RPM Team Video: >>> Spin for Everyone <<<

TimothyO

Hall of Fame
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83cOCN4xL9s

The video linked above covers RPM Blast and introduces the new RPM Team. (Jump to 00:59 for the part on RPM Team)

The interesting bit for we string tech geeks is how they portray the "increased spin" aspect of the RPM Team graphically.

Rather than focusing on spin-related issues such as texture or "bite" they focus on how the stringbed opens to the ball and the physical properties that allow this: elasticity and flexibility. The graphic shows the stringbed dramatically widening as the ball embeds itself.

Keywords then appear: spin, playability, forgiveness.

While RSI shows Team with a higher stiffness than Blast Babolat says this is a "Low Density Co-Pet" version of RPM which they describe as a "High Density Co-Pet". RSI testing procedures have been suspect so maybe that doesn't matter.

My hope: this new version of RPM which combines some of the control aspects of RPM Blast with the playability and comfort of Co-Focus while retaining the excellent spin of both when hybrided with gut mains.

Only disappointment: it appears that it's only available in 16g. Maybe a 17g isn't possible or they feel it's not warranted? EDIT/CORRECTION: 17g is available! Just ordered some from a retailer here in the US. Looking forward to testing this!!!

NOTE: there's another thread about this string but I thought the marketing "spin" in this video (no pun intended) justified a new thread since it raises some interesting issues related to Babolat's perspective on spin generating string characteristics.

The final positioning statement in the video is: "Spin for Everyone".

I've often described the spin potential of the VS/RPM hybrid as "idiot proof". I feel that just as racquet manufacturers eventually made uber-powerful frames so that anyone could "hit hard" they're now focused on frame and string technologies that allow "casual access" to spin generation too. (Another example is a new string/hybrid from Wilson that tries to produce a low friction string bed but doesn't do quite as good a job as VS/RPM.)

It will be interesting to see just how low a threshold can be achieved for producing game-changing spin using technology to enhance mediocre technique.

EDIT: before the gorgnards jump on me, yes, this is marketing. But clearly Babolat is trying to develop technology to allow rec players easier access to spin. Just as noob frames are intended to be more "forgiving" perhaps in the spin generation department these technologies might one day make spin production more forgiving too. You'll still need to hit with some modicum of proper form but based on my VS/RPM experience spin in some instances is almost automatic. I've annoyed the heck out of my wife when hitting casually since the slightest slice effect will make the ball spin enough to bounce sideways. It just happens with the VS/RPM hybrid.
 
Last edited:
There's a thread on this already.

The Babolat rep here says its a string for women and old people.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnkxmbNMi18

The hype around the original RPM Blast string was absurdly OTT. I can't any marketing from Babolat seriously anymore.

I think he said for "kids and women who don't change strings that often" at about 1:26. It's interesting that you take that element of Babolat marketing seriously...

;)
 
kind of funny that when they did side to side, outer packaging said more bars on the power section. meaning RPM blast has more power than team.
 
RPM is an overrated and overpriced string that loses more tension before even hitting one ball (24 hr period) than any other string I have reviewed.
 
kind of funny that when they did side to side, outer packaging said more bars on the power section. meaning RPM blast has more power than team.

When I called to confirm availability with the retailer I asked if they had any feedback. They confirmed Team is lower powered than Blast (they've had the string for over a week now).

More comfort, more durable, less power, same spin. Perfect for me! But only testing will confirm any of this.

After 24+ hours with my VS/Blast hybrid the Blast is clearly dead. Comfort is becoming an issue. The VS is wearing out but still working. the dead Blast crosses actually make the SB play better for me. Tons of control and spin. Serves are on automatic and very precise. Yesterday I could step to the line with four balls and hit good serves to the backhand, one after another. They stayed low and fast bouncing just before the fence (more than adequete for my low level). There was enough spin so that serves to the ad backhand cleared the net comfortably.
 
When I called to confirm availability with the retailer I asked if they had any feedback. They confirmed Team is lower powered than Blast (they've had the string for over a week now).

More comfort, more durable, less power, same spin. Perfect for me! But only testing will confirm any of this.

After 24+ hours with my VS/Blast hybrid the Blast is clearly dead. Comfort is becoming an issue. The VS is wearing out but still working. the dead Blast crosses actually make the SB play better for me. Tons of control and spin. Serves are on automatic and very precise. Yesterday I could step to the line with four balls and hit good serves to the backhand, one after another. They stayed low and fast bouncing just before the fence (more than adequete for my low level). There was enough spin so that serves to the ad backhand cleared the net comfortably.

so it is lower powered than blast ?
 
so it is lower powered than blast ?

Supposedly, or at least according to the other retailer from whom I purchased it.

It all seems counterintuitive so only testing will tell the tale.

- RSI shows Team as being stiffer than Blast. That would conform to the Team is less powerful meme.

- Babolat says the air bubbles make Team play softer. That might indicate Team could be more powerful.

I should have a chance to test drive some time next week. My RPM has clearly died so I need to restring anyway to avoid arm issues. I would ask my stringer to just do the crosses but for test purposes it might be more accurate to do a completely fresh string bed.
 
They are so fallacious that it makes me sick. The inductive argument that RPM blast leads to grand slam victories is preposterous. With that line of reasoning, Luxilon should have a page scrolling constantly. Wilson should also have billboards out about their racquets. At least Head hasn't taken that approach with Djokovic. He's always been their poster boy.
 
They are so fallacious that it makes me sick. The inductive argument that RPM blast leads to grand slam victories is preposterous. With that line of reasoning, Luxilon should have a page scrolling constantly. Wilson should also have billboards out about their racquets. At least Head hasn't taken that approach with Djokovic. He's always been their poster boy.

I use RPM Blast but haven't won a grand slam.

:)

But seriously, it's quite a leap from Babolat suggesting Team might benefit women and kids who don't restring frequently to saying the Babolat claims those women and kids will win grand slams. I really don't think they said that.
 
Back
Top