th set. Thus, he will be vulnerable. Heck, he even completely ran out of gas in the 5th set on hardcourt against Federer (who plays fast and keeps points short) in Miami in 2005.
it will still take 6 hours, every single hour under the sun.......you just can't beat him with the 1-2 combos like on slow hardcourts or on the wet mud we had at montecarlo last sunday.......there is a high probablity that djokovic will lose the final in 4 sets and there is also a little probability that he will lose it in straight sets......the task is just too daunting baby.......
it will still take 6 hours, every single hour under the sun.......you just can't beat him with the 1-2 combos like on slow hardcourts or on the wet mud we had at montecarlo last sunday.......there is a high probablity that djokovic will lose the final in 4 sets and there is also a little probability that he will lose it in straight sets......the task is just too daunting baby.......
Nadal couldnt even last 1 1/2 hours in MC.
He was gassed and admitted it.
How is nadal all of a sudden going to last 4 hours + against this nole...
excepting 2009, he has not lost a best of 5 sets tennis match on clay in his career.......until i see someone beating him there, there is no reason to believe that he can lose.......andreev, gaudio, federer, ferrero and in the recent years djokovic, they all scored wins over rafa before roland garros, but it accounted for nothing as far as roland garros is concerned.......
if nadal vs djokovic happens at RG, expect a thrashing of massive proportions.......something like 6-2, 6-3, 6-3 to rafa.......nadal will make a joke of djokovic's clay movement and game......
it will still take 6 hours, every single hour under the sun.......you just can't beat him with the 1-2 combos like on slow hardcourts or on the wet mud we had at montecarlo last sunday.......there is a high probablity that djokovic will lose the final in 4 sets and there is also a little probability that he will lose it in straight sets......the task is just too daunting baby.......
LOL. What will you say next. Djokovic in 4???
Monfils will win this RG easily, if you disagree then your watching a diff sport
Monfils will win this RG easily, if you disagree then your watching a diff sport
Personally, i'd love to see Monfils win a slam.
Me too. Hope he can work out whatever he needs to contend for the Slams, first of which is, his shot selection (among other stuff)
Lame thread. Djokovic is the favorite at RG this year unless Rafa can win both Madrid and Rome. I'd say Rafa is a close second favorite (even if Nole takes Madrid and Rome), but the slight favorite to win it this year is Djokovic.
NO, he is not. Nadal is still the favorite at RG. The only way that will change is if Nadal loses Madrid and Rome and Djokovic wins them.
How on earth can Nadal still be the favorite to win RG? Cvac has owned his ass for more than 2 years now, and has just beaten him in MC. Nadal is also still not match fit after being out for so long, and still has knee troubles. Cvac is far and away the favorite at RG this year, and will be for years to come.
How on earth can Nadal still be the favorite to win RG? Cvac has owned his ass for more than 2 years now, and has just beaten him in MC. Nadal is also still not match fit after being out for so long, and still has knee troubles. Cvac is far and away the favorite at RG this year, and will be for years to come.
How on earth can Nadal still be the favorite to win RG? Cvac has owned his ass for more than 2 years now, and has just beaten him in MC. Nadal is also still not match fit after being out for so long, and still has knee troubles. Cvac is far and away the favorite at RG this year, and will be for years to come.
No he has not. In 2012 Nadal owned Djokovic on clay with three clay wins. We are only talking about one loss at MC this year. Nadal is still the favorite, he is the 7 time FO champion and he won it last year. Djokovic has reached the final of the FO ONE time. Too early to say Djokovic is the favorite for the FO after only one win on clay this year. Wait until Madrid and Rome. If Nadal loses both of those and Djokovic wins them, then you could say Djokovic is the slight favorite for the FO but not until then.
Because it's Nadal at Roland Garros.
Btw, how in god's name do you have 10k+ posts in two years?
It's no use. Clarky thinks Novak owned Rafa in 2012 for whatever stupid reason.
It's about 14 posts a day. If you scoured these boards hunting down every remotely positive thing said about Nadal and his play and then contradicted it with something negative about Nadal and his play, it probably isn't that hard to reach that number. She's intensely focused on her mission to prove to us that Nadal is a "clown" and a "mug." Perhaps even a muggy clown.
But, to your point, I don't think Rafa was the favorite last year at RG or the year before either. I don't feel that Nole was an outrageous favorite in those years, but he was, in my opinion, the slight favorite over Nadal. Nole 2.0 has been the best player in the world since 2011 and thus goes into most, if not all, tournaments as the slight favorite. I think Rafa can beat him, as he did nicely three times in a row last year, but I think it will take really great tennis from him to do it this year.
It's about 14 posts a day. If you scoured these boards hunting down every remotely positive thing said about Nadal and his play and then contradicted it with something negative about Nadal and his play, it probably isn't that hard to reach that number. She's intensely focused on her mission to prove to us that Nadal is a "clown" and a "mug." Perhaps even a muggy clown.
But, to your point, I don't think Rafa was the favorite last year at RG or the year before either. I don't feel that Nole was an outrageous favorite in those years, but he was, in my opinion, the slight favorite over Nadal. Nole 2.0 has been the best player in the world since 2011 and thus goes into most, if not all, tournaments as the slight favorite. I think Rafa can beat him, as he did nicely three times in a row last year, but I think it will take really great tennis from him to do it this year.
IMO the clay masters decide who the favorite is. If Nadal wins Madrid and Rome, there's no way Djokovic is the favorite. If Djokovic wins Madrid and Rome, there's no way Rafa is the favorite.
Because it's Nadal at Roland Garros.
Btw, how in god's name do you have 10k+ posts in two years?
IMO the clay masters decide who the favorite is. If Nadal wins Madrid and Rome, there's no way Djokovic is the favorite. If Djokovic wins Madrid and Rome, there's no way Rafa is the favorite.