Round of 32 by age

Australian Open 2025 Women’s Singles Final

26: Sabalenka
29: Keys

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 0
25-29: 2
30-34: 0
35-39: 0

Nice win for Keys today! She made her first AO semi at 19, and gave Serena Williams a good run for her money. Probably didn't expect at that point that it would take her until the month before she turns 30 to make her first AO final, but here she is.
 
Last edited:
I had a lot going on last week, so will update this pet thread of mine all in one go per gender:

Roland Garros 2025 Women's Singles 3rd Round
18: Mboko, Andreeva
21: Gauff
22: Tauson, Zheng, Jacquemot, Boisson, Bouzas Maneiro
23: Anisimova, Swiatek [turns 24 on 31 May], Baptiste
24: Danilovic
25: Yastremska, Starodubtseva, Rybakina, Vondrousova
26: Samsonova, Cristian [turns 27 on 5 June], Kenin, Bouzkova
27: Sabalenka, Ostapenko [turns 28 on 8 June, the last day of the tournament], Badosa
28: Kasatkina, Kudermetova
29: Paolini
30: Pera, Svitolina, Putintseva, Keys, Alexandrova
31: Pegula

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 2
20-24: 10
25-29: 14
30-34: 6


4th Round

18: Andreeva
21: Gauff
22: Zheng, Boisson
23: Anisimova, Baptiste
24: Swiatek [turned 24 on 31 May]
25: Rybakina
26: Samsonova
27: Sabalenka
28: Kasatkina
29: Paolini
30: Svitolina, Keys, Alexandrova
31: Pegula

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 1
20-24: 6
25-29: 5
30-34: 4

Quarter-Finals

18: Andreeva
21: Gauff
22: Zheng, Boisson
24: Swiatek [turned 24 on 31 May]
27: Sabalenka
30: Svitolina, Keys

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 1
20-24: 4
25-29: 1
30-34: 2

Semi-Finals

21: Gauff
22: Boisson
24: Swiatek [turned 24 on 31 May]
27: Sabalenka

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 3
25-29: 1
30-34: 0
 
Roland Garros 2025 Men's Singles 3rd Round

18: Fonseca
20: Fils
21: Rocha, Quinn, Medjedovic
22: Rune, Shelton, Alcaraz
23: Sinner, Lehecka, Draper, Cobolli, Fearnley, Misolic, Musetti, Gigante
24: Navone, Korda
25: Popyrin
26: Altmaier
27: Rublev, Bublik, Tiafoe
28: Zverev, Griekspoor, Halys, Borges, Paul
29: Norrie, Khachanov
33: Dzumhur
38: Djokovic

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 1
20-24: 17
25-29: 12
30-34: 1
35-39: 1

4th Round

22: Shelton, Alcaraz
23: Sinner, Draper, Musetti
25: Popyrin
26: Altmaier
27: Rublev, Bublik, Tiafoe
28: Zverev, Griekspoor, Halys, Paul
29: Norrie
38: Djokovic

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 5
25-29: 10
30-34: 0
35-39: 1

Quarter-Finals

22: Alcaraz
23: Sinner, Musetti
27: Bublik, Tiafoe
28: Zverev, Paul
38: Djokovic

By Age Bracket:
20-24: 3
25-29: 4
35-39: 1

Semi-Finals

22: Alcaraz
23: Sinner, Musetti
38: Djokovic

By Age Bracket:
20-24: 3
25-29: 0
35-39: 1

15 years between Sinner and Djokovic! Three Lost Gens!
 
Grass remains a surface for older players: only five men aged 21 or younger won a match at Wimbledon (Mensik, Quinn, Tien, Fonseca, and Tarvet). Three teens and two 21-year-olds.

By contrast, 23 players aged 29 or older won a match (Vukic, Dimitrov, Ofner, Fucsovics, Monfils, Sonego, Basilashvili, Cilic, Giron, Evans, Djokovic, Van de Zandschulp, Thompson, Bonzi, Harris, Khachanov, Majchrzak, Garin, Rinderknech, Jarry, Norrie, Mannarino, and Struff).
 
Last edited:
Wimbledon 2025 Women's Singles 3rd Round

18: Andreeva
20: Noskova
21: Sierra
22: Raducanu, Parry, Bouzas Maneiro, Tauson
23: Rakhimova, Anisimova, Kartal, Sonmez, Baptiste
24: Navarro, Cocciaretto, Swiatek
25: Yastremska
26: Galfi, Rybakina, Samsonova
27: Sabalenka, Bucsa, Osaka
28: Bencic, Kasatkina
29: Mertens, Krejcikova
30: Svitolina, Keys, Alexandrova
31: Collins
33: Pavlyuchenkova [turns 34 on Thursday July 3, so will play the R3 aged 34, but made it aged 33]
37: Siegemund

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 1
20-24: 14
25-29: 11
30-34: 5
35-39: 1
 
Wimbledon 2025 Men's Singles 3rd Round

18: Fonseca
19: Mensik
22: Alcaraz, Shelton
23: Cobolli, Darderi, Nakashima, Sinner
24: Bellucci
25: Kecmanovic
26: Davidovich Fokina, De Minaur
27: Rublev, Fritz, Holmgren
28: Borges, Munar, Martinez
29: Khachanov, Majchrzak, Jarry, Norrie, Rinderknech, Ofner
30: Sonego
31: Thompson
33: Fucsovics
34: Dimitrov
35: Struff
36: Cilic
37: Mannarino
38: Djokovic

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 2
20-24: 7
25-29: 15
30-34: 4
35-39: 4

N.B. Mannarino turned 37 on Sunday 29 June, the day before the tournament began. I usually only note changes of age that occur during the tournament itself, but at one day out from it, I decided to make a note.
 
Last edited:
Wimbledon 2025 Women's Singles 4th Round

18: Andreeva
20: Noskova
21: Sierra
22: Bouzas Maneiro, Tauson
23: Anisimova, Kartal
24: Navarro, Swiatek
26: Samsonova
27: Sabalenka
28: Bencic
29: Mertens
30: Alexandrova
34: Pavlyuchenkova [turned 34 on Thursday July 3]
37: Siegemund

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 1
20-24: 8
25-29: 4
30-34: 2
35-39: 1

Quite a young women's lineup, but with a couple of outliers.
 
Wimbledon 2025 Men's Singles 4th Round

22: Alcaraz, Shelton
23: Cobolli, Sinner
26: De Minaur
27: Rublev, Fritz
29: Khachanov, Majchrzak, Jarry, Norrie
30: Sonego
31: Thompson
34: Dimitrov
36: Cilic
38: Djokovic

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 4
25-29: 7
30-34: 3
35-39: 2

Pretty old men's lineup, with Alcaraz the youngest man left in the tournament.
 
Wimbledon 2025 Women's Singles Quarter-Finals

18: Andreeva
23: Anisimova
24: Swiatek
26: Samsonova
27: Sabalenka
28: Bencic
34: Pavlyuchenkova [turned 34 on Thursday July 3]
37: Siegemund

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 1
20-24: 2
25-29: 3
30-34: 1
35-39: 1

Mostly a good fourth round for the older players left, while in the men's it was a good round for the younger players, so the two draws have become much more even in terms of age.
 
Wimbledon 2025 Men's Singles Quarter-Finals

22: Alcaraz, Shelton
23: Cobolli, Sinner
27: Fritz
29: Khachanov, Norrie
38: Djokovic

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 4
25-29: 3
30-34: 0
35-39: 1

The 4th round was the last ride for the old guard - Djokovic (partially) excepted.
 
Wimbledon 2025 Women's Singles Semi-Finals

23: Anisimova
24: Swiatek
27: Sabalenka
28: Bencic

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 2
25-29: 2
30-34: 0
35-39: 0

Both the older and the younger players lost in the quarter-finals, so the semis have a fairly standard age range.
 
What a journey... for a mere 28-year-old.
HBnsxcf.jpg
 
Wimbledon 2025 Men's Singles Semi-Finals

22: Alcaraz
23: Sinner
27: Fritz
38: Djokovic

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 2
25-29: 1
30-34: 0
35-39: 1

Fritz's win means we have only two lost gens this time, not three. I suspect we'll have no lost gens in the final, but we'll see.
 
An out-of-season update for my pet thread:

Today is Luca Nardi (the world #97)'s 22nd birthday.

He is the 94th of the top 100 to have reached his 22nd birthday. Thus, only six of the top 100 are 21 or younger. Here they are from youngest to oldest:

1. Joao Fonseca (rank #49; age 18 years, 11 months, 16 days).
2. Learner Tien (rank #61; age 19 years, 8 months, 4 days).
3. Jakub Mensik (rank #18; age 19 years, 11 months, 5 days).
4. Alex Michelsen (rank #34; age 20 years, 11 months, 12 days).
5. Arthur Fils (rank #21; age 21 years, 1 month, 25 days).
6. Ethan Quinn (rank #86; age 21 years, 4 months, 25 days).

Fonseca turns 19 later in August, and Michelsen turns 21 later in August. Mensik turns 20 on 1 September.

By contrast, to get to an age at which only six of the top 100 are that old, you have to go all the way to 35: Monfils, Djokovic, Bautista Agut, Mannarino, Cilic, and Nishikori are all 35. There are nine men in the top 100 aged 34 or more.

Younger players have certainly been doing better in the last few years than in the few years before that. But as these rankings show, the change is not to the age profile of the 70s or 80s, or even that of the 90s or 00s.
 
helterskelter said:
An out-of-season update for my pet thread:

Today is Luca Nardi (the world #97)'s 22nd birthday.

He is the 94th of the top 100 to have reached his 22nd birthday. Thus, only six of the top 100 are 21 or younger. Here they are from youngest to oldest:

1. Joao Fonseca (rank #49; age 18 years, 11 months, 16 days).
2. Learner Tien (rank #61; age 19 years, 8 months, 4 days).
3. Jakub Mensik (rank #18; age 19 years, 11 months, 5 days).
4. Alex Michelsen (rank #34; age 20 years, 11 months, 12 days).
5. Arthur Fils (rank #21; age 21 years, 1 month, 25 days).
6. Ethan Quinn (rank #86; age 21 years, 4 months, 25 days).

Fonseca turns 19 later in August, and Michelsen turns 21 later in August. Mensik turns 20 on 1 September.

By contrast, to get to an age at which only six of the top 100 are that old, you have to go all the way to 35: Monfils, Djokovic, Bautista Agut, Mannarino, Cilic, and Nishikori are all 35. There are nine men in the top 100 aged 34 or more.

Younger players have certainly been doing better in the last few years than in the few years before that. But as these rankings show, the change is not to the age profile of the 70s or 80s, or even that of the 90s or 00s.
Click to expand...

Players aged 21 or under continue to struggle: only Coleman Wong is still in the US Open men's draw in that age group, so there's a good chance that ALL of the last 32 will be 22+. Wong plays Adam Walton tomorrow, so a good opportunity for him.
 
US Open 2025, Men's Singles 3rd Round

21: Wong
22: Kym, Shelton, Alcaraz
23: Lehecka, Collignon, Darderi, Musetti, Cobolli, Riedi
24: Machac, Sinner
25: Auger-Aliassime
26: Blanchet, Shapovalov, Bergs, Altmaier, De Minaur
27: Tiafoe, Fritz, Rublev
28: Bublik, Paul, Munar, Zverev
29: Bonzi, Majchrzak
30: Norrie, Rinderknech
35: Struff
37: Mannarino
38: Djokovic

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 12
25-29: 15
30-34: 2
35-39: 3

Well, Wong made R3 on his debut as a qualifier, but other than him, there is nobody younger than 22 in the draw.
 
US Open 2025, Women's Singles 3rd Round

18: Andreeva
20: Noskova
21: Gauff
22: Fernandez [turns 23 on 6 September, the day of the women's final], Raducanu, Parry [turns 23 on 1 September, the day of her R4 match, if she makes it that far]
23: Kostyuk, Anisimova [turns 24 on 31 August, the day between her R3 and R4 matches]
24: Navarro, Swiatek
25: Li
26: Rybakina, Vondrousova, Kalinskaya
27: Sabalenka, Busca, Hon, Osaka, Frech, Christian
28: Kasatkina
29: Mertens, Paolini, Krejcikova, Townsend, Muchova, Haddad Maia
30: Sakkari, Alexandrova
31: Pegula
36: Azarenka
37: Siegemund

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 1
20-24: 9
25-29: 17 [!]
30-34: 3
35-39: 2
 
helterskelter said:
US Open 2025, Women's Singles 3rd Round

18: Andreeva
20: Noskova
21: Gauff
22: Fernandez [turns 23 on 6 September, the day of the women's final], Raducanu, Parry [turns 23 on 1 September, the day of her R4 match, if she makes it that far]
23: Kostyuk, Anisimova [turns 24 on 31 August, the day between her R3 and R4 matches]
24: Navarro, Swiatek
25: Li
26: Rybakina, Vondrousova, Kalinskaya
27: Sabalenka, Busca, Hon, Osaka, Frech, Christian
28: Kasatkina
29: Mertens, Paolini, Krejcikova, Townsend, Muchova, Haddad Maia
30: Sakkari, Alexandrova
31: Pegula
36: Azarenka
37: Siegemund

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 1
20-24: 9
25-29: 17 [!]
30-34: 3
35-39: 2
Click to expand...
22-29 might still be peak age;)
 
Jonas78 said:
22-29 might still be peak age;)
Click to expand...

That women's draw has shifted heavily to late 20s from early 20s, though.

And as I told you, players younger than 22 are really struggling these days - that's a big change from 30 years ago, when lots of top players were 19-21. (Younger, in the women's game, of course).
 
@Jonas78 This is a good example of the philosophy of science principle that it's hard to separate the observer and the thing being observed (e.g. that people see what they expect to see). You look at those age breakdowns and think nothings changed. You expect to see that, so you do see it. I look at the age breakdowns and think that a fair amount has changed. I expect to see that, so I do see it! ;)
 
helterskelter said:
That women's draw has shifted heavily to late 20s from early 20s, though.

And as I told you, players younger than 22 are really struggling these days - that's a big change from 30 years ago, when lots of top players were 19-21. (Younger, in the women's game, of course).
Click to expand...
Yeah I think its harder to win as a teenager. Most players have seen their absoulte best days by age 29 though. Will be interesting to follow Sincaraz as they age.
 
helterskelter said:
@Jonas78 This is a good example of the philosophy of science principle that it's hard to separate the observer and the thing being observed (e.g. that people see what they expect to see). You look at those age breakdowns and think nothings changed. You expect to see that, so you do see it. I look at the age breakdowns and think that a fair amount has changed. I expect to see that, so I do see it! ;)
Click to expand...
I also think we look at things a little differently. Im mostly into players peak age. I certainly acknowledge that players can have longer careers because of improvements in nutrition, arthroscopic surgery etc.

If in a perfect world, every year produced the same quality players, then i believe almost all slam winners would be in their 20s. To win as much as Big3 did late career, you will need both exeptional ATGs, and a weaker crop of younger players.

I dont believe the Djokovic of 2021 would beat the Djokovic of 2011, or the Federer of 2015 would beat the Federer of 2005, or the Nadal of 2019 would beat the Nadal of 2008.
 
Jonas78 said:
Yeah I think its harder to win as a teenager. Most players have seen their absoulte best days by age 29 though. Will be interesting to follow Sincaraz as they age.
Click to expand...

It being harder to win as a teenager makes sense in the men's game, because teenage boys aren't as strong as adult men and thus are at a significant disadvantage. That's why the only teens to win slams in their teens since 1990 were all unusually strong (Sampras, Nadal, Alcaraz) and thus in the Becker mould, not the Wilander/Chang mould. The days of a teen winning on the back of teens having an advantage in twitch muscle speed and thus ability to change direction and track everything down are probably gone. You still can be a decent teen that way - as with Juncheng Shang - but you won't win slams that way. And thus the pool of teen winners will be drastically reduced.

On the other hand, some 18/19-year-old girls should win, because many girls are only marginally weaker than adult women by that age. I think it will be hard for a 16-year-old girl to win but older teens should still be competitive. And Gauff did win the US Open at 19 just two years ago.
 
Jonas78 said:
I also think we look at things a little differently. Im mostly into players peak age. I certainly acknowledge that players can have longer careers because of improvements in nutrition, arthroscopic surgery etc.

If in a perfect world, every year produced the same quality players, then i believe almost all slam winners would be in their 20s. To win as much as Big3 did late career, you will need both exeptional ATGs, and a weaker crop of younger players.

I dont believe the Djokovic of 2021 would beat the Djokovic of 2011, or the Federer of 2015 would beat the Federer of 2005, or the Nadal of 2019 would beat the Nadal of 2008.
Click to expand...

I think that's probably true, though I do think that in modern tennis the balance has shifted at least a bit between (say) being 23 and being 27. The only slam final I ever attended - Wimbledon 1995 - was between a 23-year-old (Sampras) and a 27-year-old (Becker), and the 23-year-old had a clear age advantage. If anything, I think it's an age advantage to be 27 over being 23 today, but at the very least it's a wash. That is a change from 1995.

I know there are posters who think that the peak age range for tennis is 21-25. I understand why they think that - it was probably true in 1995. But now I think it's more accurate either to shift that up by two years at either end (to 23-27) or to elongate it to something more like 22-29.

There's no way that I'd accept that 21 is part of the peak age range in men's tennis today. It's just not. Players are taking longer to mature and most of them are still making significant improvements at 21. But in the past many male players were at their best then. Similarly, 16 used to be a prime age in women's tennis and it's not now. Tennis being more strength dependent than it used to be pushes the age of maturation up a couple of years.

[I decided to speak in your terms in this post, even though you're right that they are not my preferred way of looking at things. :)]
 
US Open 2025, Men's Singles 4th Round

22: Alcaraz
23: Lehecka, Musetti, Riedi
24: Machac, Sinner
25: Auger-Aliassime
26: De Minaur
27: Fritz, Rublev
28: Bublik, Munar
30: Rinderknech
35: Struff
37: Mannarino
38: Djokovic

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 6
25-29: 6
30-34: 1
35-39: 3

Late 80s generation continue to expose early 90s generation.
 
US Open 2025, Women's Singles 4th Round

21: Gauff
23: Kostyuk
24: Swiatek, Anisimova [turned 24 on 31 August, the day before her R4 match]
25: Li
26: Rybakina, Vondrousova
27: Sabalenka, Busca, Osaka
29: Krejcikova, Townsend, Muchova, Haddad Maia
30: Alexandrova
31: Pegula

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 4
25-29: 10 [!]
30-34: 2
35-39: 0
 
US Open 2025, Men's Singles Quarter-Finals

22: Alcaraz
23: Lehecka, Musetti
24: Sinner
25: Auger-Aliassime
26: De Minaur
27: Fritz
38: Djokovic

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 4
25-29: 3
30-34: 0
35-39: 1
 
US Open 2025, Women's Singles Quarter-Finals

24: Swiatek, Anisimova [turned 24 on 31 August, the day before her R4 match]
26: Vondrousova
27: Sabalenka, Osaka
29: Krejcikova, Muchova
31: Pegula

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 2
25-29: 5
30-34: 1
35-39: 0
 
James P said:
Older women's QF than men's. I wonder if that happens very often these days or it's an outlier.
Click to expand...

Right. Only one women's semi-finalist will be younger than 27 - the winner of the Swiatek/Anisimova match.

Part of it is that two of the men always in the last eight are 22 and 24, so that's 25% of slots taken up by young players every time. But the younger high-ranked women all lost early here too: most notably Gauff and Andreeva, but also Zheng to a lesser extent (she's about to turn 23, so she's not as young as them).
 
US Open 2025, Women's Singles Semi-Finals

24: Anisimova [turned 24 on 31 August, the day before her R4 match]
27: Sabalenka, Osaka
31: Pegula

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 1
25-29: 2
30-34: 1
35-39: 0
 
US Open 2025, Men's Singles Semi-Finals

22: Alcaraz
24: Sinner
25: Auger-Aliassime
38: Djokovic

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 2
25-29: 1
30-34: 0
35-39: 1
 
US Open 2025, Women's Singles Final

24: Anisimova [turned 24 on 31 August, the day before her R4 match]
27: Sabalenka

By Age Bracket:
15-19: 0
20-24: 1
25-29: 1
30-34: 0
35-39: 0
 
Went to the beginning of your great thread:

AO17:

Teenagers: 1
20-24: 3
25-29: 12
30-34: 14
35+: 2

Things have certainly changed, but as you have said, this might be because of the weak(est) 90-95s gen now being in their early thirties! Will be fun and interesting to follow.
 
Jonas78 said:
Went to the beginning of your great thread:

AO17:

Teenagers: 1
20-24: 3
25-29: 12
30-34: 14
35+: 2

Things have certainly changed, but as you have said, this might be because of the weak(est) 90-95s gen now being in their early thirties! Will be fun and interesting to follow.
Click to expand...

An interesting titbit is that while the 80s players in the men's outlasted the 90s players as per usual (because of Djokovic), if we count women's, the 90s players outlasted the 80s players, because the finalists will be one 90s player (Sabalenka) and three 00s players (Sinner, Anisimova, and Alcaraz - the first two born in 2001, the final one born in 2003). Of course, 90s players should outlast 80s players, especially 98-born players like Sabalenka.

Seems safe to say that by reaching her seventh slam final, having won three of her first six, Sabalenka is guaranteed to end up better than Medvedev and thus better than any man born in the 90s. Though she and Osaka are still battling for best 90s-born women, if Osaka really is back. Even with Osaka having a 4-3 slam title edge, I think I'd give Saba the edge overall, as she has a 7-4 lead in finals and many more titles outside the slams. This US Open was the first time Osaka made the QFs of a major but didn't go on to win that major. I guess one might be able to make a case for Ash Barty as still being ahead of Sabalenka, though I doubt that case will be plausible much longer, and I'd have to take a look at Barty's overall resume to judge how plausible it really is at this point. (Swiatek was born in 2001, so isn't eligible for this category).
 
Last edited:
Jonas78 said:
Went to the beginning of your great thread:

AO17:

Teenagers: 1
20-24: 3
25-29: 12
30-34: 14
35+: 2

Things have certainly changed, but as you have said, this might be because of the weak(est) 90-95s gen now being in their early thirties! Will be fun and interesting to follow.
Click to expand...

I had a busy day yesterday so I was only able to watch the first match from halfway through set 2 onwards and I only saw a few points from the second match. What did you make of them? Did FAA show enough to suggest that there's any chance of him making the improvements necessary to challenge more consistently?

Djokovic made all four slam SFs this year (and never was taken to five en route to the semis) but he didn't win a set in any of the slam SFs. I think it's safe to say he's reached the point at which he's very unlikely to challenge the top players in big matches anymore.
 
helterskelter said:
I had a busy day yesterday so I was only able to watch the first match from halfway through set 2 onwards and I only saw a few points from the second match. What did you make of them? Did FAA show enough to suggest that there's any chance of him making the improvements necessary to challenge more consistently?

Djokovic made all four slam SFs this year (and never was taken to five en route to the semis) but he didn't win a set in any of the slam SFs. I think it's safe to say he's reached the point at which he's very unlikely to challenge the top players in big matches anymore.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately i couldnt watch the night match in Norway. I have small kids and it started 01am so its a luxury i dont have. Im going to watch some of it now.

Regarding Sinner im a bit worried of the 1st serve in% which sometimes dips well below 50%. I have just seen the stats so it will be interesting to watch the match. Seems he was very off 2nd set.

Totally agree on Djokovic. I think this was his Connors-Courier USO91 moment, were you just knew the slam winning days were over, although he reached the SF.
 
Jonas78 said:
Unfortunately i couldnt watch the night match in Norway. I have small kids and it started 01am so its a luxury i dont have. Im going to watch some of it now.

Regarding Sinner im a bit worried of the 1st serve in% which sometimes dips well below 50%. I have just seen the stats so it will be interesting to watch the match. Seems he was very off 2nd set.

Totally agree on Djokovic. I think this was his Connors-Courier USO91 moment, were you just knew the slam winning days were over, although he reached the SF.
Click to expand...

The bookies still have Sinner as favorite for tomorrow, though by a small margin - roughly 55-45.

When I was a teenager in the UK, I often stayed up late watching the US Open. But that was because of the time zone difference. On Thursday, I stayed up until 1 a.m. watching the women's semi-finals (which were great, by the way!) even though I was in the same time zone as the tournament. I think they really should stop playing so many matches at the AO and USO that go well past midnight local time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Still an old round of 32 despite Djokovic's loss
Replies
18
Views
1K
helterskelter
H
H
The most recent 20 Slam champions by age:
2 3
Replies
134
Views
7K
Meles
Meles
H
The men's draw is getting even older...
Replies
26
Views
2K
Moose Malloy
M
jm1980
Top 200 players with a one-handed backhand
Replies
12
Views
2K
onehandbh
onehandbh
Meles
Hamburg European Open 2020 - ATP 500
Replies
1
Views
516
I Am Finnish
I Am Finnish
Back
Top