Rune will likely never be a big GS threat

LetWinner

Rookie
To me, he will have a similar success level to Kafelnikov. May win a couple of GS, but will probably be outclassed by Alcaraz. He most likely will not be constantly challenging for slams (my definition of a big GS threat)

I like Rune’s gritty attitude and belief in himself. His backhand is great and he is a willing net player. However, these attributes cannot overcome his forehand. The FH technique is just bad, and usually at this stage of a career it doesn’t change much. IDK exactly what it is, but something about his wrist on the forehand is completely off, and that issue doesn’t allow him to hit it well except for when he purposefully ups the racket head speed to levels that are unsustainable over a whole match.

If we look at Fed and Djokovic, two of the best ball strikers of all time, they both have fairly fundamentally sound strokes. Agassi is the same. Because Nadal wants to produce as much spin as possible for clay, his FH isn’t as fundamentally sound as the other 3, which is why he has struggled to play a style of tennis that is conducive to consistent results on HC and grass (However, the clay results compensate for this.)

Alcaraz and Sinner have far better FH technique than Rune. Alcaraz’ technique has shown in his results, whereas Sinner’s hasn’t because of outside reasons (mainly mentality issues and fitness).

No hate towards Rune intended btw, just feel that his FH limits his ceiling and he isn’t going to be a consistent slam threat going forward, unless he completely changes his FH technique.
 
Last edited:

Milehigh5280

Professional
He’s only 20 and had lots of time to develop. I expect him to eventually be a fixture in the top 3 for years and a contender at every slam
 

daggerman

Hall of Fame
I would be very surprised if Rune's forehand isn't at least as good as Andy Murray's within the next few years.
 

InsuranceMan

Hall of Fame
Nadal FH not as sound as Djokovic’s? I’m not too sure about that one. Also, could you try to delve further into Rune’s technique that’s the issue? I consider myself somewhat of a forehand aficionado so this is all interesting stuff to me. Nice to hear a different viewpoint
 

LetWinner

Rookie
Nadal FH not as sound as Djokovic’s? I’m not too sure about that one. Also, could you try to delve further into Rune’s technique that’s the issue? I consider myself somewhat of a forehand aficionado so this is all interesting stuff to me. Nice to hear a different viewpoint

I’m not too well-versed on the technical details when it comes to this stuff. It’s more like looking at what most successful players’ forehands look like and comparing it to Rune.

With the Nadal Djokovic one, Nadal’s grip and the whole loop around the head thing that lead to huge net clearance and RPMs is what I’m referring to.

In terms of Rune, It’s hard to exactly pinpoint it, but it’s something on the take back, not on the actual swing itself. I think it’s either 1 of 2 things. On the take back a lot of the time his raquet faces up completely with no angle (or a 90* angle depending on your POV), which seems different than most other pros I’ve seen. Or it could be that when he takes it back he doesn’t create a 90* angle with his forearm and upper arm, its a larger angle (as in it seems he extends his arm on the takeback more than other pros)

Idk what it is exactly, but there is something funky in the takeback that’s going to limit his potential, IMO.
 

Mustard

Bionic Poster
Like Kafelnikov? Such a person would be a workaholic in tennis, be highly motivated by money, highly consistent, a very dry sense of humour, sometimes temperamental, and be technically good at virtually every shot and strategy in tennis. Does that really describe Rune? Perhaps the temperamental bit.

And Kafelnikov did win the 1996 French Open well. He dropped just 1 set, and beat Sampras and Stich in straight sets in his last two matches to win the title.
 
Last edited:

LetWinner

Rookie
Like Kafelnikov? Such a person would be a workaholic in tennis, be highly motivated by money, highly consistent, a very dry sense of humour, sometimes temperamental, and be technical good at virtually every shot and strategy in tennis. Does that really describe Rune? Perhaps the temperamental bit.

And Kafelnikov did win the 1996 French Open well. He dropped just 1 set, and beat Sampras and Stich in straight sets in his last two matches to win the title.

changed it again to make my point clearer. That paragraph of my post is really ruining the perception of the rest lol
 

LetWinner

Rookie
If you keep changing the content of your OP every 10 minutes, you'll soon be saying "Rune will likely be a big GS threat
starting next year!" :)

The worst part is I keep changing the first 3 sentences. It’s like when you write a good essay but your intro sucks. It’s extremely annoying
 

NickShot

Rookie
Probably the worst forehand in the top 100. Stiff arm makes racquet head speed more difficult. Looks like he is 'pulling' the racquet. When I started playing tennis, I watched some coaching videos, that taught this forehand pulling technique. I tried it but quickly moved on as it was bad for timing and power/spin.
 

Fabresque

Legend
He won’t ever be a threat at slams but will win a few slams.

I don’t even know anymore with this website. Are you lot even trying?
 
Top