Rome 2011 Djokovic vs Rome 2006 Nadal

Who would win?

  • Rome 2006 Nadal in straights

    Votes: 6 20.7%

  • Rome 2006 Nadal in 4

    Votes: 10 34.5%

  • Rome 2006 Nadal in 5

    Votes: 4 13.8%

  • Rome 2011 Novak in 3

    Votes: 1 3.4%

  • Rome 2011 Novak in 4

    Votes: 5 17.2%

  • Rome 2011 Novak in 5

    Votes: 3 10.3%
  • Total voters
    29
  • Poll closed .
Apparently I visited more of Asia than I thought at first. Nice to know that. :)
 
Tennisanity said:
I have, and there are instances of both. Depends on which you favour.
Click to expand...

No, anyway im done with this ridiculousness. When people dont concede they are wrong, I lose interest. Moscow is in Europe geographically is a fact like New York is in North America. End of story.
 
MichaelNadal said:
Yall are so delusional. Call me when Ultron has an 81-match winning streak on any surface.
Click to expand...
It is true that Novak was playing at a very high level in Rome 2011. I know Nadal is the most accomplished player on clay but I don't see any version of Nadal beating that Djokovic on clay.
 
Tenisfan3 said:
It is true that Novak was playing at a very high level in Rome 2011. I know Nadal is the most accomplished player on clay but I don't see any version of Nadal beating that Djokovic on clay.
Click to expand...

My goodness, PLEASE! Who says Nadal was playing soooooo well that day? I can't think of a single more overrated match on this board. You'd think Nadal was in god-mode, and Djokovic hit 100 winners.

He won with a break in each set, wowwwww o_O
bad_boys_20.gif
Yeah 08 Nadal would lose in straights.
 
MichaelNadal said:
My goodness, PLEASE! Who says Nadal was playing soooooo well that day? I can't think of a single more overrated match on this board. You'd think Nadal was in god-mode, and Djokovic hit 100 winners.

He won with a break in each set, wowwwww o_O
bad_boys_20.gif
Yeah 08 Nadal would lose in straights.
Click to expand...
You really feel Novack Rome 2011 would lose to Rafa Rome 2006?
 
Tenisfan3 said:
Based on accomplishments, Nadal (can't argue with 9 RGs).
Based on peak level, Novak Djokovic.
Click to expand...

But brother it took Novak 6 years to finally beat Nadal in a best of 3 on clay. It took him 10 years to finally beat a one-legged Nadal in a best of 5. I don't think his highest level is close to Nadal's highest level at all:eek:
 
Incognito said:
But brother it took Novak 6 years to finally beat Nadal in a best of 3 on clay. It took him 10 years to finally beat a one-legged Nadal in a best of 5. I don't think his highest level is close to Nadal's highest level at all:eek:
Click to expand...
Experts like Mats Wilander and many of my fellow Novack fans believe the same.
 
Rafa in 4 or 5. Novak would have had his chances if it were best of 3 but there is a reason he is 1-6 against Nadal in best of 5 and that one win came against the absolute worst version of Nadal ever known on clay. Even a slightly decent but hardly invincible Rafa won in 2014. Rafa's dominance over Novak in Best of 5 from 2012-2014, which is supposed to be Novak's era more than Rafa's era should lay to bed any doubts as to who would be the favorite in a Best of 5 match on clay.
 
Incognito said:
But brother it took Novak 6 years to finally beat Nadal in a best of 3 on clay. It took him 10 years to finally beat a one-legged Nadal in a best of 5. I don't think his highest level is close to Nadal's highest level at all:eek:
Click to expand...

#Ultronians. He was 4 in 2006, so don't blame him.

 
125downthemiddle said:
He lives in Moscow, yes im saying wiki is wrong. But anyway enough of minutiae. Please dont play into it.

Im tired of this persons trolling and this thread was the final straw. Either hes banned or im gone. Shameful.
Click to expand...

It does get old but don't leave dood, you're a valued poster. Just pay him no mind.

I will say, for any old-timers here, TF3 is child's play compared to gj011. That guy was a force of nature back in the day.
 
TheFifthSet said:
It does get old but don't leave dood, you're a valued poster. Just pay him no mind.

I will say, for any old-timers here, TF3 is child's play compared to gj011. That guy was a force of nature back in the day.
Click to expand...

I used to browse for a very long time before posting and I remember him, one of the worst...his account is permanently expunged, you can't even see his old posts lol.
 
2011 Djokovic was in Nadal's head after Madrid. He was supremely motivated and confident.

2006 Nadal was more of a grinder than 2008 and beyond. I think he might have given Djokovic problems with his sheer resiliency and will to win.
Tenisfan3 said:
Djokovic FH on clay>>>Fed FH on clay IMO.
Click to expand...

N
Moby Dick said:
If Wilander says something then 99% of the times it is the proof of the opposite.
Click to expand...
So "the highest clay peak ever" can't get past the SF of RG!
 
Gentlemen, let's not overlook the fact that Clayray was extremely close to knocking Djokovic out of Rome in the SF. They played an amazing match that Djokovic pulled out in the clutch.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
  • Poll Poll
2011 Rome Djokovic vs 2006 Nadal Rome 2006
2 3
Replies
117
Views
4K
Eren
Eren
DjokoGOAT
Djokovic in 2011 reached the highest level ever on BO3 clay
2 3
Replies
138
Views
4K
DjokoGOAT
DjokoGOAT
M
  • Poll Poll
How would 2015 Djokovic do against 2011 Nadal if replaced with his 2011 self?
2
Replies
87
Views
2K
JasonZ
J
ForehandRF
  • Poll Poll
Federer- Nadal Rome 2006 or Nadal-Djokovic Madrid 2009, which match was higher quality ?
Replies
31
Views
960
MeatTornado
MeatTornado
beltsman
Djokovic 2011 vs Federer 2006
2
Replies
73
Views
2K
NoleFam
NoleFam
Back
Top